 | |
| Producer | Elsevier (Netherlands) |
|---|---|
| History | 10 November 2004; 20 years ago (2004-11-10) |
| Languages | 40 languages |
| Access | |
| Providers | Elsevier |
| Cost | Subscription |
| Coverage | |
| Disciplines |
|
| Record depth | 41,462 indexed titles (2021) |
| Format coverage | csv, BibText, ASCII, RIS |
| Temporal coverage | 1788–present |
| Geospatial coverage | Worldwide |
| No. of records | 82.4 million |
| Update frequency | daily |
| Links | |
| Website | www |
| Title list(s) | scopus.com/sources |
Scopus is a scientificabstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisherElsevier as a competitor to olderWeb of Science in 2004.[1] The ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvement in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price. Free databaseThe Lens completes the triad of main universal academic research databases.
Journals in Scopus are reviewed for sufficient quality each year according to four numerical measures:h-Index,CiteScore, SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) and SNIP (source normalized impact per paper). For this reason, the journals listed in Scopus are considered to meet the requirement forpeer review quality established by severalresearch grant agencies for their grant recipients and bydegree-accreditation boards in a number of countries.[2]
Scopus also allows patent searches from a dedicated patent database,Lexis-Nexis, albeit with limited functionality.[3] At present, Scopus indexes the following patent databases: United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); European Patent Office (EPO); Japan Patent Office (JPO): World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO); UK Intellectual Property Office.[4][5]
Comparing ease of use and coverage of Scopus and theWeb of Science (WOS), a 2006 study concluded that Scopus is "easy to navigate, even for the novice user. ... The ability to search both forward and backward from a particular citation would be very helpful to the researcher. The multidisciplinary aspect allows the researcher to easily search outside of his discipline" and "One advantage of WOS over Scopus is the depth of coverage, with the full WOS database going back to 1945 and Scopus going back to 1966. However, Scopus and WOS complement each other as neither resource is all-inclusive."[6] A small number of studies found ca. 80-90% overlap in coverage between WoS and Scopus for the period between 1990 and 2020.
In terms of thestructured query language search capabilities Scopus is somewhat more advanced thanWeb of Science: for example, WoS can perform only NEAR/n queries, Scopus can also do PRE/n queries.[7]
Also, when the same article was covered in Scopus and in theWeb of Science (WoS), its Scopus entry had a keyword ratio 3-5 of than its WoS counterpart, and the Scopus keywords are more focused on the specific article content, whereas WoS has more keywords related to the broad category of the article's subject. A larger number of narrow-targeted keywords allows Scopus users to find a larger number of relevant publications, while filtering out false positives. On the other hand, WoS exports (e.g. in theris format) thedoi numbers of cited articles, while Scopus exports the titles of cited articles. Also, Scopus allows exporting 20,000 references (e.g. as a ris file) at once, while WoS export is limited to 5,000 references at once.
Scopus provides chemical search byCAS number and by chemical name, while WoS does not have these features. On the other hand, WoS has chemical structure search, but only a small number of publications are actually indexed for chemical structure searches.SciFinder is the preferred option for chemical searches is all cases.
Scopus also offers author profiles which cover affiliations, number of publications and theirbibliographic data,references, and details on the number of citations each published document has received. It has alerting features that allow registered users to track changes to a profile and a facility to calculate authors'h-index. In 2016, a gratis website, Scopus CiteScore,[8] was introduced. It provides citation data for all 25,000+ active titles such as journals, conference proceedings and books in Scopus and provides an alternative to theimpact factor, ajournal-level indicator which may correlate negatively with reliability.[9]
Scopus IDs for individual authors can be integrated with the non-proprietary digital identifierORCID.[10]
In 2018, Scopus started embedding partial information about theopen access status of works, usingUnpaywall data.[11] However, Scopus'ris export files do not contain the information aboutOpen Access status.
SinceElsevier is the owner of Scopus and is also one of the main international publishers of scientific journals, an independent and international Scopus Content Selection and advisory board (CSAB) was established in 2009 to prevent a potential conflict of interest in the choice of journals to be included in the database and to maintain an open and transparent content coverage policy, regardless of publisher.[12] The board consists of scientists and subject librarians. Nevertheless, critique over a perceived conflict of interest has continued.[13]
CSAB team is responsible for inclusion and exclusion of different titles on Scopus. The list of journals and books indexed in Scopus is updated 2 to 3 times per year. Each year Scopus receives around 3,500 submissions for new titles to be included and accepts approximately 25% of them.[14] The re-evaluation policy is based on four criteria of Publication Concern, Under Performance, Outlier Performance and Continuous curation. Between 2004 and 2020, Scopus included 46,534[15] and excluded 688 titles[16] Between 2016 and 2023, the CSAB has re-evaluated 990 titles published by 539 different publishers, leading to 536 titles discontinued for indexing.[17] In 2024 Scopus covered around 28,000 active journals and nearly 300,000 books.
Nevertheless, research continues to show the inclusion ofpredatory journals.[18][19]
While marketed as a global point of reference, Scopus and WoS have been characterised as "structurally biased against research produced in non-Western countries, non-English language research, and research from the arts, humanities, and social sciences".[20]
Scopus AI, launched by Elsevier in January 2024, is a generative AI tool designed to revolutionize research by leveraging the world's largest database of curated scientific literature. This functionality aims to assist researchers and institutions in obtaining fast, accurate summaries and insights to enhance research collaboration and societal impact.[21]
According to Maxim Khan, then the VP of Analytics, Products and Data Platform at Elsevier, Scopus AI provides the following benefits:
CiteScore (CS) of anacademic journal is ameasure reflecting the yearly average number ofcitations to recent articles published in that journal. It is produced byElsevier, based on the citations recorded in the Scopus database. Absoluterankings andpercentile ranks are also reported for each journal in a given subject area.[23]
This journal evaluation metric was launched in December 2016 as an alternative to theJournal Citation Reports (JCR)impact factor (IF), calculated byClarivate. CiteScore is based on the citations collected for articles published in the preceding four years, instead of two or five in the JCR IF. This enhanced methodology was introduced with the release of CiteScore 2019 in June 2020. At launch, CiteScore's neutrality was questioned by bibliometrics experts likeCarl Bergstrom, who found it appeared to favour Elsevier's titles over Nature's.[24]
| Elsevier |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexisNexis |
| ||||||
| RX |
| ||||||
