 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
| Part ofa series on the | ||||||||
| Anthropology ofkinship | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||
Basic concepts
| ||||||||
Case studies | ||||||||
Major theorists
| ||||||||
| Social anthropology Cultural anthropology | ||||||||
Roger Lancaster is a professor ofanthropology andcultural studies atGeorge Mason University inFairfax, Virginia, where from 1999 until 2014 he directed the Cultural Studies PhD Program. He is known for his writing inLGBT studies,gender/sexuality, culture andpolitical economy, and criticalscience studies. His research tries to understand how sexual mores, racial hierarchies, and class predicaments interact in a changing world.[1]
Lancaster is a fellow in theAmerican Anthropological Association. From 2004 to 2006, he served as the AAA's media liaison onkinship, the family, and marriage, fielding questions onsame-sex marriage from a range of major media organizations.[2][3]
Lancaster's first book,Thanks to God and the Revolution: Religion and Class Consciousness in the New Nicaragua (1988), was a study of liberation theology and other religious currents in Sandinista Nicaragua. Joining debates on the nature and origins ofclass consciousness, the book reworked established Marxist understandings of therole of religion in social life. From a Marxist-populist perspective, it views popular orfolk religion as a recurring site where poor people reflect on class inequalities and devise understandings of morality and justice consistent with their self-interests. Its main argument is that elements of an implicit class consciousness are discernible in traditional saint's cults and in popular rites and festivities, and that these elements provide a springboard for the subsequent development of forms of explicit class consciousness (inliberation theology,Sandinismo, andMarxism).
Lancaster's first book had traced the Sandinista revolution's ascent; his second book examined its decline.Life is Hard: Machismo, Danger, and the Intimacy of Power in Nicaragua (1992) was an ethnography of everyday life during thecontra war and its attendant economic crisis. Chronicling the lives of three poor families among their networks of friends and kin, it dissects plural and intimate forms of power—in gender relations, color discriminations, and same-sex relationships—that, Lancaster argues, undermined attempts to construct a revolutionaryNew Man (and Woman) and thus subverted the Sandinista project from below. The book is noted for its development of an analysis ofmachismo as a system of male domination over both women and men, and for its analysis of active/passive roles in male same-sex intercourse in some Latin American settings. Weavingsemiotics,poststructuralism, and theBakhtin school into an overarching Marxist approach,Life is Hard traded in the topical eclecticism of cultural studies, setting brisk chapters of media criticism alongside interviews and descriptions of Nicaragua's survival economy. The book won theSociety for the Study of Social Problems' C. Wright Mills Award and the Society of Lesbian and Gay Anthropologists' Ruth Benedict Prize.[4][5]
Lancaster's third monograph,The Trouble with Nature: Sex in Science and Popular Culture (2003), was a polemic againstevolutionary psychology and otherreductionist explanations for gender roles and sexual orientations. The book contrasts anthropological and historical perspectives on cultural diversity with evolutionaryjust-so stories, defending asocial constructionist approach to human nature in chapters onsexual selection,masculinity, beauty, the social organization of reproduction, and thegay gene. The book's argument proceeds in part by showing that reductionist ideas are unscientific on their own terms and in part by underscoring a historical irony: stories about a hardwired and immutable human nature fluoresce in a period marked by pitched political struggles around sex, when shifts in production and institutional changes have thrown gender and sexual roles into question. Such stories offer comfort and certainty at a time when not much really seems certain about the nature of men, women, and others.
His fourth monograph,Sex Panic and the Punitive State (2011), won the author's second Ruth Benedict Prize. The book's first part provides a historical and ethnographic account of modern sex offender laws in the US; it shows how a series of sex panics have institutionalized a culture of sexual fear and produced draconian, ineffective laws. Its second part provides a wider polemical analysis of the development of mass incarceration and other aspects of the punitive state.
In addition to his monographs, Lancaster coedited (with Micaela di Leonardo)The Gender/Sexuality Reader: Culture, History, Political Economy (1997), a large advanced interdisciplinary introduction to the field. TheReader foregrounded historical, anthropological, and political-economic approaches at a time when literary theory dominated the field.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
| Other | |
