| Crisis of the Third Century | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 The divided Empire in 271 AD | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| Belligerents | ||||||||||
| Roman Empire[a] | Roman Breakaways | Sasanian Empire Germanic Tribes | ||||||||
| Commanders and leaders | ||||||||||
| Shapur I Cniva † | ||||||||||
TheCrisis of the Third Century, also known as theMilitary Anarchy[1] or theImperial Crisis, was a period inRoman history during which theRoman Empire nearly collapsed under the combined pressure of repeatedforeign invasions,civil wars andeconomic disintegration. At the height of the crisis, the Roman state split into three distinct and competing polities. The period is usually dated between the death ofSeverus Alexander (235) and accession ofDiocletian (284).
The crisis began in 235 with theassassination of Emperor Severus Alexander by his own troops. During the following years, the empire sawbarbarian invasions andmigrations into Roman territory, civil wars,peasant rebellions andpolitical instability, with multipleusurpers competing for power. This led to thedebasement ofcurrency and a breakdown in bothtrade networks andeconomic productivity, with thePlague of Cyprian contributing to the disorder. Roman armies became more reliant over time on the growing influence of the barbarian mercenaries known asfoederati. Roman commanders in the field, although nominally loyal to the state, became increasingly independent of Rome's central authority.
During the crisis, there were at least 26 claimants to the title of emperor, mostly prominentRoman generals, who assumed imperial power over all or part of the empire. The same number of men became accepted by theRoman Senate as emperor during this period and so became legitimate emperors. By 268, the empire had split into three competing states: theGallic Empire (including theRoman provinces ofGaul,Britannia and, briefly,Hispania); thePalmyrene Empire (including the eastern provinces ofSyria Palaestina andAegyptus); and, between them, the Italian-centered Roman Empire proper.
The reign ofAurelian (270–275) marked a turning point in the crisis period. Aurelian successfully reunited the empire by defeating the two breakaway states, and carried out a series of reforms which helped restore some measure of stability to the Roman economy. The crisis is said to have ended with Diocletian and hisrestructuring of the Roman imperial government, economy and military. The last is seen as a pivotal moment in Roman history, signaling the beginning of theDominate.
The crisis resulted in such profound changes in the empire's institutions, society, economic life, andreligion that it is increasingly seen by most historians as defining the transition between thehistorical periods ofclassical antiquity andlate antiquity.[2]
| Roman imperial dynasties | ||
|---|---|---|
| Crisis of the Third Century | ||
| Chronology | ||
|
Septimius Severus, in order to maintain the loyalty of the armies, raised the pay of legionaries, and gave substantialdonatives to the troops.[3][4] This policy was maintained by his successors in the Severan dynasty.[5][6][7] Over time the army required larger and larger bribes to remain loyal.[8] The large and ongoing increase in military expenditure caused problems for all of his successors.[9]
Instead of warring in foreign lands, the Roman empire was increasingly put on the defensive by marauding enemies and civil wars. This cut off the essential source of income gained from plundering enemy countries, while opening up the Roman countryside to economic devastation from looters both foreign and domestic. Frequent civil wars contributed to depletion of the army's manpower, and drafting replacement soldiers strained the labour force further. Fighting on multiple fronts, increasing size and pay of the army, increasing cost of transport, populist "bread and circuses" political campaigns, inefficient and corrupt tax collection, unorganised budgeting, and paying off foreign nations for peace all contributed to the financial crisis. The emperors responded by confiscating assets and supplies to combat the deficit.[10]
The situation of the Roman Empire became dire in 235. ManyRoman legions had been defeated during a previous campaign againstGermanic peoples raiding across the borders, while the emperorSeverus Alexander had been focused primarily on the dangers from theSassanid Empire. Leading his troops personally, the emperor resorted to diplomacy and accepting tribute to pacify theGermanic chieftains quickly, rather than military conquest. According toHerodian, this cost Severus Alexander the respect of his troops, who may have felt that more severe punishment was required for the tribes that had intruded on Rome's territory.[11] The troops assassinated Severus Alexander and proclaimed the new emperor to beMaximinus Thrax, commander of one of the legions present.
Maximinus was the first of thebarracks emperors – rulers who were elevated by the troops without having any political experience, a supporting faction, distinguished ancestors, or a hereditary claim to the imperial throne. As their rule rested on military might and generalship, they operated aswarlords reliant on the army to maintain power. Maximinus continued the campaigns inGermania but struggled to exert his authority over the whole empire. The Senate was displeased at having to accept a peasant as Emperor.[12] This precipitated the chaoticYear of the Six Emperors during which all of the original claimants were killed: in 238 a revolt broke out in Africa led byGordian I andGordian II,[13] which was soon supported by theRoman Senate,[14] but this was quickly defeated with Gordian II killed and Gordian I committing suicide. The Senate, fearing the wrath of Maximinus,[15] raised two of their own as co-Emperors,Pupienus andBalbinus, with Gordian I's grandsonGordian III asCaesar.[16] Maximinus marched on Rome but was assassinated by his own troops, and subsequently Pupienus and Balbinus were murdered by thePraetorian Guard.
In the following years, numerousRoman generals fought each other for control of the empire and neglected their duties of defending it from invasion. There were frequent raids across theRhine and Danube frontier by foreign tribes, including theCarpians,Goths,Vandals, andAlamanni, and attacks fromSassanids in the east.Climate changes and asea level rise disrupted the agriculture of what is now theLow Countries, forcing tribes residing in the region to migrate into Roman lands.[17] Further disruption arose in 251, when thePlague of Cyprian (possiblysmallpox) broke out. This plague caused large-scale death, severely weakening the empire.[18][19] The situation was worsened in 260 when the emperorValerian was captured in battle by the Sassanids (he later died in captivity).
Throughout the period, numeroususurpers claimed the imperial throne. In the absence of a strong central authority, the empire broke into three competing states. TheRoman provinces ofGaul,Britain, andHispania broke off to form theGallic Empire in 260. The eastern provinces ofSyria,Palestine, andAegyptus also became independent as thePalmyrene Empire in 267. The remaining provinces, centered on Italy, stayed under a single ruler but now faced threats on every side.[20]
An invasion of Macedonia and Greece byGoths, who had been displaced from their lands on theBlack Sea, was defeated by emperorClaudius II Gothicus at theBattle of Naissus in 268 or 269. Historians see this victory as the turning point of the crisis. In its aftermath, a series of tough, energetic barracks emperors were able to reassert central authority. Further victories by Claudius Gothicus drove back theAlamanni and recovered Hispania from the Gallic Empire. He died of the plague in 270 and was succeeded byAurelian, who had commanded the cavalry at Naissus. Aurelian reigned (270–275) through the worst of the crisis, gradually restoring the empire. He defeated the Vandals,Goths, Palmyrene Empire, and finally the remainder of the Gallic Empire. By late 274, the Roman Empire had been reunited into a single entity. However, Aurelian was assassinated in 275, sparking a further series of competing emperors with short reigns. The situation did not stabilize untilDiocletian, himself a barracks emperor, reunified the empire in 285.[21]
More than a century would pass before Rome again lost military ascendancy over its external enemies. However, dozens of formerly thriving cities, especially in the Western Empire, had been ruined. Their populations dead or dispersed, these cities could not be rebuilt, due to the economic breakdown caused by constant warfare. The economy was also crippled by the breakdown in trading networks and the debasement of the currency. Major cities and towns, including Rome itself, had not needed fortifications for many centuries, but now surrounded themselves with thickwalls.[22]
Fundamental problems with the empire still remained. The right of imperial succession had never been clearly defined, which was a factor in the continuous civil wars as competing factions in the military, Senate, and other parties put forward their favored candidate for emperor. The sheer size of the empire, which had been an issue since the lateRoman Republic three centuries earlier, continued to make it difficult for a single ruler to effectively counter multiple threats at the same time. These continuing problems were addressed by the radical reforms of Diocletian, who broke the cycle of usurpation. He began by sharing his rule with a colleague, then formally established theTetrarchy of four co-emperors in 293.[23] However the trend of civil war would continue after the abdication of Diocletian in theCivil wars of the Tetrarchy (306–324) until the rise ofConstantine the Great as sole Emperor.[24] The empire surviveduntil 476 in the West anduntil 1453 in the East.
From the beginning of thePrincipate there were no clear rules for the imperial succession, largely because the empire maintained the facade of a republic.[25]
During the early Principate, the process for becoming an emperor relied on a combination of proclamation by the Senate, popular approval, and acceptance by the army, in particular thePraetorian Guard. A family connection to a previous emperor was beneficial, but it did not determine the issue in the way a formal system ofhereditary succession would. From theJulio-Claudian dynasty onwards there was sometimes tension between the Senate's preferred choice and the army. As the Senatorial class declined in political influence and more generals were recruited from the provinces, this tension increased.
Whenever the succession appeared uncertain, there was an incentive for any general with support of a sizable army to attempt to seize power, sparking civil war. The most recent example of this prior to the Crisis was theYear of the Five Emperors which resulted in the victory ofSeptimius Severus. After the overthrow of the Severan dynasty, for the rest of the 3rd century, Rome was ruled by a series of generals, coming into power through frequent civil wars which devastated the empire.[26]
The first and most immediately disastrous of the natural disasters that the Roman Empire faced during the Third Century was the plague. The 2nd-centuryAntonine Plague that preceded the Crisis of the Third Century sapped manpower from Roman armies and proved disastrous for theRoman economy.[27] From 249 to 262, thePlague of Cyprian devastated the Roman Empire to such a degree that some cities, such as thecity of Alexandria, experienced a 62% decline in population.[28] These plagues greatly hindered the Roman Empire's ability to ward off barbarian invasions but also factored into problems such asfamine, with many farms becoming abandoned and unproductive.[29]
A second and longer-term natural disaster that took place during the third century was the increased variability of weather. Drier summers meant lessagricultural productivity and more extreme weather events led to agricultural instability. This could also have contributed to the increased barbarian pressure on Roman borders, as they too would have experienced the detrimental effects of climate change and sought to push inward to more productive areas of the Mediterranean region.[30]
Barbarian invasions came in the wake of civil war, plague, and famine. Distress caused in part by the changing climate led various barbarian tribes to push into Roman territory. Other tribes coalesced into more formidable entities (notably theAlamanni andFranks), or were pushed out of their former territories by more dangerous peoples such as theSarmatians (theHuns did not appear west of the Volga for another century). Eventually, the frontiers were stabilized by theIllyrian Emperors. However, barbarian migrations into the empire continued in greater and greater numbers. Though these migrants were initially closely monitored and assimilated, later tribes eventually entered the Roman Empireen masse with their weapons, giving only token recognition of Roman authority.[31]
The defensive battles that Rome had to endure on the Danube since the 230s, however, paled in comparison to the threat the empire faced in the East. There,Sassanid Persia represented a far greater danger to Rome than the isolated attacks ofGermanic tribes.[32] The Sassanids had in 224 and 226 overthrown the Parthian Arsacids, and the Persian KingArdashir I, who also wanted to prove his legitimacy through military successes, had already penetrated into Roman territory at the time ofSeverus Alexander, probably taking the strategically important cities ofNisibis andCarrhae in 235/236.[33]
 | This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(August 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
_-_Foto_G._Dall%2527Orto_28-5-2006_(cropped).jpg)
Internally, the empire facedhyperinflation caused by years of coinagedevaluation.[34] This had started earlier under theSeveran emperors who enlarged the army by one quarter,[35][self-published source?] and doubled the base pay of legionaries. As each of the short-lived emperors took power, they needed ways to raise money quickly to pay the military's "accession bonus" and the easiest way to do so was by inflating the coinage severely, a process made possible by debasing the coinage with bronze and copper.
This resulted in runaway rises in prices, and by the time Diocletian came to power, the old coinage of the Roman Empire had nearly collapsed. Some taxes were collected in kind and values often were notional, inbullion orbronze coinage.Real values continued to be figured in gold coinage, but the silver coin, the denarius, used for 300 years, was gone (1 pound of gold = 40 goldaurei = 1,000denarii = 4,000sestertii).[citation needed] This currency had almost no value by the end of the third century, and trade was carried out without retail coinage.
One of the most profound and lasting effects of the Crisis of the Third Century was the disruption of Rome's extensive internal trade network. Ever since thePax Romana, starting withAugustus, the empire's economy had depended in large part on trade between Mediterranean ports and across the extensive road systems to the Empire's interior. Merchants could travel from one end of the empire to the other in relative safety within a few weeks, moving agricultural goods produced in the provinces to the cities, and manufactured goods produced by the great cities of the East to the more rural provinces.
Large estates produced cash crops for export and used the resulting revenues to import food and urban manufactured goods. This resulted in a great deal of economic interdependence among the empire's inhabitants. The historian Henry St. Lawrence Beaufort Moss describes the situation as it stood before the crisis:
Along these roads passed an ever-increasing traffic, not only of troops and officials but of traders, merchandise and even tourists. An interchange of goods between the various provinces rapidly developed, which soon reached a scale unprecedented in the previous history and not repeated until a few centuries ago. Metals mined in the uplands of Western Europe, hides, fleeces, and livestock from the pastoral districts of Britain, Spain, and the shores of the Black Sea, wine and oil from Provence and Aquitaine, timber, pitch and wax from South Russia and northern Anatolia,dried fruits from Syria, marble from the Aegean coasts, and – most important of all – grain from the wheat-growing districts of North Africa, Egypt, and the Danube Valley for the needs of the great cities; all these commodities, under the influence of a highly organized system of transport and marketing, moved freely from one corner of the Empire to the other.[36]
With the onset of the Crisis of the Third Century, however, this vast internal trade network broke down. The widespread civil unrest made it no longer safe for merchants to travel as they once had, and the financial crisis that struck made exchange very difficult with the debased currency. This produced profound changes that, in many ways, foreshadowed the very decentralized economic character of the comingMiddle Ages. Large landowners, no longer able to successfully export their crops over long distances, began producing food for subsistence and local barter. Rather than import manufactured goods from the empire's great urban areas, they began to manufacture many goods locally, often on their own estates, thus beginning the self-sufficient "house economy" that would become commonplace in later centuries, reaching its final form in themanorialism of the Middle Ages. The common, free people of the Roman cities, meanwhile, began to move out into the countryside in search of food and better protection.[37]
Made desperate by economic necessity, many of these former city dwellers, as well as many small farmers, were forced to give up hard-earned basic civil rights in order to receive protection from large land-holders. In doing so, they became a half-free class of Roman citizen known ascoloni. They were tied to the land, and in later Imperial law, their status was made hereditary. This provided an early model forserfdom, the origins of medievalfeudal society and of the medieval peasantry. The decline in commerce between the imperial provinces put them on a path toward increased self-sufficiency. Large landowners, who had become more self-sufficient, became less mindful of Rome's central authority, particularly in the Western Empire, and were downright hostile toward its tax collectors. The measure of wealth at this time began to have less to do with wielding urban civil authority and more to do with controlling large agricultural estates in rural regions since this guaranteed access to the only economic resource of real value – agricultural land and the crops it produced. The common people of the empire lost economic and political status to the land-holding nobility, and the commercial middle classes waned along with their trade-derived livelihoods. The Crisis of the Third Century thus marked the beginning of a long gradual process that would transform the ancient world of classical antiquity into the medieval one of theEarly Middle Ages.[38]
However, although the burdens on the population increased, especially the lower strata of the population, this cannot be generalized to the whole empire, especially since living conditions were not uniform. Although the structural integrity of the economy suffered from the military conflicts of that time and the inflationary episode of the 270s, it did not collapse, especially because of the complex regional differences. Recent research has shown that there were regions that prospered even further, such as Egypt, Africa and Hispania. But even for Asia Minor, which was directly affected by attacks, no general decline can be observed.[39] While commerce and the overall economy flourished in several regions, with several provinces not affected by hostilities, other provinces experienced some serious problems, as evidenced by personalhoards in the northwestern provinces of the empire. However, there can be no talk of a general economic crisis throughout the whole of the Empire.[40]
Even the Roman cities began to change in character. The large cities of classical antiquity slowly gave way to the smaller,walled cities that became common in the Middle Ages. These changes were not restricted to the third century, but took place slowly over a long period, and were punctuated with many temporary reversals. In spite of extensive reforms by later emperors, however, the Roman trade network was never able to fully recover to what it had been during thePax Romana (27 BC – AD 180). This economic decline was far more noticeable and important in the western part of the empire, which was also invaded by barbarian tribes several times during the century. Hence, the balance of power clearly shifted eastward during this period, as evidenced by the choice of Diocletian to rule fromNicomedia inAsia Minor, putting his second in command,Maximian, inMilan. This would have a considerable impact on the later development of the empire with a richer, more stableeastern empire surviving theend of Roman rule in the west.[41]
While imperial revenues fell, imperial expenses rose sharply. More soldiers, greater proportions of cavalry, and the ruinous expense of walling in cities all added to the toll. Goods and services previously paid for by the government were now demanded in addition to monetary taxes. The empire suffered from a crippling labour shortage. The steady exodus of both rich and poor from the cities and now-unprofitable professions forcedDiocletian to use compulsion; conscription was made universal, most trades were made hereditary, and workers could not legally leave their jobs or travel elsewhere to seek better-paying ones. This included the unwanted middle-class civil service positions and under Constantine, the military. Constantine also tried to provide social programs for the poor to reduce the labour shortage.[42]
All thebarracks emperors based their power on the military and on the soldiers of the field armies, not on the Praetorians in Rome. Thus, Rome lost its role as the political center of the empire during the third century, although it remained ideologically important. In order to legitimize and secure their rule, the emperors of the third century needed above all military successes.[43]
The centre of decision-making shifted away from Rome and to wherever the emperor was with his armies, typically, in the east. This led to the transfer of the capital to the four cities Milan, Trier, Nicomedia, and Sirmium, and then to Constantinople. The Senate ceased to be the main governing organ and instead members of the equestrian class who filled the military officer corps became increasingly prominent.[44]
Usurpation, that is, the unauthorized assumption of the imperial title, was relatively common during all of Roman imperial history. Given that real power was ultimately based on brute force and control of the army, it became common to see one or several Roman generals try to take power by force, just asJulius Caesar did in his time. This was solidified early on with the accession ofClaudius, the fourth emperor, who was raised to the throne by thePraetorian Guard after the murder ofCaligula. The role of the army increased in the following century, leading the way to the military anarchy.
The crisis saw over 50 different people claim the title ofaugustus ("emperor")[c], but only about half of them managed to become "legitimate" emperors through their recognition by theRoman Senate. Several of these men attempted to create stability by appointing their descendants ascaesar (heir), or co-augustus, resulting in several brief dynasties. These generally failed to survive beyond one generation, although there were exceptions. With the exception ofClaudius Gothicus (a few emperors' deaths are disputed), every single "legitimate" emperor died in a violent manner, often killed by their own troops.
The chronology followsKienast 2017 andPeachin 1990 (see alsoBurgess 2014), with biographical information fromVagi 2000 andAdkins 2019.
| Bust | Coin | Name | Approximate reign | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximinian dynasty (235–238)[edit] | ||||
 | .jpg) | Maximinus I "Thrax" Gaius Julius Verus Maximinus[d] | March 235 – June 238[e] (3 years and 3 months) | Bornc. 173 inThracia, hence his nickname. Proclaimed emperor by his troops during a mutiny againstAlexander inMogontiacum,Germania Superior. A man of humble origins, the first commoner to become emperor, he was hated by the Senate because he never visited Rome. His heavy taxation policy made him unpopular, and the Senate declared him apublic enemy. He was killed at the age of 65 in Northern Italy by theLegio II Parthica after theSiege of Aquileia against followers ofPupienus andBalbinus.[47] |
| Magnus Gaius Petronius Magnus | late 235 (inGermania) | A patritian ex-consul; said to have been hailed emperor after Alexander's murder. Herodian suggests that he was actually incriminated.[48][49][50] | ||
| Titus Quartinus | late 235 / early 236[f] (inMesopotamia) | Ex-consul; reluctantly hailed by troops loyal to Alexander. He was later killed by the same man who proclaimed him emperor.[48][52][50] | ||
.jpg) (possible) | .jpg) | Maximus Gaius Julius Verus Maximus | January/May 236 – June 238 (caesar under Maximinus I) | Son of Maximinus andCaecilia Paulina, bornc. 215; incorrectly called "Maximinus" by some sources. Lost his mother sometime before 235; Maximinus honored her with the titles ofaugusta anddiva. Namedcaesar (heir) by his father at the age of 20; killed alongside him in the battlefield.[53] |
Gordian dynasty (238)[edit] | ||||
| [g] | .jpg) | Gordian I Marcus Antonius Gordianus Sempronianus Romanus "Africanus" | c. April – May 238 (22 days,in Africa) | Father and son, proclaimed joint emperors during a revolt againstMaximinus; recognized as legitimate emperor shortly after by theRoman Senate. The nearly 80-years-old Gordian I, one of the richest Romans at the time and the oldest emperor at accession, was a formerconsul and was given governorship over theAfrican province shortly before the revolt. The 46-years-old Gordian II, the shortest reigning Roman emperor, was killed inCarthage fighting a pro-Maximinus army led byCapelianus; his father committed suicide right after.[55] |
.jpg) | Gordian II Marcus Antonius Gordianus Sempronianus Romanus "Africanus" | |||
Non-dynastic (238)[edit] | ||||
_(cropped).jpg) | .jpg) | Pupienus Marcus Clodius Pupienus Maximus | c. May – August 238 (99 days) | Senior senators and formerconsuls (Pupienus was 74, Balbinus 60), elected joint emperors by theSenate after the death of the Gordians and in opposition toMaximinus, who was on his way to Italy. Made regents of thecaesarGordian III, who was given the title by popular demand. Pupienus organized military affairs, while Balbinus saw administrative matters. They soon developed a destructive rivalry, and were assassinated by the displeasedPraetorian Guard only one month after Maximinus' death.[56] |
.jpg) | .jpg) | Balbinus Decimus Caelius Calvinus Balbinus | ||
Gordian dynasty (238–244)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) | .jpg) | Gordian III Marcus Antonius Gordianus "Pius" | c. August 238 – February 244 (5 years and 6 months) | Orphan grandson ofGordian I, born in Rome on 20 January 222. Madecaesar by the Senate in May 238, succeeded asaugustus at age 13, the youngest sole emperor. Reigned under the regency of the Senate and, from 241, of thepraetorian prefectTimesitheus, whose daughterTranquillina he married. Died following theBattle of Misiche against the Persians, aged 19 (some Roman sources claim he was killed byPhilip).[57] |
| Sabinian Marcus Asinius Sabinianus | 240 (inAfrica) | Ex-consul andproconsul of Africa; killed by the governor ofMauretania.[58][59] | ||
Philippian dynasty (244–249)[edit] | ||||
.png) | .jpg) | Philip I "the Arab" Marcus Julius Philippus | February 244 – September 249 (5 years and 7 months) | Bornc. 204 inRoman Arabia, madepraetorian prefect of Gordian III after the sudden death of Timesitheus in 243. Proclaimed emperor after theBattle of Misiche, after which he made peace with the Sassanids in shameful terms. Suffered several revolt at the end of his reign, finally being killed at theBattle of Verona againstDecius, aged 45. During his rule Rome celebrated its1000th anniversary. Some later sources claim he was the first Christian emperor, but this is most unlikely.[60] |
.jpg) (possible) | .jpg) | Philip II "the Younger" Marcus Julius Severus Philippus | c. July 247 – September 249 (co-augustus under Philip I) | Son of Philip I andMarcia Otacilia Severa, bornc. 237. Proclaimedcaesar in 244 and later co-augustus in 247, at the age of 10. Killed as soon as news of his father's death reached Rome (although some say he was killed alongside him).[60] |
.jpg) | Pacatian Tiberius Claudius Marinus Pacatianus | c. 248 / 249 (Danube) | Commander inMoesia orPannonia and a formerconsul; defeated byDecius and killed by his own soldiers shortly after. His rule came on (or shortly after) Rome's 1000th anniversary.[61] | |
.jpg) | Jotapian Marcus Fulvius Ru(fus) Jotapianus | c. 249 (Levant) | A member of Near East nobility, perhaps related to the ancient kings ofCommagene, claimed descent fromAlexander the Great. Revolted for several months inSyria andCappadocia in response to the heavy taxation policies ofPriscus, Philip's brother and governor of the East. Like many, Jopatian was eventually killed by his own soldiers.[61][62] | |
 | Silbannacus Mar(cius?) Silbannacus | c. 249 (?) (Gaul?) | Only known for two coins, possibly an usurper in Gaul (or perhaps Rome). According to one view, he may be related toMarcia Otacilia Severa, Philip's wife.[61][63] | |
_(obverse).png) | Sponsianus | c. 249 (??) (Balkans?) | Existence disputed, only known for a few coins found inTransylvania that reuse oldRepublican denarii.[61][64] | |
Decian dynasty (249–251)[edit] | ||||
_(cropped).jpg) | .jpg) | Decius Gaius Messius Quintus Traianus Decius | c. September 249 – June 251 (1 year and 9 months) | Born asC. Messius Q. Decius Valerinus inSirmium,Pannonia Inferior.City prefect in Rome and formerconsul, send to the Danube to fight the usurperPacatian and secure the border. Proclaimed emperor by the Danube troops; killedPhilip at theBattle of Verona, later recognized the Senate, which gave him the honorific "Trajan" after the beloved emperor. Killed by the Goths at theBattle of Abritus, one of the worst Roman defeats in record.[65] |
.jpg) | Herennius Etruscus Quintus Herennius Etruscus Messius Decius | May/June – June 251 (less than a month, under Decius) | Young son of Decius, proclaimedcaesar and lateraugustus, killed with his father.[65] | |
| Licinian Julius Valens Licinianus | c. 251 | Biefly mentioned byAurelius Victor; fictionalized asValens Senior in theHistoria Augusta. Defeated by the (future emperor)Valerian.[66][67][68] | ||
| Priscus Titus Julius Priscus | c. 251 | Governor of Macedonia, proclaimed himself emperor inPhilippopolis during a siege by Goths.[69][68] | ||
Vibian dynasty (251–253)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) | .jpg) | Trebonianus Gallus Gaius Vibius Trebonianus Gallus | June 251 – August 253 (3 years and 2 months) | Senator, former consul and commander of Moesia, proclaimed emperor after the death of Decius. Suffered the propagation of theCyprian Plague, which further weakened the Empire, and faced enemies in several fronts. Killed with his son during his confrontation against Aemilianus, the Danubian commander.[70] |
.png) | Hostilian Gaius Valens Hostilianus Messius Quintus | c. June – c. July 251 (1 month, under Gallus) | Son of Decius, proclaimedcaesar andaugustus by Gallus as a way to maintain legitimacy. Possibly died of plague.[71] | |
.jpg) (possible) | .jpg) | Volusianus Gaius Vibius Afinius Gallus Veldumnianus Volusianus | August 251 – August 253 (2 years, under Gallus) | Son of Gallus, namedcaesar and thenaugustus on the death of Hostilian. Appears to have ruled only as subordinate to his father, as virtually nothing is known about him.[70] |
Non-dynastic (253)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) | Aemilianus Marcus Aemilius Aemilianus | c. July – c. September 253 (two months) | Commander in Moesia, proclaimed emperor by his troops; defeated Gallus in battle. Only ruled alone for a single month before being killed by another pretender, Valerian.[72] | |
Licinian dynasty (253–268)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) | .jpg) | Valerian Publius Licinius Valerianus | c. September 253 – c. June 260 (6 years and c. 9 months,East) | Member of an ancient senatorial family (theLicinii) and former consul, proclaimed emperor after the death ofTrebonianus Gallus, recognized in Rome alongside his son Gallienus. Divided the empire in two, with himself ruling over the East while his son ruled over the West. Defeated and captured by the Persians at theBattle of Edessa, an unprecedentent disaster in Roman military history.[73] |
 | .jpg) | Gallienus Publius Licinius Egnatius Gallienus | c. September 253 – c. September 268 (15 years) | Son of Valerian andEgnatia Mariniana, named senior co-emperor at the age of 35, ruling over the Western provinces. Became sole emperor after his father's, having the longest reign since the start of the crisis. A persevering ruler, he faced a large number of usurpers and foreign invasions. Murdered during his confrotation againstAureolus in a conspiracy led by thepraetorian prefectHeraclianus, the future emperorAurelian, andClaudius II, who succeeded Gallienus.[73] |
 | Valerian II Publius Licinius Cornelius Valerianus | 256–258 (caesar under Valerian and Gallienus) | Son and heir of Gallienus. Died in unclear circumstances, likely assassinated by his guardianIngenuus, who then claimed the imperial title.[73] | |
.jpg) (possible) | .png) | Saloninus Publius Licinius Cornelius Saloninus Valerianus | Autumn 260 (co-augustus under Gallienus) | Son and heir of Gallienus, namedcaesar in 258, proclaimed emperor by his father's troops duringPostumus' siege ofCologne; killed just a few weeks later. His acclamation was not authorized by Gallienus, but had he survived it would certainly have been recognized. Posthumous coinage avoid any title, perhaps as a way to hide the crises in the family.[73] |
 | Uranius Antoninus Lucius Julius Aurelius Sulpicius Severus Uranius Antoninus | c. 253 / 254 (Syria) | Born asSampsiceramus, initially a priest of the cult ofElagabal, likely a descendant ofElagabalus. Proclaimed emperor after successfully defendingEmesa from the Persian forces ofShapur I; fate unknown.[74][75] | |
| Ingenuus | c. 260 (Pannonia) | Governor of Pannonia, proclaimed inSirmium by the legions ofMoesia after the capture of Valerian, defeated and killed and inMursa.[76] | ||
 | Regalianus P(ublius) C(assius) Regalianus | c. 260 (Pannonia) | A native of Dacia, commander inIllyricum. Proclaimed emperor in Moesia but killed shortly after,[77] perhaps by his own troops upon Gallienus' arrival.[78] | |
.jpg) | Macrianus Minor Titus Fulvius Junius Macrianus | c. 260 – 261 (in the East) | Sons ofMacrianus Major, Valerian's quartermaster general, who was proclaimed emperor by the praetorian prefectBalista but refused due to his age and health, instead proclaiming his two sons, bothlegates, as joint emperors andconsuls. They quickly took over most of the East (Egypt, Syria and Asia) while Gallienus fought in the West. Both Macrianus were eventually defeated at Illyricum byAureolus, while Quietus, the younger brother, was sieged byOdaenathus inEmesa with Ballista and killed.[79][80] | |
.jpg) | Quietus Titus Fulvius Junius Quietus | |||
| Valens "Thessalonicus" | c. 261 (Achaia/Macedonia) | Proconsul ofAchaia, probably gained his nickname after defendingThessalonica. Proclaimed emperor during his confrontation againstPiso, one of Macrianus' generals. Valens defeated him, but was killed by his own soldiers shortly after.[81] | ||
| Aemilianus (II) Lucius Mussius Aemilianus "Aegippius" | c. 261 – 262 (Egypt) | A distinguished officer who supported the revolt of Macrianus, claimed imperial power after their deaths, probably to avoid punishment. Defeated byAurelius Theodotus.[82][83] | ||
| Memor | c. 262 (?) | Amauri briefly mentioned byZosimus (c. 500 AD) andPeter the Patrician (c. 550 AD).[84] Likely a follower of Macrianus, he may have never actually claimed imperial power.[85] | ||
| Aureolus (Manius Acilius) Aeolus | 268 (Northern Italy) | Native of Dacia and Gallienus' right-hand man. Defeated the usurpersIngenuus (260) andMacrianus (261), but later allied himself withPostumus against Gallienus. He proclaimed himself emperor following Gallienus' death, but was quickly killed by Claudius' troops after surrendering to him.[86] | ||
Gallic Empire (260–274)[edit]TheGallic Empire wasbreakaway part of the Roman Empire that, unlike most usurper-ruled territories, functionedde facto as a separate state from 260 to 274. It had its own capital (Trier), a clear succession of emperors, its ownpair of yearly-elected consuls, and even its own usurpers. At its height, the Empire controlled all Western European provinces:Hispania,Gaul andBritannia. The term "Gallic Empire" and "Gallic Emperor" are modern conventions; its rulers continued to use the standard imperial titulature without changes.[87] | ||||
 | Postumus Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus | c. 260 – April/August 269 (about 9 years) | Governor of Germania under EmperorGallienus, proclaimed emperor after a military victory, after which he killed Gallienus' sonSaloninus atCologne. Established a court inTrier, but made no moves against the Emperor in Rome. He was killed by his troops in the aftermath of Laelian's usurpation, as he did not allow them to sack Mainz.[87][88] | |
 | Laelian Ulpius Cornelius Laelianus | mid-269 (Germania, 2 months or less) | General under Postumus, revolted inMainz in February or June 269, possibly in coordination with Claudius II's forces, which constantly attacked Southern Germania. He was related to the Hispanic emperorTrajan (r. 98–117), which made him earn support from that region. Laelian was quickly defeated by Postumus;Hispania switched allegiance to Claudius II shortly after.[87][89] | |
.jpg) | Marius Marcus Aurelius Marius | c. 269 (a few months, more than Laelian) | Ablacksmith that was proclaimed emperor in Mainz after Laelian and Postumus' demise, but was killed shortly after. Ancient sources give him a reign of only a couple of days, but this is impossible given the amount of coinage produced during his reign.[87][90] | |
.jpg) | Victorinus Marcus Piavonius Victorinus | c. 269 – 271 (about 3 years) | Proclaimed emperor after Marius' assassination with the support of his motherVictoria, a wealthy noblewoman who probably contributed to the fall of Postumus. Failed to maintain Hispania and faced pro-Roman revolts in central Germania. Said to have been a womanizer, he was killed[87][91] | |
.JPG) | Domitian (II) Domitianus | c. 271 (very shortly) | Obscure figure that briefly rebelled in Gaul, perhaps during Victorinus' reign.[87][92] | |
.jpg) | Tetricus I Gaius Esuvius Tetricus | c. 271 – 274 (about 3 years) | Governor ofAquitania; proclaimed emperor atBordeaux with the support ofVictoria, Victorinus' mother. He surrendered toAurelian after theBattle of Châlons against his troops, although Tetricus appears to have been secretly arranged his abdication with the Emperor, who pardon him and appointed him as governor ofLucania (Southern Italy).[87][93] | |
.jpg) | Tetricus II Gaius Esuvius Tetricus | c. 273 – 274 (caesar under Tetricus I) | Young son of Tetricus, almost nothing known except that he lived on to have a distinguished senatorial career. There is some debate on whether he was proclaimedaugustus on the final weeks on the Gallic empire, as the evidence (coins) for this are rare and of disputed authenticity.[87][93] | |
| Faustinus (?) | 274 | Governor ofGallia Belgica, rebelled against Tetricus, who was forced to askAurelian for help. Not known if he actually claimed the imperial title.[94] | ||
Claudian dynasty (268–270)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) (possible) |  | Claudius II "Gothicus" Marcus Aurelius Claudius | c. September 268 – August (?) 270 (1 year or less) | Born on 10 May 214, claimed descent fromGordian II, posthumously named a relative ofConstantine the Great. Fought forGallienus against the usurpersIngenuus,Postumus andAureolus, but then turned against him withAurelian and had himself proclaimed emperor. Defeated the Goths at theBattle of Naissus, hence his nickname, and recovered most of Hispania, thus beginning the restoration of the Empire. Died as a result of thePlague of Cyprian, aged 56.[95] |
.jpg) | Quintillus Marcus Aurelius Claudius Quintillus | 270 (17–77 days)[h] | Younger brother of Claudius, declared emperor after his death. Events of his reign are contradictory; died after a reign of a few weeks of either suicide or assassination.[99] | |
Palmyrene Empire (271–273)[edit]ThePalmyrene Empire was a short-livedbreakaway state centered around the city ofPalmyra. It encompassed theRoman provinces ofSyria Palaestina,Arabia Petraea, andEgypt, as well as large parts ofAsia Minor. Chaos consumed the East following the capture ofValerian and the revolts ofMacrianus, but the territories were eventually pacified byOdaenathus, who was namedDux Romanorum ("leader of the Romans") andCorrector totius orientis (essentially "governor of all the East") byGallienus, effectively turning the territory into a semi-independent entity. Odaenathus was proclaimed "King of Kings" (rex regum), but remained loyal to the Emperor. He was murdered by his sonHairan in 267, who was in turn killed by his cousinMaeonius. The throne went to Odaenathus' young son Vaballathus, who reigned under the regency of her mother Zenobia.[100] | ||||
.png) | Vaballathus Lucius Julius Aurelius Septimius Vaballathus Athenodorus[i] | c. March – June 272[j] (about 3 months) | Young son ofZenobia andOdaenathus, succeeded his father asdux,corrector andrex of Palmyra with the addition of the titlesconsul andimperator, although all real power was held by Zenobia. He was given the imperial title (augustus) by his mother in 272.[103] | |
.png) | Zenobia | A remarkable and cultured stateswoman; wife of Odaenathus and mother of Vaballathus,de facto ruler of the East since 267, conquered Egypt in late 271, assumed the title ofaugusta in early 272. She first attempted to rule as a co-equal to Aurelian, with no results. She was spared, however, and was allowed to retire with his son, later marrying a senator.[104] | ||
| Antiochus | 273 (very briefly) | Son of Zenobia, perhaps still a child. Proclaimed emperor during a revolt against the restored Roman rule in Palmyra. The rebellion was crushed, but he was spared.[105] | ||
Non dynastic (270–282)[edit] | ||||
.jpg) (possible) | .png) | Aurelian "Restitutor" Lucius Domitius Aurelianus | August (?) 270 – November (?) 275 (5 years and a few months) | Born on 9 September 214, proclaimed emperor in opposition to Quintillus. Named "restorer of the World" (restitutor orbis) after his unprecedented series of military victories. Reconquered the territories of thePalmyrene andGallic Empire; built theAurelian Walls in Rome and reformed the falling economy. Murdered by his secretary Eros, aged 61, while preparing for a campaign against Persia, as response for Aurelian's strict character.[106] |
| Septimius | c. 271 | Rebelled in Dalmatia; killed by his own men. Briefly mentioned byZosimus andVictor.[107] | ||
| Urbanus (?) | unknown | Nothing known, only briefly mentioned by Zosimus.[108] | ||
.jpg) | .jpg) | Tacitus Marcus Claudius Tacitus | c. December 275 – c. June 276 (c. 6 months) | A former Illyriam soldier, proclaimed emperor by the army (and not the Senate, as claimed by theHistoria Augusta, who also claims he was a distinguished 75-years-old senator) after a brief interregnum.[k] Died of either illness or murder while campaigning inCappadocia.[110] |
.jpg) | Florianus Marcus Annius Florianus | c. June – September 276 (80–88 days) | Maternal half-brother of Tacitus, proclaimed himself emperor after his death but killed shortly after. Said to have done "nothing worth remembering" according toEutropius. He was killed by his own soldiers while fighting Probus.[111] | |
.jpg) | .png) | Probus Marcus Aurelius Probus | c. June 276 – c. September 282 (c. 6 years and 3 months) | Born on 19 August 232, proclaimed emperor by the eastern legions in opposition to Florianus. Spent his reign fighting in both West and East, winning several victories, but exhausting his army. He was killed, aged 60, during the revolt ofCarus.[112] |
.jpg) | Bonosus | 280 (Germany) | Commanders in Germany, proclaimed emperors atCologne (alternatively, they were proclaimed separately, but soon joined forces). Bonosus committed suicide after facing Probus' army, while Proculus was either killed in battle or executed soon after.[113][114] | |
.jpg) | Procolus | |||
 | Saturninus Gaius Julius Sallustius Saturninus Fortunatianus | c. 281 (Egypt) | A formerconsul native of Africa and commander in the East, revolted inAntioch. Hoped to gain recognition by Probus, with no results. He was killed by his own soldiers nearApamea in the ensuing confrontation.[114][115][113] | |
Caran dynastic (282–285)[edit] | ||||
 | Carus Marcus Aurelius Carus | c. September 282 – c. July 283 (c. 10 months) | Praetorian prefect under Probus, proclaimed emperor inRaetia/Noricum, seized power upon Probus' murder. Launched a successful campaign against the Persians, but died before finishing it, likely killed by his praetorian prefectAper.[116] | |
.JPG) | .jpg) | Carinus Marcus Aurelius Carinus | Spring 283 – July 285 (2 years,West) | Son of Carus, appointed joint emperor shortly before his death. Succeeded jointly with Numerian, with himself ruling over the Western provinces, where he won several victories. Defeated and killed byDiocletian at theBattle of the Margus. He was villainized by ancient historians as part of pro-Diocletianic propaganda, although some of the criticisms may have been legitimate.[117] |
.jpg) | Numerian Marcus Aurelius Numerianus | c. July 283 – November 284 (1 year and 3/4 months,East) | Younger son of Carus, spent most of his reign traveling back to the West after the successful Persian campaign. Possibly assassinated byAper, like his father.[118] | |
.jpg) | .jpg) | Diocletian Gaius Valerius Diocletianus | 20 November 284 – July 285 (as an usurper in theEast) | Born asDiocles on 22 December 242 (or 243) in Dalmatia, said to have been the son of a scribe or afreedman (former slave). Proclaimed emperor inNicomedia after the death of Numerian. His first act was to executeAper, and then marched West to face Carinus. Reunited the Roman Empire after theBattle of the Margus.[119] |
.png) | Julian Marcus Aurelius Sabinus Julianus | c. November 284 –c. February 285 (Pannonia, 3 months or less) | Governor ofVenice, revolted in north-eastern Italy after the death ofNumerian, but was quickly defeated nearVerona by Carinus, who used Julian's soldiers to fight the approaching Diocletian.[120] Sometimes treated as two emperors, oneMarcus Aurelius Julianus, in Pannonia, and anotherSabinius Julianus, in Italy.[121] | |
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: publisher location (link)