| Firebee | |
|---|---|
 Ryan Model 124 / BQM-34A Firebee | |
| General information | |
| Type | Unmanned aerial vehicle /Aerial target |
| Manufacturer | Ryan Aeronautical |
| Primary users | United States Air Force |
| History | |
| Introduction date | 1952 |
| First flight | 1951 |
| Developed into | Ryan Model 147 |
TheRyan Firebee is a series oftarget drones developed by theRyan Aeronautical Company beginning in 1951. It was one of the firstjet-propelled drones, and remains one of the most widely used target drones ever built.
.jpg)
The Firebee I was the result of a 1948U.S. Air Force request and contract to Ryan for a jet-powered gunnery target. The first flight of theXQ-2 Firebee prototype took place in early 1951. The drone featured swept flight surfaces and a circular nose inlet. The initial models had distinctive "arrowhead" shaped endplates on the tailplane. The Firebee could beair-launched from a specially modified launch aircraft (Douglas A-26 Invader was first to be used for this purpose), or ground-launched with a singleRATObooster.[1]
Following successful evaluation the target was ordered into production for the USAF as theQ-2A, powered by aContinental J69-T-19B turbojet engine with 1,060pounds-force (4.7 kN) of thrust. The Air Force then obtained small numbers of aQ-2B with a more powerful engine for high-altitude performance.
TheU.S. Navy bought the Firebee as theKDA-1 which was mostly similar to the Q-2A, differing mainly in its powerplant: aFairchild J44-R-20B turbojet with 1,000 lbf (4.4 kN) thrust. The KDA-1 and Q-2A could be distinguished by the KDA-1's protruding inlet centerbody and wider, steeply raked inlet. TheU.S. Army also obtained a KDA-1 version designated theXM21 that differed only in minor details.
The Navy obtained several improved variants of the KDA-1, including theXKDA-2 andXKDA-3 which were not built in quantity, and theKDA-4, which was the main production version for the series. These variants were difficult to distinguish from the KDA-1, differing mainly in successively uprated J44 engines and other minor changes.
The RCAF purchased 30 KDA-4 Firebees,[2] which were flown from two specially convertedAvro Lancaster Mk.10DC Drone Carriers[3] from 1956 to 1961.[4] These were used to test the weapons system for theAvro Canada CF-100 andAvro Canada CF-105 Arrow.[2] The cancellation of the latter brought the drone program to an end as it was no longer needed for theSparrow II missile that would have armed the Arrow.[5]
In the late 1950s, theUSAF awarded Ryan a contract for a substantially improved "second generation" Firebee, theModel 124, originally with the designationQ-2C. The initial prototype performed its first flight in late 1958 and went into production in 1960. In 1963, it was redesignated theBQM-34A. The old first-generation KDA-1 and KDA-4 targets then still flying with the Navy were (somewhat confusingly) given the respective redesignationsAQM-34B andAQM-34C.
The BQM-34A emerged as the Firebee as it is recognized today, with a bigger airframe, longer wings, and a particular "chin"-type inlet under a pointed nose (in contrast to the circular intake of the first-generation Firebees). It was powered by a Continental J69-T-29A turbojet, a copy of the improved Turbomeca Gourdon derivative of the Marbore, with 1,700 lbf (7.6 kN) thrust. The U.S. Navy also adopted the BQM-34A, while the Army obtained a ground-launched version designatedMQM-34D with longer wings and a heavier JATO booster.
A feature of the second-generation Firebee is that some photographs show it to with triangular endplates on thetailplane, while others show no endplates but feature aventral fin under the tail, and still others have neither endplates nor ventral fin. Since most modern photographs of Firebees show the ventral fin, this may have been due to production changes or later refits (reference sources are unclear on this).[citation needed]
In 1960 the firststealth technology development program was initiated by USAF, by reducing theradar cross-section of a Q-2C drone. This was achieved through specially designed screens over the air intake,radiation-absorbent material on the fuselage and a special radar-absorbing paint.[6]
During the 1970s the U.S. Army updated some of their MQM-34Ds for use as targets forFIM-92 Stinger man-portableSAMs, refitting these drones with aGeneral Electric J85-GE-7 turbojet of 10.9 kN (2,500 lbf) thrust which were salvaged from oldADM-20 Quail decoys. The modified MQM-34Ds featured a revised forward fuselage with a circular nose intake that gave them an appearance similar to that of a "stretched" first-generation Q-2A target, and were given the designation of MQM-34D Mod II.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Navy upgraded the avionics in their BQM-34As, which were then designatedBQM-34S. In the early 1980s the Navy also began to refit these with the uprated J69-T-41A engine of 1,920 lbf (8.5 kN) thrust. The Air Force began to update their BQM-34As with improved avionics and also the J85-GE-7 engine which was fitted without major changes in the drone's airframe; the improved USAF variants retained their existing BQM-34A designation.
BQM-34A production ended in 1982, but the production line was reopened in 1986 to produce more BQM-34S targets. Air Force and Navy Firebees have received further upgrades since that time, most refitted beginning in 1989 with the improved J85-GE-100 engine (also with 2,450 lbf (10.9 kN) thrust) as well as modernized avionics. In the late 1990s some Firebees were also fitted withGPS navigation receivers.
The Firebee's main air launch platform is theLockheed DC-130 drone controller aircraft, which can carry four drones on underwing pylons. The Firebee is typicallysnatched out of the air by a recovery aircraft that sweeps up the drone's parachute, simplifying recovery and reducing damage to the target from ground impact. During early test flights, theFairchild C-119 was used for this purpose, while on operational flights theSikorsky SH-3 Sea King was the primary recovery platform.[7] The drone canfloat for an extended period of time if it ditches in water.
The target drone can be fitted with various control systems, some that give itfighter-like maneuverability. It is also equipped with scoring and countermeasures systems, radar enhancement devices to allow it to emulate a wide range of combat aircraft, and wingtip thermal flares which cause heat-seeking missiles to aim for wing tips rather than the engine exhaust, sparing the target. It can also tow a target sleeve or other types of towed targets.
Teledyne Ryan also developed a third-generationModel 166 Firebee II with supersonic performance, with the U.S. Navy awarding a development contract to the company in 1965. Initial flight was in 1968. Although its external appearance was substantially different from that of the original Firebee, the Firebee II used the same engine and control systems, and confusingly retained the BQM-34 designation. The Navy version was theBQM-34E, while the Air Force version was theBQM-34F.
The Air Force BQM-34F was slightly heavier, with an additional parachute for midair recovery by helicopter snatch. The Navy BQM-34E was updated with improved avionics in the mid-1970s, with the upgrade redesignatedBQM-34T.
The Firebee II was a sleek dart of an aircraft with swept tailplane and swept mid-body wings. It was powered by a Teledyne CAE J69-T-6 turbojet with 1,840 lbf (8.2 kN) thrust, with the intake on the belly forward of the wings and the exhaust under the tailfins. Internal fuel capacity was small, but the target could be fitted with a conformal external tank that was dropped before boosting to supersonic speeds. Flight operations were performed much as they are for the Firebee I, with launch from aDC-130. It was also ground launched using RATO for use as a target. It had a maximum speed of Mach 1.5, dashing for 4 minutes at 60,000 feet (18,000 m) and had a subsonic endurance of 75 minutes, giving it a range of approximately 570 miles (920 km).[8]
In all 286 Firebee IIs were built, a tiny quantity compared to the number of Firebee Is manufactured. The Firebee II is now out of service, while the Firebee I continues in operation and has been in service for over 50 years, making it one of the longest-lived aircraft in the U.S. military inventory.
The Firebee target vehicle's success led toRyan being asked to develop areconnaissance version, which became the highly successfulModel 147 Fire Fly and Lightning Bug series; these saw extensive service in theVietnam War.
The Firebee target drone has proven successful and remains in operation with the U.S. Navy and Air Force. Firebees have also served with theCanadian Armed Forces andJapan Self-Defense Forces, with Japanese Firebees built byFuji Heavy Industries. A small number were also supplied to NATO programs. More than 7,000 Firebees have been built, with 1,280 of these being first generation variants.
In the late 1990sTeledyne Ryan, using company funds, configured two Firebees with cameras and communications electronics to provide real-time intelligence for battlefield target acquisition anddamage assessment. These two UAVs, named Argus, were used in a USAF "Green Flag" exercise to relay images in real time from the test range in Nevada to stations in Florida.
FiveBQM-34-53 Extended Range Firebees were also used to laychaff corridors during the2003 invasion of Iraq. The drones were modernized byNorthrop Grumman in a fast-response program earlier that year, being fitted with chaff dispensers and other improvements includingGPS-based programmable waypoint guidance systems (which may or not have been added by the upgrade program). These Firebees were delivered for service in charcoal-black paint schemes. Only oneDC-130 drone launcher aircraft remained in theU.S. military's inventory at the time and was not immediately operational due to a malfunction. Two Firebees were ground-launched on the first night of the operation; the other three were air-launched by the DC-130 on the second night of the operation. The drones flew until they ran out of fuel and crashed. Iraqi TV broadcast footage of the wrecks while describing them as piloted aircraft.
The last Firebee was delivered in 2002.[citation needed]
Data from Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1982–83[9]
General characteristics
Performance
