As of 2025,[update] the Saturn V remains the only launch vehicle to have carried humans beyondlow Earth orbit (LEO). The Saturn V holds the record for the largest payload capacity to low Earth orbit, 140,000 kg (310,000 lb), which included unburnedpropellant needed to send theApollo command and service module andLunar Module to the Moon.
In September 1945 German rocket technologistWernher von Braun was brought, under contract, to theUnited States duringOperation Paperclip.[5] Operation Paperclip, authorized by PresidentTruman,[6] brought in over 1,600 German rocket engineers and technicians from formerNazi Germany afterWorld War II to the United States for government employment.[7] Von Braun, who had helped create the GermanV-2 rocket,[8] was assigned to theUnited States Army Ordnance Corps atFort Strong,Massachusetts, then atFort Bliss,Texas.[9] During his time at Fort Bliss, von Braun and his team were not given much to work with. In the first couple of months, the Germans were only given "primitive or aged"[10] wooden workshops and were not allowed to leave Fort Bliss without a military escort. In 1950, von Braun remarked toDaniel Lang, a reporter atThe New Yorker, "AtPeenemünde we had been coddled, here you were counting pennies."[11] However, he wrote books and articles in popular magazines, such asCollier's.[12][13]
This approach changed in 1957, when the Soviets launchedSputnik 1 atop anR-7 ICBM, which could carry athermonuclear warhead to the U.S.[14][15][16] The American Army and government began putting more effort towards sending Americans into space before the Soviets.[17] The Army turned to von Braun's team, who had created theJupiter series of rockets.[18] TheJuno I rocket launched thefirst American satellite in January 1958.[19] Von Braun considered the Jupiter series of rockets to be a prototype of the upcomingSaturn series of rockets, and referred to it as "an infant Saturn".[20]
The Saturn rocket family were named afterthe sixth planet from the Sun because the design of the various Saturn rockets evolved from the earlier Jupiter vehicles, which were named after thefifth planet from the Sun.[21] Between 1960 and 1962, theMarshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) designed a series of Saturn rockets that could be deployed for Earth orbit and lunar missions.[22] NASA planned to use a Saturn vehicle as part of theEarth orbit rendezvous (EOR) method for a lunar mission.[23] Development on theSaturn C-3 rocket was just beginning when the MSFC planned an even bigger rocket, theSaturn C-4, which would use fourF-1 engines in its first stage and fiveJ-2 engines in its second stage.[24]
On January 25, 1962, NASA gave its approval to build the C-5. The three-stage rocket would consist of theS-IC first stage, with five F-1 engines; theS-II second stage with five J-2 engines; and theS-IVB third stage, with a single J-2 engine.[25] The C-5 would undergo component testing even before the first model was constructed. The S-IVB third stage would be used as the second stage for the C-1B,[26] which would serve both to demonstrate proof of concept and feasibility for the C-5 and to provide flight data critical to the development of the C-5.[27] Rather than undergoing testing for each major component, the C-5 would be tested in an "all-up" fashion, meaning that the first test flight of the rocket would include complete versions of all three stages. By testing all components at once, far fewer test flights would be required before a crewed launch.[28]The C-5 was confirmed as NASA's choice for the Apollo program in mid-1962,[27] and was named the Saturn V in February 1963.[29] In the same month, the C designations were dropped; the C-1 became the Saturn I and C-1B became Saturn IB.[27][30] By November 1962, NASA had switched to and confirmed alunar orbit rendezvous (LOR) method for a lunar mission.[31] The outside contractors that were chosen for the construction were: Boeing (S-IC),[32] North American Aviation (S-II),[32] Douglas Aircraft (S-IVB),[26] and IBM (S-IU).[33]
Early in the planning process, NASA considered three methods for the Moon mission: Earth orbit rendezvous (EOR),direct ascent, and lunar orbit rendezvous (LOR). A direct ascent configuration would require an extremely large rocket to send a three-man spacecraft to land directly on the lunar surface with enough fuel to fly back to Earth. NASA proposed theNova for this method.[34][35] An EOR would launch the direct-landing spacecraft in two smaller parts which would combine in Earth orbit. A LOR mission would involve a single rocket launching two spacecraft: amother ship, and a smaller, two-man landing module which would rendezvous back with the main spacecraft in lunar orbit. The lander would be discarded and the mother ship would return home.[35]
Originally, in the early 1960s, when the Saturn project was transferred to NASA from the U.S Army, direct ascent was the preferred method.[34] At the same time, the Air Force had been developing of a lunar mission namedLunex, which would use the direct ascent method. TheSpace Systems Division estimated that a mission to the Moon using direct ascent could be done by 1967 at an estimated cost of $7.5 billion (equivalent to $60.1 billion in 2024). NASA dismissed both of the rendezvous methods as "dangerous and impractical." Von Braun's team had shown an interest in using the EOR method as early as 1958, arguing that smaller vehicles could be used.[36] Around the same time,Thomas Dolan and his team from theVought Astronautics Division became the first to study the LOR method. Although his team presented their ideas to NASA, nothing came from his proposal.[37]
In 1960, several NASA officials, includingLangley Research Center engineerJohn Houbolt, argued that a lunar orbit rendezvous provided the simplest landing on the Moon with the most cost–efficient launch vehicle, and the best chance to accomplish the lunar landing within the decade.[38][23] Throughout 1961, Houbolt and his team went around convincing other research teams to pursue LOR,[39] catching the attention of the chief of the Engineering Division,James Chamberlin. Although in charge of what would later becomeProject Gemini, he proposed using a two-man spacecraft using LOR to send a one-man lunar lander to the surface of the Moon. Although Chamberlin's plan stalled, it did mark a shift towards LOR.[40] Houbolt also managed to convince NASA officialGeorge Low.[23] In June 1962, von Braun announced LOR would be MSFC's choice.[41] As more NASA officials became convinced, LOR was officially selected and announced as the mission configuration for the Apollo program on November 7, 1962 by NASA administratorJames E. Webb.[31]
AboilerplateApollo spacecraft, BP-027 was used for all configurations of dynamic testing.[42] The boilerplate took the place of actual flight hardware. Boilerplate size, shape, mass, and center of gravity were the same, but it was not necessary for the entire Apollo spacecraft to be completed to commence dynamic testing. The boilerplate was outfitted with instrumentation to record data for engineering study and evaluation.[43] BP-27 was accepted at the Marshall Space Flight Center in late September 1964.[44]
"Space Port" (1970) - officialNASA promotional film reel.
The third stage, the S-IVB-D arrived at MSFC before any other Saturn V stage because it was first needed for dynamic testing of theSaturn IB rocket.[26] The third stage arrived on January 4, 1965.[45] Next, the instrument unit, S-IU-200D/500D, was built. Unlike the other major components of the rocket, the instrument unit was built in Huntsville, Alabama, where the MSFC is located.[33] The ring was completed in January 1965 and electronic components from IBM installed by February 1. Like the third stage, it arrived before the other stages because it was needed for dynamic testing in the Saturn IB first.[46][47]
The first stage of the Saturn V rocket, S-IC-D, set out on the maiden voyage of NASA bargePoseidon to Marshall Space Flight Center on October 6, 1965, and arrived on October 13.[48] While the first stage was on its way, dynamic testing for the Saturn V program using the test rocketSA-500D began on October 8.[48] The first stage was lifted into place in the dynamic test stand January 13, 1966.[49]
The second stage of the SA-500D had a complex history. Originally, NASA wanted to use the S-II-D stage for its dynamic testing. However, in the spring of 1965, NASA canceled the production of the S-II-D stage and instead opted to use the S-II-S stage for its dynamic tests.[50] The S-II-S stage, whichNorth American Aviation's Space and Information Systems Division (S&ID) atSeal Beach had completed by January 31, 1965,[51] was re-designated as S-II-S/D to be used for dynamic testing.[52] The S-II-S/D would rupture and be destroyed during a test on September 29, 1965 at Seal Beach. It was discovered that the test was exercising a considerable margin above the structural limits required for flight, approximately 144 percent of its designed load limit.[52][53] Because of this, NASA was forced to substitute the S-II-T stage for testing.[54] In early 1966, the S-II-T was re-designated S-II-T/D, so it could be used for dynamic testing as well as engine firing.[55] On May 28, 1966, S-II-T/D was undergoing a pressure test to find a hydrogen leak, but the hydrogen pressure sensors and switches had been disconnected unbeknownst to the second-shift crew. As a result, the crew, believing that a valve was leaking liquid hydrogen, began closing valves. This caused the liquid hydrogen tank to over pressurize and explode, injuring five men and hospitalizing two others.[56][57]
After the S-II-T/D was destroyed, the S-II-F stage was assigned to dynamic test duties. The S-II-F stage was at the Kennedy Space Center being used as a non-flight version of the stage. Being shipped from Seal Beach, California, toKennedy Space Center where it arrived March 4.[58] The S-II-F, now designated S-II-F/D, arrived at the MSFC on November 10, 1966.[59]
Dynamic testing examined "the vehicle's response to lateral, longitudinal, and torsional excitation, simulating those that would be experienced in flight. The vehicle was "mounted on a hydrodynamic support system made up of four hydraulic/pneumatic pedestals to permit a simulated unrestrained reaction." Engineers tested vibrations in one plane at a time with different amounts of ballast simulating "fuel load at critical time points in the flight trajectory."[60]
In Configuration One, SA-500D was fully assembled inside the dynamic test facility.
Dynamic tests were conducted in three configurations, one for each phase of Saturn V-powered flight. Configuration I tested the entire stack for its bending and vibration characteristics, as if the vehicle had just been launched. Configuration II tested the stack as if the first stage had jettisoned and the second stage were firing,[61] and configuration III tested only the third stage and Apollo spacecraft.[62] Tests began with Configuration III in the Saturn IB dynamic test facility.[60] Configuration III testing took place in late 1965.[63] Configuration I testing followed in the Saturn V dynamic test stand, then Configuration II in the same place.[60] With all the components at MSFC as of November 10, 1966,[61][59] the second stage was stacked atop the first inside the dynamic test stand on November 23. The third stage was added to the stack November 30, and the Instrument Unit and boilerplate Apollo were installed in December. The rocket was stacked and ready for "Configuration One" testing.[61]
Configuration One Testing finished on March 11.[64] Testing produced "several minor irregularities indicating the need for possible engineering changes" Configuration Two testing followed; in which the first stage was removed from the stack to simulate conditions after the first stage had jettisoned.[65] On August 3, 1967, MSFC announced the successful completion of the dynamic test program, thereby declaring the dynamics and structures of the Saturn V ready for its first launch later in the year. The dynamic testing resulted in "several slight modifications" to the final flight vehicle.[66]
Used as a facility verification vehicle. The first stage was scrapped. The second stage was converted toS-II-F/D and was used for dynamic testing. It was later moved to theU.S. Space & Rocket Center where it currently sits. The third stage was modified into aSkylab dynamic test article before it was scrapped.
Vehicle was struck twice by lightning shortly after liftoff, but did not suffer serious damage. Made second crewed lunar landing, nearSurveyor 3 atOcean of Storms
Severepogo oscillations in second stage caused early center engine shutdown; guidance compensated by burning remaining engines longer. Lunar landing mission was aborted by service module failure.
Uncrewed launch of the Skylab orbital workshop, which replaced the third stage, S-IVB-513, on display atJohnson Space Center. Originally designated forcanceled Apollo 18.
Originally designated for canceled Apollo 19. Never used. First stage on display at Johnson Space Center. Second and third stage on display at Kennedy Space Center.
Originally designated for canceled Apollo 20 and later it was used as a backup Skylab launch vehicle. Never used. The first stage was on display atMichoud Assembly Facility, until June 2016 then was moved to theINFINITY Science Center in Mississippi for preservation. The second stage is on display at Johnson Space Center. The third stage was converted to a backup Skylab orbital workshop and is on display at theNational Air and Space Museum.
The size and payload capacity of the Saturn V dwarfed those of all other previous rockets successfully flown at that time. With theApollo spacecraft on top, the Saturn V stood 363 ft (111 m) tall, and, ignoring the fins, had a diameter of 33 ft (10 m) at its base.[90] Fully fueled, the Saturn V had a mass of 2,822,171 to 2,965,241 kg (6,221,823 to 6,537,238 lb),[91] with a low Earth orbit (LEO) payload capacity of about 140,000 kg (310,000 lb),[92] and could send about 43,500 kg (95,900 lb) to the Moon.[93]
The Saturn V was primarily designed by theMarshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.[26] The rocket used the powerfulF-1 andJ-2rocket engines.[90] When all five F-1 engines of the first stage were tested together at theStennis Space Center, their low-frequency roar shattered the plate-glass window of a bank building inPicayune, 15 miles away.[94] Designers decided early on to attempt to use as much technology from theSaturn I program as possible for the Saturn V. Consequently, the S-IVB third stage of the Saturn V was based on theS-IVB second stage of the Saturn I.[95] The Saturn V was primarily constructed ofaluminum,titanium,polyurethane,cork andasbestos.[96] Blueprints and other plans of the rocket are available onmicrofilm at the Marshall Space Flight Center.[97]
The Saturn V consisted of three stages—the S-IC first stage, S-II second stage, S-IVB third stage, and theinstrument unit.[90] All three stages usedliquid oxygen (LOX) as theoxidizer. The first stage usedRP-1 for fuel,[98] while the second and third stages usedliquid hydrogen (LH2).[99] LH2 has a higherspecific energy (energy per unit mass) than RP-1, which makes it more suitable for higher-energy orbits, such as thetrans-lunar injection required for Apollo missions. Conversely, RP-1 offers higherenergy density (energy per unit volume) and higher thrust than LH2, which makes it more suitable for reducing aerodynamic drag and gravity losses in the early stages of launch. If the first stage had used LH2, the volume required would have been greater, which would have been aerodynamically infeasible at the time.[32] The second and third stages also used small solid-propellantullage motors that helped to separate the stages during the launch to ensure proper positioning of the liquid propellants for pump intake.[100]
The first stage ofApollo 8 Saturn V being erected in theVAB on February 1, 1968
The S-IC was built by the Boeing Company at theMichoud Assembly Facility, New Orleans, and theMississippi Test Facility (now known as the Stennis Space Center),Hancock County, Mississippi.[101] Most of its launch mass was propellant: RP-1 fuel with liquid oxygen as the oxidizer.[102] The stage was 42 m (138 ft) tall and 10 m (33 ft) in diameter. It provided 33,000 kN (7,500,000 lbf) of thrust at sea level. The S-IC had a dry mass of about 137,000 kg (303,000 lb). When fully fueled at launch, it had a total mass of 2,214,000 kg (4,881,000 lb).[101] The S-IC was powered by fiveRocketdyne F-1 engines arrayed in aquincunx. The center engine was fixed, while the four outer engines werehydraulically turned withgimbals to steer the rocket.[103] The S-IC had a burn time of approximately 150 seconds.[101]
The S-IC structure design reflects the requirements of the F-1 engines,propellants, control,instrumentation, and interfacing systems. The stage is primarily built ofaluminum alloy, specifically7075 and2219 aluminum alloys. The major components are the forward skirt, oxidizer tank, intertank section, fuel tank, and thrust structure. Theaft end of the forward skirt is attached to the oxidizer (liquid oxygen) tank and the forward end interfaces with theS-II. The skin panels, fabricated from 7075 aluminum, are stiffened and strengthened by ring frames and stringers.[104]
The 1,310,000 L (345,000 U.S. gal) liquid oxygen tank is the structural link between the forward skirt and the intertank section. Ring baffles attached to the skin stiffeners stabilize the tank wall and serve to reduce liquid oxygen sloshing. The tank is made of 2219 aluminum alloy and is a cylinder withellipsoidal upper and lowerbulkheads. The skin thickness is tapered in eight steps from 0.65 cm (0.254 in) at the aft section to 0.48 cm (0.190 in) at the forward section. The intertank structure helps provide structural continuity between the liquid oxygen and fuel tanks. The skin panels and ring frames are fabricated from 7075 aluminum.[104]
The 820,000 L (216,000 U.S. gal) fuel tank provides the structural link between the thrust and intertank structures. It iscylindrical with ellipsoidal upper and lower bulkheads. Anti-slosh ring baffles are located on the inside wall of the tank and anti-vortexcruciformbaffles are located in the lower bulkhead area. Five liquid oxygen ducts run from the liquid oxygen tank, through the RP-1 tank, and terminate at the F-1 engines. The 2219 aluminum skin thickness is decreased in four steps from 0.49 cm (0.193 in) at the aft section to 0.43 cm (0.170 in) at the forward section.[104]
Cutaway diagram of the S-IC
The thrust structure assembly redistributes the loads of the five F-1 engines to the periphery of the fuel tank. It also provides support for the engine accessories, baseheat shield, enginefairings andfins, propellant lines,retrorockets, and environmental control ducts. The lower thrust ring has four holddown points, which support the fully loaded rocket and, as necessary, restrain the vehicle from lifting off at full F-1 engine thrust. The skin segments are fabricated from 7075 aluminum alloy.[104]
The electrical power system of the S-IC is divided into three basic subsystems: an operational power subsystem, a measurement power subsystem, and a visual instrumentation power subsystem. On-board power is supplied by five 28-volt batteries, one each for the operational and measurement power systems. The operational power system battery supplies power to operational loads such asvalve controls, purge and venting systems,pressurization systems, sequencing systems, and flight control. The measurement power system battery supplies power to measurement loads such astelemetry systems,transducers,multiplexers, andtransmitters. Both batteries supply power to their loads through a commonmain power distributor, but each system is completelyisolated from the others. In the visual instrumentation system, two batteries provide power for the liquid-oxygen tank strobe lights, while a third battery energizes the control circuits, camera motors, and thrusters of the film-camera portion of the visual instrumentation system.[105]
The instrumentation system monitors functional operations of stage systems and provides signals for vehicle tracking during the S-ICburn. Prior to liftoff, measurements were telemetered bycoaxial cable to ground support equipment. During flight, data is transmitted to ground stations overradio frequency (RF) links. The offset Doppler (ODOP) system uses theDoppler principle to provide vehicle position and acceleration data during flight.[106]
The S-II was built byNorth American Aviation at Seal Beach, California. Using liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen, it had five Rocketdyne J-2 engines arranged similarly to the S-IC,[107] and also used the four outer engines for control.[108] The S-II was 24.87 m (81 ft 7 in) tall with a diameter of 10 m (33 ft), identical to the S-IC. The S-II had a dry mass of about 43,000 kg (95,000 lb); when fully fueled, it weighed 470,000 kg (1,037,000 lb). The second stage accelerated the Saturn V through the upper atmosphere with 4,400 kN (1,000,000 lbf) of thrust in a vacuum. The S-II had a burn time of 395 seconds.[109] When loaded with fuel, more than 90 percent of the mass of the stage was propellant.[107]
The S-II consisted of a body shell structure (forward and aft skirts and interstage), a propellant tank structure (liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen tanks), and a thrust structure. The body shell structure consists of the forward skirt, aft skirt, and interstage. The three are of the same basic design except that the aft skirt and interstage were generally of heavier construction because of higher structural loads placed on them. Each unit is a cylindrical shell ofsemi-monocoque construction, built of 7075 aluminum alloy material, stiffened by external hat-section stringers and stabilized internally by circumferential ring frames. The forward skirt has a basic skin thickness of 0.10 cm (0.040 in), while the aft skirt and interstage both have basic skin thicknesses of 0.18 cm (0.071 in).[110]
The thrust structure, like the body shell structure, is of semi-monocoque construction but in the form of atruncated cone increasing in size from approximately 5.5 metres (18 ft) to 10 metres (33 ft) in diameter. It is stiffened by circumferential ring frames and hat-section stringers like the body shell structure. Four pairs of thrustlongerons (two at each outboard engine location) and a center engine support beam distribute the thrust loads of the J-2 engines. The shell structure is of 7075 aluminum alloy. A fiberglass honeycomb heat shield, supported from the lower portion of the thrust structure, protects the stage base area from excessive temperatures.[110]
The liquid hydrogen tank consists of a long cylinder with aconcave modified ellipsoidal bulkhead forward and a convex modified ellipsoidal bulkhead aft. The aft bulkhead is also used by the liquid oxygen tank. The liquid hydrogen tank wall is composed of six cylindrical sections. Wall sections and bulkheads are all fabricated from2014 aluminum alloy and are joined together byfusion welding. The forward bulkhead has an 11 m (36 ft) diameter wide accessmanhole built into its center. The common bulkhead is an adhesive-bonded sandwich assembly employing facing sheets of 2014 aluminum alloy andfiberglass/phenolichoneycomb core to prevent heat transfer and retain thecryogenic properties of the two fluids to which it was exposed.[110]
Cutaway diagram of the S-II
The liquid oxygen tank consists of ellipsoidal fore and aft halves. The tank is fitted with three ring-type slosh baffles to control propellant sloshing and minimize surface disturbances and cruciform baffles to prevent the generation of vortices at the tank outlet ducts and to minimize residuals. A six-port sump assembly located at the lowest point of the tank provides a fill and drain opening and openings for five engine feed lines.[111]
The S-II electrical system consists of the electrical power and electrical control subsystems. The electrical power system provides the stage with the electrical power source and distribution. The electrical power system consists of sixDC bus systems and a ground suppliedAC bus system. In flight, the electrical power system busses are energized by fourzinc-silver oxide batteries. The electrical control system interfaces with the instrument unit (IU) to accomplish the mission requirements of the stage. TheLaunch Vehicle Digital Computer (LVDC) in the IU controls in-flight sequencing of stage functions through the stage switch selector. The stage switch selector can provide up to 112 individual outputs in response to the appropriate commands. These outputs are routed through the stage electrical sequence controller or the separation controller to accomplish the directed operation.[112]
The S-II instrumentation system consists of both operational andR&D measurement and telemetry systems. The measurement system monitors and measures conditions on the stage while the telemetry system transmits this information to ground stations. The measurement system consists of transducers,signal conditioners, and distribution equipment necessary to provide the required measurement ranges and to present suitably scaled signals to the telemetry system. The measurement system monitors numerous stage conditions and characteristics. This data is processed and conditioned into a form acceptable to the telemetry systems. The telemetry system accepts the signals produced by the measuring portion of the instrumentation system and transmits them to the ground stations. Telemetry equipment includes signal multiplexers,subcarrieroscillators,amplifiers, modulators, transmitters,RF power amplifiers, RF multiplexers and an omni-directional system of fourantennas.[113]
The S-IVB stage was built byDouglas Aircraft Company at Huntington Beach, California.[114] It had one Rocketdyne J-2 engine and used liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen.[1] The S-IVB used a common bulkhead to separate the two tanks.[115] It was 17.86 m (58 ft 7 in) tall with a diameter of 6.60 m (21 ft 8 in) and was also designed with high mass efficiency, though not quite as aggressively as the S-II. The S-IVB had a dry mass of about 15,200 kg (33,600 lb) and, when fully fueled, weighed about 120,500 kg (265,600 lb).[1] The S-IVB had a burn time of 165 seconds the first burn, and 312 seconds for the second burn. Its single J-2 engine produced 1,000 kN (225,000 lbf) of thrust.[1]
The S-IVB consists of the following structural assemblies: the forward skirt, propellant tanks, aft skirt, thrust structure, and aft interstage. These assemblies, with the exception of thepropellant tanks, are all of a skin/stringer type aluminum alloyairframe construction. In addition, there are two longitudinal tunnels which house wiring, pressurization lines, and propellant dispersion systems. The tunnel covers are made of aluminum stiffened byinternal ribs. The forward skirt, cylindrical in shape, extends forward from the intersection of the liquid hydrogen tank sidewall and the forward dome, providing a hard attach point for the instrument unit (IU). It is theload supporting member between the liquid hydrogen tank and the IU. An access door in the IU allows servicing of the equipment in the forward skirt.[115]
The thrust structure assembly is an inverted, truncated cone attached at its large end to theaft dome of the liquid oxygen tank and attached at its small end to the engine mount. It provides the attach point for the J-2 engine and distributes the engine thrust over the entire tank circumference. Attached externally to the thrust structure are the engine piping, wiring and interface panels, eight ambient helium spheres,hydraulic system, oxygen/hydrogen burner, and some of the engine and liquid oxygen tank instrumentation.[115]
The propellant tank is cylindrical with a hemispherical dome at each end, and a common bulkhead to separate the liquid oxygen from the liquid hydrogen. This bulkhead is of sandwich type construction consisting of two parallel hemispherical shaped 2014 aluminum alloy domes bonded to and separated by a fiberglass-phenolic honeycomb core. The internal surface of the liquid hydrogen tank is machine-milled in a waffle pattern to obtain required tank stiffness with minimum structural weight. Attached to the inside of the liquid hydrogen tank are: a 10 m (34 ft) propellant utilization probe, nine coldhelium spheres, brackets with temperature and level sensors, a chill-down pump, aslosh baffle, a slosh deflector, and fill, pressurization and vent pipes. Attached to the inside of the liquid oxygen tank are slosh baffles, a chill-down pump, a 4.1 m (13.5 ft) propellant utilization probe, temperature and level sensors, and fill, pressurization, and vent pipes. Attached externally to the propellant tank are helium pipes, propellant dispersion components, and wiring which passes through two tunnel fairings.[115]
The electrical system of the S-IVB consists of two major subsystems: the electrical power subsystem which consists of all power sources on the stage; and the electrical control subsystem which distributes power and control signals to various loads throughout the stage.[116] On-board power is supplied by four zinc/silver-oxide batteries. Two are located in the forward equipment area and two in the aft equipment area. These batteries are activated during the final pre-launch preparations. Heaters and instrumentation probes are an integral part of each battery.[117] The electrical control subsystem function is to distribute the command signals required to control the electrical components of the stage. The major components of the electrical control subsystem are the power and control distributors, the sequencer assemblies, and the pressure sensing and control devices.[118]
The S-IVB instrumentation monitors functional operations of stage systems. Before liftoff, measurements are telemetered by coaxial cable to ground support equipment. During flight, radio frequency antennae convey data to ground stations, similar to the other two stages. The telemetry system consists of apulse-code-modulator (PCM) digitaldata acquisition system (DDAS) for pre-launch checkout. The stage also contains a PCM frequency modulated (PCM/FM) system, a FM/FM system, and asingle sideband (SS/FM) system for launch information. The radio frequency (RF) subsystem consists of a PCM-RF assembly, bi-directional coupler,RF detectors,DC amplifiers, coaxial switch,dummy load, RFpower divider, and associated cabling. Omnidirectional antenna pattern coverage is provided by the folded-sleevedipoles. Theeffective radiating power of the system is 20watts nominal and 16 watts minimum.[119]
The Instrument Unit (IU) is a cylindrical structure installed on top of the S-IVB. The IU contains the guidance, navigation, and control equipment. In addition, it contains telemetry, communications, tracking, and crew safety systems, along with their supporting electrical power and environmental control systems.[120] Developed from theSaturn I IU, the Saturn V's IU was designed by the Marshall Space Flight Center and built byIBM at their Huntsville, Alabama facility.[121] The basic IU structure is a short cylinder fabricated of an aluminum alloy honeycomb sandwich material. The structure is fabricated from three honeycomb sandwich segments of equal length. The top and bottom edges are made from extruded aluminum channels bonded to thehoneycomb sandwich. This type of construction was selected for its high strength-to-weight ratio,acoustical insulation, and thermal conductivity properties. The cylinder is manufactured in three 120-degree segments, which are joined by splice plates into an integral structure. The access door segment has an umbilical door, as well as an equipment/personnel access door. The access door has the requirement to carry flight loads and still be removable at any time prior to flight.[122] The IU has a diameter of 6.6 m (260 in), a height of 0.91 m (36 in), and a weight of around 2,000 kg (4,500 lb).[123]
Upon arrival at the Vehicle Assembly Building, each stage was inspected in a horizontal position before being oriented vertically starting with the first stage and ending with theApollo spacecraft.[131] NASA also constructed a large spool-shaped S-II second stage that could be used in place of stage if a particular stage was delayed. These spools were identical to the real stage and contained the same electrical connections as the actual stages.[132][133] NASA assembled the Saturn V on amobile launcher by using a 230 metric tons (250 short tons) overhead bridge crane and slings to lift the first stage onto the mobile launcher. The first stage was then held in place by four support arms, and the rest of the stages stacked vertically in order. After assembly and testing were completed, the entire stack was moved from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to the launch pad using theCrawler Transporter (CT).[131] Built by theMarion Power Shovel Company,[134] the CT ran on four double-tracked treads, each with 57 "shoes". Each shoe weighed around 900 kg (2,000 lb). Each CT had a length of 40 m (130 ft) and a width of 35 m (115 ft). This transporter was also required to keep the rocket level within 10minutes of arc (0.16 degrees), as it traveled the 5.535 km (3.439 mi) to the launch site,[135] especially at the 5 percentgrade encountered at the launch pad.[136]
From 1964 until 1973, $6.417 billion (equivalent to $34.5 billion in 2024) was appropriated for theResearch and Development and flights of the Saturn V, with the maximum being in 1966 with $1.2 billion (equivalent to $8.84 billion in 2024).[137] That same year, NASA received its largest total budget of $4.5 billion, about 0.5 percent of thegross domestic product (GDP) of the United States at that time.[138] In the time frame from 1969 to 1971 the cost of launching a Saturn V Apollo mission was $185 million (equivalent to $995 million in 2024).[139]
TheMobile Service Structure (MSS), on which the Saturn V sat on, was moved to the launch pad atLaunch Complex 39A around two months before launch. Moving the vehicle let technicians access parts normally inaccessible and allowed testing and other preparations to begin. Around 21 days before launch, technicians fueled the first stage up withRP-1. This was the only fuel that could be loaded this far from the launch date, asliquid oxygen andliquid hydrogen arecryogenic and could only be loaded a couple of hours before launch.[140] The pre-count operations started around six days before launch; equipment was installed and additional testing was performed.[141] At T−24 hours, the Saturn V was completely powered up using ground equipment and theKennedy Space Center began monitoring wind speeds.[142]
At T−9 hours before launch, an 11-hour hold would begin to allow work on any problems discovered. After, the backup crew of the mission entered theCommand Module (CM) to set the switches and circuit breakers to a predetermined position. At T−7 hours 30 minutes, the liquid oxygen tanks on all three stages began to be loaded[143] and would finish an hour later.[144] At T−5 hours, the liquid hydrogen tanks began to be loaded, starting with the second stage and then the third stage.[145] Both the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen tanks had to be continuously refilled as the previously loaded fuel boiled and evaporated.[145] At T−3 hours 45 minutes, the crew was awakened and shortly after, another hold began. The hold lasted an hour and a half, allowing time to fix any remaining issues.[146] At T−2 hours 40 minutes, the crew entered the Command Module and prepared for launch,[147] with the hatch being closed 40 minutes later.[148]
In the event of an abort, the range safety officer would remotely shut down the engines and send a command for the explosive charges attached to the rocket to detonate. These explosions would open the fuel and oxidizer tanks to help disperse the fuel and minimize mixing.[149][150] Around T−40 minutes, a test was conducted to see if the Saturn V could pick up the signal, with the explosives being armed at T−5 minutes 30 seconds.[151]
At T−8 minutes, the onboard computer, theLaunch Vehicle Digital Computer (LVDC), was armed.[152] At T−5 minutes 45 seconds, the finalGo/No-Go was given from the launch controllers. At T−4 minutes 30 seconds, the Terminal Countdown Sequencer (TCS) was armed and prepared to execute the countdown sequence automatically.[153] At T−3 minutes 7 seconds, the TCS began the automatic countdown sequence.[154] At T−16.97 seconds, the TCS sent a signal to the LVDC giving it access to the internalgyroscopes andaccelerometers.[155]
At T−8.9 seconds, the first-stage ignition sequence was initiated, with[156] the center engine being ignited first, followed by opposing outboard pairs at 300-millisecond intervals to reduce the structural loads on the rocket. At T+0.3 seconds, the rocket was "soft released" in two stages. First, the hold-down arms released the rocket. Second, as the rocket began to accelerate upwards, it was slowed by tapered metal pins being pulled through holes for half a second.[157][158] At T+0.63 seconds, the IUumbilical cable was disconnected, indicating to the LVDC that launch had occurred.[159]
At about T+1.7 seconds, the vehicleyawed 1.25° away from the launch tower to ensure adequate clearance despite winds. It took about 10 seconds for the rocket to clear the tower; this varied between missions. At an altitude of 140 m (450 ft) the rocket rolled to the correct flightazimuth, which varied from 72 to 108 degrees depending on the time and date of launch.[160][161] At T+20.6 seconds, the four outboard engines were tilted outward, in case of a premature outboard engine shutdown.[160] At around T+1 minute, the Saturn V reached thespeed of sound.[162][161]
At about T+1 minute 6 seconds, the rocket experiencedmaximum dynamic pressure (maxq). Dynamic pressure on a rocket varies withair density andrelative velocity. Although velocity continues to increase, air density decreases so quickly with altitude that dynamic pressure falls below maxq.[162] As the Saturn V consumed fuel, its weight decreased, increasing its acceleration. This caused the crew to experience 4g at T+2 minutes 15 seconds. To reduce the g forces, the center engine was cut, lowering the g forces to 3g. Each F-1 engine consumed 900,000 kg/min (16.5 short ton/s). At this time, the Saturn V had analtitude of 44.1 km (23.8 nmi), weighted 1,110,000 kg (2,450,000 lb), and had a speed of 7,124.4 km/h; 4,426.9 mph (6,492.8 ft/s)[163]
When theoptical depletion sensors detected low fuel or oxidizer, the remaining four outboard engines were shut down. This would happen around T+2 minutes 40 seconds. The Saturn V had an altitude of 66.1 km (35.7 nmi), weighed 830,000 kg (1,820,000 lb), and had a speed of 9,950.8 km/h; 6,183.1 mph (9,068.6 ft/s)[164] Just before first stage separation, on earlier Apollo missions, smallullage engines on the second stage were ignited for a few seconds to ensure the fuels were at the bottom of their tanks. First stage separation occurred less than one second after the engines were cut off. Eight small solid-fuel separation motors separated the S-IC from the rest of the vehicle. The first stage would continue on aballistic trajectory for another minute and 45 seconds before falling into theAtlantic Ocean about 560 km (350 mi) downrange.[165][166]
Apollo 4 interstage falling away. The interstage glows as it interacts with the engine exhaust from the S-II.
After S-IC separation, the five J-2 engines were ignited and began providing thrust. It took a couple of seconds for the J-2 engines to reach full thrust.[167] At about T+3 minutes 12 seconds, the interstage ring dropped from the second stage. The ring, sitting only a 1 m (3.3 ft) from the outboard J-2 engines, needed to fall cleanly without hitting them, as it could have potentially damaged the engines. Shortly after interstage separation, theLaunch Escape System was also jettisoned.[168][107]
At about T+3 minutes 24 seconds, the Saturn V switched from a pre-programmed trajectory to a "closed loop," or Iterative Guidance Mode. The pre-programmed trajectory was designed to keep the vehicle on its course but prioritized making sure that the aerodynamic forces on the Saturn V did not exceed its limits. The instrument unit computed in real time the most fuel-efficient trajectory toward its target orbit. If the instrument unit failed, the crew could switch control of the Saturn to the command module's computer, take manual control, or abort the flight.[169] At about T+7 minutes 40 seconds, the center engine shut down to reducelongitudinal pogo oscillations.[170]
Five levelsensors in the bottom of each S-II propellant tank were armed during S-II flight, allowing any two to trigger S-II cutoff and staging when uncovered.[171] At about T+9 minutes 8 seconds, the rest of the J-2 engines shut off and the process of separating the S-II from the S-IVB began. At this time, the Saturn V had an altitude of 187.2 km (101.1 nmi) and had a speed of 24,897.9 km/h; 15,470.9 mph (22,690.6 ft/s). Two small ullage engines were ignited andretro motors were fired, separating the S-II from the rest of the rocket.[172]
Apollo 17S-IVB rocket stage, shortly after transposition and docking with the Lunar Module
Unlike the two-plane separation of the S-IC and S-II stages, the S-II and S-IVB separated with a single step.[173] Less than one second after the S-II's engines were cut off, the S-IVB's single J-2 engine was ignited, taking about 5 seconds to reach full thrust.[174]
The third stage burned for about 2.5 minutes until first cutoff at about T+11 minutes 40 seconds. The vehicle had an altitude of 191.1 km (103.2 nmi) and had a speed of 28,048 km/h; 17,428 mph (25,561 ft/s). Unlike the previous two stages, S-IVB's J-2 engine was restarted fortrans-lunar injection (TLI).[175] After engine cutoff, the Saturn V entered anEarth parking orbit 190 km (100 nmi) above the Earth. The third stage remained attached to the spacecraft while itorbited the Earth one and a half times.[176]
TLI came at about T+2 hours 44 minutes after launch. The J-2 took around 10 seconds to reach full thrust.[177] The S-IVB burned for almost six minutes, giving the spacecraft a velocity of about 39,027.6 km/h; 24,250.6 mph (35,567.6 ft/s).[178] About 40 minutes after TLI, the Apollo Command and Service module (CSM) separated from the third stage, turned 180 degrees, and docked with the Lunar Module (LM), which rode below the CSM during launch. The CSM and LM separated from the spent third stage 50 minutes later in a maneuver known astransposition, docking, and extraction.[179]
If it remained on the same trajectory as the spacecraft, the S-IVB could have presented a collision hazard, so its remaining propellants were vented, and the auxiliary propulsion system was fired to move it away. For lunar missions before Apollo 13, the S-IVB was directed toward the Moon's trailing edge in its orbit,slingshotting it beyond Earth escape velocity and into solar orbit. From Apollo 13 onwards, the S-IVB was sent to hit the Moon.[180][181]Seismometers left behind by previous missions detected the impacts, and the information helped map theinternal structure of the Moon.[182][183]
In 1965, theApollo Applications Program (AAP) was created to explore scientific missions that could be performed using Apollo hardware. Much of the planning centered on the idea of a space station. Von Braun's earlier 1964 plans employed a "wet workshop" concept, with a spent S-II Saturn V second stage being launched into orbit and outfitted in space. The following year, AAP studied a smaller station using theSaturn IB second stage. By 1969, Apollo funding cuts eliminated the possibility of procuring more Apollo hardware and forced the cancellation of some later Moon landing flights. This freed up at least one Saturn V, allowing the wet workshop to be replaced with the "dry workshop" concept: the station—now known as Skylab— would be built on the ground from a surplus Saturn IB second stage and launched atop the first two live stages of a Saturn V.[184] A backup station, constructed from a Saturn V third stage, was built and is now on display at theNational Air and Space Museum.[185] The only significant changes to the Saturn V from the Apollo configurations involved some modifications to the S-II to act as the terminal stage for inserting the Skylab payload into Earth orbit.[186] The S-II remained in orbit for almost two years before it made an uncontrolled re-entry on January 11, 1975.[187]
In the early 1970s, as the public's attention turned away from space exploration to other matters, such as theVietnam War,Congress began to cut NASA's budget. The U.S Government was less willing to continue funding NASA, especially after the improvement of U.S-Soviet relations.[188] After Apollo, the Saturn V was planned to be the prime launch vehicle forProspector. Prospector was a proposed 330 kg (730 lb) robotic rover, similar to the two SovietLunokhod rovers,[189] theVoyager Mars probes, and a scaled-up version of theVoyager interplanetary probes.[190] The Saturn V was also to have been the launch vehicle for the nuclear rocket stage RIFT test program and for some versions of the upcomingNERVA project.[191] All of these planned uses of the Saturn V were canceled, with cost being a major factor.Edgar Cortright, who had been the director ofNASA Langley, stated decades later that "JPL never liked the big approach. They always argued against it. I probably was the leading proponent in using the Saturn V, and I lost. Probably very wise that I lost."[192]
The canceled second production run of Saturn Vs would very likely have featured anuprated F-1 engine in its first stage, providing a substantial performance boost.[193] Other likely changes would have been biggerfins,[194] a strengthened construction,[195] a stretched S-IC first stage,[196] and theHG-3 engine for the upper stages.[197]
A number of alternate Saturn vehicles were proposed based on the Saturn V, ranging from theSaturn INT-20 with anS-IVB stage and interstage mounted directly onto a S-IC,[198] through to the Saturn V-24(L), which would not only have five uprated F-1 engines in the first stage, but also four strap-onboosters with two uprated F-1 engines each, giving a total of thirteen F-1 engines firing at launch.[199]
There is one Saturn V on display at theU.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville.SA-500D is on horizontal display made up of its S-IC-D, S-II-F/D and S-IVB-D. These were all test stages not meant for flight. This vehicle was displayed outdoors from 1969 to 2007, was restored, and is now displayed in the Davidson Center for Space Exploration.[69]
There is one at theJohnson Space Center made up of the first stage from SA-514, the second stage from SA-515, and the third stage from SA-513 (replaced for flight by the Skylab workshop). With stages arriving between 1977 and 1979, this was displayed in the open until its 2005 restoration when a structure was built around it for protection. This is the only display Saturn consisting entirely of stages intended to be launched.[202][69]
One at theKennedy Space Center Visitor Complex, made up of S-IC-T (test stage) and the second and third stages from SA-514.[203] It was displayed outdoors for decades, then in 1996 was enclosed for protection from the elements in the Apollo/Saturn V Center.[204][69]
On September 3, 2002,astronomerBill Yeung discovered a suspectedasteroid, which was given the discovery designationJ002E3. It appeared to be in orbit around the Earth, and was soon discovered from spectral analysis to be covered in whitetitanium dioxide, which was a major constituent of the paint used on the Saturn V. Calculation of orbital parameters led to tentative identification as being theApollo 12 S-IVB stage.[207][208] Mission controllers had planned to send Apollo 12's S-IVB into solar orbit after separation from the Apollo spacecraft, but it is believed the burn lasted too long, and hence did not send it close enough to the Moon, so it remained in a barely stable orbit around the Earth and Moon. In 1971, through a series ofgravitational perturbations, it is believed to have entered in a solar orbit and then returned into weakly captured Earth orbit 31 years later. It left Earth orbit again in June 2003.[209]
^abSerial numbers were initially assigned by theMarshall Space Flight Center in the format "SA-5xx" (for Saturn-Apollo). By the time the rockets achieved flight, theManned Spacecraft Center started using the format "AS-5xx" (for Apollo-Saturn).
Cortright, Edgar M. (August 20, 1998)."Oral History Transcript"(PDF) (Interview). Interviewed by Rich Dinkel. NASA. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on September 10, 2012.
Dewar, James (2007).To The End of the Solar System: The Story of the Nuclear Rocket (2nd ed.). Burlington, Ontario: Apogee.ISBN978-1-894959-68-1.OCLC1061809723.
Lawrie, Alan; Godwin, Robert (2010).Saturn V: The Complete Manufacturing and Test Records: Plus Supplemental Material (2nd ed.). Burlington, Ontario:Apogee Books.OCLC1311136347.
Lennick, Michael (2006).Launch Vehicles: Heritage of the Space Race. Burlington, Ontario: Apogee Books.ISBN1-894959-28-0.OCLC68621072.
Wells, Helen T.; Whiteley, Susan H.; Karegeannes, Carrie E. (1976).Origins of NASA names. Washington, D.C.: NASA. SP-4402.Archived(PDF) from the original on January 14, 2025.
This template lists historical, current, and future space rockets that at least once attempted (but not necessarily succeeded in) an orbital launch or that are planned to attempt such a launch in the future
Symbol† indicates past or current rockets that attempted orbital launches but never succeeded (never did or has yet to perform a successful orbital launch)
.jpg)
