Representative democracy places power in the hands of representatives who are elected by the people.Political parties often become central to this form of democracy ifelectoral systems require or encourage voters to vote for political parties or for candidates associated with political parties (as opposed to voting for individual representatives).[4] Somepolitical theorists (includingRobert Dahl,Gregory Houston, andIan Liebenberg) have described representative democracy aspolyarchy.[5][6]
Representatives are elected by the public, as in national elections for the national legislature.[2] Elected representatives may hold the power to select other representatives, presidents, or other officers of the government or of the legislature, as theprime minister in the latter case.
Some political theorists, such asEdmund Burke, believe that part of the duty of a representative is not simply to follow the wishes of the electorate but also to use their own judgment in the exercise of their powers, even if their views are not reflective of those of a majority of voters.[8] A representative who chooses to execute the wishes of their constituents acts as a delegate. If the representative chooses to use their best judgment and knowledge in making decisions, even when the constituents do not fully agree with the decision, then the representative acts as a trustee.
TheRoman Republic was the first known state in theWestern world to have a representative government, despite taking the form of a direct government in theRoman assemblies. The Roman model of governance would inspire many political thinkers over the centuries,[9] and today's modern representative democracies imitate more the Roman than the Greek model, because it was a state in which supreme power was held by the people and their elected representatives, and which had an elected or nominated leader.[10] Representative democracy is a form of democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives; as opposed to direct democracy, a form of democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly.[11] AEuropeanmedieval tradition of selecting representatives from the variousestates (classes, but not as we know them today) to advise/controlmonarchs led to relatively wide familiarity with representative systems inspired by Roman systems.
Representative democracy came into general favour particularly in post-industrial revolutionnation states where large numbers ofcitizens evinced interest inpolitics, but where technology and population figures remained unsuited to direct democracy.[citation needed] Many historians credit theReform Act 1832 with launching modern representative democracy in the United Kingdom.[21][22]
The U.S. House of Representatives, one example of representative democracy
Globally, a majority of governments in the world are representative democracies, including constitutional monarchies and republics with strong representative branches.[23]
Separate but related, and very large, bodies of research inpolitical philosophy andsocial science investigate how and how well elected representatives, such as legislators, represent the interests or preferences of one or another constituency. Theempirical research shows that representative systems tend to be biased towards the representation of more affluent classes to the detriment of the population at large.[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][excessive citations]
In his bookPolitical Parties, written in 1911,Robert Michels argues that most representative systems deteriorate towards anoligarchy orparticracy. This is known as theiron law of oligarchy.[32]Representative democracies which are stable have been analysed byAdolf Gasser and compared to the unstable representative democracies in his bookGemeindefreiheit als Rettung Europas which was published in 1943 and a second edition in 1947.[33] Adolf Gasser stated the following requirements for a representative democracy in order to remain stable, unaffected by the iron law of oligarchy:
Society has to be built up from bottom to top. As a consequence, society is built up by people, who are free and have the power to defend themselves with weapons.
These free people join or form local communities. These local communities are independent, which includesfinancial independence, and they are free to determine their own rules.
Local communities join into a higher unit, e.g. a canton.
There is competition between these local communities, e.g. on services delivered or on taxes.
A drawback to this type of government is that elected officials are not required to fulfill promises made before their election and are able to promote their own self-interests once elected, providing an incohesive system of governance.[34] Legislators are also under scrutiny as the system of majority-won legislators voting for issues for the large group of people fosters inequality among themarginalized.[35]
Proponents ofdirect democracy criticize representative democracy due to its inherent structure. As the fundamental basis of representative democracy is non inclusive system, in which representatives turn into anelite class that works behind closed doors, as well as the criticizing the elector system as being driven by acapitalistic andauthoritarian system.[36][37]
TheV-Dem Institute classifies electoral democracies as the bare minimum of democracies, describing them as being governments that are "de-facto accountable to citizens through periodic elections", but are notliberal democracies and lack further entrenched individual and minority rights beyond the electoral sphere. Basic representative democracies may not possess a fully developedrule of law, legislative and judicial oversight of the executive branch, protections against the "tyranny of the majority", and only minimal fulfillment ofRobert Dahl's institutional prerequisites for democracy.[3]
The system ofstochocracy has been proposed as an improved system compared to the system of representative democracy, where representatives are elected. Stochocracy aims to at least reduce this degradation by having all representatives appointed bylottery instead of by voting. Therefore, this system is also called lottocracy. The system was proposed by the writer Roger de Sizif in 1998 in his bookLa Stochocratie. Choosing officeholders by lot was also the standard practice in ancientAthenian democracy[38] and inancient India. The rationale behind this practice was to avoidlobbying andelectioneering by economic oligarchs.
The system ofdeliberative democracy is a mix between a majority-ruled system and a consensus-based system. It allows for representative democracies or direct democracies to coexist with its system of governance, providing an initial advantage.[39]
^De Vos et al (2014).South African Constitutional Law in Context. Oxford University Press.
^Houston, G F (2001).Public Participation in Democratic Governance in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council HSRC Press.
^Dahl, R A (2005). "Is international democracy possible? A critical view". in Sergio Fabbrini (editor):Democracy and Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Exploring post-national governance. pp. 195–204 (Chapter 13). Abingdon on the Thames: Routledge.
^The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Volume I. London: Henry G. Bohn. 1854. pp. 446–448.Certainly, Gentlemen, it ought to be the happiness and glory of a Representative, to live in the strictest union, the closest correspondence, and the most unreserved communication with his constituents. Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; their opinion, high respect; their business, unremitted attention. It is his duty to sacrifice his repose, his pleasures, his satisfactions, to theirs; and above all, ever, and in all cases, to prefer their interest to his own. But his unbiassed opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened conscience, he ought not to sacrifice to you, to any man, or to any set of men living. These he does not derive from your pleasure; no, nor from the Law and the Constitution. They are a trust from Providence, for the abuse of which he is deeply answerable. Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.
^"Constitutionalism: America & Beyond". Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), U.S. Department of State. Archived fromthe original on 24 October 2014. Retrieved30 October 2014.The earliest, and perhaps greatest, victory for liberalism was achieved in England. The rising commercial class that had supported the Tudor monarchy in the 16th century led the revolutionary battle in the 17th and succeeded in establishing the supremacy of Parliament and, eventually, of the House of Commons. What emerged as the distinctive feature of modern constitutionalism was not the insistence on the idea that the king is subject to the law (although this concept is an essential attribute of all constitutionalism). This notion was already well established in the Middle Ages. What was distinctive was the establishment of effective means of political control whereby the rule of law might be enforced. Modern constitutionalism was born with the political requirement that representative government depended upon the consent of citizen subjects... However, as can be seen through provisions in the 1689 Bill of Rights, the English Revolution was fought not just to protect the rights of property (in the narrow sense) but to establish those liberties which liberals believed essential to human dignity and moral worth. The "rights of man" enumerated in the English Bill of Rights gradually were proclaimed beyond the boundaries of England, notably in the American Declaration of Independence of 1776 and in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789.
^"We Hold These Truths to be Self-evident;" An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Roots of Racism & slavery in America Kenneth N. Addison; Introduction P. xxii
^Eric J. Evans,The Forging of the Modern State: Early Industrial Britain, 1783–1870 (2nd ed. 1996) p. 229
^Roser, Max (15 March 2013)."Democracy".Our World in Data.
^Jacobs, Lawrence R.; Page, Benjamin I. (February 2005). "Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?".American Political Science Review.99 (1):107–123.doi:10.1017/S000305540505152X.S2CID154481971.
^Bernauer, Julian; Giger, Nathalie; Rosset, Jan (January 2015). "Mind the gap: Do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?".International Political Science Review.36 (1):78–98.doi:10.1177/0192512113498830.S2CID145633250.
^Carnes, Nicholas (2013).White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. University of Chicago Press.ISBN978-0-226-08728-3.[page needed]
^Giger, Nathalie; Rosset, Jan; Bernauer, Julian (April 2012). "The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective".Representation.48 (1):47–61.doi:10.1080/00344893.2012.653238.S2CID154081733.
^Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens (1911, 1925; 1970). Translated asSociologia del partito politico nella democrazia moderna : studi sulle tendenze oligarchiche degli aggregati politici, from the German original by Dr. Alfredo Polledro, revised and expanded (1912). Translated, from the Italian, by Eden and Cedar Paul asPolitical Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy (Hearst's International Library Co., 1915; Free Press, 1949; Dover Publications, 1959); republished with an introduction by Seymour Martin Lipset (Crowell-Collier, 1962; Transaction Publishers, 1999,ISBN0-7658-0469-7); translated in French by S. Jankélévitch,Les partis politiques. Essai sur les tendances oligarchiques des démocraties, Brussels, Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 2009 (ISBN978-2-8004-1443-0).
^Gemeindefreiheit als Rettung Europas. Grundlinien einer ethischen Geschichtsauffassung. Verlag Bücherfreunde, Basel 1947. In 1983 republished under: "Gemeindefreiheit – kommunale Selbstverwaltung" (Adolf Gasser/Franz-Ludwig Knemeyer), in de reeks "Studien zur Soziologie", Nymphenburger, München, 1983.
^Thaa, Winfried (3 May 2016). "Issues and images – new sources of inequality in current representative democracy".Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.19 (3):357–375.doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1144859.S2CID147669709.
^Razsa, Maple; Kurnik, Andrej (May 2012). "The Occupy Movement in Žižek's hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming: The Occupy Movement in Žižek's hometown".American Ethnologist.39 (2):238–258.doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01361.x.
^"1,5".Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. Josiah Ober, Robert Wallace, Paul Cartledge, Cynthia Farrar (1st ed.). 15 October 2008. pp. 17, 105.ISBN978-0520258099.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
