 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Roche lobe" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Inastronomy, theRoche lobe is the region around astar in abinary system within whichorbiting material isgravitationally bound to that star. It is an approximately teardrop-shaped region bounded by a criticalgravitationalequipotential, with the apex of the teardrop pointing towards the other star (the apex is at theL1Lagrangian point of the system).
The Roche lobe is different from theRoche sphere, which approximates the gravitationalsphere of influence of oneastronomical body in the face ofperturbations from a more massive body around which it orbits. It is also different from theRoche limit, which is the distance at which an object held together only by gravity begins to break up due totidal forces. The Roche lobe, Roche limit, and Roche sphere are named after theFrenchastronomerÉdouard Roche.
In a binary system with a circular orbit, it is often useful to describe the system in a coordinate system that rotates along with the objects. In thisnon-inertial frame, one must considercentrifugal force in addition to gravity. The two together can be described by apotential, so that, for example, the stellar surfaces lie along equipotential surfaces.
Close to each star, surfaces of equalgravitational potential are approximatelyspherical and concentric with the nearer star. Far from the stellar system, the equipotentials are approximatelyellipsoidal and elongated parallel to the axis joining the stellar centers. A critical equipotential intersects itself at theL1Lagrangian point of the system, forming a two-lobed figure-of-eight with one of the two stars at the center of each lobe. This critical equipotential defines the Roche lobes.[2]
Wherematter moves relative to the co-rotating frame it will seem to be acted upon by aCoriolis force. This is not derivable from the Roche lobe model as the Coriolis force is a non-conservative force (i.e. not representable by ascalar potential).
In the gravity potential graphics, L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 are in synchronous rotation with the system. Regions of red, orange, yellow, green, light blue and blue are potential arrays from high to low. Red arrows are rotation of the system and black arrows are relative motions of the debris.
Debris goes faster in the lower potential region and slower in the higher potential region. So, relative motions of the debris in the lower orbit are in the same direction with the system revolution while opposite in the higher orbit.
L1 is the gravitational capture equilibrium point. It is a gravity cut-off point of the binary star system. It is the minimum potential equilibrium among L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5. It is the easiest way for the debris to commute between aHill sphere (an inner circle of blue and light blue) and communal gravity regions (figure-eights of yellow and green in the inner side).
L2 and L3 are gravitational perturbation equilibria points. Passing through these two equilibrium points, debris can commute between the external region (figure-eights of yellow and green in the outer side) and the communal gravity region of the binary system.
L4 and L5 are the maximum potential points in the system. They are unstable equilibria. If the mass ratio of the two stars becomes larger, then the orange, yellow and green regions will become ahorseshoe orbit.
The red region will become thetadpole orbit.
When a star "exceeds its Roche lobe", its surface extends out beyond its Roche lobe and the material which lies outside the Roche lobe can "fall off" into the other object's Roche lobe via the first Lagrangian point. In binary evolution this is referred to asmass transfer viaRoche-lobe overflow.
In principle, mass transfer could lead to the total disintegration of the object, since a reduction of the object's mass causes its Roche lobe to shrink. However, there are several reasons why this does not happen in general. First, a reduction of the mass of the donor star may cause the donor star to shrink as well, possibly preventing such an outcome. Second, with the transfer of mass between the two binary components,angular momentum is transferred as well.While mass transfer from a more massive donor to a less massive accretor generally leads to a shrinking orbit, the reverse causes the orbit to expand (under the assumption of mass and angular-momentum conservation). The expansion of the binary orbit will lead to a less dramatic shrinkage or even expansion of the donor's Roche lobe, often preventing the destruction of the donor.
To determine the stability of the mass transfer and hence exact fate of the donor star, one needs to take into account how the radius of the donor star and that of its Roche lobe react to the mass loss from the donor; if the star expands faster than its Roche lobe or shrinks less rapidly than its Roche lobe for a prolonged time, mass transfer will be unstable and the donor star may disintegrate. If the donor star expands less rapidly or shrinks faster than its Roche lobe, mass transfer will generally be stable and may continue for a long time.
Mass transfer due to Roche-lobe overflow is responsible for a number of astronomical phenomena, includingAlgol systems,recurring novae (binary stars consisting of ared giant and awhite dwarf that are sufficiently close that material from the red giant dribbles down onto the white dwarf),X-ray binaries andmillisecond pulsars. Such mass transfer by Roche lobe overflow (RLOF) is further broken down into three distinct cases:
The precise shape of the Roche lobe depends on the mass ratio, and must be evaluated numerically. However, for many purposes it is useful to approximate the Roche lobe as a sphere of the same volume. An approximate formula for the radius of this sphere is
where and.Function is greater than for. The lengthA is the orbital separation of the system andr1 is the radius of the sphere whose volume approximates the Roche lobe of massM1. This formula is accurate to within about 2%.[2] Another approximate formula was proposed by Eggleton and reads as follows:
This formula gives results up to 1% accuracy over the entire range of the mass ratio.[8]