Robert of Melun | |
|---|---|
| Bishop of Hereford | |
| Appointed | 1163 |
| Term ended | 27 February 1167 |
| Predecessor | Gilbert Foliot |
| Successor | Robert Foliot |
| Orders | |
| Consecration | 22 December 1163 by Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury |
| Personal details | |
| Born | c. 1100 |
| Died | 27 February 1167 |
| Buried | Hereford Cathedral |
Robert of Melun (c. 1100 – 27 February 1167) was an Englishscholastic Christian theologian who taught in France, and later becameBishop of Hereford in England. He studied underPeter Abelard in Paris before teaching there and at Melun, which gave him his surname. His students includedJohn of Salisbury,Roger of Worcester,William of Tyre, and possiblyThomas Becket. Robert was involved in theCouncil of Reims in 1148, which condemned the teachings ofGilbert de la Porrée. Three of his theological works survive, and show him to have been strictly orthodox.
Robert returned to England in 1160, and was appointed Bishop of Hereford in 1163. KingHenry II of England appointed him to the see, or bishopric, and was influenced in his decision by PopeAlexander III and Thomas Becket. Following his consecration, Robert became involved in the dispute between Becket and the king, during which he generally took the king's side. He also served as a papal and a royal judge.
Robert was born in England, probably in about 1100.[1] Nothing else is known of his background.[2] He owed his name to the place where he taught,Melun in France.[3] Robert studied under Peter Abelard andHugh of St. Victor in Paris, where in 1137 he succeeded Abelard as a teacher in the school on Mont Ste-Geneviève.[4] John of Salisbury and William of Tyre were among his pupils in Paris.[5] King Henry II of England's cousin, Roger of Worcester, later theBishop of Worcester, was another of Robert's students.[6] He probably also taught Thomas Becket, laterArchbishop of Canterbury,[1][7] although this is not certain.[8][9]
Robert went to Melun in 1142 to direct a school,[4] but returned to Paris in 1147.[10] He took part in the condemnation of Gilbert de la Porrée at the Council of Rheims in 1148,[5] working withPeter Lombard to secure Porrée's recantation.[1] A smallconsistory court was held after the ending of the council's deliberations, and was attended byBernard of Clairvaux andSuger ofSt Denis, along with Robert and Peter. This court forced Porrée to repudiate his views on theTrinity.[11][12] A fellow scholar,Herbert of Bosham, described Robert as a great teacher, who "sent forth from himself, like rays of his light, a great and learned host of students".[13]
After teaching as a master of arts[14] in Paris for over forty years,[15] Robert was recalled to England by King Henry II in 1160, and was appointed Bishop of Hereford in 1163. He was consecrated atCanterbury on 22 December[16] by Archbishop Thomas Becket.[4][17][a] Becket had been prominent among those recommending Robert for the vacancy at Hereford;[1] one of Becket's later biographers said that Becket urged the king to findbenefices for Englishmen living abroad.[19] There is some evidence that PopeAlexander III had a hand in Robert's election, as Becket in 1166 reminded Robert and Roger of Worcester that they both owed their episcopates to Alexander.[20]
Little evidence of Robert's activities survives from his time as bishop, although it is known that he acted as apapal judge-delegate in 1165. Five documents survive from his time at Hereford, as well as confirmations of gifts by previous bishops toLlanthony Priory, which he augmented with another grant of tithes.[2] He also served as a royal judge.[21]
In 1163, a conflict arose between the king and the new Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, over the rights of the king in the English church. At a council held atWestminster in October 1163, the king and Becket contended over the question, with the bishops supporting Becket against the king.[22] Robert was involved in the conflict not only as a bishop-elect, but as an envoy to Becket from the pope, as he accompanied Philip of Aumone, a French abbot, who was sent by Alexander to Becket in after the Council of Westminster to urge Becket not to inflame the situation. Robert went with Philip, probably because it was hoped he would be able to influence Becket.[17]
Robert was present in January 1164 when the king summoned a council of the barons and the bishops to Clarendon, where the king demanded that both groups swear to uphold the royal rights of Henry's grandfather, KingHenry I, without any reservations or conditions. Although Becket at first attempted to resist, he eventually submitted, and then forced the other bishops to swear also.[23] In October 1164, Becket was accused of denying justice to a royal vassal, tried at a council held atNorthampton,[24] and was found guilty although he did not accept the sentence.[25] During the trial, Robert attempted to moderate Becket's behaviour, by persuading him from having his archiepiscopal cross, a symbol of spiritual authority, carried in front of him when he entered the court, which would have been an insult to the king.[2] Shortly after the trial, Robert interceded with the king to order that no injury be done to Becket, who went into voluntary exile.[26]
Early in Becket's exile, Robert received a papal censure for not doing more to support Becket.[27] In summer 1165, Robert accompaniedGilbert Foliot, theBishop of London, on a papal mission to King Henry, to convey to the king Pope Alexander's complaints about the king's behaviour. The king had been preventing his subjects from visiting or appealing to the papacy, and Alexander wished to protest against that, as well as against the king's treatment of Becket.[28] In 1166, Becket tried to convince Robert to switch sides, writing to Robert in conciliatory tones. John of Salisbury, a supporter of Becket's, prevailed upon two French academics to write to Robert, criticising him for hypocrisy.[29]
In October 1166, Becket ordered Robert and Roger of Worcester to attend him in France, so they could give him guidance on his dispute with the king. When they informed the king of their intended journey, he forbade them to leave England. Nevertheless, they attempted to sneak out of the country in February 1167. They were apprehended on 2 February, and ordered to remain in England not only in the king's name, but also in Alexander's.[30]
Robert's theology is expressed in his three surviving works, theQuaestiones de divina pagina,Quaestiones de epistolis Pauli, and the unfinishedSententiae. The dating of the works is problematic, but it appears that the first two works were composed between 1145 and 1157. TheSententiae was revised twice, probably during the 1150s and the 1160s.[2] His works, especially theSententiae, cover the entire subject of theology and are strictly orthodox in Christian doctrine.[5]
Robert'sSententiae, orSumma Theologica, was well known in his time, and has been considered a key connection in theology between Robert's own teachers' works and the works of Peter Lombard.[1] Robert is the first commentator onSt Paul to say that resistance to a tyrant might be vindicated by the Bible. Robert also opined that a king might beexcommunicated if royal actions harmed the church. Robert usedGratian's works as sources for his own, citing theDecretum Gratiani. Although he used this work, which dealt with church law, he does not appear to have been considered a lawyer, and his training was that of a theologian. Furthermore, his years as a student predated the establishment ofcanon law as a distinct discipline in the European schools.[31] Robert's views of theglossators, and their main workGlossa Ordinaria was that they had shortened theirglosses to such a point that they made them unintelligible.[32] Robert was also known as a logician,[33] and John of Salisbury named him one of the leadingdisputatores,[3] or a person who used rhetoric and logic to debate in public.[9]
Although Robert condemned Gilbert Porrée in conjunction with Peter Lombard, he did not agree with Lombard'sChristology, or views on the nature of Jesus Christ. Likewise, although he disagreed with some of Abelard's teachings, he defended Abelard against charges of heresy. Robert did, however, agree with some of Abelard's teachings and methods. The introduction to theSententiae proclaims Robert's desire to harmonise the writings of two unnamed scholars, who have been identified by modern writers as Hugh of St Victor and Abelard.[2]
Robert died on 27 February 1167.[16]William fitzStephen, one of Becket's supporters, wrote that Robert died of grief because he was unable to visit Becket in exile.[30] He was buried in Hereford Cathedral.[2] Robert enjoyed a good reputation on the continent, for his knowledge and teaching ability, as well as for his personal qualities. Before his appointment to Hereford, John of Salisbury had praised him, but Robert's conduct during the Becket controversy soured John's attitude towards his old teacher.[1]
Robert's works have been published in four volumes, edited by R. M. Martin. His episcopal documents are inHereford 1079–1234: English Episcopal Acta Number 7, published in 1993.[2]
| Catholic Church titles | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by | Bishop of Hereford 1163–1167 | Succeeded by |
