| Samaritan revolts | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Diocese of the Orient at the Byzantine period, where Samaritans largely inhabited Palaestina Prima (Samaria). | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
|  Unknown leader (484 revolt)
| ||||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||||
| ben Sabar revolt: 20,000–120,000 killed 556–572 revolt: 140,000 killed Jewish revolt against Hercalius: 66,509 killed[1] | ben Sabar revolt: 20,000–100,000 killed 556–572 revolt: 100,000–120,000 killed[2] Jewish revolt against Hercalius 4,518 killed[3] | ||||||||
TheSamaritan revolts (c. 484–573) were a series of insurrections inPalaestina Prima province, launched by theSamaritans against theByzantine Empire. The revolts were marked by great violence on both sides, and their brutal suppression at the hands of the Byzantines and theirGhassanid allies severely reduced the Samaritan population. The events irreversibly shifted the demographics of the region, making theChristians the only dominant group in the Palaestina Prima province for many decades onward.
Following the period ofJewish–Roman wars, the previously demographically dominant Jewish community became almost extinct across Judaea and the shores of theSouthern Levant, remaining a majority only in Southern Judea,Galilee andGolan.[citation needed] Samaritans and Byzantine Christians filled this vacuum in the central regions of Southern Levant, whereasNabataeans and ChristianGhassanid Arabs settled the periphery.[citation needed]
This period is considered a golden age for theSamaritan community. The Temple of Gerizim was rebuilt after theBar Kochba revolt in Judaea, around 135 CE. With the withdrawal of Roman legions, Samaria enjoyed a limited kind of independence during the 3rd and 4th centuries.Baba Rabba (ca. 288–362), the leader of the Samaritans, divided Samaritan territories into districts, and established local rulers out of aristocratic Samaritan families. He also executed a series of reforms and installed state institutions. Much of the Samaritan liturgy was set by Baba Rabba during this time. This period of semi-independence was brief, however, as Byzantine forces overran Samaria and took Baba Rabba captive toConstantinople, where he died in prison several years later around 362 CE.[4]
During the reign ofByzantine EmperorZeno (r. 474–475 and 476–491), tensions between the Christian community and theSamaritans in Neapolis (Shechem) grew dramatically. According to Samaritan sources, Zeno, whom the sources call "Zait the King of Edom", persecuted the Samaritans with no mercy. The Emperor went to Neapolis, gathered the elders and asked them to convert; when they refused, Zeno had many Samaritans killed, and rebuilt thesynagogue into a church. Zeno then took for himselfMount Gerizim, where the Samaritans worshipped God, and built several edifices, among them a tomb for his recently deceased son, on which he put a cross, so that the Samaritans, worshipping God, would prostrate in front of the tomb.
Later, in 484, the Samaritans revolted, provoked by rumors that the Christians intended to transfer the remains ofAaron's sons and grandsonsEleazar,Ithamar andPhinehas. Samaritans reacted by entering the cathedral of Neapolis, killing the Christians inside and severing the fingers of the bishop Terebinthus.
The Samaritans electedJusta (or Justasas) as their king and moved toCaesarea, where a noteworthy Samaritan community lived. There many Christians were killed and the church of St. Procopius was destroyed.[5] Justa celebrated the victory with games in the circus.[5]
According toJohn Malalas, Asclepiades, thedux Palaestinae (commander of the province'sLimes Arabicus troops), whose units were reinforced by the Caesarea-basedArcadiani oflestodioktes (police chief) Rheges, defeated Justa, killed him and sent his head to Zeno.[5][6] Terebinthus meanwhile fled toConstantinople, requesting an army garrison to prevent further attacks. According toProcopius, Terebinthus went to Zeno to ask for revenge;[5] the Emperor personally went to Samaria to quell the rebellion.[7][better source needed]
As a result of the revolt, Zeno erected a church dedicated toMary, mother of Jesus on Mount Gerizim. He also forbade the Samaritans to travel to the mountain to celebrate their religious ceremonies, and confiscated their synagogue there. These actions by the emperor fueled Samaritan anger towards the Christians further.[8]
Some modern historians believe that the order of the facts preserved by Samaritan sources should be inverted, as the persecution of Zeno was a consequence of the rebellion rather than its cause, and should have happened after 484, around 489. Zeno rebuilt the church of Saint Procopius in Neapolis and the Samaritans were banned from Mount Gerizim, on whose top a signaling tower was built to alert in case of civil unrest.[6]
Samaritans rebelled again in 495, during the reign of EmperorAnastasius I Dicorus, reoccupyingMount Gerizim. The Samaritan mob commanded by a Samaritan woman is said to have seized the Church of St. Mary and massacred the garrison.[5] The revolt was subsequently suppressed by the Byzantine governor ofEdessa,Procopius,[6] and the Samaritan leaders were slain.[5]
Under acharismatic,messianic figure namedJulianus ben Sabar (or ben Sahir), the Samaritans launched a war, sometimes referred to as the final Samaritan revolt,[5] to create their own independent state in 529. This was perhaps the most violent of all the Samaritan uprisings. According to Procopius,[citation needed] the violence erupted due to restrictions imposed on Samaritans by the Byzantine authorities via Justinian's edicts, whileCyril of Scythopolis indicates sectarian tensions between Christians and Samaritans as the primary cause for the revolt.[9]
Following massive riots inScythopolis and Samarian countryside, the rebels quickly conquered Neapolis and ben Sabar emerged as their leader, being proclaimed a king.[10] Ben Sabar followed a strict anti-Christian policy: Neapolis' bishop and many priests were murdered and he persecuted the Christians, destroyed churches and organized guerrilla warfare in the countryside, driving the Christians away.[10] According to Byzantine sources, the name of the bishop wasAmmonas (also Sammon or Ammon).[citation needed] As a response, forces of thedux Palaestinae, combined with units of local governors and theGhassanid Arabphylarch, were dispatched to deal with the uprising.[10] Ben Sabar was surrounded and defeated after withdrawing with his forces from Neapolis.[10] After his capture, he was beheaded and his head, crowned with adiadem, was sent to Emperor Justinian.[10]
By 531 the rebellion had been put down.[11] The forces of EmperorJustinian I quelled the revolt with the help of theGhassanid Arabs; tens of thousands of Samaritans died or wereenslaved, with their death-toll possibly being between 20,000 and 100,000.[5] The ChristianByzantine Empire thereafter virtually outlawed the Samaritan faith. According toProcopius of Caesarea, the majority of Samaritan peasants chose to be defiant in this revolt and "were cut to pieces".[5] Further,Samaria, the "world's most fertile land, was left with no one to till it".[5]
The emperor Justinian I faced another major revolt in 556. On this occasion the Jews and the Samaritans seem to have made common cause, beginning their rebellion in Caesarea early in July.[12]: 31 They fell upon the Christians in the city, killing many of them, after which they attacked and plundered the churches. The governor, Stephanus, and his military escort were pressed hard, and eventually the governor was killed, while taking refuge in his own house.[12]: 31 Amantius, the governor of theEast was ordered to quell the revolt, after the widow of Stephanus reached Constantinople.[12]: 31
Despite the Jewish participation, the rebellion seems to have gathered less support than the revolt of Ben Sabar.[12]: 31 TheChurch of the Nativity was burned down, suggesting that the rebellion had spread south toBethlehem. Either 100,000 or 120,000 are said to have been butchered following the revolt. Others were tortured or driven into exile. However, this is probably an exaggeration as punishment seems to have been limited to the district of Caesarea.[13]
Still, the tensions were not over yet. EmperorJustin II (r. 565–578) complained about "outrages committed by....Samaritans at the foot ofMount Carmel upon the Christian Churches and the holy images".[12]: 31 Probably in response to this event, Justin II issued an order in May 572 rescinding the restoration of rights granted by Justinian.[12]: 30–31 [14] In response, a second joint Samaritan-Jewish revolt took place in summer 572 and again in early 573 or alternatively in 578.[14][15]John of Ephesus andJohn of Nikiû may have described this revolt.[14]
The Samaritan faith was outlawed and from a population of nearly a million, the Samaritan community dwindled to the low hundreds of thousands.[citation needed] The situation of the Samaritans further worsened with the failure of theJewish revolt against Heraclius and the slaughter of the Jewish population in 629.[citation needed]
Samaritan numbers remained very low in the Islamic era, similar to the late Byzantine period – a result of previous revolts and forced conversions.[16] Contemporary sources claim 30-80,000 Samaritans were living inCaesarea Maritima prior to the Muslim invasion (alongside roughly 100,000 Jews), out of a total provincial population of 700,000 of mostly Christians.[17] By the early Islamic period the Samaritan diaspora disappears from records except small communities of Egypt andDamascus.[16] The Egyptian Samaritan community was likely swelled due to refugees from coastal cities of Palestine as a result of Muslim invasion.
Following theMuslim conquest of the Levant in 636, Samaritans suffered more social and economic discrimination than Christians and Jews, as Arab rulers often doubted whether Samaritans ought be included within the Muslim definition of "People of the Book" (however, according to Nathan Schur, the Arab Islamic invasion had initially benefited the community).[18] Still, many Samaritans converted to Islam for economic, social, and theological reasons, and the community's numbers continued to dwindle.[18] Harsh persecution of Samaritans was at times carried out by the more fanatical caliphs, such asAl-Mansur (754–775),Harun al-Rashid (786–809) andal-Mutawakkil (847–861).[19] Islamic religious leaders also periodically sought to consolidate their power by stirring up anti-Samaritan sentiments and occasionally calling for their annihilation.[20] As a result, Samaritan wealth was practically wiped out.[20]
