Theroot microbiome (also called rhizosphere microbiome) is the dynamiccommunity ofmicroorganisms associated with plantroots.[1] Because they are rich in a variety of carbon compounds, plant roots provide unique environments for a diverse assemblage of soil microorganisms, includingbacteria,fungi, andarchaea. The microbial communities inside the root and in therhizosphere are distinct from each other,[2] and from the microbial communities of bulksoil,[3] although there is some overlap inspecies composition.
Different microorganisms, both beneficial and harmful, affect the development and physiology of plants. Beneficial microorganisms include bacteria that fix nitrogen, various microbes that promote plant growth, mycorrhizal fungi, mycoparasitic fungi, protozoa, and certain biocontrol microorganisms.[1] Pathogenic microorganisms can also include certain bacteria, fungi, and nematodes that can colonize the rhizosphere. Pathogens are able to compete with protective microbes and break through innate plant defense mechanisms.[1] Some pathogenic bacteria that can be carried over to humans, such asSalmonella,enterohaemorhagicEscherichia coli,Burkholderia cenocepacia,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, andStenotrophomonas maltophilia, can also be detected in root microbiomes and other plant tissues.[1]
Root microbiota affect planthostfitness andproductivity in a variety of ways. Members of the root microbiome benefit from plant sugars or other carbon rich molecules. Individual members of the root microbiome may behave differently in association with different plant hosts,[4] or may change the nature of their interaction (along themutualist-parasite continuum) within a single host as environmental conditions or host health change.[5]
Despite the potential importance of the root microbiome forplants andecosystems, our understanding of how root microbial communities are assembled is in its infancy.[6][7] This is in part because, until recent advances insequencing technologies, root microbes were difficult to study due to highspecies diversity, the large number ofcryptic species, and the fact that most species have yet to be retrieved inculture.[8] Evidence suggests bothbiotic (such as host identity and plant neighbor) andabiotic (such assoil structure and nutrient availability) factors affect community composition.[9][10][11][12][13]
Sunlight and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere are absorbed by the leaves in the plant and converted to fixed carbon. This carbon travels down into the roots of the plant, where some travels back up to the leaves. The fixed carbon traveling to the root is radiated outward into the surrounding soil where microbes use it as food for growth. In return, microbes attach to the plant root where it improves the roots access to nutrients and its resistance to environmental stress and pathogens. In specific plant/root symbiotic relationships, the plant root secretes flavonoids into the soil which is sensed by microbes, where these microbes release nod factors to the plant root which promotes the infection of the plant root. These unique microbes carry out nitrogen fixation in root nodules, which supplies nutrients to the plant.
Root symbionts may improve their host's access tonutrients,[14][15][16] produceplant-growth regulators,[17] improveenvironmental stress tolerance of their host,[18][19][20] induce hostdefenses andsystemic resistance against pests or pathogens,[21][22][23] or bepathogenic.[24] Parasites consume carbon from the plant without providing any benefit or providing insufficient benefit relative to their carbon consumption, thereby compromising host fitness. Symbionts may be biotrophic (subsisting off of living tissue) or necrotrophic (subsisting off of dead tissue).
While some microbes may be purelymutualistic orparasitic, many may behave differently depending on the host species with which it is associated, environmental conditions, and host health.[4] A host's immune response controls symbiont infection and growth rates.[4] If a host's immune response is not able to control a particular microbial species, or if host immunity is compromised, the microbe-plant relationship will likely reside somewhere nearer the parasitic side of the mutualist-parasite continuum. Similarly, high nutrients can push some microbes into parasitic behavior, encouraging unchecked growth at a time when symbionts are no longer needed to aid with nutrient acquisition.[4]
Roots are colonized byfungi,bacteria, andarchaea. Because they aremulticellular, fungi can extendhyphae from nutrient exchange organs within host cells into the surrounding rhizosphere and bulk soil. Fungi that extend beyond the root surface and engage in nutrient-carbon exchange with the plant host are commonly considered to bemycorrhizal, but external hyphae can also include otherendophytic fungi. Mycorrhizal fungi can extend a great distance into bulk soil,[5] thereby increasing the root system's reach and surface area, enabling mycorrhizal fungi to acquire a large percentage of its host plant's nutrients. In some ecosystems, up to 80% of plant nitrogen and 90% of plant phosphorus is acquired bymycorrhizal fungi.[14] In return, plants may allocate ~20–40% of their carbon to mycorrhizae.[25]
Mycorrhizal (from Greek) literally means "fungus roots" and defines symbiotic interaction between plants and fungi. Fungi are important for decomposing and recycling organic material. However, the boundaries between the pathogenic and symbiotic lifestyles of fungi are not always clear-cut. Most of the time, the association is symbiotic, with the fungus improving nutrient and water acquisition or increasing stress tolerance for the plant and benefiting from the carbohydrates produced by the plant in return.[26] Mycorrhizae include a wide variety of root-fungi interactions characterized by the mode of colonization. Essentially all plants form mycorrhizal associations, and there is evidence that some mycorrhizae transport carbon and other nutrients not only from soil to plant, but also between different plants in a landscape.[5] The main groups includeectomycorrhizae,arbuscular mycorrhizae,ericoid mycorrhizae,orchid mycorrhizae, andmonotropoid mycorrhizae. Monotropoid mycorrhizae are associated with plants in themonotropaceae, which lackchlorophyll. ManyOrchids are also achlorophyllous for at least part of their life cycle. Thus, these mycorrhizal-plant relationships are unique because the fungus provides the host with carbon and other nutrients, often by parasitizing other plants.[5] Achlorophyllous plants forming these types of mycorrhizal associations are calledmycoheterotrophs.
Endophytes grow inside plant tissue—roots, stems, leaves—mostly symptomless. However, when plants age, they can become slightly pathogenic.[26] They may colonize inter-cellular spaces, the root cells themselves, or both.Rhizobia anddark septate endophytes (which producemelanin, anantioxidant that may provide resilience against a variety of environmental stresses[27]) are examples.
The zone of soil surrounding the roots is rich in nutrients released by plants and is, therefore, an attractive growth medium for both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria. Root associated beneficial bacteria promote plant growth and provide protection from pathogens. They are mostlyrhizobacteria that belong toPseudomonadota andBacillota, with many examples fromPseudomonas andBacillus genera.[1]Rhizobium species colonize legume roots forming nodule structures. In response to root exudates, rhizobia produceNod signalling factors that are recognized by legumes and induce the formation of nodules on plant roots.[28] Within these structures,Rhizobium fix atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia that is then used by the plant. In turn, plants provide the bacteria with a carbon source to energize the nitrogen fixation.[29][30] In addition to nitrogen fixation,Azospirillum species promote plant growth through the production of growthphytohormones (auxins,cytokinins,gibberellins). Due to these phytohormones, root hairs expand to occupy a larger area and better acquire water and nutrients.[29][31] Pathogenic bacteria that infect plants infect plant roots are most commonly fromPectobacterium,Ralstonia,Dickeya andAgrobacterium genera. Among the most notorious arePectobacterium carotovorum,Pectobacterium atrosepticum,Ralstonia solanacearum,Dickeya dadanthi,Dickeya solani, andAgrobacterium tumefaciens.
Bacteria attach to roots in a biphasic mechanism with two steps—first weak, non-specific binding, then a strong irreversible residence phase. Both beneficial and pathogenic bacteria attach in this fashion. Bacteria can stay attached to the outer surface or colonize the inner root.[29] Primary attachment is governed by chemical forces or extracellular structures such as pili orflagella. Secondary attachment is mainly characterized by the synthesis ofcellulose, extracellular fibrils, and specific attachment factors such as surface proteins that help bacteria aggregate and form colonies.[29]
The presence and relative abundance of archaea in various environments suggest that they likely play an important role in the root microbiome.[32] Archaea have been found to promote plant growth and development, provide stress tolerance, improve nutrient uptake, and protect against pathogens.[32][36][43] For example,Arabidopsis thaliana colonized with an ammonia-oxidizing soil archaea,Nitrosocosmicus oleophilius, exhibited increased shoot weight, photosynthetic activity, and immune response.[43]
Examination of microbial communities in soil and roots has identified archaeal organisms and genes with functions similar to that ofbacteria andfungi, such asauxin synthesis, protection againstabiotic stress, andnitrogen fixation.[36][44] In some cases, key genes for plant growth and development, such asmetabolism andcell wall synthesis, are more prevalent in archaea than bacteria.[36]
Archaeal presence in the root microbiome can also be affected by plant hosts, which can change the diversity, presence, and health of archaeal communities.[8][38][45]
There is an ongoing debate regarding what mechanisms are responsible for assembling individual microbes intocommunities. There are two primary competing hypotheses. One is that "everything is everywhere, but the environment selects," meaningbiotic andabiotic factors pose the only constraints, throughnatural selection, to which microbes colonize whatenvironments. This is called theniche hypothesis. Its counterpart is the hypothesis that neutral processes, such as distance and geographic barriers todispersal, control microbial community assembly whentaxa are equallyfit within an environment. In this hypothesis, differences between individual taxa in modes and reach of dispersal explain the differences in microbial communities of different environments.[7] Most likely, both natural selection and neutral processes affect microbial community assembly, though certain microbial taxa may be more restricted by one process or the other depending on their physiological restrictions and mode of dispersion.[7]
Microbial dispersal mechanisms include wind, water, and hitchhiking on more mobile macrobes. Microbial dispersion is difficult to study, and little is known about its effect on microbial community assembly relative to the effect of abiotic and biotic assembly mechanisms,[7] particularly in roots. For this reason, only assembly mechanisms that fit within the niche hypothesis are discussed below.
The taxa within root microbial communities seem to be partly drawn from the surrounding soil, though the relative abundance of various taxa may differ greatly from those found in bulk soil due to uniqueniches in the root and rhizosphere.[8]
Recent evidence shows that seed-transmitted bacteria contribute significantly to the composition of the root microbiome. In wheat, they can dominate over soil-derived microbes and structure the rhizosphere community through niche partitioning and facilitation.[46] These bacteria possess traits that allow them to degrade root-derived compounds and support the growth of other microbes, highlighting the importance of seed microbiota in microbial succession and community assembly within the rhizosphere.
Different parts of the root are associated with different microbial communities. For example, fine roots, root tips, and the main root are all associated with different communities,[8][47] and the rhizosphere, root surface, and root tissue are all associated with different communities,[2][3] likely due to the unique chemistry and nutrient status of each of these regions, which differ from those of the bulk soil.[48] For instance, root exudates provide specific carbon compounds that are enriched in the rhizosphere, selecting for microbial taxa with matching metabolic traits and shaping root-associated communities accordingly.[48] Additionally, different plant species, and even different cultivars, harbor different microbial communities,[9][10][47] probably due to host specific immune responses[4] and differences in carbon root exudates.[49] Host age affects root microbial community composition, likely for similar reasons as host identity.[8] The identity of neighboring vegetation has also been shown to impact a host plant's root microbial community composition.[9][10][50][51]
Abiotic mechanisms also affect root microbial community assembly[9][10][11][12][13] because individual taxa have different optima along variousenvironmental gradients, such as nutrient concentrations, pH, moisture, temperature, etc. In addition to chemical and climatic factors, soil structure and disturbance impact root biotic assembly.[8]
The root microbiome is dynamic and fluid within the constraints imposed by the biotic and abiotic environment. As inmacroecological systems, the historical trajectory of the microbiotic community may partially determine the present and future community. Due to antagonistic and mutualistic interactions between microbial taxa, the taxa colonizing a root at any given moment could be expected to influence which new taxa are acquired, and therefore how the community responds to changes in the host or environment.[7] While the effect of initial community on microbialsuccession has been studied in various environmental samples,human microbiome, and laboratory settings, it has yet to be studied in roots.
^abcdefgBuée M, De Boer W, Martin F, van Overbeek L, Jurkevitch E (2009). "The rhizosphere zoo: An overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms, including phages, bacteria, archaea, and fungi, and of some of their structuring factors".Plant and Soil.321 (1–2):189–212.Bibcode:2009PlSoi.321..189B.doi:10.1007/s11104-009-9991-3.S2CID45768977.
^abcdDean SL, Farrer EC, Taylor DL, Porras-Alfaro A, Suding KN, Sinsabaugh RL (March 2014). "Nitrogen deposition alters plant-fungal relationships: linking belowground dynamics to aboveground vegetation change".Molecular Ecology.23 (6):1364–78.Bibcode:2014MolEc..23.1364D.doi:10.1111/mec.12541.PMID24112704.S2CID15540300.
^abcdDean SL, Farrer EC, Porras-Alfaro A, Suding KN, Sinsabaugh RL (2014). "Assembly of root-associated bacteria communities: interactions between abiotic and biotic factors".Environmental Microbiology Reports.7 (1):102–110.doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12194.PMID25870878.
^abEgerton-Warburton, Louise M.; Johnson, Nancy Collins; Allen, Edith B. (November 2007). "Mycorrhizal Community Dynamics following Nitrogen Fertilization: A Cross-Site Test in Five Grasslands".Ecological Monographs.77 (4):527–44.Bibcode:2007EcoM...77..527E.doi:10.1890/06-1772.1.JSTOR27646105.
^abTedersoo L, Bahram M, Toots M, Diédhiou AG, Henkel TW, Kjøller R, Morris MH, Nara K, Nouhra E, Peay KG, Põlme S, Ryberg M, Smith ME, Kõljalg U (September 2012). "Towards global patterns in the diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi".Molecular Ecology.21 (17):4160–70.Bibcode:2012MolEc..21.4160T.doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05602.x.hdl:11336/18182.PMID22568722.
^Marschner P, Crowley D, Rengel Z (2011). "Rhizosphere interactions between microorganisms and plants govern iron and phosphorus acquisition along the root axis – model and research methods".Soil Biology and Biochemistry.43 (5):883–94.Bibcode:2011SBiBi..43..883M.doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.005.
^Latch, Garrick C.M. (1993). "Physiological interactions of endophytic fungi and their hosts. Biotic stress tolerance imparted to grasses by endophytes".Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.44 (1–4):143–56.Bibcode:1993AgEE...44..143L.doi:10.1016/0167-8809(93)90043-O.
^abcLiu, Yin; Li, Hong; Liu, Qun Fang; Li, Yan Hong (2015-03-05). "Archaeal communities associated with roots of the common reed (Phragmites australis) in Beijing Cuihu Wetland".World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.31 (5):823–832.doi:10.1007/s11274-015-1836-z.ISSN0959-3993.PMID25739566.S2CID19039050.
^abMarschner P, Yang CH, Lieberei R, Crowley DE (2001). "Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere".Soil Biology and Biochemistry.33 (11):1437–45.Bibcode:2001SBiBi..33.1437M.doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00052-9.
^Meinhardt KA, Gehring CA (March 2012). "Disrupting mycorrhizal mutualisms: a potential mechanism by which exotic tamarisk outcompetes native cottonwoods".Ecological Applications.22 (2):532–49.Bibcode:2012EcoAp..22..532M.doi:10.1890/11-1247.1.PMID22611852.