Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

STS-78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1996 American crewed spaceflight to support the Life and Microgravity Spacelab

STS-78
Spacelab Module LM2 inColumbia's payload bay, serving as the Life and Microgravity Spacelab
Mission typeBioscience research
Microgravity research
OperatorNASA
COSPAR ID1996-036AEdit this at Wikidata
SATCATno.23931Edit this on Wikidata
Mission duration16 days, 21 hours, 48 minutes, 30 seconds
Distance travelled11,000,000 kilometres (6,800,000 mi)
Orbits completed271
Spacecraft properties
SpacecraftSpace Shuttle Columbia
Payload mass9,649 kilograms (21,272 lb)
Crew
Crew size7
Members
Start of mission
Launch dateJune 20, 1996, 14:49:00.0075 (1996-06-20UTC14:49Z) UTC
Launch siteKennedy,LC-39B
End of mission
Landing dateJuly 7, 1996, 12:37:30 (1996-07-07UTC12:37:31Z) UTC
Landing siteKennedy,SLF Runway 33
Orbital parameters
Reference systemGeocentric
RegimeLow Earth
Perigee altitude246 kilometres (153 mi)
Apogee altitude261 kilometres (162 mi)
Inclination39.0 degrees
Period89.6 minutes

Left to right – Seated: Henricks, Kregel; Standing: Favier, Linnehan, Helms, Brady, Thirsk
← STS-77
STS-79 →

STS-78 was the fifth dedicated Life and MicrogravitySpacelab mission for theSpace Shuttle program, flown partly in preparation for theInternational Space Station project. The mission used theSpace ShuttleColumbia, which lifted off successfully fromKennedy Space Center'sLaunch Pad 39B on June 20, 1996. This marked the 78th flight of the Space Shuttle and 20th mission forColumbia.

Crew

[edit]
PositionAstronaut
CommanderUnited StatesTerence T. Henricks
Fourth and last spaceflight
PilotUnited StatesKevin R. Kregel
Second spaceflight
Mission Specialist 1United StatesRichard M. Linnehan
First spaceflight
Mission Specialist 2
Flight Engineer
United StatesSusan Helms
Third spaceflight
Mission Specialist 3United StatesCharles E. Brady Jr.
Only spaceflight
Payload Specialist 1FranceJean-Jacques Favier,CNES
Only spaceflight
Payload Specialist 2CanadaRobert Thirsk,CSA
First spaceflight

Backup crew

[edit]
PositionAstronaut
Payload Specialist 1SpainPedro Duque,ESA
First spaceflight
Payload Specialist 2ItalyLuca Urbani,ASI
First spaceflight

Mission objectives

[edit]
  • Research into the effects of long-duration spaceflight on human physiology in preparation for flights on the International Space Station.
  • 22 life science and microgravity experiments using the Orbiter's pressurized Life & Microgravity Spacelab module (LM2).
  • Tests into the use of the Orbiter'sReaction Control System jets to raise the altitude of orbiting satellites.

Crew seat assignments

[edit]
Seat[1]LaunchLanding
Seats 1–4 are on the flight deck.
Seats 5–7 are on the mid-deck.
1Henricks
2Kregel
3LinnehanBrady
4Helms
5BradyLinnehan
6Favier
7Thirsk

Mission highlights

[edit]
Launch of STS-78

During the 16-day, 21-hour mission, the crew ofColumbia assisted in the preparations for the International Space Station by studying the effects of long-duration spaceflight on the human body in readiness for ISS Expeditions, and also carried out experiments similar to those now being carried out on the orbital station.

Following launch,Columbia climbed to an altitude of 278 kilometers (173 mi) with an orbital inclination of 39° to theEarth'sequator to allow the seven-member flight crew to maintain the same sleep rhythms they were accustomed to on Earth and to reduce vibrations and directional forces that could have affected on-board microgravity experiments.

Once in orbit, the crew entered the 40 feet (12 m) long pressurized Spacelab module to commence over 40 science experiments to take place during the mission. Not only did these experiments make use of the module's laboratory, but also employed lockers in the middeck section of the orbiter. Thirteen of the experiments were dedicated to studying the effects of microgravity on the human body, whilst another six studied the behavior of fluids and metals in the almost weightless environment and the production of metallic alloys and protein crystals. The crew also carried out the first ever comprehensive study of sleep patterns in microgravity, research into bone and muscle loss in space, and in-flight fixes to problem hardware on the Bubble, Drop and Particle Unit (BDPU), designed to study fluid physics.

The mission also featured a test of a procedure that was later used during the secondHubble Space Telescope servicing mission to raise the telescope's altitude without damaging the satellite's solar arrays. During the test,Columbia's vernier Reaction Control System jets were gently pulsed to boost the Shuttle's altitude without jarring any of the mission payloads. The test was successful, and was later employed byDiscovery duringSTS-82, and was used multiple times to boost the orbit of the ISS when docked with an orbiter.

Mission anomaly

[edit]

Although the launch went without any issue, an issue was discovered with thesolid rocket boosters (SRBs) following their disassembly in June post-recovery. Analysis showed worrying damage to the field joints which was likely caused by hot gases. Failure of booster seals on the lower sections ofSpace ShuttleChallenger's right SRB ultimately caused theorbiter to break up mid-flight in 1986.[2][3] This time the issue did not compromise astronaut safety because the hot gas path traveled through the engines' field joints but not their capture joint (containing the infamous "O-ring" seals). Despite there being no issue with safety, it did raise questions about a newEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA)–mandated adhesive and cleaning fluid.[4][5]

Due to the issue,STS-79 which was meant to dock with theSpace StationMir and return astronautShannon Lucid, was delayed.[5][6] Options of returning Shannon on a Soyuz were considered,[citation needed] but never followed through as the Shuttle was considered safe and able to return Shannon.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"STS-78". Spacefacts. RetrievedApril 25, 2024.
  2. ^Helveston, John Paul (Fall 2019)."A case study on turning data into information".EMSE6574: Fall 2019. George Washington University. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  3. ^Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (June 6, 1986)."Chapter IV: The Cause of the Accident". Report of the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident.National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Report). Washington, D.C. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  4. ^Evans, Ben (June 18, 2014)."'Man, I'm Here': 20 Years Since the Record-Setting Mission of STS-78 (Part 1)".AmericaSpace. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  5. ^abBraukus, Michael (July 12, 1996)."NASA DELAYS LAUNCH OF SPACE SHUTTLE" (Press release). NASA. Archived fromthe original on February 23, 2010. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.
  6. ^"NASA-2 Shannon Lucid: Enduring Qualities".Shuttle-Mir: The U.S. and Russia Share History's Highest Stage (CD-ROM edition). NASA. September 2001. RetrievedJune 15, 2024.

External links

[edit]

Public Domain This article incorporatespublic domain material from websites or documents of theNational Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Flights
Status
Related
Completed
(crews)
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
Cancelled
Orbiters
  •  Failed mission
  •  Successful mission, but failed to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Launches are separated by dots ( • ), payloads by commas ( , ), multiple names for the same satellite by slashes ( / ).
Crewed flights are underlined. Launch failures are marked with the † sign. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are (enclosed in parentheses).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=STS-78&oldid=1322091016"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp