Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Napo River

Coordinates:3°27′28″S72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W /-3.45778; -72.71750
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromRio Napo)
River in Ecuador, Peru
Napo river
The Napo River to the east ofCoca
Map of theAmazon Basin with the Napo River highlighted
Location
Countries
Physical characteristics
Source 
 • locationConfluence of Jatunyaçu and Anzu,Ecuador
 • coordinates1°2′48.6204″S77°48′27.4392″W / 1.046839000°S 77.807622000°W /-1.046839000; -77.807622000
 • elevation430 m (1,410 ft)
2nd source 
 • locationJatunyaçu–Verdeyaçu,Andes,Ecuador
 • coordinates0°38′22.6248″S78°3′29.1924″W / 0.639618000°S 78.058109000°W /-0.639618000; -78.058109000
 • elevation3,419 m (11,217 ft)
3rd source 
 • locationJatunyaçu–Mulatos,Andes,Ecuador
 • coordinates0°53′55.0464″S78°24′32.8824″W / 0.898624000°S 78.409134000°W /-0.898624000; -78.409134000
 • elevation3,871 m (12,700 ft)
4th source 
 • locationAnzu River,Andes,Ecuador
 • coordinates1°23′30.408″S78°4′48.7668″W / 1.39178000°S 78.080213000°W /-1.39178000; -78.080213000
 • elevation1,430 m (4,690 ft)
MouthAmazon River
 • location
70 km (43 mi) downstream fromIquitos,Loreto Region,Peru
 • coordinates
3°27′28″S72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W /-3.45778; -72.71750
 • elevation
78 m (256 ft)
Length1,130 km (700 mi)[1]
Basin size103,307.79 km2 (39,887.36 sq mi)[2]
Discharge 
 • locationFrancisco de Orellana (near mouth)
 • average(Period: 1971–2000)7,147.8 m3/s (252,420 cu ft/s)[2]
 • minimum3,200 m3/s (110,000 cu ft/s)[3]
 • maximum10,800 m3/s (380,000 cu ft/s)[3]
Discharge 
 • locationMazán (Bella Vista)
 • average(Period: 1991–2023)7,000 m3/s (250,000 cu ft/s)[4]
 • minimum3,250 m3/s (115,000 cu ft/s)[4]
 • maximum11,200 m3/s (400,000 cu ft/s)[4]
Discharge 
 • locationSanta Clotilde
 • average(Period: 2002–2011)5,895 m3/s (208,200 cu ft/s)[5]
Discharge 
 • locationNueva Rocafuerte
 • average(Period: 2001–2009)2,032 m3/s (71,800 cu ft/s)[5]
Discharge 
 • locationPuerto Francisco de Orellana
 • average(Period: 2001–2009)1,105 m3/s (39,000 cu ft/s)[5]
Basin features
ProgressionAmazonAtlantic Ocean
River systemAmazon River
Tributaries 
 • leftJatunyaçu, Misahualli, Payamino,Coca,Aguarico, Tamboyaçu
 • rightAnzu, Llocullón,Tiputini,Yasuní, Anahiri,Curaray, Tacshacuraray, Mazán

TheNapo River (Spanish:Río Napo) is atributary to theAmazon River that rises inEcuador on the flanks of the eastAndeanvolcanoes ofAntisana, Sincholagua andCotopaxi.

The total length is 1,075 km (668 mi). The river drains an area of ca 103,000 km2. The mean annual discharge atMazán 6,800 m3/s (240,000 cu ft/s).[6][7][8]

Geography

[edit]
Village along the west bank of Napo River in Peru, a few miles above confluence with the Amazon. The land visible beyond the waterway is an island in the river.

Before it reaches the plains it receives a great number of small streams from impenetrable, saturated and much broken mountainous districts, where the dense and varied vegetation seems to fight for every piece of ground. From the north it is joined by theCoca River, having its sources in the gorges ofCayambe volcano on theequator, and also a powerful river, theAguarico having its headwaters between Cayambe and theColombia frontier.From the west, it receives a secondary tributary, theCuraray, from theAndean slopes, between Cotopaxi and theTungurahua volcano. From its Coca branch to the mouth of the Curaray the Napo is full of snags and shelving sandbanks and throws out numerous canoes among jungle-tangled islands, which in thewet season are flooded, giving the river an immense width. From the Coca to the Amazon it runs through a forested plain where not a hill is visible from the river - its uniformly level banks being only interrupted byswamps andlagoons. From the Amazon the Napo is navigable for river craft up to its Curaray branch, a distance of about 216 mi (348 km), and perhaps a bit further; thence, by painful canoe navigation, its upper waters may be ascended as far asSanta Rosa, the usual point of embarkation for any venturesome traveller who descends from theQuito tableland. The Coca river may be penetrated as far up as its middle course, where it is jammed between two mountain walls, in a deep canyon, along which it dashes over high falls and numerous reefs. This is the stream made famous by the expedition of the SpanishconquistadorGonzalo Pizarro.

Hydrometric stations on the Napo River:

StationRiver kilometer (rkm)Elevation (m)Drainage basin

(km2)

Averagedischarge

(m3/s)

[9][2][10]
Lower Napo
Francisco de Orellana078103,307.797,147.86,611
Mazán79.7685100,5187,0336,464.5
Bellavista194.5110590,305.36,416.1
Santa Clotilde256.2411385,7706,124.45,700
Campo Serio421.3514050,342.93,430.3
Cabo Pantoja546.816644,698.23,007.53,280
Nuevo Rocafuerte574.117327,489.41,937.32,032
Pañacocha67320321,731.41,552.1
Upper Napo
Puerto Francisco de Orellana78224312,3431,0161,105
Puerto Napo9504274,182.4260.9377.6

Discharge

[edit]

Napo River atBellavista average (Q), dominante (Qd) discharge (m3/s) andsediment load (S – million ton/year). Period from 1991/09–2009/08:

Water yearQSQdWater yearQSQd
1991/19925,66728.6086,0092001/20025,97932.4316,335
1992/19937,10447.7187,4472002/20035,66932.1546,312
1993/19948,01367.1598,5832003/20046,14841.9167,054
1994/19956,05534.8016,5252004/20056,45637.9536,767
1995/19965,95634.0176,4632005/20066,14334.776,523
1996/19976,26238.2586,7902006/20076,53540.3446,942
1997/19989,839105.95610,3542007/20086,61540.8326,977
1998/19996,83951.487,6862008/20097,42852.5047,749
1999/20006,72549.7357,576
2000/20016,45238.5276,810Average6,66044.9537,161

[8]

Napo River atBellavista average, minimum and maximum discharge (m3/s). Period from 2009/09 to 2023/08:

Water yearMeanMinMaxWater yearMeanMinMax
2009/20107,1772016/20177,273.63,20011,150
2010/20115,768.21,64910,8602017/20187,2841,55013,500
2011/20127,447.42,89412,2302018/20198,2342,85012,200
2012/20137,452.73,10211,2302019/20208,1003,10012,700
2013/20148,6523,23013,7002020/20218,4103,62014,000
2014/20159,3364,81013,4502021/20226,8552,07813,500
2015/20165,761498.610,2002022/20235,8491,20115,200

Minimum 498.6 m3/s (2016/02); Maximum: 15,820 m3/s (2015/07);[4][11]

Napo River atBellavista average, maximum, minimum and multiannual average (normal) discharge (m3/s) and anomaly (%):

MeanMaxMinNormal(%)
2010/09 – 2011/08
SEP2,620.53,0891,9695,121.2–49
OCT2,413.53,0611,6494,898.6–51
NOV3,818.74,7782,6965,595.1–32
DEC4,774.16,2404,1485,660.6–16
JAN3,604.25,0012,1744,580.7–21
FEB2,480.73,4781,9204,386.9–43
MAR4,753.47,1273,7905,824.1–18
APR9,206.810,2407,8657,502.423
MAY9,561.510,0408,3488,941.37
JUN10,193.810,8608,8219,422.98
JUL9,846.310,5907,9048,844.711
AUG5,944.68,6583,7586,610.8–10
Mean5,768.26,9304,5876,449.1–12
2011/09 – 2012/08
SEP4,551.35,4413,7575,121.211
OCT5,344.96,9952,8944,898.69
NOV4,4276,8783,0235,595.1–21
DEC6,536.89,1605,2055,660.615
JAN7,998.79,5014,8684,580.775
FEB6,536.88,3025,1554,386.949
MAR9,557.212,1505,4175,824.164
APR11,843.712,23010,8707,502.458
MAY10,322.710,7909,7028,941.315
JUN8,878.89,9617,0119,422.9–6
JUL8,189.39,2287,1978,844.7–7
AUG5,1827,6053,9756,612.4–22
Mean7,447.49,0205,7566,449.215.5
2012/09 – 2013/08
SEP5,0377,8223,2495,096–1
OCT5,1136,4574,6324,9184
NOV4,1305,6603,1025,567–26
DEC4,7556,8383,5685,698–17
JAN7,5899,1833,8544,72361
FEB5,8519,0714,1704,46531
MAR10,06010,7409,1275,97368
APR9,405106108,6757,68322
MAY8,32210,5706,9328,999–8
JUN10,49511,2309,7439,40012
JUL9,67510,4108,4028,81710
AUG9,0019,7768,3866,55137
Mean7,452.79,0306,1536,490.815

[12][13][14]

Napo River average discharge:
PeriodDischargeRef.
Francisco de Orellana

(near mouth)

3°27′28″S72°43′3″W / 3.45778°S 72.71750°W /-3.45778; -72.71750

2010–20157,400 m3/s (260,000 cu ft/s)[15]
7,500 m3/s (260,000 cu ft/s)[3]
1971–20007,147.8 m3/s (252,420 cu ft/s)[2]
8,936 m3/s (315,600 cu ft/s)[16]
4,555.23 m3/s (160,866 cu ft/s)[17]
Bellavista (Mazán)
1930–20066,464 m3/s (228,300 cu ft/s)[18]
1981–20206,800 m3/s (240,000 cu ft/s)[6]
1989–20106,360 m3/s (225,000 cu ft/s)

(Q–dominante: 6,865 m3/s (242,400 cu ft/s)

[19]
1991–20096,660 m3/s (235,000 cu ft/s)[8]
1997–20156,734.2 m3/s (237,820 cu ft/s)[20]
2000–20116,461 m3/s (228,200 cu ft/s)[5]
2001–20126,758 m3/s (238,700 cu ft/s)[21]
2001–20096,369 m3/s (224,900 cu ft/s)[8]
2002–20086,489 m3/s (229,200 cu ft/s)[22]
2003–20096,855 m3/s (242,100 cu ft/s)[23]
2004–20106,609 m3/s (233,400 cu ft/s)[24]
2001–20056,976 m3/s (246,400 cu ft/s)[7]
2004–20066,267 m3/s (221,300 cu ft/s)[7]
2016–20179,338 m3/s (329,800 cu ft/s)[25]
1971–20007,032 m3/s (248,300 cu ft/s)[2]

Tributaries

[edit]

List of the major tributaries of the Napo River (from the mouth upwards):

Left

tributary

Right

tributary

Length (km)Basin size (km2)*Average discharge (m3/s)
Napo1,089.03103,307.797,147.8
Lower Napo
Sucusari590.739.8
Mazán509.117,721.3532.9
Yanayaçu1,34089
Zapote140.89.3
Papaya27817.5
Tacshacuraray203.12,760.5196.5
Huirina61033.2
Tamboryaçu4,958327.2
Pucara82750.4
Curaray772.7726,704.72,044.4
Tarapoto67946.1
Gomez424.832.6
Loro Caparin794.161.8
Anshiri2,682.5202.1
Santa Maria1,471.5107.8
Aguarico502.513,404.5889.3
Yasuní238.53,386.8237.7
Tiputini380.44,423.1320.2
Huiririma13.2
Cariyuturi253.518.3
Pañyaçu80876.768.4
Indillana71.8636.351.5
Itaya120.69.6
Jivino121.7707.956
Blanco24917.6
Coca245.15,308.1338.9
Upper Napo
Payamino110.42,012.6171.2
Suyunoyaçu198.816.8
Suno96.71,891.4161.2
Arajuno835.997.9
Pusuno160.215.2
Misahuallí68.71,659.6170.6
Jatunyaçu1073,221.2302.7
Anzu69.7817.175

*Period: 1971–2000[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Ziesler, R.; Ardizzone, G.D. (1979). "Amazon River System".The Inland waters of Latin America.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.ISBN 92-5-000780-9.Archived from the original on 8 November 2014.
  2. ^abcdef"Amazon".
  3. ^abcCharles J., Vörösmarty; Berrien, Moore; Annette L., Grace; M. Patricia, Gildea (1989).CONTINENTAL SCALE MODELS OF WATER BALANCE AND FLUVIAL TRANSPORT: AN APPLICATIONS TO SOUTH AMERICA(PDF). Vol. 3. p. 241-265.
  4. ^abcd"Reportes hidrológicos".Archived from the original on 2023-10-03. Retrieved2023-10-03.
  5. ^abcd"6_1-6_Linea Ambiental"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2014-06-07. Retrieved2021-10-15.
  6. ^abClaire, F. Beveridge; Jhan-Carlo, Espinoza; Simone, Athayde; Sandra, Bibiana Correa; Thiago, B. A. Couto; Sebastian, A. Heilpern; Clinton, N. Jenkins; Natalia, C. Piland; Renata, Utsunomiya; Sly, Wongchuig; Elizabeth, P. Anderson (2024)."The Andes–Amazon–Atlantic pathway: A foundational hydroclimate system for social–ecological system sustainability".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.121 (22): e2306229121.Bibcode:2024PNAS..12106229B.doi:10.1073/pnas.2306229121.PMC 11145265.PMID 38722826.
  7. ^abcChristophoul, Frédéric (January 2009)."Sediment budget of the Napo River, Amazon basin, Ecuador and Peru".www.academia.edu Hydrological …, 2009.
  8. ^abcdESTUDIO BINACIONAL DE NAVEGABILIDAD DEL RÍO NAPO(PDF). 2010.
  9. ^"Hydro-SHEDS".
  10. ^"SO-HYBAM".
  11. ^"Senamhi". 7 September 2021.Archived from the original on 28 March 2023. Retrieved28 March 2023.
  12. ^"EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2011".Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved2023-03-28.
  13. ^"EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA DE LAS CUENCAS AMAZÓNICAS PERUANAS – OCTUBRE 2012".Archived from the original on 2023-03-28. Retrieved2023-03-28.
  14. ^"BOLETIN EXTRAORDINARIO DE LA EVALUACIÓN HIDROLÓGICA Y PLUVIOMÉTRICA EN LA CUENCA AMAZÓNICA PERUANA – AGOSTO 2013". Archived fromthe original on 2021-11-02. Retrieved2021-11-02.
  15. ^William, Santini (2019).An index concentration method for suspended load monitoring in large rivers of the Amazonian foreland.doi:10.5194/esurf-2018-93.
  16. ^"Oficina Nacional de Evaluación de Recursos Naturales (ONERN)".
  17. ^"Empresa de Electricidad del Perú S.A.-ELECTROPERU-Plataforma del Estado Peruano". 19 May 2023.
  18. ^"HYBAM".
  19. ^Julio Isaac, Montenegro Gambini (2015).Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modeling in a bend of napo amazonian river: Morphodynamics and infrastructure implications.doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.27735.68008.
  20. ^Jamie, Towner (2019)."Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 14 October 2023. Retrieved28 March 2022.
  21. ^Filizola, Naziano; Melo, Edileuza; Armijos, Elisa; McGlynn, John (2015)."Preliminary Analysis of Potential for River Hydrokinetic Energy Tecnologies in the Amazon Basin".Idb Publications.doi:10.18235/0000222 (inactive 10 January 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2025 (link)
  22. ^Alain, Laraque; Jean-Sébastien, Moquet (2011)."Chemical weathering and atmospheric/soil CO2 uptake in the Andean and Foreland Amazon basins".Chemical Geology.287 (1–2):1–26.Bibcode:2011ChGeo.287....1M.doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.005.
  23. ^Ricardo Zubieta, Barragán (2013).Modelado hidrológico distribuido de la cuenca amazónica peruana utilizando precipitación obtenida por satélite.
  24. ^Philippe, Vauchel; Jorge Luis, Carranza Vasle; Alain, Crave (2013)."Suspended sediment dynamics in the Amazon River of Peru".Journal of South American Earth Sciences.44: 75.Bibcode:2013JSAES..44...75A.doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2012.09.002.
  25. ^Ricardo, Zubieta; Augusto, Getirana; Jhan Carlo, Espinoza; Waldo, Lavado-Casimiro; Luis, Aragon (2017)."Hydrological modeling of the Peruvian-Ecuadorian Amazon Basin using GPM-IMERG satellite-based precipitation dataset".Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.21 (7):3543–3555.Bibcode:2017HESS...21.3543Z.doi:10.5194/hess-21-3543-2017.PMC 7402198.PMID 32753831.
International
National
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Napo_River&oldid=1280480639"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp