Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Riemannian manifold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Smooth manifold with an inner product on each tangent space
Not to be confused withRiemann surface.
Thedot product of two vectors tangent to thesphere sitting inside3-dimensional Euclidean space contains information about the lengths and angle between the vectors. The dot products on everytangent plane, packaged together into one mathematical object, are a Riemannian metric.

Indifferential geometry, aRiemannian manifold is ageometric space on which many geometric notions such as distance, angles, length, volume, and curvature are defined.Euclidean space, then{\displaystyle n}-sphere,hyperbolic space, andsmooth surfaces in three-dimensional space, such asellipsoids andparaboloids, are all examples of Riemannianmanifolds. Riemannian manifolds are named after German mathematicianBernhard Riemann, who first conceptualized them.

Formally, aRiemannian metric (or just ametric) on asmooth manifold is a smoothly varying choice ofinner product for eachtangent space of the manifold. A Riemannian manifold is a smooth manifold together with a Riemannian metric. The techniques ofdifferential and integral calculus are used to pull geometric data out of the Riemannian metric. For example, integration leads to the Riemannian distance function, whereas differentiation is used to define curvature andparallel transport.

Any smooth surface in three-dimensional Euclidean space is a Riemannian manifold with a Riemannian metric coming from the way it sits inside theambient space. The same is true for anysubmanifold of Euclidean space of any dimension. AlthoughJohn Nash proved that every Riemannian manifold arises as a submanifold of Euclidean space, and although some Riemannian manifolds are naturally exhibited or defined in that way, the idea of a Riemannian manifold emphasizes the intrinsic point of view, which defines geometric notions directly on the abstract space itself without referencing an ambient space. In many instances, such as for hyperbolic space andprojective space, Riemannian metrics are more naturally defined or constructed using the intrinsic point of view. Additionally, many metrics onLie groups andhomogeneous spaces are defined intrinsically by usinggroup actions to transport an inner product on a single tangent space to the entire manifold, and many special metrics such asconstant scalar curvature metrics andKähler–Einstein metrics are constructed intrinsically using tools frompartial differential equations.

Riemannian geometry, the study of Riemannian manifolds, has deep connections to other areas of math, includinggeometric topology,complex geometry, andalgebraic geometry. Applications includephysics (especiallygeneral relativity andgauge theory),computer graphics,machine learning, andcartography. Generalizations of Riemannian manifolds includepseudo-Riemannian manifolds,Finsler manifolds, andsub-Riemannian manifolds.

History

[edit]
Riemannian manifolds were first conceptualized by their namesake, German mathematicianBernhard Riemann.

In 1827,Carl Friedrich Gauss discovered that theGaussian curvature of a surface embedded in 3-dimensional space only depends on local measurements made within the surface (thefirst fundamental form).[1] This result is known as theTheorema Egregium ("remarkable theorem" in Latin).

A map that preserves the local measurements of a surface is called alocal isometry. A property of a surface is called an intrinsic property if it is preserved by local isometries and it is called an extrinsic property if it is not. In this language, the Theorema Egregium says that the Gaussian curvature is an intrinsic property of surfaces.

Riemannian manifolds and their curvature were first introduced non-rigorously byBernhard Riemann in 1854.[2] However, they would not be formalized until much later. In fact, the more primitive concept of asmooth manifold was first explicitly defined only in 1913 in a book byHermann Weyl.[2]

Élie Cartan introduced theCartan connection, one of the first concepts of aconnection.Levi-Civita defined theLevi-Civita connection, a special connection on a Riemannian manifold.

Albert Einstein used the theory ofpseudo-Riemannian manifolds (a generalization of Riemannian manifolds) to developgeneral relativity. Specifically, theEinstein field equations are constraints on the curvature ofspacetime, which is a 4-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold.

Definition

[edit]

Riemannian metrics and Riemannian manifolds

[edit]
A tangent plane of the sphere with two vectors in it. A Riemannian metric allows one to take the inner product of these vectors.

LetM{\displaystyle M} be asmooth manifold. For each pointpM{\displaystyle p\in M}, there is an associated vector spaceTpM{\displaystyle T_{p}M} called thetangent space ofM{\displaystyle M} atp{\displaystyle p}. Vectors inTpM{\displaystyle T_{p}M} are thought of as the vectors tangent toM{\displaystyle M} atp{\displaystyle p}.

However,TpM{\displaystyle T_{p}M} does not come equipped with aninner product, a "measuring stick" that gives tangent vectors a concept of length and angle. This is an important deficiency because calculus teaches that to calculate the length of a curve, the length of vectors tangent to the curve must be defined. A Riemannian metric puts such a "measuring stick" on every tangent space.

ARiemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} onM{\displaystyle M} assigns to eachp{\displaystyle p} apositive-definitesymmetric bilinear form (i.e. an inner product)gp:TpM×TpMR{\displaystyle g_{p}:T_{p}M\times T_{p}M\to \mathbb {R} } in a smooth way (see the section on regularity below).[3] This induces a normp:TpMR{\displaystyle \|\cdot \|_{p}:T_{p}M\to \mathbb {R} } defined byvp=gp(v,v){\displaystyle \|v\|_{p}={\sqrt {g_{p}(v,v)}}}. A smooth manifoldM{\displaystyle M} endowed with a Riemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} is aRiemannian manifold, denoted(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)}.[3] A Riemannian metric is a special case of ametric tensor.

A Riemannian metric is not to be confused with the distance function of ametric space, which is also called a metric.

The Riemannian metric in coordinates

[edit]

If(x1,,xn):URn{\displaystyle (x^{1},\ldots ,x^{n}):U\to \mathbb {R} ^{n}} are smoothlocal coordinates onM{\displaystyle M}, the vectors

{x1|p,,xn|p}{\displaystyle \left\{{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{1}}}{\Big |}_{p},\dotsc ,{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{n}}}{\Big |}_{p}\right\}}

form a basis of the vector spaceTpM{\displaystyle T_{p}M} for anypU{\displaystyle p\in U}. Relative to this basis, one can define the Riemannian metric's components at each pointp{\displaystyle p} by

gij|p:=gp(xi|p,xj|p){\displaystyle g_{ij}|_{p}:=g_{p}\left(\left.{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{i}}}\right|_{p},\left.{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{j}}}\right|_{p}\right)}.[4]

Thesen2{\displaystyle n^{2}} functionsgij:UR{\displaystyle g_{ij}:U\to \mathbb {R} } can be put together into ann×n{\displaystyle n\times n} matrix-valued function onU{\displaystyle U}. The requirement thatgp{\displaystyle g_{p}} is a positive-definite inner product then says exactly that this matrix-valued function is asymmetricpositive-definite matrix atp{\displaystyle p}.

In terms of thetensor algebra, the Riemannian metric can be written in terms of thedual basis{dx1,,dxn}{\displaystyle \{dx^{1},\ldots ,dx^{n}\}} of the cotangent bundle as

g=i,jgijdxidxj.{\displaystyle g=\sum _{i,j}g_{ij}\,dx^{i}\otimes dx^{j}.}[4]

Regularity of the Riemannian metric

[edit]

The Riemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} iscontinuous if its componentsgij:UR{\displaystyle g_{ij}:U\to \mathbb {R} } are continuous in any smooth coordinate chart(U,x).{\displaystyle (U,x).} The Riemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} issmooth if its componentsgij{\displaystyle g_{ij}} are smooth in any smooth coordinate chart. One can consider many other types of Riemannian metrics in this spirit, such asLipschitz Riemannian metrics ormeasurable Riemannian metrics.

There are situations ingeometric analysis in which one wants to consider non-smooth Riemannian metrics. See for instance (Gromov 1999) and (Shi and Tam 2002). However, in this article,g{\displaystyle g} is assumed to be smooth unless stated otherwise.

Musical isomorphism

[edit]
Main article:Musical isomorphism

In analogy to how an inner product on a vector space induces an isomorphism between a vector space and itsdual given byvv,{\displaystyle v\mapsto \langle v,\cdot \rangle }, a Riemannian metric induces an isomorphism of bundles between thetangent bundle and thecotangent bundle. Namely, ifg{\displaystyle g} is a Riemannian metric, then

(p,v)gp(v,){\displaystyle (p,v)\mapsto g_{p}(v,\cdot )}

is a isomorphism ofsmooth vector bundles from the tangent bundleTM{\displaystyle TM} to the cotangent bundleTM{\displaystyle T^{*}M}.[5]

Isometries

[edit]

An isometry is a function between Riemannian manifolds which preserves all of the structure of Riemannian manifolds. If two Riemannian manifolds have an isometry between them, they are calledisometric, and they are considered to be the same manifold for the purpose of Riemannian geometry.

Specifically, if(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} and(N,h){\displaystyle (N,h)} are two Riemannian manifolds, adiffeomorphismf:MN{\displaystyle f:M\to N} is called anisometry ifg=fh{\displaystyle g=f^{\ast }h},[6] that is, if

gp(u,v)=hf(p)(dfp(u),dfp(v)){\displaystyle g_{p}(u,v)=h_{f(p)}(df_{p}(u),df_{p}(v))}

for allpM{\displaystyle p\in M} andu,vTpM.{\displaystyle u,v\in T_{p}M.} For example, translations and rotations are both isometries from Euclidean space (to be defined soon) to itself.

One says that a smooth mapf:MN,{\displaystyle f:M\to N,} not assumed to be a diffeomorphism, is alocal isometry if everypM{\displaystyle p\in M} has an open neighborhoodU{\displaystyle U} such thatf:Uf(U){\displaystyle f:U\to f(U)} is an isometry (and thus a diffeomorphism).[6]

Volume

[edit]

An orientedn{\displaystyle n}-dimensional Riemannian manifold(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} has a uniquen{\displaystyle n}-formdVg{\displaystyle dV_{g}} called theRiemannian volume form.[7] The Riemannian volume form is preserved by orientation-preserving isometries.[8] The volume form gives rise to ameasure onM{\displaystyle M} which allows measurable functions to be integrated.[citation needed] IfM{\displaystyle M} iscompact, thevolume ofM{\displaystyle M} isMdVg{\displaystyle \int _{M}dV_{g}}.[7]

Examples

[edit]

Euclidean space

[edit]

Letx1,,xn{\displaystyle x^{1},\ldots ,x^{n}} denote the standard coordinates onRn.{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}.} The (canonical)Euclidean metricgcan{\displaystyle g^{\text{can}}} is given by[9]

gcan(iaixi,jbjxj)=iaibi{\displaystyle g^{\text{can}}\left(\sum _{i}a_{i}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{i}}},\sum _{j}b_{j}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{j}}}\right)=\sum _{i}a_{i}b_{i}}

or equivalently

gcan=(dx1)2++(dxn)2{\displaystyle g^{\text{can}}=(dx^{1})^{2}+\cdots +(dx^{n})^{2}}

or equivalently by its coordinate functions

gijcan=δij{\displaystyle g_{ij}^{\text{can}}=\delta _{ij}} whereδij{\displaystyle \delta _{ij}} is theKronecker delta

which together form the matrix

(gijcan)=(100010001).{\displaystyle (g_{ij}^{\text{can}})={\begin{pmatrix}1&0&\cdots &0\\0&1&\cdots &0\\\vdots &\vdots &\ddots &\vdots \\0&0&\cdots &1\end{pmatrix}}.}

The Riemannian manifold(Rn,gcan){\displaystyle (\mathbb {R} ^{n},g^{\text{can}})} is calledEuclidean space.

Submanifolds

[edit]
Main article:Riemannian submanifold
Then{\displaystyle n}-sphereSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} with the round metric is an embedded Riemannian submanifold ofRn+1{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n+1}}.

Let(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} be a Riemannian manifold and leti:NM{\displaystyle i:N\to M} be animmersed submanifold or anembedded submanifold ofM{\displaystyle M}. Thepullbackig{\displaystyle i^{*}g} ofg{\displaystyle g} is a Riemannian metric onN{\displaystyle N}, and(N,ig){\displaystyle (N,i^{*}g)} is said to be aRiemannian submanifold of(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)}.[10]

In the case whereNM{\displaystyle N\subseteq M}, the mapi:NM{\displaystyle i:N\to M} is given byi(x)=x{\displaystyle i(x)=x} and the metricig{\displaystyle i^{*}g} is just the restriction ofg{\displaystyle g} to vectors tangent alongN{\displaystyle N}. In general, the formula forig{\displaystyle i^{*}g} is

igp(v,w)=gi(p)(dip(v),dip(w)),{\displaystyle i^{*}g_{p}(v,w)=g_{i(p)}{\big (}di_{p}(v),di_{p}(w){\big )},}

wheredip(v){\displaystyle di_{p}(v)} is thepushforward ofv{\displaystyle v} byi.{\displaystyle i.}

Examples:

is a smooth embedded submanifold of Euclidean spaceRn+1{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n+1}}.[11] The Riemannian metric this induces onSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} is called theround metric orstandard metric.
is a smooth embedded submanifold of Euclidean spaceR3{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}}.

On the other hand, ifN{\displaystyle N} already has a Riemannian metricg~{\displaystyle {\tilde {g}}}, then the immersion (or embedding)i:NM{\displaystyle i:N\to M} is called anisometric immersion (orisometric embedding) ifg~=ig{\displaystyle {\tilde {g}}=i^{*}g}. Hence isometric immersions and isometric embeddings are Riemannian submanifolds.[10]

Products

[edit]
A 2x2 square grid
A torus embedded in Euclidean space
Atorus naturally carries a Euclidean metric, obtained by identifying opposite sides of a square (left). The resulting Riemannian manifold, called aflat torus, cannot be isometrically embedded in 3-dimensional Euclidean space (right), because it is necessary to bend and stretch the sheet in doing so. Thus the intrinsic geometry of a flat torus is different from that of an embedded torus.

Let(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} and(N,h){\displaystyle (N,h)} be two Riemannian manifolds, and consider theproduct manifoldM×N{\displaystyle M\times N}. The Riemannian metricsg{\displaystyle g} andh{\displaystyle h} naturally put a Riemannian metricg~{\displaystyle {\widetilde {g}}} onM×N,{\displaystyle M\times N,} which can be described in a few ways.

For example, consider then{\displaystyle n}-torusTn=S1××S1{\displaystyle T^{n}=S^{1}\times \cdots \times S^{1}}. If each copy ofS1{\displaystyle S^{1}} is given the round metric, the product Riemannian manifoldTn{\displaystyle T^{n}} is called theflat torus. As another example, the Riemannian productR××R{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} \times \cdots \times \mathbb {R} }, where each copy ofR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } has the Euclidean metric, is isometric toRn{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}} with the Euclidean metric.

Positive combinations of metrics

[edit]

Letg1,,gk{\displaystyle g_{1},\ldots ,g_{k}} be Riemannian metrics onM.{\displaystyle M.} Iff1,,fk{\displaystyle f_{1},\ldots ,f_{k}} are any positive smooth functions onM{\displaystyle M}, thenf1g1++fkgk{\displaystyle f_{1}g_{1}+\ldots +f_{k}g_{k}} is another Riemannian metric onM.{\displaystyle M.}

Every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric

[edit]

Theorem: Every smooth manifold admits a (non-canonical) Riemannian metric.[13]

This is a fundamental result. Although much of the basic theory of Riemannian metrics can be developed using only that a smooth manifold is a locally Euclidean topological space, for this result it is necessary to use that smooth manifolds areHausdorff andparacompact. The reason is that the proof makes use of apartition of unity.

Proof that every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric

LetM{\displaystyle M} be a smooth manifold and{(Uα,φα)}αA{\displaystyle \{(U_{\alpha },\varphi _{\alpha })\}_{\alpha \in A}} alocally finiteatlas so thatUαM{\displaystyle U_{\alpha }\subseteq M} are open subsets andφα:Uαφα(Uα)Rn{\displaystyle \varphi _{\alpha }\colon U_{\alpha }\to \varphi _{\alpha }(U_{\alpha })\subseteq \mathbf {R} ^{n}} are diffeomorphisms. Such an atlas exists because the manifold is paracompact.

Let{τα}αA{\displaystyle \{\tau _{\alpha }\}_{\alpha \in A}} be a differentiablepartition of unity subordinate to the given atlas, i.e. such thatsupp(τα)Uα{\displaystyle \operatorname {supp} (\tau _{\alpha })\subseteq U_{\alpha }} for allαA{\displaystyle \alpha \in A}.

Define a Riemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} onM{\displaystyle M} by

g=αAταg~α{\displaystyle g=\sum _{\alpha \in A}\tau _{\alpha }\cdot {\tilde {g}}_{\alpha }}

where

g~α=φαgcan.{\displaystyle {\tilde {g}}_{\alpha }=\varphi _{\alpha }^{*}g^{\text{can}}.}

Heregcan{\displaystyle g^{\text{can}}} is the Euclidean metric onRn{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}} andφαgcan{\displaystyle \varphi _{\alpha }^{*}g^{\mathrm {can} }} is itspullback alongφα{\displaystyle \varphi _{\alpha }}. Whileg~α{\displaystyle {\tilde {g}}_{\alpha }} is only defined onUα{\displaystyle U_{\alpha }}, the productταg~α{\displaystyle \tau _{\alpha }\cdot {\tilde {g}}_{\alpha }} is defined and smooth onM{\displaystyle M} sincesupp(τα)Uα{\displaystyle \operatorname {supp} (\tau _{\alpha })\subseteq U_{\alpha }}. It takes the value 0 outside ofUα{\displaystyle U_{\alpha }}. Because the atlas is locally finite, at every point the sum contains only finitely many nonzero terms, so the sum converges. It is straightforward to check thatg{\displaystyle g} is a Riemannian metric.

An alternative proof uses theWhitney embedding theorem to embedM{\displaystyle M} into Euclidean space and then pulls back the metric from Euclidean space toM{\displaystyle M}. On the other hand, theNash embedding theorem states that, given any smooth Riemannian manifold(M,g),{\displaystyle (M,g),} there is an embeddingF:MRN{\displaystyle F:M\to \mathbb {R} ^{N}} for someN{\displaystyle N} such that thepullback byF{\displaystyle F} of the standard Riemannian metric onRN{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{N}} isg.{\displaystyle g.} That is, the entire structure of a smooth Riemannian manifold can be encoded by a diffeomorphism to a certain embedded submanifold of some Euclidean space. Therefore, one could argue that nothing can be gained from the consideration of abstract smooth manifolds and their Riemannian metrics. However, there are many natural smooth Riemannian manifolds, such as theset of rotations of three-dimensional space and hyperbolic space, of which any representation as a submanifold of Euclidean space will fail to represent their remarkable symmetries and properties as clearly as their abstract presentations do.

Metric space structure

[edit]

Anadmissible curve is a piecewise smooth curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} whose velocityγ(t)Tγ(t)M{\displaystyle \gamma '(t)\in T_{\gamma (t)}M} is nonzero everywhere it is defined. The nonnegative functiontγ(t)γ(t){\displaystyle t\mapsto \|\gamma '(t)\|_{\gamma (t)}} is defined on the interval[0,1]{\displaystyle [0,1]} except for at finitely many points. The lengthL(γ){\displaystyle L(\gamma )} of an admissible curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} is defined as

L(γ)=01γ(t)γ(t)dt.{\displaystyle L(\gamma )=\int _{0}^{1}\|\gamma '(t)\|_{\gamma (t)}\,dt.}

The integrand is bounded and continuous except at finitely many points, so it is integrable. For(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} a connected Riemannian manifold, definedg:M×M[0,){\displaystyle d_{g}:M\times M\to [0,\infty )} by

dg(p,q)=inf{L(γ):γ an admissible curve with γ(0)=p,γ(1)=q}.{\displaystyle d_{g}(p,q)=\inf\{L(\gamma ):\gamma {\text{ an admissible curve with }}\gamma (0)=p,\gamma (1)=q\}.}

Theorem:(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is ametric space, and themetric topology on(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} coincides with the topology onM{\displaystyle M}.[14]

Proof sketch that(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is a metric space, and the metric topology on(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} agrees with the topology onM{\displaystyle M}

In verifying that(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} satisfies all of theaxioms of a metric space, the most difficult part is checking thatpq{\displaystyle p\neq q} impliesdg(p,q)>0{\displaystyle d_{g}(p,q)>0}. Verification of the other metric space axioms is omitted.

There must be some precompact open set aroundp which every curve fromp toq must escape. By selecting this open set to be contained in a coordinate chart, one can reduce the claim to the well-known fact that, in Euclidean geometry, the shortest curve between two points is a line. In particular, as seen by the Euclidean geometry of a coordinate chart aroundp, any curve fromp toq must first pass though a certain "inner radius." The assumed continuity of the Riemannian metricg only allows this "coordinate chart geometry" to distort the "true geometry" by some bounded factor.

To be precise, let(U,x){\displaystyle (U,x)} be a smooth coordinate chart withx(p)=0{\displaystyle x(p)=0} andqU.{\displaystyle q\notin U.} LetVx{\displaystyle V\ni x} be an open subset ofU{\displaystyle U} withV¯U.{\displaystyle {\overline {V}}\subset U.} By continuity ofg{\displaystyle g} and compactness ofV¯,{\displaystyle {\overline {V}},} there is a positive numberλ{\displaystyle \lambda } such thatg(X,X)λX2{\displaystyle g(X,X)\geq \lambda \|X\|^{2}} for anyrV{\displaystyle r\in V} and anyXTrM,{\displaystyle X\in T_{r}M,} where{\displaystyle \|\cdot \|} denotes the Euclidean norm induced by the local coordinates. LetR denotesup{r>0:Br(0)x(V)}{\displaystyle \sup\{r>0:B_{r}(0)\subset x(V)\}}.Now, given any admissible curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} fromp toq, there must be some minimalδ>0{\displaystyle \delta >0} such thatγ(δ)V;{\displaystyle \gamma (\delta )\notin V;} clearlyγ(δ)V.{\displaystyle \gamma (\delta )\in \partial V.}

The length ofγ{\displaystyle \gamma } is at least as large as the restriction ofγ{\displaystyle \gamma } to[0,δ].{\displaystyle [0,\delta ].} So

L(γ)λ0δγ(t)dt.{\displaystyle L(\gamma )\geq {\sqrt {\lambda }}\int _{0}^{\delta }\|\gamma '(t)\|\,dt.}

The integral which appears here represents the Euclidean length of a curve from 0 tox(V)Rn{\displaystyle x(\partial V)\subset \mathbb {R} ^{n}}, and so it is greater than or equal toR. So we concludeL(γ)λR.{\displaystyle L(\gamma )\geq {\sqrt {\lambda }}R.}

The observation about comparison between lengths measured byg and Euclidean lengths measured in a smooth coordinate chart, also verifies that the metric space topology of(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} coincides with the original topological space structure ofM{\displaystyle M}.

Although the length of a curve is given by an explicit formula, it is generally impossible to write out the distance functiondg{\displaystyle d_{g}} by any explicit means. In fact, ifM{\displaystyle M} is compact, there always exist points wheredg:M×MR{\displaystyle d_{g}:M\times M\to \mathbb {R} } is non-differentiable, and it can be remarkably difficult to even determine the location or nature of these points, even in seemingly simple cases such as when(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} is an ellipsoid.[citation needed]

If one works with Riemannian metrics that are merely continuous but possibly not smooth, the length of an admissible curve and the Riemannian distance function are defined exactly the same, and, as before,(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is ametric space and themetric topology on(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} coincides with the topology onM{\displaystyle M}.[15]

Diameter

[edit]

Thediameter of the metric space(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is

diam(M,dg)=sup{dg(p,q):p,qM}.{\displaystyle \operatorname {diam} (M,d_{g})=\sup\{d_{g}(p,q):p,q\in M\}.}

TheHopf–Rinow theorem shows that if(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} iscomplete and has finite diameter, it is compact. Conversely, if(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is compact, then the functiondg:M×MR{\displaystyle d_{g}:M\times M\to \mathbb {R} } has a maximum, since it is a continuous function on a compact metric space. This proves the following.

If(M,dg){\displaystyle (M,d_{g})} is complete, then it is compactif and only if it has finite diameter.

This is not the case without the completeness assumption; for counterexamples one could consider any open bounded subset of a Euclidean space with the standard Riemannian metric. It is also not true thatany complete metric space of finite diameter must be compact; it matters that the metric space came from a Riemannian manifold.

Connections, geodesics, and curvature

[edit]

Connections

[edit]
Main article:Affine connection

An(affine) connection is an additional structure on a Riemannian manifold that defines differentiation of one vector field with respect to another. Connections contain geometric data, and two Riemannian manifolds with different connections have different geometry.

LetX(M){\displaystyle {\mathfrak {X}}(M)} denote the space ofvector fields onM{\displaystyle M}. An(affine) connection

:X(M)×X(M)X(M){\displaystyle \nabla :{\mathfrak {X}}(M)\times {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\to {\mathfrak {X}}(M)}

onM{\displaystyle M} is a bilinear map(X,Y)XY{\displaystyle (X,Y)\mapsto \nabla _{X}Y} such that

  1. For every functionfC(M){\displaystyle f\in C^{\infty }(M)},f1X1+f2X2Y=f1X1Y+f2X2Y,{\displaystyle \nabla _{f_{1}X_{1}+f_{2}X_{2}}Y=f_{1}\,\nabla _{X_{1}}Y+f_{2}\,\nabla _{X_{2}}Y,}
  2. The product ruleXfY=X(f)Y+fXY{\displaystyle \nabla _{X}fY=X(f)Y+f\,\nabla _{X}Y} holds.[16]

The expressionXY{\displaystyle \nabla _{X}Y} is called thecovariant derivative ofY{\displaystyle Y} with respect toX{\displaystyle X}.

Levi-Civita connection

[edit]
Main article:Levi-Civita connection

Two Riemannian manifolds with different connections have different geometry. Thankfully, there is a natural connection associated to a Riemannian manifold called theLevi-Civita connection.

A connection{\displaystyle \nabla } is said topreserve the metric if

X(g(Y,Z))=g(XY,Z)+g(Y,XZ){\displaystyle X{\bigl (}g(Y,Z){\bigr )}=g(\nabla _{X}Y,Z)+g(Y,\nabla _{X}Z)}

A connection{\displaystyle \nabla } istorsion-free if

XYYX=[X,Y],{\displaystyle \nabla _{X}Y-\nabla _{Y}X=[X,Y],}

where[,]{\displaystyle [\cdot ,\cdot ]} is theLie bracket.

ALevi-Civita connection is a torsion-free connection that preserves the metric. Once a Riemannian metric is fixed, there exists a unique Levi-Civita connection.[17] Note that the definition of preserving the metric uses the regularity ofg{\displaystyle g}.

Covariant derivative along a curve

[edit]

Ifγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} is a smooth curve, asmooth vector field alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma } is a smooth mapX:[0,1]TM{\displaystyle X:[0,1]\to TM} such thatX(t)Tγ(t)M{\displaystyle X(t)\in T_{\gamma (t)}M} for allt[0,1]{\displaystyle t\in [0,1]}. The setX(γ){\displaystyle {\mathfrak {X}}(\gamma )} of smooth vector fields alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma } is a vector space under pointwise vector addition andscalar multiplication.[18] One can also pointwise multiply a smooth vector field alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma } by a smooth functionf:[0,1]R{\displaystyle f:[0,1]\to \mathbb {R} }:

(fX)(t)=f(t)X(t){\displaystyle (fX)(t)=f(t)X(t)} forXX(γ).{\displaystyle X\in {\mathfrak {X}}(\gamma ).}

LetX{\displaystyle X} be a smooth vector field alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma }. IfX~{\displaystyle {\tilde {X}}} is a smooth vector field on a neighborhood of the image ofγ{\displaystyle \gamma } such thatX(t)=X~γ(t){\displaystyle X(t)={\tilde {X}}_{\gamma (t)}}, thenX~{\displaystyle {\tilde {X}}} is called anextension ofX{\displaystyle X}.

Given a fixed connection{\displaystyle \nabla } onM{\displaystyle M} and a smooth curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M}, there is a unique operatorDt:X(γ)X(γ){\displaystyle D_{t}:{\mathfrak {X}}(\gamma )\to {\mathfrak {X}}(\gamma )}, called thecovariant derivative alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma }, such that:[19]

  1. Dt(aX+bY)=aDtX+bDtY,{\displaystyle D_{t}(aX+bY)=a\,D_{t}X+b\,D_{t}Y,}
  2. Dt(fX)=fX+fDtX,{\displaystyle D_{t}(fX)=f'X+f\,D_{t}X,}
  3. IfX~{\displaystyle {\tilde {X}}} is an extension ofX{\displaystyle X}, thenDtX(t)=γ(t)X~{\displaystyle D_{t}X(t)=\nabla _{\gamma '(t)}{\tilde {X}}}.

Geodesics

[edit]
Main article:Geodesic
In Euclidean spaceRn{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}} (left), the maximal geodesics are straight lines. In the round sphereSn{\displaystyle S^{n}} (right), the maximal geodesics aregreat circles.

Geodesics are curves with no intrinsic acceleration. Equivalently, geodesics are curves that locally take the shortest path between two points. They are the generalization of straight lines in Euclidean space to arbitrary Riemannian manifolds. An ant living in a Riemannian manifold walking straight ahead without making any effort to accelerate or turn would trace out a geodesic.

Fix a connection{\displaystyle \nabla } onM{\displaystyle M}. Letγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} be a smooth curve. Theacceleration ofγ{\displaystyle \gamma } is the vector fieldDtγ{\displaystyle D_{t}\gamma '} alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma }. IfDtγ=0{\displaystyle D_{t}\gamma '=0} for allt{\displaystyle t},γ{\displaystyle \gamma } is called ageodesic.[20]

For everypM{\displaystyle p\in M} andvTpM{\displaystyle v\in T_{p}M}, there exists a geodesicγ:IM{\displaystyle \gamma :I\to M} defined on some open intervalI{\displaystyle I} containing 0 such thatγ(0)=p{\displaystyle \gamma (0)=p} andγ(0)=v{\displaystyle \gamma '(0)=v}. Any two such geodesics agree on their common domain.[21] Taking the union over all open intervalsI{\displaystyle I} containing 0 on which a geodesic satisfyingγ(0)=p{\displaystyle \gamma (0)=p} andγ(0)=v{\displaystyle \gamma '(0)=v} exists, one obtains a geodesic called amaximal geodesic of which every geodesic satisfyingγ(0)=p{\displaystyle \gamma (0)=p} andγ(0)=v{\displaystyle \gamma '(0)=v} is a restriction.[22]

Every curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} that has the shortest length of any admissible curve with the same endpoints asγ{\displaystyle \gamma } is a geodesic (in a unit-speed reparameterization).[23]

Examples

[edit]
  • The nonconstant maximal geodesics of the Euclidean planeR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} are exactly the straight lines.[22] This agrees with the fact from Euclidean geometry that the shortest path between two points is a straight line segment.
  • The nonconstant maximal geodesics ofS2{\displaystyle S^{2}} with the round metric are exactly thegreat circles.[24] Since the Earth is approximately a sphere, this means that the shortest path a plane can fly between two locations on Earth is a segment of a great circle.

Hopf–Rinow theorem

[edit]
Main article:Hopf–Rinow theorem
The punctured planeR2{(0,0)}{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}\backslash \{(0,0)\}} is not geodesically complete because the maximal geodesic with initial conditionsp=(1,1){\displaystyle p=(1,1)},v=(1,1){\displaystyle v=(1,1)} does not have domainR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }.

The Riemannian manifoldM{\displaystyle M} with its Levi-Civita connection isgeodesically complete if the domain of every maximal geodesic is(,){\displaystyle (-\infty ,\infty )}.[25] The planeR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} is geodesically complete. On the other hand, thepunctured planeR2{(0,0)}{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}\smallsetminus \{(0,0)\}} with the restriction of the Riemannian metric fromR2{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}} is not geodesically complete as the maximal geodesic with initial conditionsp=(1,1){\displaystyle p=(1,1)},v=(1,1){\displaystyle v=(1,1)} does not have domainR{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }.

TheHopf–Rinow theorem characterizes geodesically complete manifolds.

Theorem: Let(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} be a connected Riemannian manifold. The following are equivalent:[26]

Parallel transport

[edit]
Main article:Parallel transport
Parallel transport of a tangent vector along a curve in the sphere.

In Euclidean space, all tangent spaces are canonically identified with each other via translation, so it is easy to move vectors from one tangent space to another.Parallel transport is a way of moving vectors from one tangent space to another along a curve in the setting of a general Riemannian manifold. Given a fixed connection, there is a unique way to do parallel transport.[27]

Specifically, call a smooth vector fieldV{\displaystyle V} along a smooth curveγ{\displaystyle \gamma }parallel alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma } ifDtV=0{\displaystyle D_{t}V=0} identically.[22] Fix a curveγ:[0,1]M{\displaystyle \gamma :[0,1]\to M} withγ(0)=p{\displaystyle \gamma (0)=p} andγ(1)=q{\displaystyle \gamma (1)=q}. to parallel transport a vectorvTpM{\displaystyle v\in T_{p}M} to a vector inTqM{\displaystyle T_{q}M} alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma }, first extendv{\displaystyle v} to a vector field parallel alongγ{\displaystyle \gamma }, and then take the value of this vector field atq{\displaystyle q}.

The images below show parallel transport induced by the Levi-Civita connection associated to two different Riemannian metrics on thepunctured planeR2{0,0}{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}\smallsetminus \{0,0\}}. The curve the parallel transport is done along is the unit circle. Inpolar coordinates, the metric on the left is the standard Euclidean metricdx2+dy2=dr2+r2dθ2{\displaystyle dx^{2}+dy^{2}=dr^{2}+r^{2}\,d\theta ^{2}}, while the metric on the right isdr2+dθ2{\displaystyle dr^{2}+d\theta ^{2}}. This second metric has a singularity at the origin, so it does not extend past the puncture, but the first metric extends to the entire plane.

Parallel transports on the punctured plane under Levi-Civita connections
Cartesian transport
This transport is given by the metricdr2+r2dθ2{\displaystyle dr^{2}+r^{2}d\theta ^{2}}.
Polar transport
This transport is given by the metricdr2+dθ2{\displaystyle dr^{2}+d\theta ^{2}}.

Warning: This is parallel transport on the punctured planealong the unit circle, not parallel transporton the unit circle. Indeed, in the first image, the vectors fall outside of the tangent space to the unit circle.

Riemann curvature tensor

[edit]
Main article:Riemann curvature tensor

The Riemann curvature tensor measures precisely the extent to which parallel transporting vectors around a small rectangle is not the identity map.[28] The Riemann curvature tensor is 0 at every point if and only if the manifold is locally isometric to Euclidean space.[29]

Fix a connection{\displaystyle \nabla } onM{\displaystyle M}. TheRiemann curvature tensor is the mapR:X(M)×X(M)×X(M)X(M){\displaystyle R:{\mathfrak {X}}(M)\times {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\times {\mathfrak {X}}(M)\to {\mathfrak {X}}(M)} defined by

R(X,Y)Z=XYZYXZ[X,Y]Z{\displaystyle R(X,Y)Z=\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}Z-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}Z-\nabla _{[X,Y]}Z}

where[X,Y]{\displaystyle [X,Y]} is theLie bracket of vector fields. The Riemann curvature tensor is a(1,3){\displaystyle (1,3)}-tensor field.[30]

Ricci curvature tensor

[edit]
Main article:Ricci curvature

Fix a connection{\displaystyle \nabla } onM{\displaystyle M}. TheRicci curvature tensor is

Ric(X,Y)=tr(ZR(Z,X)Y){\displaystyle Ric(X,Y)=\operatorname {tr} (Z\mapsto R(Z,X)Y)}

wheretr{\displaystyle \operatorname {tr} } is the trace. The Ricci curvature tensor is a covariant 2-tensor field.[31]

Einstein manifolds

[edit]
Main article:Einstein manifold

The Ricci curvature tensorRic{\displaystyle Ric} plays a defining role in the theory ofEinstein manifolds, which has applications to the study ofgravity. A (pseudo-)Riemannian metricg{\displaystyle g} is called anEinstein metric ifEinstein's equation

Ric=λg{\displaystyle Ric=\lambda g} for some constantλ{\displaystyle \lambda }

holds, and a (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold whose metric is Einstein is called anEinstein manifold.[32] Examples of Einstein manifolds include Euclidean space, then{\displaystyle n}-sphere, hyperbolic space, andcomplex projective space with theFubini-Study metric.

Scalar curvature

[edit]
Main article:Scalar curvature

Constant curvature and space forms

[edit]

A Riemannian manifold is said to haveconstant curvatureκ if everysectional curvature equals the numberκ. This is equivalent to the condition that, relative to any coordinate chart, theRiemann curvature tensor can be expressed in terms of themetric tensor as

Rijkl=κ(gilgjkgikgjl).{\displaystyle R_{ijkl}=\kappa (g_{il}g_{jk}-g_{ik}g_{jl}).}

This implies that theRicci curvature is given byRjk = (n − 1)κgjk and thescalar curvature isn(n − 1)κ, wheren is the dimension of the manifold. In particular, every Riemannian manifold of constant curvature is anEinstein manifold, thereby having constant scalar curvature. As found byBernhard Riemann in his 1854 lecture introducing Riemannian geometry, the locally defined Riemannian metric

dx12++dxn2(1+κ4(x12++xn2))2{\displaystyle {\frac {dx_{1}^{2}+\cdots +dx_{n}^{2}}{(1+{\frac {\kappa }{4}}(x_{1}^{2}+\cdots +x_{n}^{2}))^{2}}}}

has constant curvatureκ. Any two Riemannian manifolds of the same constant curvature arelocally isometric, and so it follows that any Riemannian manifold of constant curvatureκ can be covered by coordinate charts relative to which the metric has the above form.[33]

ARiemannian space form is a Riemannian manifold with constant curvature which is additionallyconnected andgeodesically complete. A Riemannian space form is said to be aspherical space form if the curvature is positive, aEuclidean space form if the curvature is zero, and ahyperbolic space form orhyperbolic manifold if the curvature is negative. In any dimension, the sphere with its standard Riemannian metric, Euclidean space, and hyperbolic space are Riemannian space forms of constant curvature1,0, and−1 respectively. Furthermore, theKilling–Hopf theorem says that any simply connected spherical space form is homothetic to the sphere, any simply connected Euclidean space form is homothetic to Euclidean space, and any simply connected hyperbolic space form is homothetic to hyperbolic space.[33]

Using thecovering manifold construction, any Riemannian space form is isometric to thequotient manifold of a simply connected Riemannian space form, modulo a certain group action of isometries. For example, the isometry group of then-sphere is theorthogonal groupO(n + 1). Given any finitesubgroupG thereof in which only theidentity matrix possesses1 as aneigenvalue, the natural group action of the orthogonal group on then-sphere restricts to a group action ofG, with thequotient manifoldSn /G inheriting a geodesically complete Riemannian metric of constant curvature1. Up to homothety, every spherical space form arises in this way; this largely reduces the study of spherical space forms to problems ingroup theory. For instance, this can be used to show directly that every even-dimensional spherical space form is homothetic to the standard metric on either the sphere orreal projective space. There are many more odd-dimensional spherical space forms, although there are known algorithms for their classification. The list of three-dimensional spherical space forms is infinite but explicitly known, and includes thelens spaces and thePoincaré dodecahedral space.[34]

The case of Euclidean and hyperbolic space forms can likewise be reduced to group theory, based on study of the isometry group of Euclidean space and hyperbolic space. For example, the class of two-dimensional Euclidean space forms includes Riemannian metrics on theKlein bottle, theMöbius strip, thetorus, thecylinderS1 × ℝ, along with the Euclidean plane. Unlike the case of two-dimensional spherical space forms, in some cases two space form structures on the same manifold are not homothetic. The case of two-dimensional hyperbolic space forms is even more complicated, having to do withTeichmüller space. In three dimensions, the Euclidean space forms are known, while the geometry of hyperbolic space forms in three and higher dimensions remains an area of active research known ashyperbolic geometry.[35]

Riemannian metrics on Lie groups

[edit]

Left-invariant metrics on Lie groups

[edit]

LetG be aLie group, such as thegroup of rotations in three-dimensional space. Using the group structure, any inner product on the tangent space at the identity (or any other particular tangent space) can be transported to all other tangent spaces to define a Riemannian metric. Formally, given an inner productge on the tangent space at the identity, the inner product on the tangent space at an arbitrary pointp is defined by

gp(u,v)=ge(dLp1(u),dLp1(v)),{\displaystyle g_{p}(u,v)=g_{e}(dL_{p^{-1}}(u),dL_{p^{-1}}(v)),}

where for arbitraryx,Lx is the left multiplication mapGG sending a pointy toxy. Riemannian metrics constructed this way areleft-invariant; right-invariant Riemannian metrics could be constructed likewise using the right multiplication map instead.

The Levi-Civita connection and curvature of a general left-invariant Riemannian metric can be computed explicitly in terms ofge, theadjoint representation ofG, and theLie algebra associated toG.[36] These formulas simplify considerably in the special case of a Riemannian metric which isbi-invariant (that is, simultaneously left- and right-invariant).[37] All left-invariant metrics have constant scalar curvature.

Left- and bi-invariant metrics on Lie groups are an important source of examples of Riemannian manifolds.Berger spheres, constructed as left-invariant metrics on thespecial unitary group SU(2), are among the simplest examples of thecollapsing phenomena, in which a simply connected Riemannian manifold can have small volume without having large curvature.[38] They also give an example of a Riemannian metric which has constant scalar curvature but which is notEinstein, or even of parallel Ricci curvature.[39] Hyperbolic space can be given a Lie group structure relative to which the metric is left-invariant.[40][41] Any bi-invariant Riemannian metric on a Lie group has nonnegative sectional curvature, giving a variety of such metrics: a Lie group can be given a bi-invariant Riemannian metric if and only if it is the product of acompact Lie group with anabelian Lie group.[42]

Homogeneous spaces

[edit]

A Riemannian manifold(M,g) is said to behomogeneous if for every pair of pointsx andy inM, there is some isometryf of the Riemannian manifold sendingx toy. This can be rephrased in the language ofgroup actions as the requirement that the natural action of theisometry group is transitive. Every homogeneous Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete and has constant scalar curvature.[43]

Up to isometry, all homogeneous Riemannian manifolds arise by the following construction. Given a Lie groupG with compact subgroupK which does not contain any nontrivialnormal subgroup ofG, fix anycomplemented subspaceW of theLie algebra ofK within the Lie algebra ofG. If this subspace is invariant under the linear mapadG(k):WW for any elementk ofK, thenG-invariant Riemannian metrics on thecoset spaceG/K are in one-to-one correspondence with those inner products onW which are invariant underadG(k):WW for every elementk ofK.[44] Each such Riemannian metric is homogeneous, withG naturally viewed as a subgroup of the full isometry group.

The above example of Lie groups with left-invariant Riemannian metrics arises as a very special case of this construction, namely whenK is the trivial subgroup containing only the identity element. The calculations of the Levi-Civita connection and the curvature referenced there can be generalized to this context, where now the computations are formulated in terms of the inner product onW, the Lie algebra ofG, and the direct sum decomposition of the Lie algebra ofG into the Lie algebra ofK andW.[44] This reduces the study of the curvature of homogeneous Riemannian manifolds largely to algebraic problems. This reduction, together with the flexibility of the above construction, makes the class of homogeneous Riemannian manifolds very useful for constructing examples.

Symmetric spaces

[edit]
Main article:Symmetric space

A connected Riemannian manifold(M,g) is said to besymmetric if for every pointp ofM there exists some isometry of the manifold withp as afixed point and for which the negation of thedifferential atp is theidentity map. Every Riemannian symmetric space is homogeneous, and consequently is geodesically complete and has constant scalar curvature. However, Riemannian symmetric spaces also have a much stronger curvature property not possessed by most homogeneous Riemannian manifolds, namely that theRiemann curvature tensor andRicci curvature areparallel. Riemannian manifolds with this curvature property, which could loosely be phrased as "constant Riemann curvature tensor" (not to be confused withconstant curvature), are said to belocally symmetric. This property nearly characterizes symmetric spaces;Élie Cartan proved in the 1920s that a locally symmetric Riemannian manifold which is geodesically complete andsimply-connected must in fact be symmetric.[45]

Many of the fundamental examples of Riemannian manifolds are symmetric. The most basic include the sphere andreal projective spaces with their standard metrics, along with hyperbolic space. The complex projective space,quaternionic projective space, andCayley plane are analogues of the real projective space which are also symmetric, as arecomplex hyperbolic space, quaternionic hyperbolic space, and Cayley hyperbolic space, which are instead analogues of hyperbolic space.Grassmannian manifolds also carry natural Riemannian metrics making them into symmetric spaces. Among the Lie groups with left-invariant Riemannian metrics, those which are bi-invariant are symmetric.[45]

Based on their algebraic formulation as special kinds of homogeneous spaces, Cartan achieved an explicit classification of symmetric spaces which areirreducible, referring to those which cannot be locally decomposed asproduct spaces. Every such space is an example of anEinstein manifold; among them only the one-dimensional manifolds have zero scalar curvature. These spaces are important from the perspective ofRiemannian holonomy. As found in the 1950s byMarcel Berger, any Riemannian manifold which is simply connected and irreducible is either a symmetric space or has Riemannian holonomy belonging to a list of only seven possibilities. Six of the seven exceptions to symmetric spaces in Berger's classification fall into the fields ofKähler geometry,quaternion-Kähler geometry,G2 geometry, andSpin(7) geometry, each of which study Riemannian manifolds equipped with certain extra structures and symmetries. The seventh exception is the study of 'generic' Riemannian manifolds with no particular symmetry, as reflected by the maximal possible holonomy group.[45]

Infinite-dimensional manifolds

[edit]
This section includes alist of references,related reading, orexternal links,but its sources remain unclear because it lacksinline citations. Please helpimprove this section byintroducing more precise citations.(July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The statements and theorems above are for finite-dimensional manifolds—manifolds whose charts map to open subsets ofRn.{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}.} These can be extended, to a certain degree, to infinite-dimensional manifolds; that is, manifolds that are modeled after atopological vector space; for example,Fréchet,Banach, andHilbert manifolds.

Definitions

[edit]

Riemannian metrics are defined in a way similar to the finite-dimensional case. However, there is a distinction between two types of Riemannian metrics:

Examples

[edit]

Metric space structure

[edit]

Length of curves and the Riemannian distance functiondg:M×M[0,){\displaystyle d_{g}:M\times M\to [0,\infty )} are defined in a way similar to the finite-dimensional case. The distance functiondg{\displaystyle d_{g}}, called thegeodesic distance, is always apseudometric (a metric that does not separate points), but it may not be a metric.[46] In the finite-dimensional case, the proof that the Riemannian distance function separates points uses the existence of a pre-compactopen set around any point. In the infinite case, open sets are no longer pre-compact, so the proof fails.

Hopf–Rinow theorem

[edit]

In the case of strong Riemannian metrics, one part of the finite-dimensional Hopf–Rinow still holds.

Theorem: Let(M,g){\displaystyle (M,g)} be a strong Riemannian manifold. Then metric completeness (in the metricdg{\displaystyle d_{g}}) implies geodesic completeness.[citation needed]

However, a geodesically complete strong Riemannian manifold might not be metrically complete and it might have closed and bounded subsets that are not compact.[citation needed] Further, a strong Riemannian manifold for which all closed and bounded subsets are compact might not be geodesically complete.[citation needed]

Ifg{\displaystyle g} is a weak Riemannian metric, then no notion of completeness implies the other in general.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^do Carmo 1992, pp. 35–36.
  2. ^abdo Carmo 1992, p. 37.
  3. ^abdo Carmo 1992, p. 38.
  4. ^abLee 2018, p. 13.
  5. ^Lee 2018, p. 26.
  6. ^abLee 2018, p. 12.
  7. ^abLee 2018, p. 30.
  8. ^Lee 2018, p. 31.
  9. ^Lee 2018, pp. 12–13.
  10. ^abLee 2018, p. 15.
  11. ^Lee 2018, p. 16.
  12. ^abLee 2018, p. 20.
  13. ^Lee 2018, p. 11.
  14. ^Lee 2018, p. 39.
  15. ^Burtscher 2015, p. 276.
  16. ^Lee 2018, pp. 89–91.
  17. ^Lee 2018, pp. 122–123.
  18. ^Lee 2018, p. 100.
  19. ^Lee 2018, pp. 101–102.
  20. ^Lee 2018, p. 103.
  21. ^Lee 2018, pp. 103–104.
  22. ^abcLee 2018, p. 105.
  23. ^Lee 2018, p. 156.
  24. ^Lee 2018, p. 137.
  25. ^Lee 2018, p. 131.
  26. ^do Carmo 1992, pp. 146–147.
  27. ^Lee 2018, pp. 105–110.
  28. ^Lee 2018, p. 201.
  29. ^Lee 2018, p. 200.
  30. ^Lee 2018, pp. 196–197.
  31. ^Lee 2018, p. 207.
  32. ^Lee 2018, p. 210.
  33. ^abWolf 2011, Chapter 2.
  34. ^Wolf 2011, Chapters 2 and 7.
  35. ^Wolf 2011, Chapters 2 and 3.
  36. ^Cheeger & Ebin 2008, Proposition 3.18.
  37. ^Cheeger & Ebin 2008, Corollary 3.19;Petersen 2016, Section 4.4.
  38. ^Petersen 2016, Section 4.4.3 and p. 399.
  39. ^Petersen 2016, p. 369.
  40. ^In the upper half-space model of hyperbolic space, the Lie group structure is defined by(x1,,xn)(y1,,yn)=(x1+ynx1,,xn1+ynxn1,xnyn).{\displaystyle (x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})\cdot (y_{1},\ldots ,y_{n})=(x_{1}+y_{n}x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n-1}+y_{n}x_{n-1},x_{n}y_{n}).}
  41. ^Lee 2018, Example 3.16f.
  42. ^Lee 2018, p. 72;Milnor 1976.
  43. ^Kobayashi & Nomizu 1963, Theorem IV.4.5.
  44. ^abBesse 1987, Section 7C.
  45. ^abcPetersen 2016, Chapter 10.
  46. ^abMagnani & Tiberio 2020.
  47. ^Michor & Mumford 2005.

Sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Basic concepts
Main theorems(list)
Maps
Types of
manifolds
Tensors
Vectors
Covectors
Bundles
Connections
Related
Generalizations
Basic concepts
Types of manifolds
Main results
Generalizations
Applications
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riemannian_manifold&oldid=1304952330"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp