Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Richard Helms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
U.S. Director of Central Intelligence (1966–1973)
For the Australian naturalist, seeRichard Helms (naturalist).
Richard Helms
Official portraitc. 1966–72
United States Ambassador to Iran
In office
April 5, 1973 – December 27, 1976
PresidentRichard Nixon
Gerald Ford
Preceded byJoseph S. Farland
Succeeded byWilliam H. Sullivan
8thDirector of Central Intelligence
In office
June 30, 1966 – February 2, 1973
PresidentLyndon B. Johnson
Richard Nixon
DeputyRufus Taylor
Robert E. Cushman Jr.
Vernon A. Walters
Preceded byWilliam Raborn
Succeeded byJames R. Schlesinger
7thDeputy Director of Central Intelligence
In office
April 28, 1965 – June 30, 1966
PresidentLyndon B. Johnson
Preceded byMarshall Carter
Succeeded byRufus Taylor
Deputy Director of Central Intelligence for Plans
In office
February 17, 1962 – April 28, 1965
PresidentJohn F. Kennedy
Lyndon B. Johnson
Preceded byRichard M. Bissell Jr.
Succeeded byDesmond Fitzgerald
Personal details
BornRichard McGarrah Helms
(1913-03-30)March 30, 1913
St. Davids, Pennsylvania, U.S.
DiedOctober 23, 2002(2002-10-23) (aged 89)
Resting placeArlington National Cemetery
RelationsGates W. McGarrah (grandfather)
EducationWilliams College(BA)
Military service
AllegianceUnited States
Branch/serviceUnited States Navy
Years of service1942–1946
Battles/warsWorld War II

Richard McGarrah Helms (March 30, 1913 – October 23, 2002) was an American government official, intelligence officer and diplomat who served asDirector of Central Intelligence (DCI) from 1966 to 1973 and asUnited States Ambassador to Iran from 1973 to 1976.

Helms served in theOffice of Strategic Services, a wartime predecessor to the CIA, in Europe duringWorld War II. After the war, he returned to Washington, DC, to become one of the founding officers of the CIA. Following the 1947 creation of theCentral Intelligence Agency (CIA), he rose in its ranks during the presidencies of Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy. Helms then was DCI under PresidentsJohnson andNixon,[1] yielding toJames R. Schlesinger in early 1973.

During his tenure as head of the CIA under presidentsLyndon B. Johnson andRichard Nixon, Helms oversaw the agency's involvement in theVietnam War,Six Day War, andefforts to undermine Chilean president Salvador Allende. Domestically, he directed surveillance of American radicals inOperation CHAOS and was a key figure in the earliest stages of theWatergate scandal, delaying the investigation into the initial break-in and distancing the CIA from public involvement, but ultimately declining to usestate secrets privilege to complete the cover-up. He was forced to resign by Nixon in 1973 and appointed Ambassador to Iran, where he served from April 1973 to December 1976.

After leaving public office, Helms was subject to scrutiny for his tenure at the CIA during a period of growing distrust of American intelligence agencies. Helms was a key witness in theChurch Committee investigation of the CIA during the mid-1970s, but the investigation was hampered severely by Helms's 1973 order to destroy all files related to theMKUltra program. In 1977, as a result ofearlier covert operations in Chile, Helms became the only DCI convicted of misleading Congress.[2]

Early life and education

[edit]

Richard McGarrah Helms was born on March 30, 1913 inSt. Davids, Pennsylvania. His father, Herman Henry Helms, was the son ofLutheran immigrants fromSudwalde,Lower Saxony and a senior executive atAlcoa.[3][4] His mother, Marion Helms (née McGarrah), was the daughter ofGates W. McGarrah, the first president of theBank of International Settlements.[5]

Helms received part of his education inSwitzerland andGermany, which contributed to his fluency in German and French. He attendedInstitut Le Rosey, a private boarding school in Switzerland.[6] He graduated fromWilliams College in Massachusetts. After graduating from Williams College, he worked as a journalist in Europe and for theIndianapolis Times.

Helms wrote a letter to his son Dennis, celebratingV-E Day, on stationery which had belonged toAdolf Hitler.

World War II

[edit]

Upon the United States entry into World War II, Helms joined the Navy. He was recruited to theOffice of Strategic Services (OSS), the wartime intelligence agency of the United States, and served in Europe. Following the war, he was stationed with the OSS in Germany.[1] While there, he wrote a letter to his son Dennis on stationery he had recovered fromAdolf Hitler's office in the ruins of theReich Chancellery. The letter was dated "V-E Day" (May 8, 1945), the day Germany surrendered. In 2011, Dennis Helms donated the letter to the private museum ofCIA headquarters inLangley, Virginia.[7]

In 1945, the OSS was terminated, and Helms joined theStrategic Services Unit, which had been established to take over the work of theSecret Intelligence andX-2 Counter Espionage branches of the OSS. Helms focused on espionage in central Europe at the start of the Cold War and took part in vetting theGehlen Organization in Germany. When intelligence and counter-espionage was transferred to theOffice of Special Operations (OSO), Helms followed.[citation needed]

Early CIA career

[edit]

Chief of Operations (1947–58)

[edit]

In 1947, theCentral Intelligence Agency (CIA) was founded, and OSO was transferred into the new organization. Helms was made head of OSO shortly before Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Walter Bedell Smith merged OSO with theOffice of Policy Coordination in 1952 to form the newDirectorate of Plans. The Directorate was led byFrank Wisner as Deputy DCI for Plans (DDP) until 1958, with Helms serving as his Chief of Operations.[citation needed] During its early period, the CIA had a reputation forpolitical liberalism stemming from itsopposition to fascism during World War II.[8][9][10][11]

In 1953,Allen Dulles was named DCI, and his brotherJohn Foster Dulles was appointedUnited States Secretary of State. During this period, as Chief of Operations, Helms was specifically tasked with defending the CIA against threats from SenatorJoseph McCarthy and the development of the controversial projectMKUltra. He oversawOperation Gold, a joint British-American effort to wiretapSoviet Army headquarters inBerlin using a tunnel into theSoviet occupation zone. The plan was revealed to the Soviets by a mole inMI6,George Blake, and the Soviets revealed their knowledge to the public in 1956, causing a media sensation. Because the Soviets could not publicly reveal their foreknowledge without risking Blake's cover, the mission was celebrated as a success in the United States, where Allen Dulles claimed that it had revealedorder of battle plans and other information about communist operations behind theIron Curtain.[12][13][14][15]

As Chief of Operations, Helms generally focused on espionage and information-gathering, emphasizing long-term strategy over high-riskcovert operations. However, Dulles and Wisner directed such operations to influence regime change inIran (1953),Guatemala (1954) and theCongo (1960), which Helms oversaw. In Iran, regime change broughtMohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had been Helms's classmate atInstitut Le Rosey, to power.[citation needed]

In 1958, Wisner resigned from the CIA. Rather than elevating Helms, Dulles choseRichard M. Bissell Jr. as the new DDP. During the early presidency of John F. Kennedy, Dulles selected Helms to testify before Congress on the topic of Soviet forgery.[citation needed]

In 1961, the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion resulted in the resignation of Dulles as DCI. Although Helms, as chief of operations, was involved in the failed operation, he successfully distanced himself from its disastrous results. CIA official and authorVictor Marchetti later noted that Helms had been meticulous to ensure "that not a single piece of paper existed in the agency which linked [him] to ... the Bay of Pigs."[16]

Deputy Director for Plans (1962–65) and Deputy DCI (1965–66)

[edit]

Following the1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco and resignation of Dulles as DCI,John F. Kennedy appointedJohn McCone as DCI and Helms was promoted to DDP. As DDP, Helms was assigned to manage the CIA's role inOperation Mongoose, a multi-agency effort to deposeFidel Castro as the leader of Cuba. During theCuban Missile Crisis, Helms supported McCone's contributions to the strategic White House discussions.[citation needed]

After the1963 South Vietnamese coup d'état, Helms was privy to Kennedy's anguish over the killing of South Vietnamese presidentNgo Dinh Diem. Three weeks later, Kennedy himselfwas assassinated. Helms worked to manage the CIA's complicated response during its subsequent investigation by theWarren Commission.[citation needed]

In 1965,Lyndon B. Johnson appointedWilliam Raborn as DCI and Helms asDeputy Director of Central Intelligence. After less than one year, Raborn resigned, and Johnson elevated Helms to DCI.[17][18]

Vietnam and Laos

[edit]

Earlier American intelligence operations in Vietnam dated back to OSS contacts with the communist-led resistance toJapanese occupation during World War II.[19] After French withdrawal in 1954, CIA officers includingEdward Lansdale assistedNgo Dinh Diem in his efforts to reconstitutean independent government in the south.[20][21] Early CIA reports did not present an optimistic appraisal of Diem's future. Many analysts concluded that a favorable outcome was more likely for thenew communist regime in the north under its widely admired leaderHo Chi Minh.[22][23][24] Nationwide elections were avoided, and the CIA continued to back Diem, though he refused to enact reforms recommended by the agency.[25][26]

During the 1960s, the CIA became fully engaged in political and military affairs in Southeast Asia, including intelligence-gathering and both overt and covert field operations. For example, the CIA organized armed minorityHmong in Laos, ruralcounterinsurgency forces in Vietnam, and minorityMontagnards in the highlands. The CIA was also actively involved in South Vietnamese internal politics, especially after the1963 coup which killed Diem.[27][28] Helms personally traveled to Vietnam with DCI McCone in 1962.[29]

In 1963, Helms directed the CIA effort to defend theKingdom of Laos against the communist revolutionaryPathet Lao, which were supported by North Vietnam. Because both the CIA and North Vietnamese were in violation of the 1962International Agreement on the Neutrality of Laos, the efforts were conducted covertly.[30][31] Several hundred CIA personnel were involved in managing a large scale paramilitary operation, largely in the form of training and arming native tribal groups, primarily theHmong underVang Pao.[32] The efforts, which continued through Helms's term as DCI, were largely successful at maintaining the functional neutrality of Laos despite the presence of theHo Chi Minh trail, and Helms later repeatedly referred to Laos as "the war we won."[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Despite this, the "secret war" later drew frequent political attacks,[41][42][43] and CIA critics cite the operation as the origin of CIA involvement in alleged heroin trafficking throughout theGolden Triangle.[44][45][46]

Helms was later highly critical of U.S. senators who claimed to be unaware of the CIA operations in Laos, includingStuart Symington, who had visited CIA stations in Laos twice, been briefed on the progress of the operations, and praised their success.[47][48][49][50]

Director of Central Intelligence (1966–73)

[edit]

Helms was appointed DCI byLyndon B. Johnson in 1966.[17][18][51] He was the first homegrown DCI, having risen through the ranks from the agency's founding,[52] and he would continue in the role through the first term of PresidentRichard Nixon, leaving office in 1973.[53]

During his tenure as head of the CIA, Helms oversaw the agency's involvement in theVietnam War and Southeast Asia, theSix Day War,subversive activities against the Salvador Allende presidency in Chile, anddomestic surveillance of American radicals.[54] After the Six-Day War, Helms became one of Lyndon Johnson's top advisors on matters of foreign policy, and increasingly pessimistic CIA assessments of the Vietnam War culminated in Johnson's decision not to seek re-election to the presidency, on advice from Helms andseveral foreign policy advisors relying on CIA intelligence.[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] While he was a trusted advisor to Johnson, Helms came into conflict with the Nixon administration, particularlyNational Security AdvisorHenry Kissinger, over the agency's authority and strategy, as well as theWatergate scandal. Nixon eventually forced Helms to resign as DCI and accept a position as ambassador to Iran in April 1973.

Vietnam War

[edit]
William Colby ran the Far East and Soviet desks at the CIA under Helms and administered thePhoenix Program under Helms.

Conflicts within CIA and with military intelligence

[edit]

As the military and political situation progressed in Southeast Asia, CIA reports became more pessimistic regarding South Vietnamese prospects.[64][65] By the time Helms took office as DCI, the CIA was sharply divided over the issue, with those active in the region, such asLucien Conein andWilliam Colby, remaining robustly optimistic regarding their projects.[66][67] According to historian Anne Karalekas, "At no time was the institutional dichotomy between the operational and analytic components more stark."[68] In his 2003 memoirs, Helms described the divisions:

From the outset, the intelligence directorate and theOffice of National Estimates held a pessimistic view of the military developments. The operations personnel ... remained convinced the war could be won. Without this conviction, the operators could not have continued their difficult face-to-face work with the South Vietnamese, whose lives were often at risk. In Washington, I felt like a circus rider standing astride two horses, each for the best of reasons going its own way.[69]

In addition to internal conflict, the CIA had a statutory mandate to reconcile the conflicting views of various other American intelligence services, including theDefense Intelligence Agency andBureau of Intelligence and Research.[70][71][72] TheJohnson administration was resistant to negative outlooks regarding Vietnam; this resistance had eventually led to McCone's exclusion from White House strategy meetings and contributed to McCone's decision to resign in 1965.[73][74][75]

After Helms took office and Johnson increased the size and scope of American commitment to South Vietnam in 1965, CIA estimates became more optimistic. According to CIA officerRay S. Cline, "the pressure to give the right answer came along. I felt increasing pressure to say the war was winnable."[76] In the following years, Helms was regularly asked for intelligence reports on military action, which military leaders resented.[77] Over time, the American strategy relied on attrition warfare, and the CIA faced increasing pressure to conform to the military estimates of enemy casualties. Bitterness between the United States Army and the CIA became common knowledge within the administration.[78][79][80]

Accounts of Helms's influence during the Johnson administration differ. According to historianJohn Ranelagh, Helms "used his influence with Lyndon Johnson to warn about the growing dangers of U.S. involvement in Vietnam."[81] By contrast,Stansfield Turner, who served as DCI from 1977 to 1981, described Helms as overly loyal to the office of president and suggested that Helms moderated analysts' opinions before they reached President Johnson.[82] In 1967, one CIA analyst, Sam Adams, filed a formal complaint against Helms for deferring to the military's estimates of Viet Cong forces.[83][84] A CIA review board considered the complaint,[85] and the discrepancy later became significant to litigation betweenCBS News andWilliam Westmoreland.[86]

Phoenix Program

[edit]
Main article:Phoenix Program

A major component of the South Vietnamesecounterinsurgency policy was the establishment ofstrategic hamlets to contest communist operations in the countryside.[87][88] In 1967 and 1968, the CIA launched the controversialPhoenix Program to support these efforts and eliminate the Viet Cong.[89] Under the program, Vietnamese intelligence, military, police, and civilian forces were deployed in the field against Viet Cong support networks. Although it was officially administered byCivil Operations and Revolutionary Development Support (CORDS), the CIA designed and led the program,[90][91] andWilliam Colby took a temporary leave of absence as head of the CIA Soviet Division to lead CORDS. Colby succeededRobert Komer at CORDS, and an increasing number of CIA personnel became involved in the Phoenix Program.[92][93][94][95][96]

Vietnamese peasants detained on suspicion of Viet Cong affiliation as part of thePhoenix Program.

After receiving training through the program, rural South Vietnamese forces sought to penetrate communist organizations and arrest, interrogate or kill theircadres.[97][98][99][100] South Vietnamese forces also utilized torture, became entangled in local and official corruption, and were responsible for many questionable killings, possibly thousands.[101][102][103]

In his memoirs, Helms noted that the early program was "successful and of serious concern to the [North Vietnamese] leadership," but recounted the program's progressive slide into corruption and violence which came to nullify its early success. By the time it was discontinued, Phoenix had become useless in the field and a notorious political liability.[104][105][106] Helms attributed the corruption to Vietnamese forces acting against American instruction:

PHOENIX was directed and staffed by Vietnamese over whom the American advisors and liaison officers did not have command or direct supervision. The American staff did its best to eliminate the abuse of authority—the settling of personal scores, rewarding of friends,summary executions, prisoner mistreatment, false denunciation, illegal property seizure—that became the by-products of the PHOENIX counterinsurgency effort. In the blood-soaked atmosphere created by Viet Cong terrorism, the notion that regulations and directives imposed by foreign liaison officers could be expected to curb revenge and profit-making was unrealistic.[107]

Despite these faults, Colby later opined that the program did stop Viet Cong gains and compared it favorably to the "secret war" inLaos.[108][109][110] According to historian and journalistStanley Karnow, Vietnamese communist leaders and military commanders also found the program a very effective obstacle to their success,[111] and the official North Vietnamese history of the war identified the Phoenix Program and Marine Corps as among the most effective American counterinsurgency operations.[112][113]

Vietnamization period (1969–73)

[edit]

UnderRichard Nixon, the United States pursued a policy ofVietnamization, emphasizing peace negotiations with the North and turning greater responsibility for military and intelligence operations over to the South Vietnamese, permitting the United States to secure, in Nixon's words, "peace with honor."[114][115][116] While withdrawing American ground troops, Nixon simultaneously sought to increase bargaining power by escalating airstrikes andheavy bombing of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, and widened the scope of the conflict by covertlyinvading Cambodia.[117][118] The Nixon administration posited the conflict as a critically important theater of the broaderCold War and directed Helms to focus on Vietnam.[119]

The new strategy clashed with the advice of Helms and CIA analysts, whom national security advisorHenry Kissinger referred to as representing "the most liberal school of thought in the government."[120] As a result of Vietnamization, Helms was forced to wind down many CIA operations in the region, including civic projects and paramilitary operations. The Phoenix Program was turned over to Vietnamese direction and control.[121][122] The war in Laos, which was becoming difficult to maintain secret, was transferred to theDepartment of Defense.[123][124][125]

Although Nixon also relied on Helms to produce reports on China, as the administration sought to open relations with Mao Zedong to fosterconflict within the communist world, he shut the CIA out of his diplomatic plans totravel to China in 1972.[126][127] Shortly before his visit, Kissinger ordered Helms to halt all CIA operations in China, including Tibet.[128][129]

Israel and Six-Day War (1967)

[edit]
Main article:Six-Day War
See also:USS Liberty incident andIsrael–United States relations

As DCI, Helms was a proponent of cooperation and coordination withIsraeli intelligence under the management of counterintelligence headJames Jesus Angleton, who had led CIA-Mossad liaisons since 1953. At the time, Israel wasnon-aligned between the United States and Soviet Union, but the nation moved significantly closer to the United States during Helms's tenure.[130][131][132]

In August 1966,Mossad acquired a SovietMiG-21 from a disaffectedIraqi pilot, andMeir Amit visited Washington loan the plane to the United States for inspection.[133] At a May 1967National Security Council meeting, Helms praised Israeli military preparedness and argued that the MiG-21 demonstrated that the Israelis "had learned their lessons well."[134][135]

Helms repeatedly expressed skepticism over the official Israeli explanation for theUSSLiberty incident.

In 1967, CIA analysis bySherman Kent predicted that in the event of an armed conflict between Israel and neighboring Arab states, "the Israelis would win a war within a week to ten days,"[136][137][138][139] The analysis was challenged byU.N. ambassadorArthur Goldberg and the Israeli government underLevi Eshkol, which appealed to Lyndon B. Johnson for additional American support.[140] Unbeknownst to the Americans and Israelis, Soviet intelligence also expected an Arab victory.[141] Helms and other top Johnson advisors stood by the CIA prediction, which ultimately proved correct.[142][143] Helms later reflected that Israel sought to minimize their strength to control international expectations prior to the outbreak of war.[144]

Four days before the sudden launch of theSix-Day War in June 1967, a senior Israeli official visited Helms privately and hinted that apreemptive war was imminent. Helms passed the information on to the president.[145] In the afternoon of the third day of the war, the Americansignals intelligence spy shipUSSLiberty was attacked by Israeli warplanes and torpedo boats in international waters north of theSinai Peninsula, resulting insevere damage and massive casualties.[146][147] Israel notified the United States and claimed that they had mistaken theLiberty for the Egyptian coastal steamerEl Quseir, despite theLiberty being much longer than theEl Quseir (455 feet versus 275 feet). The United States government formally accepted the apology and the explanation.[148] In a 1984 CIA interview, Helms said, "I don't think there can be any doubt that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing. Why they wanted to attack theLiberty, whose bright idea this was, I can't possibly know. But any statement to the effect that they didn't know that it was an American ship and so forth is nonsense."[149][150] In his memoirs, Helms expressed his continued shock:

"[Few] in Washington could believe that the ship had not been identified as an American naval vessel. Later, an interim intelligence memorandum concluded the attack was a mistake and 'not made in malice against the U.S.' When additional evidence was available, more doubt was raised. ... I have yet to understand why it was felt necessary to attack this ship or who ordered the attack."[151]

During the final years of theLyndon B. Johnson presidency, Helms became a trusted advisor and participant in weekly lunch meetings.[152]

On the morning of the sixth day of the war, Johnson summoned Helms to advise on the prospect of Soviet intervention in the war following threats fromAlexei Kosygin.[153][154] In the event, Israel decisively defeated the combined Arab army with no direct Soviet intervention.Stansfield Turner later wrote that Helms claimed the accurate provision of CIA intelligence relating to the Six-Day War was "the high point of his career," and Helms believed it had kept America out of the conflict.[155]

The accurate intelligence concerning the duration, logistics, and outcome of the war also led to Helms's entry into Johnson's inner circle and regular attendance at Tuesday lunch with the President.[155][156][157][158][159] The conflict also increased American sympathy for Israel. Following the war, America moved toward decisive support for Israel, eventually supplanting France as Israel's chief military supplier.[160][161]

In a 1984 interview with a CIA historian, Helms recalled:

And I think at that time he'd made up his mind that it would be a good idea to tie intelligence into the inner circle of his policy-making and decision-making process. So starting from that time he began to invite me to the Tuesday lunches, and I remained a member of that group until the end of his administration.[162]

For the remainder of the Johnson administration, Helms functioned in proximity to high-level policymaking, with continuous access to top political leadership.

[W]e gathered for a sherry in the family living room on the second floor of the White House. If the President, who normally kept to a tight schedule, was a few minutes late, he would literally bound into the room, pause long enough to acknowledge our presence, and herd us into the family dining room, overlooking Pennsylvania Avenue. Seating followed protocol, with the secretary of state (Dean Rusk) at the President's right, and the secretary of defense (Robert McNamara, laterClark Clifford) at his left. GeneralBus Wheeler (the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) sat beside the secretary of defense. I sat beside Dean Rusk.Walt Rostow (theSpecial Assistant for National Security Affairs),George Christian (the White House Press Secretary), and Tom Johnson (the deputy press secretary) made up the rest of the table.[163]

As a neutral party within the meetings, Helms supplied the others with facts applicable to the issue at hand. Helms later commented he used this position to steer the conversation.[164]

Operation CHAOS was the investigation of alleged foreign infiltration of theanti-war movement via tactics which were dubiously legal under the CIA charter.

Operation CHAOS

[edit]
Main article:Operation CHAOS

From 1967 to 1974, under both the Johnson and Nixon administrations, Helms and the CIA were tasked with domestic surveillance of protest movements, particularly anti-war protestors and activists. These surveillance operations were referred to asOperation CHAOS.[165] The investigations were based on the theory that these movements were funded or influenced by foreign actors, especially theSoviet Union and other communist states, amid a sudden rise in anti-war activism.

As part of CHAOS, the CIA counterintelligence office under James Jesus Angleton clandestinely gathered extensive information on many anti-war groups,Ramparts magazine, and others, eventually building thousands of clandestine files on American citizens as a prerequisite to foreign espionage.[166][167] CIA agents sought to use the information to acquire credibility to use ascover when overseas. On that rationale, the operation continued for almost seven years, hidden from nearly all agency personnel outside of the counterintelligence office.[168][169][170]

The operation initially found no substantial foreign sources of money or influence, but when Helms reported these findings to the Johnson, his reaction was hostile. Helms later wrote that Johnson "simply could not believe that American youth would on their own be moved to riot in protest against U. S. foreign policy."[171] Accordingly, Johnson escalated the program.

Richard Nixon later extended the reach and scope of CHAOS and other domestic surveillance activity, convinced that domestic dissent was initiated and nurtured by Soviet agents.[171][172] In 1969, intra-agency opposition to CHAOS arose, and CIAgeneral counselLawrence R. Houston advised Helms on an official memorandum to justify the operation to officers and agents.[172][173] Nixon planned to subsume the operation under theHuston Plan, a broader multi-agency investigative effort involving the CIA, FBI,Defense Intelligence Agency, andNational Security Agency,[174] but the plan was never adopted.[175][176]

CIA critics have long derided Operation CHAOS as outright illegal or on the fringes of legality, as the CIA was ostensibly forbidden from operating on U.S. soil.[177][178][179][180] Helms later claimed that he pointed this out to President Johnson, who responded, "I'm quite aware of that," and instructed Helms to maintain focus on foreign involvement.[181][182][183] Later, both theRockefeller Commission and theChurch Committee found the initial investigation to be within the margins of the CIA's legislative charter.[184][185] Critics have also noted that the operation made no clear distinction between extreme and mainstream opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam War.[166][186] Operation CHAOS was also opposed by theFederal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) underJ. Edgar Hoover, who viewed surveillance of subversive activity as the FBI's jurisdiction. Although the FBI did conduct such operations within the U.S., the bureau refused to provide any context or analysis.[187]

Relationship with Richard Nixon (1968–73)

[edit]

Following Richard Nixon's victory in the1968 presidential election, Johnson invited Nixon tohis ranch in Texas, where he was introducedDean Rusk,Clark Clifford,Earle Wheeler, and Helms. Johnson privately told Helms that he had represented him to Nixon as a political neutral, "a merit appointment", and a career federal official who was good at his job.[188][189] Nixon invited Helms to his headquarters in New York City, where Nixon told Helms that he andJ. Edgar Hoover would be retained as "appointments out of the political arena."[190][191]

Diminishing role of CIA

[edit]
During thepresidency of Richard Nixon,Henry Kissinger supplanted Helms as chief intelligence advisor to the president.

Nixon dramatically limited the role of the CIA in his administration and interacted very little with Helms directly.[190][191] In order to dominate policy, Nixon isolated himself from the Washington bureaucracy, which he viewed with distrust. Conversations with advisors, even cabinet members, were screened byH. R. Haldeman andJohn Ehrlichman, andHenry Kissinger advised Nixon directly on national security and intelligence.[192][193] Kissinger conveyed Nixon's instructions to the CIA and other intelligence services, and all intelligence briefings were delivered through Kissinger. Nixon and Kissinger understood that they alone would "conceive, command, and control clandestine operations" through theNational Security Council.[194][195][196][197]

Under Nixon's initial intention, Helms was even excluded from the policy discussions at NSC meetings.[198][199][200][201] Nixon found Helms pedantic and tiresome because of his practice of reading directly from CIA reports at meetings.[202]

In his memoirs,Stansfield Turner described Nixon as hostile to the CIA, questioning its utility, practical value, and politics, which he viewed as liberal and elitist and having aided his political enemies.[203][204] In a 1988 interview, Helms agreed, "Nixon never trusted anybody."[205][206] Despite this, Helms later wrote that Nixon was "the best prepared to be President of any of those under whom I served" and "had the best grasp of foreign affairs and domestic politics."[207]

When Nixon attended NSC meetings, he would often direct his personal animosity and ire toward the CIA directly at Helms, and Helms found it difficult to establish a cordial working relationship with the new president.[208][209][210][211] In addition to the change in policy direction,[212] Kissinger later wrote that Nixon "felt ill at ease with Helms personally."[213]Ray Cline wrote that Nixon used Helms and the CIA "primarily as an instrument for the execution of White House wishes" and did not "understand or care about the carefully structured functions of central intelligence as a whole. ... I doubt that anyone could have done better than Helms in these circumstances."[214]

One incident exemplifying tensions between the CIA and the Nixon administration was the revelation of Soviet long-range missiles, code-named theSS-9 Scarp. The CIA reported that these missiles lackedmultiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) capability, but theDefense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reported that they did have MIRV capability, suggesting Soviet intent to achievefirst strike nuclear capacity. The Nixon administration, seeking to justify a new Americananti-ballistic missile system, publicly endorsed the DIA position. Kissinger asked Helms to review the CIA finding, which Helms initially stood by. Eventually, however, Helms compromised under pressure fromSecretary of DefenseMelvin Laird, who told Helms that the CIA was outside its authority and "subverted administration policy."[215][216] Helms later remembered:

I realized that there was no convincing evidence in the Agency or atthe Pentagon which would prove either position. Both positions were estimates—speculation—based on identical fragments of data. My decision to remove [the language contested by the Nixon administration] was based on the fact that the Agency's estimate—that the USSR was not attempting to create a first-strike capability – as originally stated in the earlier detailed National Estimate would remain the Agency position.[217]

According to authorJohn Ranelagh, at least one analyst involved in the report viewed Helms's reversal as not only "a cave-in on a matter of high principle ... but also as a public slap in the face from his director, a vote of no confidence in his work." A few years later, the nature of the Soviet SS-9 missiles became better understood, and the CIA analysis was vindicated. According to Ranelagh, "The consensus among agency analysts was that Dick Helms had not covered himself with glory this time."[218]

Watergate scandal
Events
People

Watergate

[edit]

After first learning of thebreak-in at the Watergate Office Building on June 17, 1972, in which those arrested included former CIA agentE. Howard Hunt and other former CIA assets,[219] Helms developed a general strategy to distance the CIA from the break-in altogether, including subsequent third-party investigations of Nixon's role.[220][221] Helms and DDCIVernon Walters became convinced that top CIA officials had no role in the break-in, but it soon became apparent that it was "impossible to prove anything to an inflamed national press corps already in full cry" and "daily leaks to the press kept pointing at CIA."[222][223][224] Later, Helms argued that "the leaks were coming directly from the White House," and that Nixon was personally directing them.

On June 23, 1972, Nixon and Haldeman discussed asking Helms for his assistance to deter the FBI investigation of the Watergate break-in. During the discussion, Nixon said "well, we protected Helms from one hell of a lot of things".[225] Haldeman, Ehrlichman, andJohn Dean asked Helms to assert a national security reason for the break-in and, under that rationale, interfere with the ongoing FBI investigation on the grounds ofstate secrecy andpost bail for the arrested suspects. Helms initially made stalled the FBI's progress for several weeks. At several meetings attended by Helms and Walters, Nixon's team referred to the CubanBay of Pigs fiasco as an implied threat against the integrity of CIA. Helms reacted sharply against this gambit.[226][227][228][229]Stansfield Turner called this "perhaps the best and most courageous decision of [Helms's] career."[230][231][232][233][234]White House Counsel John Dean reportedly asked for $1 million to buy the silence of the jailed Watergate burglars. In a 1988 interview, Helms stated that he believed a bribe would have been possible, but he declined because the scandal would have resulted in the end of the CIA.[235]

Although Helms ultimately succeeded in shielding the CIA from direct implication in Watergate, the scandal ultimately became a major factor in American public opinion shifting against the agency, and its political role became the subject of controversy in the following years.[236][237][238][239]

Dismissal

[edit]

After Nixon's re-election in 1972, he called for all appointed officials to resign. Because Helms did not consider his position at CIA political, he did not resign. On November 20, Helms came toCamp David to an interview with Nixon and chief of staff H.R. Haldeman, at which Helms was informed that his services in the new administration would not be required.[240] William Colby later commented that Helms "paid the price" for declining the White House requests with respect to Watergate.[241][242]

After Nixon was reminded that Helms was a career civil servant and not a political appointee, Nixon offered him theambassadorship to the Soviet Union. Helms declined, wary of the potential implications of his appointment from the Soviet perspective, considering his long career in intelligence. Instead, Helms proposed being sent to Iran,[243][244] whereMohammad Reza Pahlavi, who had studied at Le Rosey with Helms's brother,[6] was the reigning monarch and the Nixon administration sought to strengthen American ties.[245][246] Nixon dismissed ambassadorJoseph S. Farland to create an opening for Helms.[247]

Although Helms suggested that he might voluntarily retire at the end of March, after turning 60, he was abruptly dismissed on February 2, 1973, whenJames R. Schlesinger was named the new DCI.[248] Helms later wrote,

"The timing caught me by surprise. ... A few days later, I encountered Haldeman. 'What happened to our understanding that my exit would be postponed for a few weeks?' I asked. 'Oh, I guess we forgot,' he said with the faint trace of a smile. And so it was over."[249]

As one of his final acts, Helms ordered that all files pertaining to theMKUltra program be destroyed. When the program was exposed to the public in 1975, theChurch Committee andRockefeller Commission investigations were both forced to rely on the sworn testimony of direct participants and a small number of documents that survived Helms's order.[250]

InProject FUBELT, CIA agents encouraged the Chilean army to disrupt the inauguration ofSalvador Allende. Rogue Chilean officers who had met with CIA agents killed Commander-in-ChiefRené Schneider (1913–1970).[251][252]

Project FUBELT

[edit]
Main article:Project FUBELT
See also:Presidency of Salvador Allende and1973 Chilean coup d'état

Following the victory ofSalvador Allende in the1970 Chilean presidential election, Richard Nixon ordered the CIA to surveil Allende and interfere with his socialist domestic policies, an operation code-namedProject FUBELT. Despite CIA efforts, Allende was successfully inaugurated as president of Chile, and Project FUBELT declined in intensity. On September 11, 1973, after Helms had left the CIA, amilitary coup led byAugusto Pinochet violently ended the democratically elected Allende regime.[253][254][255]

During the 1970 election, the United States government sent financial and other assistance to two candidates opposing Allende.[256][257][258] According to Helms, President Nixon ordered him on September 15, 1970 to covertly support the Chilean military in preventing Allende from taking office as president. "He wanted something done and he didn't care how," Helms later characterized the order.[259][260] The order was termed "Track II" to distinguish it from the CIA's covert funding of opposition to Allende, called "Track I".[261][262][263] Accordingly, the CIA took assorted covert actions to pressure the Chilean army to seize power. CIA agents were in communication with rogue elements within the Chilean military who later assassinated GeneralRené Schneider, the Army Commander-in-Chief, over his perceivedconstitutionalism, but the CIA broke off contact before his assassination and discouraged assassination.[264][265] After the assassination, the Chilean army swung firmly behind Allende, and he was inaugurated as president on November 3, 1970.[266][267] Nixon and Kissinger blamed Helms for Allende's presidency.[266][268]

Despite this failure, the CIA continued to funnel millions of dollars to Chilean opposition groups, including political parties, media, and striking truck drivers in order to destabilizeChile's economy and subvert the Allende administration. In Nixon's own words, the United States policy was "to make the Chilean economyscream."[269] Despite these efforts, Helms later wrote, "In my remaining months in office, Allende continued his determined march to the left, but there was no further effort to instigate a coup in Chile."[270] Although he disagreed with Nixon's policy in Chile, Helms nevertheless carried out his instructions.[271] AuthorTim Weiner contradicted Helms in 2007, arguing that the CIA worked diligently to cultivate military officers willing to commit to a coup.[272][273][274][275][276][277][278]

Helms left the CIA on February 2, 1973, seven months before the coup d'etat in Chile.[279] Nixon continued to work directly against the Allende regime; he was ultimately deposed in a1973 coup d'état and died under suspicious circumstances, officially ruled a suicide.[280][281] The civil violence of the military coup and subsequent Pinochet regime provoked widespread international censure.[282][283][284][285][286][287][288]

Ambassador to Iran (1973–77)

[edit]

After Helms left the CIA, he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate as the new U.S. ambassador to Iran and proceeded to Tehran in April 1973.[289][290] He would continue to serve until January 1977, when Jimmy Carter replaced him withWilliam H. Sullivan. Much of his tenure as ambassador was interrupted by congressional hearings and investigations into CIA activities, including CIA involvement in Watergate. As a result of these investigations, he frequently had to return to the United States to testify.[291][292]

During the course of his service as ambassador, Helms dealt with the1973 oil crisis, the1975 Algiers Agreement between Iran and Iraq, and the subsequent abandonment of support forKurdish separatism in Iraq. In 1976, Helms informed Kissinger, now serving as Secretary of State under President Gerald Ford, of his plan to resign as ambassador before the presidential election.[293] Helms, who was facing increased scrutiny from a grand jury in Washington over CIA activities, submitted his resignation to President Ford in October 1976.[294]

Relationships with Iranian leadership

[edit]

Helms had an amicable relationship with both the Shah and Hoveyda. Helms later claimed that he had first met the Shah in 1957, when he visited Tehran to negotiate permission to install intercept equipment in northern Iran for the purpose of espionage against the Soviet Union.[295][296] According toWilliam Shawcross, the United States and its European allies had "almost uncritical approval of the Shah. ... Too much had been invested in the Shah—by European nations as well as by the U.S.—for any real changes in policy."[297][298]

Despite the Shah's reputation for a dominating personal style,[299] Helms established a working relationship with him. In his memoirs, he recorded lively one-on-one conversations with "polite give-and-take" at social functions or in private offices.[300][301] However, Helms followed the practice of other diplomats and respected the Shah's prohibition on contact with domestic political opposition in Iran. Shawcross describes a "shallow pool of courtiers, industrialists, lawyers, and others who were somehow benefiting from the material success of the regime" that surrounded and insulted the diplomatic corps.[302][303] Helms circulated widely among traditional Iranian elites, forming a close friendship with the aristocrat Ahmad Goreishi.[304] Even the CIA was insulated from Iranian politics, relying entirely on SAVAK for intelligence during this period. The U.S. State Department began to question this practice during Helms's final year in Iran.[305][306] As a result of these practices, the United States remained largely ignorant of Iranian opposition to American presence in the country, including intense anger over American involvement in the1953 coup d'état which deposed prime ministerMohammad Mosaddegh.[307][308][309][310][311]

According to Shawcross, Helms "came to realize that he could never understand the Iranians." Helms himself observed, "They have a very different turn of mind. Here would be ladies, dressed in Parisian clothes. ... But before they went on trips abroad, they would ship up toMashhad inchadors to ask for protection."[312] In a May 1976 memo, he added, "Iranian government and society are highly structured and authoritarian, and all major decisions are made at the top. Often, even relatively senior officials are not well informed about policies and plans and have little influence on them."[312] In July 1976, Helms transmitted a message to the U.S. Department of State voicing concerns regarding about inadequate "political institutionalization" which left the regime vulnerable.[313] HistorianAbbas Milani commented that Helms "captured the nature of the Shah's vulnerability when he wrote that, 'The conflict between rapid economic growth and modernization vis-à-vis a still autocratic rule' was the greatest uncertainty about the shah's future."[314]

Relationship with the Soviet Union

[edit]

As a result of his CIA background, the Soviet Union took Helms's appointment as ambassador to a neighboring anti-communist regime as a signal of United States aggression. Throughout the prior decades, the CIA had operatedextensive technical installations across the northern border of Iran to monitor Soviet air traffic, and the CIA, Mossad, andU.S. Agency for International Development trained and supported the Iranian intelligence and police agencySAVAK.[315] The United States also assisted Iran in its support ofKurdish nationalists against the government of Iraq.[316][317] Upon his arrival in the country, Helms reformed embassy security, and a CIA officer accompanied him wherever he went.[318][319]

In one possibly apocryphal story told in elite circles about the appointment, the Soviet ambassador told prime ministerAmir-Abbas Hoveyda, "We hear the Americans are sending their number one spy to Iran." Hoveyda replied, "The Americans are our friends. At least they don't send us their number ten spy."[320][321]

Middle Eastern diplomacy

[edit]

Helms's position as ambassador made him the chief American diplomat in the broaderMiddle East. During his first year as ambassador, Helms managed the American reaction to Yom Kippur War, subsequentOAPEC embargo on oil exports, andresulting oil crisis. Immediately following the start of the embargo, Helms requested fueling favors for theUnited States Navy nearBandar Abbas, which the Shah granted. Then, flush with oil revenues, the Shah placed orders for foreign imports and American military hardware, including high performance warplanes.[322] In his memoirs, Helms wrote, "Foreign businessmen flooded Tehran. Few had any knowledge of the country; fewer could speak a word of Persian. ... There is no doubt [the Shah] tried to go too fast, which led to the ports' congestion and the overheating of the economy."[323][324][325] The bonanza led to accelerated corruption within the Iranian civil service, involving enormous sums.[326][327]

In March 1975, Helms learned the Shah had negotiateda major agreement withSaddam Hussein of Iraq at anOPEC meeting in Algiers, mediated by Algerian head of stateHouari Boumédiène. As part of the deal, the shah had disowned support forKurdish separatists in Iraq, surprising Helms, the United States government, and the Shah's own ministers.[328][329] As a result, the CIA abandoned support forKurdish nationalism.[330]

Public scrutiny and conviction (1973–77)

[edit]

TheWatergate scandal, which implicatedE. Howard Hunt and several other former CIA assets, and the Nixon administration's effort to usestate secrets privilege in the cover-up intensified public attitudes against abuse of state secrecy, and multiple public investigations were opened into the American intelligence community. In addition to Watergate, revelations of apparent distortions and dishonesty regarding the progress of the war in Vietnam gravely eroded American public trust in government. The emergence of internal whistleblowers, such asDaniel Ellsberg, the growing prevalence of conspiracy theories regarding the John F. Kennedy assassination, and leaked details of the "systemized abuse of power" by FBI directorJ. Edgar Hoover also fueled public distrust.[331] Accordingly, the CIA became a subject of congressional inquiry and media interest. The scrutiny grew as investigators publicized questionable CIA secret activities, including the 1974 release of excerpts from "family jewels", a 1973 report detailing CIA malfeasance bySeymour Hersh.[332] Helms was frequently called to testify before congressional committees and was ultimately convicted forperjury for lying to Congress in his testimony regarding CIA activities in Chile.

Congressional and presidential investigations into CIA

[edit]

During the early stages of the Cold War, members of Congress had deliberately allowed the CIA to operate outside the boundaries of politically acceptable conduct or accountability, judging that its espionage and covert activities should be exempt from any public scrutiny to avoid communist subversion.[333][334][335] In early 1975, following theresignation of Richard Nixon and independent press investigations intoOperation CHAOS and the "family jewels," as well as the Democratic landslide in the1974 midterm elections, Congress reversed that practice by establishing committees in both the Senate and the House, chaired byFrank Church andOtis G. Pike, respectively. PresidentGerald Ford establisheda commission to investigate domestic surveillance, chaired by vice presidentNelson Rockefeller.[336][337][338]

Including theWatergate Committee, Helms testified thirteen times "before various official bodies of investigation" between 1973 and 1977. In addition to the special committees and Rockefeller Commission, Helms testified before theSenate Select Committee on Intelligence,Senate Committee on Armed Services,Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs,House Committee on Armed Services, andHouse Foreign Affairs Committee.[339][340][341] He defended the use of secrecy as an essential, utilitarian value to the government, necessary to conduct espionage and covert operations. Helms expressed dismay over the publication and investigations themselves, especially when they resulted in the publication of sensitive classified information. At points during the many hours of testimony given by Helms before Congress, his frustration and irritation with the direction of the proceedings are clearly discernible.[342] In December 1975,Richard Welch, the CIA station chief in Athens who had been exposed by classified leaks, was murdered.[343][344]

Before testifying, Helms andJohn McCone were informed by a CIA officer regarding the contours of congressional knowledge. According to authorThomas Powers, both McCone and Helms thus tailored their testimony to limit the scope of discussion to matters already known by the committee.[345] Helms' testimony, which made headlines, amounted to a circumspect, professional defense of the agency.[346] However, his testimony was contradicted by that of DCIWilliam Colby before Congress.[347][348]

Conviction for lying to Congress

[edit]

In February 1973, during his confirmation hearings before theSenate Foreign Relations Committee to become Ambassador to Iran, Helms was questioned concerningCIA operations in Chile and the deposition ofSalvador Allende. Because he considered the operation a state secret, Helms denied that the CIA had aided the opponents of Allende. He repeated the denial a few days later, before a committee chaired by Frank Church to investigate claims of involvement byInternational Telephone and Telegraph.[349][350][351][352][353]

In 1975, the newChurch Committee uncovered information directly contradicting Helms's February 1973 statements. In 1977, he was prosecuted by theDepartment of Justice for misleading Congress. Helms plednolo contendere to two lesser,misdemeanor charges that he had not "fully, completely and accurately" testified to Congress, and he was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence and a $2,000 fine.[354][355][356][357] At sentencing, JudgeBarrington D. Parker condemned Helms:

"You considered yourself bound to protect the Agency [and so] to dishonor your solemn oath to tell the truth ... If public officials embark deliberately on a course to disobey and ignore the laws of our land because of some misguided and ill-conceived notion and belief that there are earlier commitments and considerations which they must observe, the future of our country is in jeopardy."[358][359]

Helms's defense attorney,Edward Bennett Williams, said, "He was sworn not to disclose the very things that he was being requested by the [Senate] Committee to disclose," and would "wear this conviction like a badge of honor, like a banner."[360][361] Helms continued to enjoy the support of many current and retired CIA officers, includingJames Angleton.[362] Because his testimony had been given at a time when politicians generally excused CIA secrecy, Helms's supporters claimed that he was unfairly held to adouble standard.[363][364][365] He received a standing ovation at a large gathering of CIA officers inBethesda, Maryland, and the officers raised funds to pay his fine.[366][367] He continued to receive support within the CIA in the following years.[368]

Later years

[edit]
Helms (left) withSarah Brady and PresidentRonald Reagan at a private dinner on the night of the1988 elections.

After returning home from Tehran, Helms founded an international consulting company onK Street called Safeer, thePersian word for "ambassador."[369][370] Although the business was established to assist Iranians seeking to do business in the United States, it was quickly transformed by theIranian Revolution, which caught Helms by surprise, and focused instead on general consulting to businesses investing abroad.[371][372]

After the1980 election ofRonald Reagan as president, Helms was among those who supported Reagan's campaign manager,William J. Casey, for DCI. Helms had worked with Casey in the OSS during World War II. His appointment was opposed by former presidentGerald Ford and vice presidentGeorge Bush.[373][374] In his history of the CIA under Casey,Bob Woodward attributed Helms's support to an institutional interest in the preservation of the CIA against criticism from the political right. Casey, who Helms viewed as apolitical, would preserve the neutrality of the agency. "The danger, the threat to the CIA, came from both the right and the left," Woodward wrote. "Maybe the left had had its way in the 1970s and the investigations, causing their trouble. But the right could do its own mischief."[375][376][377]

As a consequence ofWilliam Westmoreland's libel lawsuit againstCBS News for its 1982 documentaryThe Uncounted Enemy, Helms was deposed by CBS attorneys. CBS insisted on video-taping Helms's deposition, but he successfully challenged the request.[378][379]

In 1983, Helms was awarded theNational Security Medal by Reagan and served as a member of the president's Commission on National Security.[380] He also received theDonovan Award at a Washington banquet held in honor of him andWilliam J. Donovan.[381][382][383]

Interviews and memoirs

[edit]

In 1979, Helms was interviewed by journalistThomas Powers about his years of service in the CIA over four mornings. The resulting transcript totaled about 300 pages and produced the bookThe Man who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA.[384][385] In his memoirs, Helms wrote, "In the event, the book's title ... seemed to bear out my intention in speaking to Powers."[386] He sat for repeated interviews over the remainder of his life. In 1978, he was interviewed by British television personalityDavid Frost.[387][388][389] In 1982–84, he was interviewed by Agency historian Robert M. Hathaway and by his former DDCI Russell Jack Smith for a classified, 1993 CIA biography.[390] He sat for additional CIA interviews through 1988.[391] In 1969 and 1981, Helms had participated in interviews for theLyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum.[392] Other interviews were conducted byEdward Jay Epstein,Thomas Powers,John Ranelagh,William Shawcross, andBob Woodward.[393][394][395][396][397]

Helms's memoirs,A Look Over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency, were published posthumously in 2003 by Random House.[398] Former OSS and CIA agent William Hood assisted Helms with the book, and Henry Kissinger wrote the foreword.[399][400][401]

Personal life and death

[edit]

In 1939, Helms married Julia Bretzman Shields, a sculptor six years his senior. Julia had two children at the time of their marriage, James and Judith. Together, Helms and Julia had a son, Dennis, who briefly worked at the CIA before becoming a lawyer. Their marriage ended in 1967.[402][403]

Helms later married Cynthia McKelvie, an English woman. She wrote two books on her public experiences during their long marriage,[404] including visits to Lyndon B. Johnson at his Texas ranch and to the Shah, who was undergoing treatment for terminal cancer in New York City following his exile from Iran. In the mid-1980s, the Helmses hosted a small dinner party at their Washington residence for PresidentRonald Reagan and First LadyNancy Reagan.[405]

Although Helms was friendly with President Johnson and conflicted with President Nixon, Helms remained publicly apolitical throughout his career. His first wife was an active member of the Democratic Party.[402][403]

He frequently readspy fiction, as was common in the intelligence field, but reportedly detestedThe Spy Who Came in from the Cold byJohn le Carré, which he found centered too much on cynicism, violence, betrayal, and despair and offended his sense that espionage should be based on trust and fraternity.[406] In his memoirs, Helms included several other books by le Carré among "the better spy novels."[407]

He was not related toJesse Helms.

Richard Helms died at the age of 89 ofmultiple myeloma on October 23, 2002.[372] He was interred atArlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia.

Legacy

[edit]

In 1989, Bob Woodward referred to Helms as "one of the enduring symbols, controversies and legends of the CIA."[408]

Despite personal conflicts with Helms, bothWilliam Colby andHenry Kissinger praised Helms as honorable and dutiful.[409][410] Kissinger wrote, "There was no public servant I trusted more. His lodestar was a sense of duty."[411] On another occasion, Kissinger said, "Disciplined, meticulously fair and discreet, Helms performed his duties with the total objectivity essential to an effective intelligence service."[412]

Jefferson Morley ofSlate magazine referred to Helms as "socially correct, bureaucratically adept, [and] operationally nasty."[413] Both critics and supporters referred to him as urbane, professional, impeccably dressed, and elegant.[414][415]

In media

[edit]

Publications

[edit]

Articles

Books

Recordings

"In an address to the nation's newspaper editors, CIA Director Richard Helms states that while he can understand Americans' inherent distaste for a peacetime intelligence gathering agency, he cannot agree that it is in conflict with the ideals of a free society."

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Richard Helms: The Intelligence Professional Personified". Central Intelligence Agency. Archived fromthe original on June 13, 2007.
  2. ^"An Interview with Richard Helms".Central Intelligence Agency. 2007-05-08. Archived fromthe original on April 27, 2010. Retrieved2008-03-16.
  3. ^Munzinger."Richard Helms". Munzinger-Archiv. Retrieved2025-08-07.
  4. ^"Veteran to Wed Miss Loughran".The New York Times. 23 January 1955. Retrieved2025-08-07.
  5. ^Madden, Richard L. (1 November 1977)."A Long Career In Intelligence Richard McGarrah Helms"(PDF).The New York Times. Retrieved11 October 2019.
  6. ^abAbbas Milani,The Shah (2011) p. 44. Not Richard Helms, but his older brother was a classmate of the Shah.
  7. ^How a letter on Hitler's stationery, written to a boy in Jersey, reached the CIA -The Washington Post
  8. ^Helms (2003) pp. 359–361 (re CIA officer Cord Meyers, former head ofUnited World Federalists, in 1953 attacked as a security risk, but retained by CIA; Meyers had a long career at CIA).
  9. ^Colby (1978) pp. 127–128: in mid-1950s Europe the CIA with a "firmly liberal coloration" in its efforts to contain the Soviets, supporting as an option an "opening to the Left" in which the "democratic socialism of the West" might also prevail in popular elections against the lure and "false promise of the Communists".
  10. ^Jeffries-Jones (1989) pp. 71–72 (CIA as liberal elite, though this is qualified); pp. 74–75 (Senator McCarthy's 1953 attacks on the CIA), pp. 76–77 (citing with reservations Jack Newfeld,Robert Kennedy: A Memoir (1969) that in the 1950s liberals "found a sanctuary, an enclave at the CIA").
  11. ^Vernon Walters, regarding as late as 1972, the year he became DDCI, estimated a preponderance of Democrats over Republicans at CIA, although most would strongly resist any partisan use of the Agency. Walters,Silent Missions (NY: Doubleday 1978) p. 592, cited by Ranelagh (1986) p. 535.
  12. ^Vogel, Steve (20 September 2020)."Dwight Eisenhower Built up American Intelligence at a Crucial Moment".History News Network. Retrieved26 February 2021.
  13. ^"Betrayal in Berlin: The True Story of the Cold War's Most Audacious Espionage Operation".Washington Independent Review. 18 November 2019. Retrieved31 December 2020.
  14. ^"Betrayal in Berlin Reviewed by Gary Keeley"(PDF).CIA. 15 June 2020. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on October 16, 2020. Retrieved31 December 2020.
  15. ^Operation REGAL: The Berlin Tunnel. National Security Agency (NSA Historical Monograph). 1988. pp. 22–24.
  16. ^Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) p. 31.
  17. ^abTurner (2005) pp. 103–105, 112–114. Turner faults Raborn, who at the start of his tenure mishandled the CIA's role regarding Johnson's political maneuvering following America's invasion of theDominican Republic in 1965 (pp. 103–105).
  18. ^abHelms (2003) pp. 246–249 (under Raborn as DDCI, LBJ ranch, DCI Raborn).
  19. ^Tucker, editer,Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (Oxford Univ. 1998, 2000), "C.I.A." at 66.
  20. ^Colby (1978) pp. 104, 142–145. Lansdale was an early counterinsurgency advisor.
  21. ^Tucker, ed.,Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (1998, 2000), "Lansdale" at 220.
  22. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 431. Earlier Eisenhower, supported by another CIA report, had rejected immediate American military intervention and the possible use of nuclear weapons in Vietnam. Ranelagh (at 776, n11) refers to the Special National Intelligence Estimate, "Communist reaction to certain US courses of action with respect to Indochina" (June 1954).
  23. ^CIA National Intelligence Estimate of August 3, 1954, referenced by theDefense Department in its 12-volume edition ofUnited States–Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967 (Washington: Government Printing Office [1972]) p. 10: 697. This once-secret DOD study became known as thePentagon Papers after portions began to appear inThe New York Times starting in June 1971. The multi-volume edition is quoted by Len Ackland in hisCredibility Gap. A digest of the Pentagon Papers (Philadelphia: American Friends Service Committee 1972) p. 33 (1954 CIA estimate), at "introduction" (1971NYT leak).
  24. ^Cf.,David Halberstam,Ho (New York: Random House 1971; reprint McGraw-Hill 1987) pp. 60–64, 103–104, 106–107.
  25. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 431–432, quote at 431.
  26. ^CIA National Intelligence Estimate of May 26, 1959: "Diem's regime reflects his ideas. A façade of representative government is maintained, but the government is in fact essentially authoritarian." [Defense Department],United States–Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967 (Washington [1972]) pp. 10: 1192, cited by Ackland,Credibility Gap (1972) p. 42.
  27. ^Powers (1979) pp. 204–206 (Hmong orMeo, Montagnard, and other forces); 209–212 (politics), 210 (quote).
  28. ^Helms (2003), e.g., at 336–339 (Phoenix program forces re rural "pacification").
  29. ^Powers (1979) p. 213: first with DCI McCone in spring 1962, then with the CIA Vietnam specialist George Carver in October 1970.
  30. ^Colby (1978) pp. 193, 194–195 (why CIA tasked to wage asecret war).
  31. ^Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) at 29 (ch.2): Use of armed forces in Laos was "justified partly because the North Vietnamese were also violating the Geneva Accords".
  32. ^Ranelagh (1978) at p. 425 note. "The CIA referred to the hill tribes as 'Meos' although they were, in fact, several different tribes."
  33. ^Helms (2003) 250–263 (Chapter: "The war we won"), at 251–253 (second Geneva), at 255, 260–261 (NVN troops). Additional forces in Laos were Thai army instructors and 20,000 "Thai volunteers", and U.S. Army special forces (at 258, 259).
  34. ^Colby (1978) pp. 191–201, at 191–195 (Geneva); at 200 (large-scale paramilitary); at 198 (at most 200 to 300 CIA, at much reduced cost than Vietnam).
  35. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 419, 425.
  36. ^Also, American planes carried out an extensive "secret bombing" of Laos. Joseph Buttinger,Vietnam. The unforgettable tragedy (1977) pp. 94.
  37. ^Helms (2003) at 262 (quote).
  38. ^1966 CIA memo to303 Committee, cited by Weiner (2007) pp. 257, 610.
  39. ^Colby (1978) pp. 198, 200.
  40. ^Powers (1979) pp. 204–205.
  41. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) p. 425 and note.
  42. ^E.g., Colby (1978) pp. 202, 348.
  43. ^Richard L. Holm, "No Drums, No Bugles. Recollections of a Case Officer in Laos, 1962–1965" inStudies in Intelligence 47/1 (CIA/CSI 2003), is cited by Weiner (2007) pp. 213, 345. The CIA's Holm later rued "the arrogance of Americans" who "had only a minimal understanding of the history, culture, and politics of the people" onto whom America's "strategic interests were superimposed". About the Hmong, Holm summarizes: "Their way of life has been destroyed. They can never return to Laos."
  44. ^Leftist writer Mark Zepezauer,The CIA's Greatest Hits (Odonian Press 1994, 1998) pp. 48–49, 90–91, claims that the CIA got involved in heroin trafficking through itsArmée Clandistine in Laos, which later led the CIA to similar crimes in Central America and Afghanistan.
  45. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 425 note, states that in the mid-1970s the Senate's Church Committee "found no evidence" of such CIA activity in Laos.
  46. ^Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) write (pp. 214–215) of unofficial drug dealing by CIA agents, including in Laos, ancillary to fighting the Cold War. The authors also relate (pp. 312–313) the CIA's failed attempt to stop the publication of Alfred McCoy's bookThe Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia (Harper and Row 1972).
  47. ^Helms (2007) p. 255 (three Presidents), at 261 (50 senators briefed on CIA in Laos, at 415 (Symington's visits).
  48. ^Colby (1978) pp. 201–202. Colby writes, one "Senator publicly attacked CIA's 'secret war' when he had been fully briefed on it and had actually visited the area."
  49. ^Helms (2003) p. 415 (quote).
  50. ^Symington's "shock" in 1973 was "viewed with undisguised scorn in the agency." Ranelagh (1978) p. 425 note. Often such "congressional huffing and puffing was for public consumption only" with the CIA being "privately congratulated" later for its efforts in Laos. Ranelagh at 610 note.
  51. ^Helms (2003) pp. 250–251 (DCI). A colorful event, it was a surprise to Helms.
  52. ^Ranelaugh (1986) pp. 448, 731, 736.
  53. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993) p. 1.
  54. ^Helms (2003), chapters 25 (Laos and Vietnam), 31 and 32 (Vietnam), 37 (Vietnam and Cambodia).
  55. ^Joseph Buttinger,Vietnam. The unforgettable tragedy (1977) pp. 101–103.
  56. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 462–467.
  57. ^Powers (19779) p. 213 re SAVA.
  58. ^Helms (2003) pp. 331–332, quote at 332.
  59. ^Powers (1979) p. 220.
  60. ^Ranelagh (1086) p. 467.
  61. ^Walter Isaacson andEvan Thomas,The Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made (New York: Simon and Schuster 1986) pp. 676–713 (chapter 23).
  62. ^Helms (2003) pp. 332–333 (quote).
  63. ^Turner (2005) pp. 120–121. Turner faults Helms for not getting the frank truth about Vietnam to Johnson earlier.
  64. ^Cf., Turner (2005) pp. 109–110.
  65. ^Senate [Church] (1976) pp. 268–269, statement by the Deputy Director for Intelligence (DDI) Edward Procter in 1975, but "the pessimistic CIA estimate on Vietnam had little or no effect on U.S. policy decisions there."
  66. ^Colby (1978) pp. 161–162, 278–280.
  67. ^Cf., William Colby,Lost Victory. A firsthand account of America's sixteen-year involvement in Vietnam (Chicago: Contemporary Books 1989).
  68. ^Karalekas (1976) p. 81.
  69. ^Helms (2003) p. 311 (quote); 321.
  70. ^Powers (1979) pp. 198–199 (Helms re Vietnam drawn into "larger paper wars").
  71. ^Cf., Cline (1976) pp. 207–208 (coordination of intelligence re Defense, State, CIA).
  72. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) p. 25 (Helms re DCI), 26 ("countless bureaucratic battles"), 111 (coordination), 166 (Defense, State, CIA), 196–197 (estimates), 346 (finesss), 412–413 (DCI role).
  73. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 446.
  74. ^Turner (2005) pp. 106–111.
  75. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 421–423.
  76. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 452.
  77. ^Tucker, editor,Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (Oxford Univ. 1998, 2000) pp. 311–312: "Order of Battle Dispute (1967)".
  78. ^Powers (1979) pp. 198–200 (CIA reports), 203 (Helm's own views).
  79. ^Robert S. McNamara,In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Times Books/Random House 1995) pp. 237–239.
  80. ^Tucker, editor,Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (Oxford Univ. 1998, 2000) p. 311.
  81. ^John Ranelagh, "Central Intelligence Agency" p. 122, inThe Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (2d ed., 2001).
  82. ^Turner (2005) pp. 120–121.
  83. ^Helms (2003) pp. 324–329.
  84. ^Powers (1979) pp. 213–216.
  85. ^Helms (2003) pp. 326–328. The analyst was Sam Adams and his complaint about Helms was heard by a CIA review board.
  86. ^Long after the war was over, civil litigation ensued between General Westmoreland and CBS which directly touched on the Viet Cong numbers controversy. Tucker, editor,Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (2000) p. 311. Also see below: "Later years".
  87. ^Tucker, editor,The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (Oxford University 1998, 2000) p. 385.
  88. ^Thestrategic hamlet was to counter the Viet Cong'scombat hamlets inliberated zones. Douglas Pike,Viet Cong: The Organization and Techniques of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1966) p. 293.
  89. ^Phoenix remains highly controversial. Douglas Valentine'sThe Phoenix Program (William Morrow 1992) offers a politically charged attack on its criminal misdeeds.Mark Moyar presents an establishment view in hisPhoenix and the Birds of Prey (Naval Institute 2000).
  90. ^Karnow,A History of Vietnam (1983) pp. 601–602.
  91. ^Colby (1978) pp. 266–286, at 266–267. The program was called by the Vietnamese governmentPhung Hoang (at 267), which in Vietnam was also a mythological bird.
  92. ^Helms (2003) pp. 335–336.
  93. ^Colby (1978) pp. 190, 242, 245–247; quotes at 245. Operation Phoenix was part of the CORDS program (at 246–247).U.S.AID funded CORDS, yet CORDS was placed in theMilitary Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) chain of command (at 267). Colby had served as CIA's chief of station in Saigon during the early 1960s (pp. 141, 162), then at Far East Division in Washington (pp. 178, 190).
  94. ^Helms (2003) p. 336 (quote).
  95. ^Tucker, editor,The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War (Oxford University 1998, 2000) p. 329: Phoenix, CORDS, MACV, CIA. "After 1967, U.S.AID economic assistance was channeled through CORDS, established under [MACV] to organize all civilian and military aid programs involved in the pacification effort" (Tucker, p. 437). "Despite negative press reports, top-ranking CIA as well as [communist] leaders agreed that the Phoenix program was a success" (Tucker at 329).
  96. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 436–441.
  97. ^Colby (1978) at 269. "Phoenix in fact had no forces of its own," but relied on various Vietnamese police and security services, and civilian programs.
  98. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) at 444.
  99. ^Pike,Viet Cong (Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1966) p. 102: Table 5-1 (showing assassination numbers for 1957–1965); pp. 246–249 (incidents recounted). Incitement of hatred was often employed in order to keep its cadres prepared for war, quoting Viet Cong literature (Pike, pp. 283–285).
  100. ^"Schoolteacers ... were another target." Viet Cong used intimidation, kidnapping, torture, indoctrination, execution.Denis Warner,The Last Confucian (Baltimore: Penguin 1964) p. 161.
  101. ^Karnow,A History of Vietnam (1983) p. 238 (Viet Cong assassinations), p. 602 (Phoenix program brutality).
  102. ^Al Santoli, editor,Everything We Had. An oral history of the Vietnam war by thirty-three American soldiers who fought it (New York: Random House 1981; reprint Ballantine 1982) pp. 199–202 "The Phoenix". Bruce Lawlor (CIA case officer in Vietnam) said the Phoenix and pacification programs were "thought of by geniuses and implemented by idiots." The "press reports here in the United States" were "a factor in shutting down the whole program." At first, "the Green Berets were a symbol of counterinsurgency and they were excellent. ...Barry Sadler [his song] was the worst thing that ever happened to them. ... the Green Berets no more were an elite small unit."
  103. ^David Harris,Our War: What We Did in Vietnam and What it Did to Us (New York: Random House 1996) pp. 100–106: a short, caustic sketch of Phoenix operations, which emphasizes the notorious crimes.
  104. ^Helms (2003) pp. 337 (quote), 338.
  105. ^Antiwar critics at home became convinced that byOperation Phoenix the CIA was "secretly implementing policies repugnant to the American public". Ranelagh (1986) p. 437.
  106. ^Joseph Buttinger,Vietnam. The unforgettable tragedy (New York: Horizon 1977) pp. 82–87, Phoenix program discussed at 86. Buttinger writes thatSaigon's land reform programs were often defeated by corruption, e.g., lands distributed to peasants in an area under pacification were later seized by former landlords who then charged the peasants rent (p. 114).
  107. ^Helms (2003) pp. 336–339, quote at 338 ("staffed by Vietnamese").
  108. ^Colby (1978) pp. 266–286 (Phoenix); 194, 195–196, 300–301 (and Laos). Colby was aware of severe problems (pp. 270–271).
  109. ^Colby wrote a book advancing his counterinsurgency analysis:Lost Victory: A First-Hand Account of America's Sixteen-Year Involvement in Vietnam (McGraw-Hill 1989).
  110. ^Colby (1978) pp. 270–280, at 270–271 (his 1969 directive to cure wrongdoing), 272 and 279 (his testimony before congressional committees), and 278–279, 280 (positive improvement then to quality of Vietnamese life in the countryside).
  111. ^Karnow,A History of Vietnam (1983) pp. 602, 603, citing a VC leader, a VC colonel, a communist general, and the foreign minister of Vietnam in 1975.
  112. ^Thomas E. Ricks,The Generals. American military command from World War II to today (New York: The Penguin Press 2012) pp. 269–273, 320 (Combined Action Platoon program of Marine Corps); at 320–325 (Hanoi's Military History Institute of Vietnam,Victory in Vietnam); at 324–325 (Phoenix); at 269, 342, 433 (Gen. Cushman re counterinsurgency); at 261 (Special Forces and CIA). Ricks links such counterinsurgency actions to new "surge" tactics in Iraq under GeneralDavid Petraeus (at 432–438).
  113. ^Cf. re American counterinsurgency, Thomas Ricks,The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006–2008 (New York: Penguin 2009) pp. 14–17, 24–31, and, e.g., 202–208.
  114. ^Tran Ngoc Chau,Vietnam Labyrinth (2013) pp. 328–329. "On the face of it, the premise for Vietnamization appeared plausible," according to this Vietnamese politician. Yet he then "believed the Nixon administration's primary interest would be to contain the Vietnam military and political situation long enough (the "decent interval") to withdraw without the appearance of having been defeated."
  115. ^Tucker, ed.,The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War, pp. 474–475: article "Vietnamization".
  116. ^Buttinger,Vietnam: The Unforgettable Tragedy (1977) 107–112, at 111: "the failure of Vietnamization was [due to] the corruption among the army leadership" ofARVN.
  117. ^David Halberstam,The Best and the Brightest (New York: Random House 1972; reprint Penguin 1983) pp. 806–807.
  118. ^Tucker, ed.,The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War at 306–307, quote at 307.
  119. ^Helms (2003) p. 309.
  120. ^Kissinger,The White House Years (1997) pp. 1180–1181, 1181 (quote).
  121. ^Helms (2003) pp. 261–262 (Laos), 338 (Phoenix).
  122. ^Colby (1978) pp. 240, 290.
  123. ^Karalekas (1976) p. 69.
  124. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 543.
  125. ^Colby (1978) p. 202 (quote); also at 301 (CIA budget taken over by Defense).
  126. ^Henry Kissinger,The White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown 1997) pp. 1049–1096 (Nixon's trip to China). Vietnam discussed at 1086, 1987, cf., 694–697. Nixon also went to thedétentesummit in Moscow the following May (pp. 1202–1275).
  127. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 505 (Helms' reports), p. 540 (within White House).
  128. ^Cf., Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) pp. 101–104.
  129. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 301–302.
  130. ^Colby (1986) p. 365.
  131. ^Epstein (1989) pp. 40–41, 100.
  132. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 123–125. DCI Dulles then leaked the text toThe New York Times.
  133. ^Dan Raviv andYossi Melman,Every Spy a Prince: The Complete History of Israel's Intelligence Community (London: Sidgwick and Jackson 1989 [asImperect Spies]; New York: Houghton Mifflin 1990) at 142.
  134. ^Ian Black &Benny Morris,Israel's Secret Wars: A History of Israel's Intelligence Services (London: Hamish Hamilton 1991; New York: Grove Weidenfeld 1991) pp. 206–210, quote 209.
  135. ^In 1966 Helms had provided Johnson with a CIA memorandum "How We Have Helped Israel" May 19, 1966, cited in Ranelagh (1986) pp. 580 and 787, n46.
  136. ^Powers (1979) p. 202 (quote).
  137. ^CIA analystSherman Kent estimated that "Israel would win a war within two weeks without any American aid." Ranelagh (1986) pp. 473–474.
  138. ^Regarding CIA's forecast Weiner (2007) p. 277 seems to give primary credit to James Angleton's contacts in Israeli intelligence.
  139. ^Helms (2003) pp. 298–299. The CIA's Office of Current Intelligence (OCI) had indicated a crisis looming since early 1967 and had set up a special task force to track it.
  140. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 473–474. Goldberg had "claimed that CIA estimates of Israeli strength were overly optimistic." Soon thereafter Israel sent President Johnson warnings that "Israel would be defeated by the Arabs if American assistance were not immediately forthcoming."
  141. ^Andrew and Mitrokhin (2005) pp. 229–230.
  142. ^Helms (2003) p. 299.
  143. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 473–474 (quote).
  144. ^Helms (2003) pp. 298–299, at 298 (quote).
  145. ^Helms (2003) pp. 299–300.
  146. ^Powers (2002, 2004) pp. 251–252 [1983].
  147. ^Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) p. 257: The American "Joint Chiefs of Staff 'proposed a quick, retaliatory air strike on the Israeli naval base which launched the attack'" but their "recommendation was turned down".
  148. ^Powers (2002, 2004) p. 252 [1983].
  149. ^"RICHARD HELMS INTERVIEW, BY ROBERT M. HATHAWAY, 8 NOVEMBER 1984"(PDF).Central Intelligence Agency, pp. 14.
  150. ^"RICHARD HELMS INTERVIEW, BY ROBERT M. HATHAWAY, 8 NOVEMBER 1984".CIA.gov Freedom of Information Act Electronic Reading Room.
  151. ^Helms, Richard; Hood, William; Kissinger, Henry (2003).A Look over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency. Random House.ISBN 9780375500121.
  152. ^Helms (2003) p. 333.
  153. ^Lyndon Johnson,The Vantage Point: Perspectives on the Presidency, 1963–1968 (New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston 1971) at 302.
  154. ^Helms (2003) pp. 301–303, quote at 303. Helms then had remarked that Soviet "fishing trawlers" trailing the Sixth Fleet "would signal Moscow the moment it was apparent that the aircraft carriers and support ships were on the move." Helms at 303.
  155. ^abTurner (2005) at 119 (quote).
  156. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993) at 2.
  157. ^Helms (2003) pp. 294–295, 295 (quote); 307.
  158. ^Powers (1979) p. 202.
  159. ^Cf., Turner (2005) pp. 107–108 re Johnson's Tuesday lunch.
  160. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 580 (quote; military aid "soared" after war).
  161. ^Black and Morris,Israel's Secret Wars (1991) pp. 234–235.
  162. ^Helms Interview of 8 Nov. 1984 by Robert M. Hathaway (CIA staff historian) at 8. Interview posted at CIA website.
  163. ^Helms (2002) p. 307 (quote, with inserts in parentheses of attendee titles and/or names from Helms at p. 294). Photograph of a Tuesday lunch appears at sixth page of photos.
  164. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993) pp. 2–4.
  165. ^The effort was renamed Chaos in July 1968. Powers (1979) p. 384.
  166. ^abRanelagh (1986) p. 534.
  167. ^E.g., an April 1966 article inRamparts had claimed that at a university the CIA ran a front doing work related to the Vietnam War.Time magazine for its Feb. 24, 1967 issue put Richard Helms on its cover for its piece "The CIA and the students".
  168. ^Colby (1978) p. 314. Helms also "kept it free of the normal process of review."
  169. ^Powers (1979) pp. 283–284. Helms created the Special Operations Group (SOG), housed in counterintelligence.
  170. ^Helms (2003) p. 280; cf., p. 285.
  171. ^abHelms (2003) p. 279.
  172. ^abRanelagh (1986) pp. 534–535.
  173. ^Powers (1979) pp. 285–286.
  174. ^Powers (1978) pp. 285, 286–288.
  175. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 371–373.
  176. ^Colby (1978) re Chaos: p. 317 ("process of dismantling"), p. 335 ("remnants"), 390 ("terminated" by December 1974).
  177. ^Cf., Senate [Church],Final Report, Book I (1976) pp. 135–139, containing remarks about the CIA and "Domestic Activities" that pertained to its statutory authority under theNational Security Act of 1947, which established the Agency (the Senate then referring to Title 50 of theUnited States Code).
  178. ^E.g., Jeffreys-Jones (1989) pp. 197–198. On December 22, 1974, journalistSeymour Hersh wrote on the front page of theNew York Times:

    "The CIA, directly violating its charter, conducted a massive illegal domestic intelligence operation during the Nixon Administration against anti-war movement and other dissent groups in the United States.

  179. ^Cf., Turner (2005) p. 118, "illegal".
  180. ^Powers (1979) pp. 333–334, e.g., the Hersh article in theNew York Times of December 22, 1974.
  181. ^Colby (1978) p. 315. "Helms was acutely conscious of the danger of seeming to involve CIA in a domestic intelligence activity." The press would likely misinterpretChaos "as an Agency effort directed against the antiwar movement, rather than its foreign contacts."
  182. ^Helms (2003) pp. 279–280 (quote).
  183. ^Tuner (2005) at 118 (quote). "Johnson assumed that the antiwar protesters and inner-city rioters were funded by overseas Communist sources."
  184. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 535–536 and note *; cf., 590–591 and note *.
  185. ^Yet "the momentum of the operation carried it beyond" initial instruction given by Helms, according to the Rockefeller Commission. Colby (1978) p. 315.
  186. ^Weiner (2007) at 285–286.
  187. ^Powers (1978) pp. 276, 277–278 (FBI refusal); p. 285 (violate CIA charter).
  188. ^Helms (2003) pp. 375–376.
  189. ^Powers (1979) pp. 223–224, 228 (a slightly different version). The Helms' first meeting with Nixon was in 1956 regarding Hungary (p. 229).
  190. ^abHelms (2003) p. 377.
  191. ^abRanelagh (1986) pp. 482–483 (appointment), 538–539 (Nixon's policy change for CIA).
  192. ^Henry Kissinger,The White House Years (Boston 1979) pp. 47–48, "isolation" and "confrontation" quotes at 48; 74–75.
  193. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 484 ("outside world" quote).
  194. ^Weiner (2007) at 293.
  195. ^Helms at (2003) p. 382.
  196. ^Karalekas (1976) p. 83.
  197. ^Even thePresident's Daily Brief by CIA was apparently superseded by the "morning News Summary, an extremely thorough compilation of media reportage prepared overnight by an efficient team of White House aides." Kissinger,The White House Years (1979) p. 694.
  198. ^Helms (2003) p. 384.
  199. ^Turner (2005); 125.
  200. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993) p. 8 (Helms excluded from full NSC meetings for first six weeks).
  201. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 500 (quote).
  202. ^Powers (1979) pp. 232, cf., 230.
  203. ^Turner (2005) pp. 122–126. Turner quotes Gen.Brent Scowcroft as saying that Nixon had an "inferiority complex" toIvy League graduates, and that Nixon believed such graduates to be dominant at the Agency (at 123).
  204. ^Henry Kissinger,The White House Years (1979) at 36: "Nixon considered CIA a refuge of Ivy League intellectuals opposed to him."
  205. ^Weiner (2007) p. 291 (Nixon as anti-CIA), p. 292 (Helms' "never trusted" quote).
  206. ^Ranelagh (2007) re Nixon: p. 483 ("Georgetown types"), pp. 484–485 ("personal anger about the CIA"), p. 501 ("liberal Georgetown set").
  207. ^Helms (2007) pp. 382–383, quote at 383.
  208. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993) pp. 8–13 (Helms per Nixon and Kissinger). Helms, interviewed in 1982, spoke about his service under Nixon:

    It was bound to be a rocky period with Richard Nixon as President, given the fact that he held the Agency responsible for his defeat in 1960. ... He would constantly, in N.S.C. meetings, pick on the Agency for not having properly judged what the Soviets were going to do ..." Helms concludes: "Dealing with him was tough, it seems to me that the fact that I ended up with my head on my shoulders after four years of working with him is not the least achievement of my life" (at 10).

  209. ^Cf., Helms (2003) pp. 382–383; at 386, 387.
  210. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 501: "During National Security Council meetings Helms had to deal with a host of put-downs from Nixon himself."
  211. ^Turner (2005) p. 126: "During his briefings of the NSC, Helms caught the brunt of Nixon's contempt. The president often interrupted him, corrected him, or badgered him with as much condescension as possible. This happened regularly, not just on particular issues."
  212. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 540 (quote).
  213. ^Henry Kissinger,The White House Years (1979) p. 36. Yet Kissinger (p. 37) presents his rather positive appraisal of Helms.
  214. ^Cline (1976) p. 216.
  215. ^Helms (2002) pp. 384–388, 390.
  216. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 490–499.
  217. ^Helms (2002) at 387 (quote).
  218. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 497 (quote), p. 498 (quote).
  219. ^Cf., generallyRockefeller Report (1975) chapter 14, pp. 172–207: "Involvement of the CIA in Improper Activities for the White House," e.g.,E. Howard Hunt at 173–182, 193–199; operations againstDaniel Ellsberg pp. 182–190. The Report (p. 199) found "no evidence either that the CIA was a participant in the planning or execution of the Watergate break-in or that it had advance knowledge of it."
  220. ^Powers (1979) pp. 288–289; at 296, 298, 299 ("distance the CIA").
  221. ^Colby (1978) p. 321 ("Just stay away from the whole damn thing"), p. 328 ("Helms' careful distancing of the Agency from Watergate").
  222. ^Helms (2003) pp. 3–7, quotes at 6, 7.
  223. ^Powers (1979) pp. 277–278, 289–297; at 297 (quoting Helms that CIA did not run the break-in); p. 303 (Walters learned from Colby that CIA was not involved in the break-in, and no reason to block the FBI).
  224. ^Colby (1978) pp. 323–324.
  225. ^'The smoking gun' tape. Source: Nixon Library. Watergate Tapes. Recording available at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oe3OgU8W0s
  226. ^Helms (2003) pp. 9–10 (Bay of Pigs), pp. 11–12 (bail), p. 283 (Nixon's team members). The White House specifically requested Helms to bring DDCI Walters with him to meetings (p. 8).
  227. ^Powers (1979) pp. 297–311.
  228. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 520–530.
  229. ^Weiner (2007) p. 630 (investigation stalled for "sixteen days at most").
  230. ^Turner (2005) p. 133 (quote), p. 134 (quote).
  231. ^Helms (2003) pp. 282–283, 395.
  232. ^Colby (1978) at 328.
  233. ^Ranelagh (1986) at 528–529 (the FBI chief's request to Walters, and Helms' orders to Walters).
  234. ^Rockefeller Report (1975) at 202, which states that it "found no evidence" that "officers of the Agency actively joined in the cover-up conspiracy formed by the White House staff in June 1972. There is no evidence that the Agency sought to block the FBI investigation."
  235. ^Weiner (2007) p. 321 (quote), pp. 321–322: on July 6 Helms then in Southeast Asia instructed Walters to refuse the request byGray at FBI toput in writing the CIA's national security claim, thus permitting FBI to proceed with its investigation.
  236. ^Helms was accordingly faulted by theRockefeller Report (1975) p. 202, which criticized "the Director's opinion that since the Agency was not involved in Watergate, it should not become involved in the Watergate investigation."
  237. ^Powers (1979) p. 298 ("undermined the consensus of trust in Washington" and "ended the congressional acquiescence to the special intimacy between the CIA and the President" so that "Watergate in short made the CIA fair game"); pp. 330–333.
  238. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 530–533.
  239. ^Colby (1978) pp. 327–328.
  240. ^Helms (2003) pp. 409–412.
  241. ^Colby (1978) p. 328 (quote).
  242. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 545 (Colby quote with brackets).
  243. ^Helms (2003) pp. 411–412 (quote).
  244. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 322–323.
  245. ^Cf., William Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally; (New York: Simon and Schuster 1988) pp. 155–165, regarding Nixon's 1972 visit to Tehran to see the Shah, and increased American arms sales to him (role quote at 168); and p. 266, re CIA's presence in Iran to gather intelligence on the Soviet military.
  246. ^Powers (1979) pp. 309–312, speculates about Nixon. Although angry that Helms in June had refused him cover over Watergate, by December Nixon looked like he would escape the scandal. Yet Nixon sensed that Helms could still help or hurt him. So Nixon offered him an ambassadorship to get him out of town while not making him a permanent enemy (p. 312).
  247. ^William Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally (New York: Simon and Schuster 1988) pp. 265–266 *note.
  248. ^Ranelagh (1986) at 546.
  249. ^Helms (2003) pp. 411, 412 (quote).
  250. ^"An Interview with Richard Helms".Central Intelligence Agency. 2007-05-08. Archived fromthe original on April 27, 2010. Retrieved2008-03-16.
  251. ^Powers (1979) pp. 269–273. Powers opines (at 273) that the General's assassins "would have done nothing at all without American encouragement to move. If the CIA did not actually shoot General Schneider, it is probably fair to say that he would not have been shot without the CIA."
  252. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 310–311, 312–313.
  253. ^Powers (1979) pp. 251–273.
  254. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 306–317.
  255. ^Turner (2005) pp. 128–130.
  256. ^Powers (1979) pp. 260–262.
  257. ^Colby (1978) p. 302. Colby, DCI 1973–1976, notes that the CIA often funded foreign "center democrats", e.g., in Italy during the 1950s (cf., 108–140).
  258. ^Cf.,Anthony Sampson,The Sovereign State of ITT (New York: Stein and Day 1973, reprint Fawcett Crest 1974).John McCone, then on the board of directors atITT Corporation and former DCI, had met with Helms twice, and Kissinger, in early 1970 to discuss stopping Allende's candidacy (p. 263, 268). ITT owned and operated the telephone system in Chile (p. 256), which in 1972 President Allende moved to nationalize (pp. 258–259, 280).
  259. ^Helms (2003) pp. 403–407, quote at 404. Only Kissinger, the Attorney GeneralJohn Mitchell, and Helms were to know about Nixon's secret order to enlist the Chilean Army to stage acoup. Helms (2003) p. 405. ThusEdward Korry the Ambassador to Chile remained out of the loop. Helms writes (at 404) that he tried to caution Nixon but to no avail.
  260. ^Regarding Ambassador Korry, see Powers (1979) pp. 256–271.
  261. ^Colby (1978) pp. 303–304. Nixon directed that "Track II" be kept secret from everybody, including the State Department and its ambassador in Chile, Defense, and theinterdepartmental oversight committee. "However unusual, this order was fully within the President's authority to order covert action."
  262. ^Senate [Church Committee] (1975) pp. 229–232.
  263. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 315–317.
  264. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 517 (quote).
  265. ^Senate [Church Committee],Alleged Assassination Plots (1975) pp. 228; cf., 226.
  266. ^abPowers (1979) p. 273.
  267. ^Andrew and Mitrokhin (2005) pp. 72–73. The SovietKGB claimed some small credit for Allende's election, having sent him campaign contributions through theCommunist Party of Chile.
  268. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 520.
  269. ^Turner (2005) p. 129.
  270. ^Helms (2003) p. 407.
  271. ^Powers (1979) pp. 124, 270–271.
  272. ^Weiner (2007) p. 315.
  273. ^Allende was counselled by the Soviets to set up a new and separate security force independent of the army, yet Allende only mustered forces sufficient to antagonize the army but not enough to provide himself with protection. Cf., Andrew and Mitrokhin (2007) p. 82.
  274. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 315–316, states that American actions after 1970 reveal the persistent goal of having an armycoup overthrow Allende. During the next year, 1971, the new CIA station chief in Santiago "built a web of military men and political saboteurs who sought to shift the Chilean military off its constitutional foundation." Yet Weiner also notes how Allende made his own trouble with the army.
  275. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 519–520. CIA's 1970 efforts continued against Allende until the 1973 coup.
  276. ^U.S. Senate (Church),Alleged Assassination Plots (1975) p. 254. The CIA understood that their 1970 efforts were to be "replaced by a longer-term effort to effect a change of government in Chile." Former DDPThomas Karamessines testified that CIA actions in Chile continued, and that "the seeds that were laid in that effort in 1970 had their impact in 1973."
  277. ^Henry Kissinger,White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown 1979) pp. 652–683. "[I]t was not American economic pressure but Allende's own policies that brought him down," writes Kissinger (at 682) about Allende's failures in managing the Chilean economy during 1970–1973. Kissinger notes that USG foreign aid and assistance to Chile did not altogether stop during Allende's presidency (at 681–682, cf. 1486–1487). About the 1970 "coup strategy", Kissinger understood Nixon's initial 'go ahead' to Helms differently (at 673–674), but states that after first contacting the Viaux group of assassins, the CIA had called them off five days before their killing of General René Schneider, Commander-in-Chief of the Army of Chile (at 676–677). Kissinger decades later wrote the "Foreword" to Helms' memoirs, published in 2003.
  278. ^Colby (1978) pp. 305–306. Although "track II" coup plotting ceased in 1970, Nixon's "hostility" toward Allende continued. American policy included "the administration's attempts to rally private capital against Chile, the State Department's efforts to cut off its international credits, and the American military's continued warm contacts with the Chilean military." Yet Colby protests making the CIA the "scapegoat" for the evils of the militarycoup in Chile.
  279. ^Helms (2003) p. 412.
  280. ^On August 22, 1973, a hostile congress passed (by 81 to 47) its resolution condemning Allende's extra-constitutional actions. In reply Allende coolly noted that they failed to get the two-thirds required for impeachment, and their own resolution seemed to invite acoup d'etat. Paul E. Sigmund,The Overthrow of Allende and the Politics of Chile, 1964–1976 (University of Pittsburgh 1980) pp. 232–234. In the weeks before thecoup Chilean society seemed locked in an unsustainable polarization; also an immediate, palpable tension gripped Chile, due to shortages and strikes. Sigmund (1980) pp. 238–239
  281. ^The Soviets apparently thought that "economic mismanagement by the Allende regime almost certainly did far more damage than the CIA." Andrew and Mitrokhin (2005) pp. 73–74.
  282. ^Weiner (2007) pp. 316–317.
  283. ^Andrews and Mitrokhin (2005) pp. 86–88. "For the KGB, Pinochet represented an almost a perfect villain, an ideal counterpoint to the martyred Allende."
  284. ^Weiner (2007) p. 316 (3200 killed). The then CIA task force chief in Chile later said the Agency was not able to finely orchestrate such covert actions, such as thecoup initiated by the Chilean Army, so as to be able to "start" and then "stop" the violence. The CIA later admitted that after thecoup it dealt with Chilean military officers complicit in "serious human rights abuses".
  285. ^Cf., Christopher Hitchens,The Trial of Henry Kissinger (London: Verso 2001) p. 67: a contemporary USG document put the number of summary executions during the coup's first 19 days at 320.
  286. ^When civilian rule returned after 1990, an official commission documented "a total of 3,197 extra-judicial executions, deaths under torture, and 'disappearances' during the Pinochet era." Andrew and Mitrokhin (2005) p. 87.
  287. ^Cf., Paul W. Drake, "Chile" at 126–128, inThe Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (2d ed., 2001), edited by Joel Krieger.
  288. ^Air Force GeneralAlberto Bachelet Martínez opposed thecoup d'etat. He was arrested for treason and for months tortured; he died in prison. His wife and daughterMichelle Bachelet were blindfolded and tortured, and held for half a year. From 1975 to 1979 they went into exile, living in theGerman Democratic Republic where she studied medicine. In 2005 she waselected president of Chile. Cf., Richard Worth,Michelle Bachelet (Chelsea House 2007).
  289. ^See above subsection "Helms dismissed" under section "Nixon presidency". Helms served in Iran under both Nixon andFord.
  290. ^Cf.,Nixon White House Tapes January 1973Archived 2010-05-28 at theWayback Machine, Nixon Presidential Library & Museum, released on 23 Jun 2009. This recording apparently presents a telephone conversation between Nixon and Helms, evidently in January 1973, after his ambassadorial appointment but before his leaving for Iran.
  291. ^Powers (1979) p. 341.
  292. ^William Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally (New York: Simon and Schuster 1988) p. 267 *note: "Much of Helms' time in Iran was devoured by trips to Washington to testify to one or another of the various congressional committees investigating the CIA."
  293. ^Helms (2003) pp. 417–418, 419 (Iraq deal, oil bonanza). Helms ends here saying that he and his wife "decided it was time to begin to think about leaving Iran and government service" (pp. 419–420).
  294. ^Powers (1979) p. 348. The scope of the investigation included 1970 actions by CIA, and Helms' 1973 testimony about it. The eventual result was legal action against Helms.
  295. ^Helms (2003) p. 417.
  296. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 266.
  297. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 263 ("uncritical" quote), p. 270 ("invested" quote).
  298. ^David Harris,The Crisis: The President, the Prophet, and the Shah—1979 and the Coming of Militant Islam (Boston: Little, Brown 2004) p. 44. Later in 1978–1979 revolutionary crowds in Tehran "called him 'the American Shah' and they were right on the mark."
  299. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 209 ("I speak" quote), p. 270 (meeting with the Shah as his monologue).
  300. ^Helms (2003) p. 417 ("tête à tête"), p. 419 ("as much" quote, "give-and-take" quote, "talk shop"). Helms commented that the shah was well disposed to CIA officials.
  301. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 367. Helms remembered, "Dean Rusk used to say that [the Shah] was the best-informed man in the world save for the U.S. President. Maybe that's a slight exaggeration."
  302. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally (Simon and Schuster 1988) pp. 264–265 (no contact with opposition), p. 270 (Shah "guest" quote); p. 265 ("jeopardized" quote, "shallow pool" quote), p. 268 (Helms' "PNG" quote), p. 271 (U.N.'sBrian Urquhart's quote).
  303. ^Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran (Harvard Univ. 2008, 2010) p. 285: "In the twilight years of the monarchy it was increasingly clear that the shah and his elite had cacooned themselves in an impenetrable web of collective self-deception."
  304. ^Abbas Milani,The Shah (Palgrave Macmillan 2011) p. 386.
  305. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 271 (CIA excluded), pp. 271–272 (CIA not monitoring shah), p. 272 (State Dept.), p. 273 (depending on Savak), 272–273 (CIA review). "The Shah would never have tolerated the necessary investigations" (p. 270).
  306. ^Yet "coded confidential telegrams" between the shah and the Iranian embassy in Washington were "regularly intercepted" and read by the USG. Milani,The Shah (Harvard 2008, 2010) p. 370.
  307. ^Cf., Shawcross (1988) at 249, 333, 351–352.

    Helms' appointment to Tehran inevitably gave rise to lurid speculations about the nature of CIA control over the Shah. For the shah's enemies it was clear confirmation that the shah was merely a CIA puppet." Shawcross (1988) at 266.

  308. ^Weiner (2007) p. 368.
  309. ^Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran (Harvard Univ. 2008, 2010) pp. 144, 146, 149, 158 (CIA and 1953 coup); pp. 260–264 (America and CIA in Iran). "The Iranian public increasingly resented the U.S. predominance" (p. 260).
  310. ^See above section "Iran: Mossadegh" for the coup and for Helms' reflections on the CIA and the subsequent Islamic revolution in Iran.
  311. ^Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran (Harvard Univ. 2008, 2010) p. 262.
  312. ^abShawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) at 267 ("Mashhad" quote), 267–268 (travel to Mashhad); at 269 ("authoritarian" quote).
  313. ^Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran (Harvard Univ. 2008, 2010) at 353.
  314. ^Milani,The Shah (Palgrave Macmillan 2011) p. 375.
  315. ^Fakhreddin Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran: A Century of Struggle against Authoritaian Rule (Harvard University 2008, 2010) at p. 164 (Savak).
  316. ^Helms (2003) p. 417 (intercepts, Kurds). Helms remarks that then as always "the Shah acted as his own chief of intelligence".
  317. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 266 (CIA 'listening posts' re Soviets), pp. 72, 160–161, 198 (CIA and Savak), at pp. 163, 165* (CIA and the Kurds), p. 266 (quote). "The CIA owned in Iran one of its largest operations in the world" (p. 264).
  318. ^Helms (2003) pp. 418–419, 421.
  319. ^Cf., Cynthia Helms,An Ambassador's Wife in Iran (1981).
  320. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 206.
  321. ^Fakhreddin Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran: A Century of Struggle against Authoritarian Rule (Harvard University 2008, 2010) p. 199 (Helms' quote).
  322. ^Helms (2003) p. 419 (fueling favors; imports, warplanes).
  323. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 266 (Helms "Shah" quote).
  324. ^Said Amir Arjomand,The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran (Oxford University 1988) on the 1973OPEC effect: "The sudden increase in the price of oil generated a boom for the next three years while seriously distorting the path of economic development" (at 110).
  325. ^"In 1977 the number of American citizens working in Iran in various areas totaled about 31,000." Rinn-Sup Shinn, "Foreign Relations" pp. 221–239, at 231, inIran: A Country Study (American Univ., 3d ed. 1978), edited by Richard F. Nyrop. Cf., p. 415: 1,400 U.S. Dept. of Defense personnel.
  326. ^Arjomand,The Turban for the Crown (Oxford Univ. 1988), about the "oil bonanza" and "petrodollars": "Corruption among the high civilian officials became phenomenal and spread to the generals as billions of dollars were being siphoned off through government and army contracts" (at 111). Arjomand noted its political results, "the utter lack of any moral commitment to the shah's regime among those who had a stake in it, the top civil servants and the well-to-do entrepreneurs" (at 111).
  327. ^Azimi,The Quest for Democracy in Iran (2008, 2010) pp. 244–247 (corruption), p. 273 (oil revenues quadruple), pp. 325–326 (opulence of "the one-thousand families"). "Corruption in its broad sense was intrinsic to the functioning of the regimes" (pp. 244–245). Professor Fakhreddin Azimi, about the shah's labored rule, mentions former premier (1961–1962)Ali Amini and his belief that 'although the Shah undoubtedly loved his country, the love did not extend to the people" (p. 301).
  328. ^Helms (2003) pp. 417–418. In exchange, the shah got changes in the border, and rights for Iranian pilgrims to visit Shi'a holy sites in Iraq. Helms notes that subsequently many anti-Shah, pro-Ayatollah audio cassettes were smuggled back into Iran by pilgrims.
  329. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) pp. 607–608.
  330. ^Powers (1979) p. 40 (quote).
  331. ^Betty Medsger,The Burglary. The discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's secret FBI (New York: Knopf 2014). The initial published evidence of Hoover's illegality was obtained by unknown informants who burglarized an FBI office in Media, PA. Book review by James Rosen in theWall Street Journal, January 31, 2014, p. A11.
  332. ^Ranelagh (1986) on the media and official investigations, pp. 571–577, 584–599; re whistleblowers, esp.Victor Marchetti, pp. 536–538; CIA dissenters, e.g.,Philip Agee, pp. 471–472.
  333. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) pp. 530–531. The Watergate scandal focused the new attitudes on the accountability of elected government, including oversight of the CIA.
  334. ^The congressional seniority system then functioned more effectively, which allowed the committee chair wide discretion. Cf., Colby (1978) p. 309.
  335. ^Marchetti and Marks (1974, 1980) pp. 90–92.
  336. ^Helms (2003) pp. 426–430, 432.
  337. ^Powers (1979) p. 337.
  338. ^Turner (2005) 147–148.
  339. ^Senator Frank Church of Idaho had chaired theMultinationals Subcommittee in 1972. It had investigatedITT Corporation's anti-Allende activities in Chile in 1970, and involved the CIA (p. 263). Sampson,The Sovereign State of ITT (1973, 1974) pp. 260–266.
  340. ^Powers (1979) p. 341: testify (quote).
  341. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 610–612, 788.
  342. ^Cf., the youtube.com videos of his congressional testimony cited in the Bibliography below.
  343. ^Helms (2003) pp. 432–434.
  344. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 472 (death of agent Richard Welch in Athens).
  345. ^Powers (1979) p. 342.
  346. ^The testimony before Congress which got Helms into trouble had been made earlier in 1973 concerning Chile. See below, section "Plea, aftermath".
  347. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 614.
  348. ^Cf., Prados (2009) p. 306.
  349. ^Helms (2003) pp. 413–415. A few days later Helms gave similar testimony about the CIA in Chile to another Senate committee investing multinational corporations: about its 1970 secret dealings withInternational Telephone and Telegraph (ITT Corp).
  350. ^Prados (2009) p. 290.
  351. ^See above section on Chile, during the Nixon presidency.
  352. ^Powers (1979) pp. 59–61.
  353. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 611–612.
  354. ^Helms (2003) pp. 441–446. Helms retained his government pension.
  355. ^Powers (1979) pp. 347–353.
  356. ^Colby (1978) p. 386 (quote re lesser charge).
  357. ^Marro, Anthony (1977-11-01)."HELMS, EX-C.I.A. CHIEF, PLEADS NO CONTEST TO 2 MISDEMEANORS".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved2022-06-09.
  358. ^Powers (1979) pp. 351, 352.
  359. ^Ranelagh (1986) p. 612.
  360. ^Woodward (1988) p. 26 (Williams "badge" quote), 43 (Schlesinger).
  361. ^Powers (1979) pp. 352–353 (Williams "disclose" quote).
  362. ^Theoharis (2005) p. 240. Angleton contributed to Helms' defense fund.
  363. ^Powers (1979) pp. 343–344.
  364. ^Helms (2002) p. 445.
  365. ^Senate [Church] (1976)Book I, at 31–40.
  366. ^Helms (2003) pp. 445–446.
  367. ^Powers (1979) p. 353.
  368. ^Woodward (1988) p. 26 ("memory" quote), p. 280 (Helms quote).
  369. ^William Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally (New York: Simon and Schuster 1988) p. 288.
  370. ^Bob Woodward,The Veil (1988, 1989) p. 24.
  371. ^Powers (1979) p. 353, and note 12 at p. 435.
  372. ^abChristopher Marquis (2002).
  373. ^Woodward,Veil (1988, 1989) pp. 25, 27.
  374. ^Evidently former President Ford ("not qualified") and former DCI, then-Vice President Bush ("an inappropriate choice") considered Casey in a different light. Weiner (2007) p. 376. Weiner writes that "Casey was a charming scoundrel".
  375. ^Bob Woodward,The Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA, 1981–1987 (New York: Simon and Schuster 1987, 1988) p. 45 (quote). In making a personnel recommendation, it was important to Helms that the proposed nominee be "a man neither of the right nor of the left."
  376. ^Woodward,The Veil (1987, 1988) p. 47. In the 1980s Colby was considered to be "the only politically liberal DCI", which impliedly casts Helms as a conservative. Nonetheless, under conservative DCI Casey the CIA became entangled in the notoriousIran-Contra scandal. Woodward, pp. 557–588 (Iran-Contra), esp. pp. 582–583, 585–586, 588 (re Casey).
  377. ^Ranelagh (1986) pp. 657, 659 (Reagan's plans for an "ideological housecleaning" at CIA), at 559–671 (Reagan'sTransition Team Report re CIA), pp. 672–675 (Reagan's campaign manager William Casey and his service as DCI).
  378. ^Robert S. McNamara,In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Times Books/Random House 1995) pp. 241–242.
  379. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) p. 739, note 7 to text at p. 25.
  380. ^Ranelagh (1986) at 731.
  381. ^Text of Helms' "Donovan speech" at CIA website, in the "Helms collection".
  382. ^Woodward,The Veil (1987, 1988) at 280–281. It was attended by Vice President Bush and DCI Casey, and celebrated as well the OSS and its founderWilliam J. Donovan.
  383. ^Cf., Ranelagh (1986) p. 774, note 57 to text at p. 415.
  384. ^Powers (1979), 'Introduction" pp. xii–xiii, 360, n6 (interviews for the book).
  385. ^Powers (1979), 456 pages.
  386. ^Helms (2003), "Preface" at v (quote).
  387. ^Ralph E. Weber, editor,Spymasters. Ten CIA Officers in their own words (Wilmington: Scholarly Resources 1999), Frost transcript pp. 265–301.
  388. ^Frost's famous interviews with Nixon had occurred the year before. Later he interviewed Kissinger, Helms, and the Shah. Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 344.
  389. ^Powers (1979) pp. 420, n5, 423, n23, 428, n57.
  390. ^Hathaway and Smith (1993; released to public in 2006), e.g., p. 4, notes 3 and 4.
  391. ^The CIA website at the "Helms collection" contains over 300 pages of transcripts of twelve oral interviews from 1982 to 1987, including four by Hathaway and four by Smith, plus a 1988 CIA-published article featuring an interview of Helms.
  392. ^Weber, editor,Spymasters: Ten CIA Officers in Their Own Words (1999), pp. 242–264 (Mulhollan), 301–312 (Gittinger).
  393. ^Powers (1979), 'Introduction" pp. xii–xiii; p. 360, n6.
  394. ^Epstein (1989) pp. 43–46.
  395. ^Ranelagh (1986), e.g., p. 777, note 18 to text at p. 435.
  396. ^Shawcross,The Shah's Last Ride (1988) p. 436.
  397. ^Woodward,The Veil (1988, 1989) pp. 24–27, cf., 40–45.
  398. ^Helms (2003), 478 pages.
  399. ^At CIA Hood served in Central Europe during the 1940s and 1950s (chief of station), was a deputy of Angleton at counterintelligence, and before retiring in 1975 was "chief of operation for Latin America".Wm. J. Hood obituary.
  400. ^Hood had served the CIA in Vienna in the early 1950s, and later as chief of operations for its East European division. Murphy, Kondrashev, Bailey,Battle Ground Berlin: CIA vs. KGB in the Cold War (Yale University 1997) at 206.
  401. ^Helms (2003) pp. ix–xii.
  402. ^abHelms (2003) pp. 29, 295.
  403. ^abPowers (1979) pp. 18–20, 63–64.
  404. ^Cynthia Helms,An Ambassador's Wife in Iran (1981), andAn Intriguing Life: A Memoir of War, Washington, and Marriage to an American Spymaster (2012).
  405. ^Helms (2003) pp. 449–450. Also attending wereRex Harrison and his wife Mercia.
  406. ^Powers (1979) pp. 63, 64, 66.
  407. ^Helms (2003) p. 233.
  408. ^Woodward,Veil (1989) p. 24.
  409. ^Yet Helms remained displeased with Colby for not keeping the secrets. Nicholas Dujmovic, editor, "Reflections of DCIs Colby and Helms on the CIA's 'Time of Troubles'" inStudies in Intelligence (1988) 51/3: 39–56, at pp. 50–51: "terrible judgment on Colby's part".
  410. ^Colby (1978) pp. 310, 459.
  411. ^Kissinger, "Foreword" pp. x, xii, to Helms (2003).
  412. ^Henry Kissinger,The White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown 1979) pp. 36–38, at 37.
  413. ^Jefferson Morley (2002).
  414. ^Kissinger,The White House Years (1979) p. 37.
  415. ^Epstein (1989) p. 43.

Bibliography

[edit]

Primary

[edit]
Written by members of the CIA's History Staff, this 230-page book (as photocopied, with white-outs) was released to the public by the Agency in 2006.

Secondary

[edit]
CIA
  • William Colby and Peter Forbath,Honorable Men: My Life in the CIA. New York: Simon and Schuster 1978.
  • Allen Dulles,The Craft of Intelligence. New York: Harper and Row 1963, revised 1965'; reprint: Signet Books, New York, 1965.
  • Stansfield Turner,Burn before Reading. Presidents, CIA Directors, and Secret Intelligence. New York: Hyperion 2005.
    • Ray S. Cline,Secrets Spies and Scholars. Blueprint of the Essential CIA. Washington: Acropolis Books 1976.
    • Harold P. Ford,CIA and the Vietnam Policymakers: Three Episodes 1962–1968. Central Intelligence Agency 1998.
    • Victor Marchetti andJohn D. Marks,The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1974; reprint: Dell, NY 1980, 1989.
    • Ludwell Lee Montague,General Walter Bedell Smith as Director of Central Intelligence, October 1950–February 1953. Pennsylvania State University 1992).
    • Stansfield Turner,Secrecy and Democracy: The CIA in Transition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1985.
  • H. Bradford Westerfield, editor,Inside the CIA's Private World: Declassified Articles from the Agency's Internal Journal, 1955–1992. Yale University 1995.
Senate/President
Commercial/Academic
  • Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones,The CIA and American Democracy. Yale University 1989.
  • Richard H. Immerman,The Hidden Hand: A Brief History of the CIA Chichester: Wiley Blackwell 2014.
  • John Ranelagh,The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA from Wild Bill Donovan to William Casey. Cambridge Pub. 1986; NY: Simon & Schuster 1986.
  • Tim Weiner,Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA. New York: Doubleday 2007.
    • Edward Jay Epstein,Deception: The Invisible War between the KGB and the CIA. New York: Simon & Schuster 1989.
    • David C. Martin,A Wilderness of Mirros. New York: Harper and Row 1980.
    • Mark Mazzetti,The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth. New York: Penguin 2013.
    • John Prados,William Colby and the CIA: The Secret Wars of a Controversial Spymaster University of Kansas 2003, 2009.
    • Bob Woodward,Veil: The Secret Wars of the CIA 1981–1987. New York: Simon and Schuster 1987; reprint: Pocket 1988.
  • Athan Theoharis, editor,The Central Intelligence Agency. Security under Scrutiny. Westport: Greenwood Press 2006.
  • Ralph E. Weber, editor,Spymasters. Ten CIA officers in Their Own Words. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources 1999.

Tertiary

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Government offices
Preceded byDeputy Director of Central Intelligence for Plans
1962–1965
Succeeded by
Preceded byDeputy Director of Central Intelligence
1965–1966
Succeeded by
Preceded byDirector of Central Intelligence
1966–1973
Succeeded by
Diplomatic posts
Preceded byUnited States Ambassador to Iran
1973–1976
Succeeded by
Central Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Central intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
Minister Resident
Seal of the US Department of State
Envoy Extraordinary
and Minister Plenipotentiary
Ambassador Extraordinary
and Plenipotentiary
Diplomatic relations suspended since 1979 (See:Iran hostage crisis)
International
National
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Helms&oldid=1315528160"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp