Aroyal court, often called simply acourt when the royal context is clear, is an extendedroyal household in amonarchy, including all those who would regularly attend on amonarch, or another central figure. Hence, the wordcourt may also be applied to thecoterie of a senior member of thenobility. Royal courts may have their seat in a designated place, several specific places, or be a mobile,itinerant court.
In the largest courts, the royal households, many thousands of individuals constituted the court. Thesecourtiers included the monarch or noble'scamarilla andretinue, household, nobility,clergy, those withcourt appointments,bodyguards, and may also include emissaries from other kingdoms or visitors to the court.Foreign princes and foreign nobility inexile may also seek refuge at a court.
Near Eastern andFar Eastern courts often included theharem andconcubines as well aseunuchs who fulfilled a variety of functions. At times, the harem was walled off and separate from the rest of the residence of the monarch. InAsia, concubines were often a more visible part of the court. Lower rankingservants and bodyguards were not properly called courtiers, though they might be included as part of the court or royal household in the broadest definition. Entertainers and others may have been counted as part of the court.
Aroyal household is the highest-ranking example ofpatronage. Aregent orviceroy may hold court during the minority or absence of the hereditary ruler, and even an electedhead of state may develop a court-like entourage of unofficial, personally-chosen advisers and "companions". The French wordcompagnon and its English derivation "companion" literally mean a "sharer of the bread" at table, and a court is an extension of the great individual's household. Wherever members of the household and bureaucrats of the administration overlap in personnel, it is reasonable to speak of a "court", for example inAchaemenid Persia,Ming China,Norman Sicily, thepapacy before 1870 (see:papal household), and theAustro-Hungarian Empire. A group of individuals dependent on the patronage of a great man, classically in ancient Rome, forms part of the system of "clientage" that is discussed undervassal.
Individual rulers differed greatly in tastes and interests, as well as in political skills and in constitutional situations. Accordingly, some founded elaborate courts based on newpalaces, only to have their successors retreat to remotecastles or to practical administrative centers. Personal retreats might arise far away from official court centres.
The earliest developed courts were probably in theAkkadian Empire,Ancient Egypt, andShang dynasty. However, there is evidence of courts as described in theNeo-Assyrian Empire[2] andZhou dynasty.[3] Two of the earliest titles referring to the concept of a courtier were likely theša rēsi andmazzāz pāni of the Neo-Assyrian Empire.[4] In Ancient Egypt, there is a title translated ashigh steward or great overseer of the house.[5] The royal courts influenced by the court of the Neo-Assyrian Empire such as those of theMedian Empire and theAchaemenid Empire would also have identifiable developed courts withcourt appointments and other features associated with later courts.[6]
One of the series of the reliefs of the Persian and Median dignitaries atApadana stairs ofPersepolis, all with weapons, but in a casual air—a rare depiction of an ancient court ceremony.[7]
The imperial court of the Achaemenid Empire atPersepolis andPasargadae is the earliest identifiable complex court with all of the definitive features of a royal court such as a household,court appointments, courtiers, and court ceremony.[8] ThoughAlexander the Great had an entourage and the rudimentary elements of a court, it was not until after he conquered Persia that he took many of the more complex Achaemenid court customs back to theKingdom of Macedonia, developing a royal court that would later influence the courts ofHellenistic Greece and theRoman Empire.[9]
TheSasanian Empire adopting and developing the earlier court culture and customs of the Achaemenid Empire would also influence again the development of the complex court and court customs of the Roman Empire andByzantine Empire.[10]
Theimperial court of the Byzantine Empire atConstantinople would eventually contain at least a thousand courtiers.[11] The court's systems became prevalent in other courts such as those in theBalkan states, theOttoman Empire, andRussia.[12]Byzantinism is a term that was coined for this spread of the Byzantine system in the 19th century.[13]
InWestern Europe, consolidation of power of local magnates and of kings in fixed administrative centres from the mid-13th century led to the creation of a distinct court culture that was the centre of intellectual and artistic patronage rivaling theabbots andbishops, in addition to its role as the apex of a rudimentary political bureaucracy that rivaled the courts of counts and dukes. The dynamics of hierarchy welded the court cultures together. Many early courts in Western Europe wereitinerant courts that traveled from place to place.
Local courts proliferated in the splintered polities ofmedieval Europe and remained inearly modern times in Germany and in Italy. Such courts became known for intrigue andpower politics; some also gained prominence as centres and collective patrons ofart andculture. In medieval Spain (Castile), provincial courts were created. Minor noblemen andburguesie allied to create a system to oppose the monarchy on many policy issues. They were called "las Cortes de Castilla". These courts are the root of the current Spanishcongress andsenate.
The courts ofValois Burgundy and theKingdom of Portugal were particularly influential over the development of court culture and pageantry in Europe. The court ofPhilip the Good,Duke of Burgundy was considered one of the most splendid in Europe and would influence the development of court life later on for all of France and Europe.[14] Later,Aliénor de Poitiers of the Burgundian court would write one of the seminal books on court etiquette,Les honneurs de la cour (Honours of the Court).
Aspolitical executive functions are assumed bydemocratic orrepublican institutions, the function of noble courts is reduced once more to that of noble households, concentrating on personal service to the household head,ceremonial and perhaps some residual politico-advisory functions. Ifrepublican zeal has banished an area's erstwhile rulingnobility, courts may survive inexile. Traces of royal court practices remain in present-day institutions like privy councils and governmental cabinets.
"Triboulet", illustration for the theater play "Le Roi S'Amuse" ("The King Takes His Amusement") byVictor Hugo. Gravure by J. A. Beaucé (1818–1875) and Georges Rouget (1781–1869).
Court officials or office-bearers (one type ofcourtier) derived their positions and retained their titles from their original duties within the courtly household. With time, such duties often became archaic. However, titles survived involving the ghosts of arcane duties. These styles generally dated back to the days when a noble household had practical and mundane concerns as well as high politics and culture. Suchcourt appointments each have their own histories. They might include but are not limited to:
Earlier courts in medieval Western Europe wereitinerant courts, but courts were often held in a fixed place. One of the criteria of Norbert Elias' concept of a court society is that it existed in space.[clarification needed][15][page needed] TheGerman wordHof, meaning an enclosedcourtyard, can also apply to a rural farmstead with outbuildings and walls forming the perimeter. It has also been used for thepalatial seat where the court was held. ThusHof or "court" can become transferred to the building itself. For example, the grand residenceHampton Court Palace on theRiver Thames above London was whereThomas Wolsey held court as Catholic cardinal (built after the Italian ideal for a cardinal's palace) until his fall and its confiscation byHenry VIII.William III andMary II also held court there, 1689–94. Though it is built round two main courts, the structure itself is no longer the seat of a court in the sense of this article.
As an example, ambassadors to the United Kingdom are still accredited to theCourt of St. James's, and courtiers of the monarchy may still have offices inSt James's Palace, London. The present monarch, however, holds court atBuckingham Palace, where dignitaries are received.
The royal courts in theIslamic world were mostly run by rulers, but there were the exceptions of important elite families such asBarmakids andNizams who established their own minor courts, enabling them to encourage arts and improve the empire even if the ruling king was useless.
^Brosius, Maria (2007). "New out of old? Court and court ceremonies in Achaemenid Persia". In Spawforth, A. J. S. (ed.).The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–57.ISBN978-0-521-87448-9.
^Spawforth, Tony (2007). "The court of Alexander the Great between Europe and Asia". In Spawforth, A. J. S. (ed.).The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–97.ISBN978-0-521-87448-9.
^Canepa, Matthew (2 February 2010).The Two Eyes of the Earth: Art and Ritual of Kingship between Rome and Sasanian Iran. University of California Press.ISBN978-0520257276.
^Angelov, Dimiter G. (2003). "Byzantinism: The Imaginary and Real Heritage of Byzantium in Southeastern Europe".New approaches to Balkan studies. Brassey's. pp. 3, 11.ISBN1574887246.
^Angelov, Dimiter G. (2003). "Byzantinism: The Imaginary and Real Heritage of Byzantium in Southeastern Europe".New approaches to Balkan studies. Brassey's. p. 8.ISBN1574887246.
^Oosterwijk, A Van (1 February 2013).Staging the Court of Burgundy (Studies in Medieval and Early Renaissance Art History). Brepols Publishers.ISBN978-1905375820.
Elias, Norbert (1983) [1969].The Court Society [Die höfische Gesellschaft]. trans. Edmund Jephcott. Oxford.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) On the sociology of the court, originally completed in 1939.
Adamson, John (ed.).The Princely Courts of Europe, 1500–1750. Ritual, Politics and Culture under the Ancien Régime, 1500–1750. London, 1999.
Asch, Ronald G., and Adolf M. Birke, eds.Princes, Patronage and the Nobility: The Court at the Beginning of the Modern Age, c.1450–1650. London and Oxford, 1991.
Birke, A., and R. Asch (eds.).Courts, Patronage and the Nobility at the Beginning of the Modern Period, 1450–1650. 1991.
Burke, Peter.The Fabrication of Louis XIV. New Haven and London, 1992.
Charles-Edwards, T.M. et al.The Welsh king and his court. Cardiff, 2000.
Dickens, A.G. (ed.).The Courts of Europe: Politics, Patronage and Royalty, 1400–1800. 1977. Emphasis on patronage.
Duindam, Jeroen.Myths of Power: Norbert Elias and the Early Modern European Court. Amsterdam, 1995. Critique of Elias. English translation of dissertationMacht en Mythe (1992).
Duindam, Jeroen.Vienna and Versailles. The courts of Europe's Dynastic Rivals 1550–1780. Cambridge, 2003.