Saccidānanda (Sanskrit:सच्चिदानन्द; alsoSat-cit-ānanda[1]) is an epithet and description for the subjective experience of the ultimate unchanging reality, calledBrahman,[2][3][note 1] in certain branches ofHindu philosophy, especiallyVedanta. It represents "existence, consciousness, and bliss"[5][7] or "truth, consciousness, bliss".[8]
Saccidānanda (सच्चिदानन्द; pre-sandhi form sat-cit-ānanda) is a compounded Sanskrit word consisting of "sat", "cit", and "ānanda", all three considered as inseparable from the nature of ultimate reality called Brahman in Hinduism.[9] The different forms of spelling is driven by euphonic (sandhi) rules of Sanskrit, useful in different contexts.[9]
sat (सत्):[10] In Sanskrit,sat means "being, existence", "real, actual", "true, good, right", or "that which really is, existence, essence, true being, really existent, good, true".[10][note 2]
ānanda (आनन्द):[16] means "happiness, joy, bliss", "pure happiness, one of three attributes of Atman or Brahman in the Vedanta philosophy".[16] Loctefeld and other scholars translateananda as "bliss".[13][14]
Satcitananda is therefore translated as "truth consciousness bliss",[8][17][18] "reality consciousness bliss",[19][20] or "Existence Consciousness Bliss".[7]
The term is contextually related to "the ultimate reality" in various schools of Hindu traditions.[9] In theistic traditions,satcitananda is the same as God such asVishnu,[21] Shiva[22] or Goddess inShakti traditions.[23] In monist traditions,satcitananda is considered directly inseparable fromnirguna (attributeless) Brahman or the "universal ground of all beings", wherein the Brahman is identical with Atman, the true individual self.[24][3] AJiva is instructed to identify themselves with theAtman, which is theBrahman in a being, thus the purpose of human birth is to realize "I am Brahman" (Aham Brahmasmi) throughPrajna which leads to the state of "ultimate consciousness" referred assat-chit-ananda and subsequentlyMoksha, however as long as a being identifies withMaya which is finite, material and tangible, they will continue to gatherKarma and remain inSaṃsāra.[25]Satcitananda or Brahman is held to be the source of all reality, source of all conscious thought, and source of all perfection-bliss.[9] It is the ultimate, the complete, the destination of spiritual pursuit in Hinduism.[9][3][26]
An early mention of the compound wordsatcitananda is in verse 3.11 of Tejobindu Upanishad,[33] composed before the 4th-century CE.[34][35] The context ofsatcitananda is explained in the Upanishad as follows:[36]
The realization of Atman.
(...) I am of the nature of consciousness. I am made of consciousness and bliss. I am nondual, pure in form, absolute knowledge, absolute love. I am changeless, devoid of desire or anger, I am detached. I am One Essence, unlimitedness, utter consciousness. I am boundless Bliss, existence and transcendent Bliss. I am the Atman, that revels in itself. I am the Sacchidananda that is eternal, enlightened and pure.
TheVedantic philosophy understandssaccidānanda as a synonym of the three fundamental attributes of Brahman. InAdvaita Vedanta, states Werner, it is the sublimely blissful experience of the boundless, pure consciousness and represents the unity of spiritual essence of ultimate reality.[7]
Satcitananda is an epithet forBrahman, considered indescribable, unitary, ultimate, unchanging reality in Hinduism.[2][38][39]
^Brahman is "the unchanging reality amidst and beyond the world",[4] which "cannot be exactly defined", but is being-consciousness-bliss[5] and the highest reality.[6]
^Another translation is offered by Sugirtharajah, who suggests a "palpable force of virtue and truth".[11]
^abDevadutta Kali (2005), Devimahatmyam: In Praise of the Goddess, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120829534, page 365, Quote: "Saccidananda, being-consciousness-bliss, a threefold epithet attempting to describe the unitary, indescribable Brahman".
^abcdeJames Lochtefeld (2002), "Satchidananda" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 2: N-Z, Rosen Publishing,ISBN0-8239-2287-1, page 578
^abSir Monier Monier-Williams,Sat, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages, Oxford University Press (Reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass),ISBN978-8120831056, page 1134
^Sir Monier Monier-Williams,Cit, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages, Oxford University Press (Reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass),ISBN978-8120831056, page 395
^abJames Lochtefeld (2002), "Ananda" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A-M, Rosen Publishing,ISBN0-8239-2287-1, page 35
^abSir Monier Monier-Williams,Ananda, A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymologically and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages, Oxford University Press (Reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass),ISBN978-8120831056, page 139
^Vasant Merchant (2000), Savitri: A Legend & a Symbol-Sri Aurobindo's Modern Epic, International Journal of Humanities and Peace, vol. 16, no. 1, pages 29-34
^Jean Holm and John Bowker (1998), Hinduism, inPicturing God, Bloomsbury Academic,ISBN978-1855671010, page 71
^Julian Woods (2001), Destiny and Human Initiative in the Mahabharata, State University of New York,ISBN978-0791449820, page 201
^Adrian Hastings et al (2000), The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought, Oxford University Press,ISBN978-0198600244, page 324
^Klaus Klostermair (2007), A Survey of Hinduism, 3rd Edition, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791470817, page 246
^Sherma, Rita (1998), Lance E. Nelson (ed.),Purifying the Earthly Body of God: Religion and Ecology in Hindu India, State University of New York Press, p. 116,ISBN978-0791439241
^Holdrege, Barbara (2004). Mittal, S; Thursby, G (eds.).The Hindu World. Routledge. pp. 241–242.ISBN0415215277.Shankara philosophical system is based on a monistic ontology in which brahman, the universal wholeness of existence, is alone declared to be real. In its essential nature as nirguna (without attributes), brahman is pure being (Sat), consciousness (Cit), and bliss (Ananda) and is completely formless, distinctionless, nonchanging, and unbounded. As saguna (with attributes), brahman assumes the form of Ishvara, the lord, [...] Moksha is attained through knowledge (jñåna, vidyå) alone, for when knowledge dawns the individual self awakens to its true nature as Atman, the universal Self, which is identical with Brahman.
^Christopher Key Chapple (2010), The Bhagavad Gita: Twenty-fifth–Anniversary Edition, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-1438428420, page xviii
^Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120814684, pages 433-437, 464-475, 484-493
^Anantanand Rambachan (2006), The Advaita Worldview: God, World, and Humanity, State University of New York Press,ISBN978-0791468517, pages 40-43
^Hattangadi, Sunder (2015)."Tejobindu Upanishad"(PDF) (in Sanskrit). p. 8. Retrieved12 January 2016.; Quote:नित्यशुद्धचिदानन्दसत्तामात्रोऽहमव्ययः । नित्यबुद्धविशुद्धैकसच्चिदानन्दमस्म्यहम् ॥
^Mircea Eliade (1970), Yoga: Immortality and Freedom, Princeton University Press,ISBN0-691017646, pages 128-129
MacFie, J.M. (2004),The Ramayan of Tulsidas or the Bible of Northern India, Kessinger Publishing
Potter, Karl H. (2008),The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Advaita Vedānta Up to Śaṃkara and His Pupils, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited
Puligandla, Ramakrishna (1997),Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, New Delhi: D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd.
