Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Schools of Buddhism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Institutional and doctrinal divisions of Buddhism
Part ofa series on
Buddhism
Representatives from the three major modern Buddhist traditions, at theWorld Fellowship of Buddhists, 27th General Conference, 2014.

Theschools of Buddhism are the various institutional and doctrinal divisions ofBuddhism, which have often been based on historicalsectarianism and the differing teachings and interpretations of specific Buddhist texts. The branching of Buddhism into separate schools has been occurring from ancient times up to the present. The classification and nature of the variousdoctrinal,philosophical orcultural facets of the schools of Buddhism is vague and has been interpreted in many different ways, often due to the sheer number (perhaps thousands) of different sects, sub-sects, movements, etc. that have made up or currently make up the whole of the Buddhist tradition. The sectarian and conceptual divisions of Buddhist thought are part of the modern framework ofBuddhist studies, as well ascomparative religion inAsia. Some factors in Buddhist doctrine appear to be consistent across different schools, such as the afterlife, while others vary considerably.

From a largely English-language standpoint, and to some extent in most of Western academia, Buddhism is separated into two groups:Theravāda (lit. 'the Teaching of the Elders' or 'the Ancient Teaching'), andMahāyāna (lit. 'the Great Vehicle'). The most common classification among scholars is threefold: Theravāda, Mahāyāna andVajrayāna.

Classifications

[edit]
Percentage of Buddhists by country, according to thePew Research Center.

In contemporaryBuddhist studies, modern Buddhism is often divided into three major branches, traditions or categories:[1][2][3][4]

Another way of classifying the different forms of Buddhism is through the different monastic ordination traditions. There are three main traditions of monastic law (Vinaya) each corresponding to the first three categories outlined above:

Terminology

[edit]

The terminology for the major divisions of Buddhism can be confusing, as Buddhism is variously divided by scholars and practitioners according to geographic, historical, and philosophical criteria rather than criteria of the adherents themselves, with different terms often being used in different contexts. The following terms may be encountered in descriptions of the major Buddhist divisions:

Conservative Buddhism
an alternative name for theearly Buddhist schools.
Early Buddhist schools
the schools into which Buddhism became divided in its first few centuries; according to some scholars only one of these,Theravāda, survives as an independent school (derived from the earlyTamraparniya school), although others would claim the various Mahāyāna branches all derived mainly from the earlyCaitika school.
East Asian Buddhism
a term used by scholars[5] to cover the Buddhist traditions of Japan, Korea, Vietnam and most of China and Southeast Asia
Eastern Buddhism
an alternative name used by some scholars[6] for East Asian Buddhism; also sometimes used to refer to all traditional forms of Buddhism, as distinct from Western(ized) forms.
Ekayāna (one yana)
Mahayana texts such as the Lotus Sutra and the Avatamsaka Sutra sought to unite all the different teachings into a single great way. These texts serve as the inspiration for using the term Ekayāna in the sense of "one vehicle." This "one vehicle" became a key aspect of the doctrines and practices of Tiantai and Tendai Buddhist sects, which subsequently influenced Chán and Zen doctrines and practices. In Japan, the one-vehicle teaching of the Lotus Sutra is also a main doctrine ofNichiren Buddhist sects. TheLotus Sutra is so central to these sects that meditation was replaced by chanting the Japanese wordsNamu Myoho Renge Kyo ("The Way of the Lotus Sutra") in religious practice.
Esoteric Buddhism
usually considered synonymous with "Vajrayāna".[7] Some scholars have applied the term to certain practices found within the Theravāda, particularly in Cambodia.[8]
Hīnayāna
literally meaning "lesser vehicle." It is considered a controversial term when applied by Mahāyānists to refer to the Theravāda schools, and as such is widely viewed as condescending and pejorative.[9][a] Moreover, Hīnayāna refers to now non-extant schools with limited sets of views, practices, and results, which emerged prior to the development of Mahāyāna traditions. The term is currently most often used as a way of describing a stage on the path in Tibetan Buddhism, but is often mistakenly confused with the contemporary Theravāda tradition, which is a far more complex, diversified, and profound phenomenon than the literal and limiting definition attributed to the wordHīnayāna in the aforementioned context.[10] Its use in scholarly publications is now also considered controversial.[b]
Lamaism
synonymous withTibetan Buddhism; an old term, sometimes still used, but widely considered derogatory.
Mahāyāna
a movement that emerged fromearly Buddhist schools, together with its later descendants, East Asian and Tibetan Buddhism. Vajrayāna traditions are sometimes listed separately. The main use of the term in East Asian and Tibetan traditions is in reference to spiritual levels,[11] regardless of school.
Mainstream Buddhism
a term used by some scholars for theearly Buddhist schools.
Mantrayāna
usually considered synonymous withVajrayāna.[12] TheTendai andShingon schools in Japan have been described as influenced by Mantrayana.[11]
Navayāna
("new vehicle") refers to the re-interpretation of Buddhism by modern Indian jurist and social reformerB. R. Ambedkar.[13][14]
Newar Buddhism
a non-monastic, caste-based Buddhism with patrilineal descent and Sanskrit texts.
Nikāya Buddhism
a non-derogatory substitute term for Hinayana or the early Buddhist schools.
Non-Mahāyāna
an alternative term for the early Buddhist schools.
Northern Buddhism
an alternative term used by some scholars[6][page needed] for Tibetan Buddhism. Also, an older term still sometimes used to encompass both East Asian and Tibetan traditions. It has even been used to refer to East Asian Buddhism alone, without Tibetan Buddhism.
Secret Mantra
an alternative rendering ofMantrayāna, a more literal translation of the term used by schools in Tibetan Buddhism when referring to themselves.[15]
Sectarian Buddhism
an alternative name for the early Buddhist schools.
Southeast Asian Buddhism
an alternative name used by some scholars[16][page needed] for Theravāda.
Southern Buddhism
an alternative name used by some scholars[6][page needed] forTheravāda.
Śrāvakayāna
an alternative term sometimes used for the early Buddhist schools.
Tantrayāna orTantric Buddhism
usually considered synonymous with "Vajrayāna".[12] However, one scholar describes the tantra divisions of some editions of theTibetan scriptures as including Śravakayāna, Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna texts[17] (seeBuddhist texts). Some scholars,[8] particularly François Bizot,[18] have used the termTantric Theravada to refer to certain practices found particularly in Cambodia.
Theravāda
the Buddhism ofSri Lanka,Bangladesh,Burma,Thailand,Laos,Cambodia, and parts ofVietnam,China,India, andMalaysia. It is considered by some scholars to be the only surviving representative of the historicalearly Buddhist schools. The termTheravāda is also sometimes used to refer toall of the early Buddhist schools.[19]
Tibetan Buddhism
usually understood as including the Buddhism of Tibet, Mongolia, Bhutan, and parts of China, India, and Russia, which follow the Tibetan tradition.
Vajrayāna
a movement that developed out of IndianMahāyāna, together with its later descendants. There is some disagreement on exactly which traditions fall into this category. Tibetan Buddhism is universally recognized as falling under this heading; many also include the JapaneseShingon school. Some scholars[20] also apply the term to the Koreanmilgyo tradition, which is not a separate school. One scholar says, "Despite the efforts of generations of Buddhist thinkers, it remains exceedingly difficult to identify precisely what it is that sets theVajrayana apart."[21]
Map of the major geographical centers of major Buddhist schools in South Asia, at around the time ofXuanzang's visit in the seventh century.
* Red: non-PudgalavādaSarvāstivāda school
* Orange: non-DharmaguptakaVibhajyavāda schools
* Yellow:Mahāsāṃghika
* Green:Pudgalavāda (Green)
* Gray:Dharmaguptaka
Note the red and grey schools already gave some original ideas of Mahayana Buddhism and the Sri Lankan section (seeTamrashatiya) of the orange school is the origin of modern Theravada Buddhism.

Early schools

[edit]
Main articles:Early Buddhist schools andNikaya Buddhism
See also:Pre-sectarian Buddhism

The early Buddhist schools or mainstream sects refers to the sects into which theIndian Buddhist monasticsaṅgha split. They are also called the Nikaya Buddhist schools, and in Mahayana Buddhism they are referred to either as theŚrāvaka (disciple) schools orHinayana (inferior) schools.

Most scholars now believe that the first schism was originally caused by differences invinaya (monastic rule).[22]: 88–90  Later splits were also due to doctrinal differences and geographical separation.

The first schism separated the community into two groups, theSthavira (Elders) Nikaya and theMahāsāṃghika (Great Community). Most scholars hold that this probably occurred after the time of Ashoka.[23] Out of these two main groups later arose many other sects or schools.

From the Sthaviras arose theSarvāstivāda sects, theVibhajyavādins, the Theravadins, theDharmaguptakas and thePudgalavāda sects.

The Sarvāstivāda school, popular in northwest India andKashmir, focused onAbhidharma teachings.[24] Their name means "the theory that all exists" which refers to one of their main doctrines, the view that all dharmas exist in the past, present and in the future. This is an eternalist theory of time.[25] Over time, the Sarvāstivādins became divided into various traditions, mainly theVaibhāṣika (who defended the orthodox "all exists" doctrine in their Abhidharma compendium called theMahāvibhāṣa Śāstra), theSautrāntika (who rejected the Vaibhāṣika orthodoxy) and theMūlasarvāstivāda.

The Pudgalavāda sects (also known asVātsīputrīyas) were another group of Sthaviras which were known for their unique doctrine of thepudgala (person). Their tradition was founded by the elder Vātsīputra circa 3rd century BCE.[26]

The Vibhajyavādins were conservative Sthaviras who did not accept the doctrines of either the Sarvāstivāda or the Pudgalavāda. In Sri Lanka, a group of them became known as Theravada, the only one of these sects that survives to the present day. Another sect which arose from the Vibhajyavādins were the Dharmaguptakas. This school was influential in spreading Buddhism to Central Asia and to China. Their Vinaya is still used in East Asian Buddhism.

The Mahāsāṃghikas also split into various sub groups. One of these were theLokottaravādins (Transcendentalists), so called because of their doctrine which saw every action of the Buddha, even mundane ones like eating, as being of a supramundane and transcendental nature. One of the few Mahāsāṃghika texts which survive, theMahāvastu, is from this school. Another sub-sect which emerged from the Mahāsāṃghika was called theCaitika. They were concentrated inAndhra Pradesh and in South India. Some scholars such as A.K. Warder hold that many important Mahayana sutras originated among these groups.[27] Another Mahāsāṃghika sect was namedPrajñaptivāda. They were known for the doctrine that viewed all conditioned phenomena as being mere concepts (Skt.prajñapti).[28]

According to the Indian philosopherParamartha, a further split among the Mahāsāṃghika occurred with the arrival of the Mahayana sutras. Some sub-schools, such as theKukkuṭikas, did not accept the Mahayana sutras as being word of the Buddha, whole others, like the Lokottaravādins, did accept them.[29]

Although there are differences in the historical records as to the exact composition of the various schools of early Buddhism, a hypothetical combined list would be as follows:

Theravāda

[edit]
The Tipitaka (Pali Canon), in a Thai Style book case. The Pali Tipitaka is the doctrinal foundation of all major Theravāda sects today
Part ofa series on
Theravāda Buddhism
Dharmachakra
Buddhism
  • Practices
  • Traditions
  • Scriptural study:
  • Oral traditions:
  • Rituals and ceremonies:
  • Meditation:
  • Forest traditions:
  • Cultural practices:
  • Other traditions/movements:

Theravāda is the only extant mainstream non-Mahayana school. They are derived from the Sri LankanMahāvihāra sect, which was a branch of the South Indian Vibhajjavādins. Theravāda bases its doctrine on thePāli Canon, the only complete Buddhist canon surviving in aclassical Indian language. This language isPāli, which serves as the school'ssacred language andlingua franca.[31]

The different sects and groups in Theravāda often emphasize different aspects (or parts) of thePāli canon and the later commentaries (especially the very influentialVisuddhimagga), or differ in the focus on and recommended way of practice. There are also significant differences in strictness or interpretation of theVinaya Pitaka, the TheravādinVinaya followed by monastics of this tradition.

The various divisions in Theravāda include:

Mahāyāna schools

[edit]

Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism

[edit]
Nagarjuna, one of the most influential thinkers of Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism

Mahāyāna (Great Vehicle) Buddhism is category of traditions which focus on thebodhisattva path and affirm texts known asMahāyāna sutras. These texts are seen by modern scholars as dating as far back as the 1st century BCE.[32] Unlike Theravada and other early schools, Mahāyāna schools generally hold that there are currently many Buddhas which are accessible, and that they are transcendental or supramundane beings.[33]

In India, there were two major traditions of Mahāyāna Buddhist philosophy. The earliest was theMādhyamaka ("Middle Way"), also known as theŚūnyavāda ("Emptiness") school. This tradition followed the works of the philosopherNāgārjuna (c. 150c. 250 CE). Two subsects of the Madhyamaka school that developed were theSvatantrika, founded by the 6th-century Indian philosopherBhāviveka, and thePrasangika, founded byChandrakirti and later advanced byJe Tsongkhapa, 14th-century founder of theGelug sect in Tibet.

The other major school of Indian Mahayana was theYogācāra ("yoga practice") school, also known as theVijñānavāda ("the doctrine of consciousness"),Vijñaptivāda ("the doctrine of ideas or percepts"), orCittamātra ("mind-only") school, founded byAsanga in the 4th century AD.

Some scholars also note that the compilers of theTathāgatagarbhatexts constitute a third "school" of Indian Mahāyāna.[34] This movement heavily influenced East Asian and Tibetan Mahayana schools such as theDashabhumika,Huayan,Tiantai,Jonang,Nichiren andZen sects, as did both Madhyamaka and Yogacara.

East Asian Mahayana

[edit]

East Asian Buddhism or East Asian Mahayana refers to the schools that developed inEast Asia and use theChinese Buddhist canon. It is a major religion in China, Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. East Asian Buddhists constitute the numerically largest body of Buddhist traditions in the world, numbering over half of the world's Buddhists.[35][36]

East Asian Mahayana began to develop in China during theHan dynasty (when Buddhism was firstintroduced from Central Asia). It is thus influenced byChinese culture andphilosophy.[37] East Asian Mahayana developed new, uniquely Asian interpretations of Buddhist texts and focused on the study ofsutras.[38]

East Asian Buddhist monastics generally follow theDharmaguptaka Vinaya.[39]

禪 Zen
Part ofa serieson
Zen Buddhism
Ensō
Persons
Chan in China

Classical

Post-classical

Contemporary

Zen in Japan

Seon in Korea

Thiền in Vietnam

Western Zen

Category: Zen Buddhists

Main sects

[edit]
Part of a series on
Pure Land Buddhism
Amitabha Buddha

Esoteric schools

[edit]
See also:Vajrayāna
Indian Buddhist Mahasiddhas, 18th century, Boston MFA.
Part ofa series on
Vajrayana Buddhism
Vajra

Esoteric Buddhism, also known as Vajrayāna, Mantrayāna, Tantrayāna, Secret Mantra, and Tantric Buddhism is often placed in a separate category by scholars due to its uniquetantric features and elements (instead of being grouped as part of Mahayana school). Esoteric Buddhism arose and developed inmedieval India among esoteric adepts known asMahāsiddhas. Esoteric Buddhism maintains its own set of texts alongside the classic scriptures, these esoteric works are known as theBuddhist Tantras. It includes practices that make use ofmantras,dharanis,mudras,mandalas and the visualization of deities and Buddhas.

Main Esoteric Buddhist traditions include:

New Buddhist movements

[edit]
B. R. Ambedkar delivering speech during conversion,Deekshabhoomi, Nagpur, 14 October 1956
Taixu, the founder of Chinese Humanistic Buddhism

One of the most significant and popular major branches of the new Buddhist movements is:

Navayana ("New Way"), also known asDalit Buddhist movement or "Ambedkarite" Buddhism, developed byB. R. Ambedkar based on the idea of “Implementing the Principles of Buddhism for the Welfare of Many People.”

Hòa Hảo is a Sect of Buddhism from Vietnam, founded byHuỳnh Phú Sổ. Following the true teachings of Buddhism to attain Pure Land to be free from the cycle of Samsara.

Various Buddhistnew religious movements arose in the 20th century, including the following:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Hinayana (literally, "inferior way") is a polemical term, which self-described Mahāyāna (literally, "great way") Buddhist literature uses to denigrate its opponents.[9]
  2. ^"The supposedMahayana-Hinayana dichotomy is so prevalent in Buddhist literature, that it has yet fully to loosen its hold over scholarly representations of the religion".[9]

Other notes

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefAccording to Buswell and Lopez, theKāśyapīya andMahīśāsaka were offshoots of the Sarvastivadins, but are grouped under theVibhajjavāda as "non-sarvastivada" groups.[30]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Lee Worth Bailey, Emily Taitz (2005),Introduction to the World's Major Religions: Buddhism, Greenwood Publishing Group, p. 67.
  2. ^Mitchell, Scott A. (2016),Buddhism in America: Global Religion, Local Contexts, Bloomsbury Publishing, p. 87.
  3. ^Gethin, Rupert,The Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press, pp. 253–266.
  4. ^William H. Swatos (ed.) (1998)Encyclopedia of Religion and Society, Altamira Press, p. 66.
  5. ^B & G, Gethin, R & J, P & K
  6. ^abcPenguin, Harvey[page needed][full citation needed]
  7. ^Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 2, p. 440. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  8. ^ab{{[}}no author cited{{]}} (1997).Indian Insights. London, UK: Luzac.[page needed][full citation needed]
  9. ^abcEncyclopedia of Buddhism. MacMillan Library Reference. New York, NY: MacMillan. 2004. p. 840.
  10. ^Ray, Reginald A (2000)Indestructible Truth: The Living Spirituality of Tibetan Buddhism, p. 240
  11. ^abPenguin Handbook[full citation needed][page needed]
  12. ^abHarvey, pp. 153ff
  13. ^Gary Tartakov (2003). Rowena Robinson (ed.).Religious Conversion in India: Modes, Motivations, and Meanings. Oxford University Press. pp. 192–213.ISBN 978-0-19-566329-7.
  14. ^Christopher Queen (2015). Steven M. Emmanuel (ed.).A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 524–525.ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  15. ^Hopkins, Jeffrey (1985)The Ultimate Deity in Action Tantra and Jung's Warning against Identifying with the Deity Buddhist-Christian Studies, Vol. 5, (1985), pp. 159–172
  16. ^R & J, P & K
  17. ^Skilling, (1997).Mahasutras, volume II, Parts I & II, p. 78. Lancaster, UK: Pali Text Society
  18. ^Crosby, Kate (2000). Tantric Theravada: A bibliographic essay on the writings of François Bizot and others on the yogvacara Tradition. [In]Contemporary Buddhism, 1:2, 141–198;doi:10.1080/14639940008573729.
  19. ^Encyclopedia of Religion, volume 2, Macmillan, New York, 1987, pp. 440ff;Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, sv Buddhism
  20. ^Harvey[page needed][full citation needed]
  21. ^Lopez,Buddhism in Practice, Princeton University Press, 1995, p. 6
  22. ^Harvey, Peter (2013).An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history, and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  23. ^Cox, Collett (1995).Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist theories on existence. Tokyo, JP: The Institute for Buddhist Studies. p. 23.ISBN 4-906267-36-X.
  24. ^Westerhoff, Jan (2018).The Golden Age of Indian Buddhist Philosophy in the First Millennium CE, pp. 60–61.
  25. ^Kalupahana, David (n/d).A history of Buddhist philosophy, continuities and discontinuities, p. 128.
  26. ^Williams, Paul (2005).Buddhism: The early Buddhist schools and doctrinal history; Theravāda doctrine, vol. 2, p. 86, Taylor & Francis.
  27. ^Warder, A.K. (2000).Indian Buddhism, p. 313
  28. ^Harris, Ian Charles (1991).The Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogacara in Indian Mahayana Buddhism, p. 98
  29. ^Sree, Padma; Barber, Anthony, W. (2008).Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra, p. 68.
  30. ^Buswell, Robert E. Jr.;Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (2013),Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism(PDF),Princeton University Press, p. 859,ISBN 978-0-691-15786-3,archived(PDF) from the original on 12 June 2018
  31. ^Crosby, Kate (2013),Theravada Buddhism: Continuity, Diversity, and Identity, p. 2.
  32. ^Warder, A.K. (3rd edn. 1999).Indian Buddhism: p. 335.
  33. ^Williams, Paul,Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Routledge, 2008, p. 21.
  34. ^Kiyota, M. (1985). Tathāgatagarbha thought: A basis of Buddhist devotionalism in east Asia.Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 207–231.
  35. ^Pew Research Center,Global Religious Landscape: Buddhists.
  36. ^Johnson, Todd M.; Grim, Brian J. (2013).The World's Religions in Figures: An Introduction to International Religious Demography(PDF). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 34. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved2 September 2013.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  37. ^Gethin, Rupert, The Foundations of Buddhism, OUP Oxford, 1998, p. 257.
  38. ^Williams, Paul, Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Taylor & Francis, 2008, P. 129.
  39. ^Gethin, Rupert, The Foundations of Buddhism, OUP Oxford, 1998, p. 260
  40. ^"Buddhism in China Today: An Adaptable Present, a Hopeful Future". Retrieved2020-06-01..
  41. ^"法鼓山聖嚴法師數位典藏". Archived fromthe original on 2013-05-28. Retrieved2013-07-29..

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schools_of_Buddhism&oldid=1315468685"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp