Roman Charity (Latin:Caritas Romana;Italian:Carità Romana) orCimon and Pero is anancient Greek andRomanexemplary story (exemplum) offilial piety (pietas) in which a woman secretlybreastfeeds her father or mother,incarcerated and supposedlysentenced to death bystarvation. Once caught, the loving devotion shown so moves the authorities that she is forgiven and the parent is typically freed. The father in the story is often named Cimon (Ancient Greek:Κίμων,Kímōn) and the daughter Pero,[1] although other versions name the father Mycon[2] (Μύκον,Mýkon). First attested in surviving Roman sources, it became a common theme inEarly Modern period ofWestern European art, particularly theBaroque period.
The story is recorded in theFactorum ac Dictorum Memorabilium Libri IX ("Nine Books of Memorable Deeds and Sayings")[3] by the ancient Roman historianValerius Maximus and was presented as a great act ofpietas (i.e., filial piety) and Roman honour. Additionally, wall paintings and terracotta statues from the first century excavated in Pompeii suggest that visual representations of Pero and Cimon were common, however it is difficult to say whether these existed in response to Maximus's anecdote or preceded – inspired – his story.[4] Among Romans, the theme had mythological echoes inJuno's breastfeeding of the adultHercules, anEtruscan myth.[5]
Maximus's anecdote of Pero and Cimon posits the following ekphrastic challenge:[6]
Men's eyes are riveted in amazement when they see the painting of this act and renew the features of the long bygone incident in astonishment at the spectacle now before them, believing that in those silent outlines of limbs they see living and breathing bodies. This must needs happen to the mind also, admonished to remember things long past as though they were recent by painting, which is considerably more effective than literary memorials.
The mid-1st centuryNatural History ofPliny the Elder includes the story in its section on the greatest examples of human affection known. In his version, ajailedplebeian woman was nursed by her daughter, who had just given birth and was searched for any food at each visit by the guard.[7][8] Finally caught, the affection is so moving that the mother was freed and the family provided for out of public funds for the rest of their lives.[7] In some versions,[which?] while the guard does hesitate and wonder if perhaps what he saw wasagainst nature (an act of lesbianism), he concludes that in fact it is an example of the first law of nature, which is to love one's own parents.[9]
The motif appeared in both its mother-daughter and father-daughter variety, although the cross-gendered version was ultimately more popular. The earliest modern depictions of Pero and Cimon emerged independently of each other in Southern Germany and Northern Italy around 1525, in a wide range of media including bronze medals, frescoes, engravings, drawings, oil paintings, ceramics, inlaid wood decorations, and statues.[10]
In Germany, the brothersBarthel Beham (1502–40) andSebald Beham (1500–50) produced between them six different renderings of Pero and Cimon. Barthel's first rendering of the theme in 1525 is usually brought in connection with a brief jail term that he, his brother Sebald, and their common friendGeorg Pencz served for charges of atheism earlier that year. Barthel's brother Sebald would reissue this print in reverse in 1544, this time with two inscriptions informing the viewer of the father's identity ("Czinmon") and of the meaning of this act: "I live off the breast of my daughter." Sebald himself would revisit the motif twice in his youth between 1526 and 1530, and again in 1540. The print from 1540 is almost ten times bigger than most of the Beham brothers' other art works (ca. 40 x 25 cm) and openly pornographic. Cimon's arms tied are behind his back and his shoulders and lower body are covered in a jacket-like piece of cloth, however his muscular chest and erect nipples are on full display. Pero stands between Cimon's knees, completely naked, her hair is undone and her pubic region and stomach are shaved. She offers him her left breast with a V-hold. An inscription made to look like a scratching into the wall reads: Whither does Piety not penetrate, what does she not devise?[11]
Later in the sixteenth century German artists began depicting the scene in oil paintings, often choosing the classicizing half-length format, thereby drawing of formal analogies between Pero and ancient heroines and including Pero within the genre of the "strong woman", similar toLucretia,Dido, andCleopatra orJudith,Salome, andDelilah. Examples of these works includeGeorg Pencz's version from 1538, Erhard Schwetzer's depiction from the same year, Pencz's version (housed in Stockholm) from 1546, and one by the so-called Master with the Griffin’s Head executed as well in 1546.[12]
Italian oil paintings of the motif existed as early as 1523, when a notary described a painting in possession of the recently deceased Pietro Luna, as "a large canvas in a gilded frame with a woman who nurses an old man". A similar painting is described by a notary for the house of Benedetti di Franciscis in 1538. Still another painting is listed, correctly identified as a daughter nursing her father, by a notary in the estate of miniaturist Gasparo Segizzi. Unfortunately, none of these paintings are still extant.[13]
In 1606/1607, the earlyBaroque artistCaravaggio featured the scene in his altarpiece,The Seven Works of Mercy, commissioned by the confraternity ofPio Monte della Misericordia in Naples.[14] With regards to his choice of iconography, Caravaggio may have been inspired by his predecessorPerino del Vaga, whose fresco of Roman Charity he could have seen during his stay in Genoa in 1605.[15] Following Caravaggio's altarpiece, the veritable craze for gallery paintings of Pero and Cimon started in 1610–12, and spread through Italy, France, the Southern Netherlands, and Utrecht, even drawing traction among Spanish painters such asJusepe de Ribera and, later,Bartolomé Esteban Murillo. Given the fact that no gallery painting pre-dates 1610, Caravaggio's altarpiece must have inspired a fad that would last another two centuries. Despite this, the subject matter as one favored by many Caravaggisti has historically been overlooked.[16]Utrecht Caravaggisti,Gerrit van Honthorst, andAbraham Bloemaert both painted versions of the scene, as did Manfredi. Additionally, nine examples of Roman Charity were apparently produced by Caravaggio's noted and outspoken foe,Guido Reni (1575 – 1625) and his workshop.[17]
Peter Paul Rubens and his followers are known to have painted at least three versions. Followers of Ruben's tended to copy his 1630 version (now in Amsterdam) but began introducing a sleeping child at Pero's feet, a detail the original legend does not mention. This element was introduced in the 17th century in order to prevent an interpretation that there was something incestuous about the deed – although the existence of a child is implicit in any case, since the woman islactating. At the same time, the inclusion of the infant added a new level of meaning to the story as the three figures would represent the three generations and could therefore also be interpreted as an allegory of the three ages of man.[18] Many examples of paintings, prints, and sculptures of Roman Charity include a baby or pre-school-age child (perhaps in the vein of the boy included in Poussin'sThe Gathering of the Manna), by artists such asNiccolò̀ Tornioli (1598–1651),Cecco Bravo (1607–61),Artus Quellinus the Elder (1609–1668),Louis Boullogne (1609–74),Jean Cornu (1650-1710),Johann Carl Loth (1632–98),Carlo Cignani (1628–1719),Adrian van der Werff (1659–1722),Gregorio Lazzarini (1657–1730),Francesco Migliori (1684–1734), and Johann Peter Weber (1737-1804).[19]
A version byArtemisia Gentileschi is notable in that the artist was a woman.[20]
A small annex to theBelfry of Ghent dating from 1741, including a sculpture of Roman Charity poised high above the front doorway. It is referred to as "mammelokker", which translates from Dutch as 'breast sucker'.[21]
During this period of prolific engagement with the imagery of Pero and Cimon,Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665) stands out because of his rendering of the breastfeeding mother-daughter couple in The Gathering of the Manna (1639).[22] Poussin's choice of subject matter demonstrated his knowledge of Maximus's other example of filial piety, as well as earlier French renderings of the theme. It is possible that Poussin was familiar with the print byÉtienne Delaune (1518/19–88) and/or, perhaps, the "Histoire Rommaine" printed in Lyon in 1548, in which a mother begs her daughter to let her nurse at her breast – a request the daughter rebukes, challenging her mother to display greater dignity in her suffering, before ultimately succumbing and allowing her mother to suckle.[23]
Similar to later depictions of Pero and Cimon, which contain the addition of Pero's child in order to dissuade any incestuous or salacious readings, Poussin includes the daughter's son, who competes with his grandmother for his mother's milk. In doing so, and in adding an observer whose reaction belays the correct reading of the scene as one of filial piety, Poussin preempts the potential reading of the scene as lesbian – harkening back to the debate Maximus proposes between the onlooking guards.[24] Despite the fact that Poussin positioned himself as the opposite of Caravaggio, he, like his rival, integrated Maximus's story into a complex religious painting.
While the choice to depict the mother-daughter scene as opposed to that of Pero and Cimon was unique at the time that Poussin was painting, the same-sex version enjoyed wider popularity than the father-daughter scene during the Middle Ages and into the early modern period.[25] The medieval work Girard de Rossillon, by an anonymous, tells the story of the imprisoned mother, nursed by her daughter but embellishes it, inventing a name for the daughter – bone Berte – and a noble lineage for the family.[26] In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, writersGiovanni Boccaccio (1313–75) andChristine de Pizan (1364-1430) both used the story of the Roman daughter as a story of reciprocal kinship relations.[27] In the sixteenth centuryHans Sachs produced an eroticized work on the scene.[28]
Few works depicting the mother-daughter version were made between the seventeenth and late eighteenth century. A poem bySibylla Schwarz(1612–38) on egalitarian relationships among women uses the anecdote.[29] A few years after Poussin's painting of The Gathering of the Manna,Guercino produced an intimate portrait of the mother and daughter (before 1661).[30] This is the last known depiction of the scene before its brief resurgence in the late eighteenth century when three paintings by Jean-Charles Nicaise Perrin (1791, lost),Angelika Kauffmann (1794, lost), and Etienne-Barthélemy Garnier (1801, lost) were made depicting the scene.[31] Perhaps this brief resurgence of interest can be explained by a French Revolutionary theme of political equality which found resonance in the reciprocity within kinship relations that the mother-daughter version displayed. The reversal of patriarchal relations that Pero and Cimon could be seen as symbolizing, while meaningful under the ancient regime, was now passé.[32]
In the 20th century, a fictional account of Roman Charity was presented inJohn Steinbeck'sThe Grapes of Wrath (1939).[33] At the end of the novel, Rosasharn (Rose of Sharon) nurses a sick and starving man in the corner of a barn. The 1969 paintingPartisan Ballad byMai Dantsig also echoes Roman Charity.[34]
The 1973 surrealist filmO Lucky Man! also contains a scene of Roman Charity when the protagonist is starving and a vicar's wife nurses him rather than let him plunder the food gathered for an offering.
A contemporary version is made by the Flemish artist Yves Decadt in his series of Allegories calledFalling Angels.
_-_Roman_Charity.jpg)
.jpg)
Media related toRoman Charity at Wikimedia Commons| Deities |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Legendary figures | ||
| Legendary beings | ||
| Texts | ||
| Concepts and practices | ||
| Philosophy | ||
| Events | ||
| Objects | ||
| Variations | ||
| See also | ||
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
