Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

List of kings of Akkad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromSargonic dynasty)

This article is about the rulers of theAkkadian Empire. For the continued usage of the title beyond its fall, seeKing of Sumer and Akkad.
King ofAkkad
Details
First monarchSargon
Last monarchShu-turul
Formationc. 2334BC
Abolitionc. 2154 BC
530 BC(
King of Sumer and Akkad)
AppointerDivine right, hereditary

Theking of Akkad (Akkadian:šar māt Akkadi,lit.'king of the land of Akkad'[1]) was the ruler of the city ofAkkad andits empire, inancient Mesopotamia. In the 3rd millennium BC, from the reign ofSargon of Akkad to the reign of his great-grandsonShar-Kali-Sharri, the Akkadian Empire represented the dominant power in Mesopotamia and the first known great empire.

The empire would rapidly collapse following the rule of its first five kings, owing to internal instability andforeign invasion, probably resulting in Mesopotamia re-fracturing into independent city-states, but the power that Akkad had briefly exerted ensured that its prestige and legacy would be claimed by monarchs for centuries to come.Ur-Nammu ofUr, who founded theNeo-Sumerian Empire and reunified most of Mesopotamia, created the title "King of Sumer and Akkad" which would be used until the days of theAchaemenid Empire.

History

[edit]
Main article:Akkadian Empire
Map of theAkkadian Empire at its greatest extent, underNaram-Sin, with directions of successful military campaigns marked

AlthoughSargon of Akkad is often referred to as the "founder" ofAkkad, the city itself probably existed before his rule; a pre-Sargonic inscription refers to it by name and the name "Akkad" itself is not actually of theAkkadian language of Sargon and his successors.[2][3] Sargon's reign does however mark the transition of Akkad from a city-state into the first known great empire, with the Akkadian king ruling all Mesopotamia. His rise to power began with the defeat of theSumerian kingLugal-zage-si, who had ruledLower Mesopotamia fromUruk, and the conquest of his empire.[4] Through military campaigns, Sargon subjugated regions as far west as theMediterranean and as far north asAssyria, which he boasted of in his inscriptions.[5]

Sargon's successors consolidated his vast realm and continued expanding the borders of theAkkadian Empire. Sargon's grandson and the fourth king of Akkad,Naram-Sin, brought the empire to its greatest extent and assumed a new title to illustrate his great power,King of the Four Quarters, which referenced the entire world. He was also the first king in Mesopotamia to bedeified in his lifetime, being addressed as "the god of Akkad".[6][7]

Although at least seven kings would rule Akkad after him, the Akkadian Empire quickly collapsed after Naram-Sin's reign and prominent central authority under a single king would not be restored in Mesopotamia until the rise of theNeo-Sumerian Empire. It's likely that the region reverted to local governance under kings of city-states in the time between the two empires.[8] A major cause of this collapse was the invasion of Mesopotamia by a people referred to as theGutians, who would be defeated and driven away by the founder of the Neo-Sumerian Empire,Ur-Nammu.[citation needed]

List of rulers

[edit]

The following list should not be considered complete:

#DepictionKingApprox. date of reignSuccessionNotes
Akkadian period (c. 2335 – c. 2154 BC)
Sargonic dynasty (c. 2335 – c. 2193 BC)

"Then the reign of Uruk wasabolished and thekingship was taken toAkkad."

— Sumerian King List (SKL)

1stSargon
𒈗𒁺
Šarru-ukīn
r. c. 2335 – c. 2279 BC
(
MC)

r. c. 2270 – c. 2215 BC
(
SC)
(54, 55, or 56 years)

  • Possibly son of La'ibum
2ndRimush
𒌷𒈬𒍑
Ri-mu-uš
r. c. 2279 – c. 2270 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2214 – c. 2206 BC
(SC)
(7, 9, or 15 years)

Son of Sargon
  • Held the title,"King of the Universe"
  • Faced widespread revolts, reconquered, and/or embarked on victorious campaigns against the cities of: Ur, Umma, Adab, Lagash, Der, Kazallu, Barakhshe, andElam from rebelliousgovernors
  • Possibly assassinated by his courtiers
3rdManishtushu
𒈠𒀭𒅖𒌅𒋢
Ma-an-ish-tu-su
r. c. 2270 – c. 2255 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2205 – c. 2191 BC
(SC)
(7 or 15 years)

Brother of Rimush and son of Sargon
  • Faced little to no rebellions and could as such embark on campaigns to lands distant from Akkad
  • Primarily campaigned to the south, winning victories along theTigris and in thePersian Gulf
4thNaram-Sin
𒀭𒈾𒊏𒄠𒀭𒂗𒍪
Na-ra-amSîn
r. c. 2255 – c. 2218 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2191 – c. 2154 BC
(SC)
(36 or 56 years)

Son of Manishtushu
5thShar-Kali-Sharri
𒊬𒂵𒉌 𒈗𒌷
Šar-ka-li-šar-ri
r. c. 2218 – c. 2193 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2154 – c. 2129 BC
(SC)
(24 or 25 years)

Son of Naram-Sin
  • During Sharkalisharri's reign, the Akkadian empire collapsed as a result of theGuti invasion and widespread drought
  • Possibly the last Akkadian king to actually control more than the city of Akkad itself

"157 are the years of the dynasty of Sargon. Then who was king? Who was the king?"

— SKL

Akkadian interregnum (c. 2193 – c. 2189 BC)
#DepictionKingApprox. date of reignSuccessionNotes
6thIgigi
𒄿𒄀𒄀
I-gi-gi
r. c. 2193 – c. 2192 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2129 – c. 2128 BC
(SC)
(≤1 year)

Unclear succession
  • Uncertain succession, anarchy following theGuti invasion
  • Seized power in the anarchy following the death of Sharkalisharri, ruling for about a year
  • Said on theSKL to have held the title of,"King" of not just Akkad; but, to have held the"Kingship" overall of Sumer
7thImi
𒄿𒈪
I-mi
r. c. 2192 – c. 2191 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2128 – c. 2127 BC
(SC)
(≤1 year)

Unclear succession
  • Historicity uncertain
  • Known from theSKL; very little otherwise
  • Said on theSKL to have held the title of,"King" of not just Akkad; but, to have held the"Kingship" overall of Sumer
8thNanum
𒈾𒉡𒌝
Na-nu-um
r. c. 2191 – c. 2190 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2127 – c. 2126 BC
(SC)
(≤1 year)

Unclear succession
  • Historicity uncertain
  • Known from theSKL; very little otherwise
  • Said on theSKL to have held the title of,"King" of not just Akkad; but, to have held the"Kingship" overall of Sumer
9thIlulu
𒅋𒇽
Ilu-lu
r. c. 2190 – c. 2189 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2126 – c. 2125 BC
(SC)
(≤1 year)

Unclear succession
  • Same person asElulmesh of the Gutians (?)
  • The final of the four short-lived rivals vying for the throne in the aftermath of Sharkalisharri's death
  • Said on theSKL to have held the title of,"King" of not just Akkad; but, to have held the"Kingship" overall of Sumer

"4 of them ruled for only 3 years"

— SKL

The final kings to rule Akkad,Dudu andShu-turul are assumed to have been related to the original ruling dynasty and as such are often regarded as members of the Sargonic dynasty.[9]
Final kings of Akkad (c. 2189 – c. 2154 BC)
#DepictionKingApprox. date of reignSuccessionNotes
10thDudu
𒁺𒁺
Du-du
r. c. 2189 – c. 2168 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2125 – c. 2104 BC
(SC)
(21 years)

Possibly a son of Sharkalisharri
  • Campaigned against former Akkadian subjects in the south, such asGirsu, Umma, and Elam
11thShu-turul
𒋗𒉣𒇬𒍌
Šu-ṭur-ul
r. c. 2168 – c. 2154 BC
(MC)

r. c. 2104 – c. 2083 BC
(SC)
(15 or 18 years)

Son of Dudu
  • The last king of Akkad, ruled over a greatly reduced territory that included Akkad itself, Kish,Tutub, andEshnunna

"11 kings; they ruled for 181 years. Then Akkad was defeated and the kingship was taken toUruk."

— SKL

King of Sumer and Akkad

[edit]
Main article:King of Sumer and Akkad
Cylindrical seal ofShulgi ofUr (r.c. 2094–2047 BC). The inscription titles him as "Shulgi, strong hero, King ofUr,King of Sumer and Akkad".

Although Akkad and what remained of its empire was destroyed, its power and prominence led to rulers of later Mesopotamian empires wishing to claim its prestige and legacy for themselves. Ur-Nammu, who founded the Neo-Sumerian Empire in the aftermath of the Gutian rule of Mesopotamia assumed the title "King of Sumer and Akkad". Although the title was meant to justify his rule over both southern (Sumer) and northern (Akkad) Mesopotamia, it also clearly connected Ur-Nammu to the old Akkadian kings,[10] who may have been against linking Sumer and Akkad in such a fashion even though they had ruled both regions.[11]

Ur-Nammu's title would endure for more than 1,500 years. It was assumed byHammurabi, founder of theOld Babylonian Empire, and used byBabylonian kings up until the 8th century BC.[12] It was also prominently used in theMiddle andNeo-Assyrian Empires[12] and in theNeo-Babylonian Empire.[1] ForAssyrian kings, "King of Sumer and Akkad" was used as a marker of their control ofBabylon (which was in the South, e.g. Sumer) and only those Assyrian kings who actually controlled Babylon used the title in their inscriptions.[12]

The final king to assume the title of "King of Sumer and Akkad" wasCyrus the Great of theAchaemenid Empire, who reigned from 559 to 530 BC. In theCyrus Cylinder, written in Akkadiancuneiform script following Cyrus'sconquest of Babylon, he assumed several traditionalMesopotamian royal titles, most of which were not used by his successors.[13]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^abDa Riva 2013, p. 72.
  2. ^Wall-Romana, Christophe (1990). "An Areal Location of Agade".Journal of Near Eastern Studies.49 (3):205–245.doi:10.1086/373442.JSTOR 546244.S2CID 161165836.
  3. ^Foster, Benjamin R. (2013), "Akkad (Agade)", in Bagnall, Roger S. (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, Chicago: Blackwell, pp. 266–267,doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah01005,ISBN 9781444338386
  4. ^Stiebing Jr, H. William (2009).Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture. Pearson Longman; University of New Orleans. p. 69.
  5. ^Dalley proposes that these sources may have originally referred toSargon II of the Assyria rather than Sargon of Akkad. Stephanie Dalley, "Babylon as a Name for Other Cities Including Nineveh", in[1] Proceedings of the 51st Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Oriental Institute SAOC 62, pp. 25–33, 2005
  6. ^Stiebing Jr, H.William. Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture. (Pearson Longman; University of New Orleans, 2009), p.74
  7. ^[2] Piotr Michalowski, "The Mortal Kings of Ur: A Short Century of Divine Rule in Ancient Mesopotamia",Oriental Institute Seminars 4, pp. 33–45, The Oriental Institute, 2008,ISBN 1-885923-55-4
  8. ^Zettler (2003), pp. 24–25. "Moreover, the Dynasty of Akkade's fall did not lead to social collapse, but the re-emergence of the normative political organization. The southern cities reasserted their independence, and if we know little about the period between the death of Sharkalisharri and the accession of Urnamma, it may be due more to accidents of discovery than because of widespread 'collapse.' The extensive French excavations at Tello produced relevant remains dating right through the period."
  9. ^De Mieroop 2004, p. 67.
  10. ^Maeda 1981, p. 5.
  11. ^Hallo 1980, p. 192.
  12. ^abcPorter 1994, p. 79.
  13. ^New Cyrus Cylinder Translation.

Cited bibliography

[edit]

Websites

[edit]
Dominion over the world
Dominion over Mesopotamia
The king's person
Specific locations
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_kings_of_Akkad&oldid=1292273535"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp