| Judicial remedies |
|---|
| Legal remedies (Damages) |
| Equitable remedies |
| Related issues |
Injurisprudence,reparation is replenishment of a previously inflicted loss by the criminal to the victim.Monetaryrestitution is a common form of reparation.
In theBasic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, reparation include the following forms:restitution,compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction andguarantees of non-repetition, whereby
The examples and perspective in this articlemay not represent aworldwide view of the subject. You mayimprove this article, discuss the issue on thetalk page, orcreate a new article, as appropriate.(July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The principle of reparation dates back to thelex talionis ofHebrew Scripture.Anglo-Saxon courts inEngland before theNorman Conquest also contained this principle. Under theEnglish legal system judges must consider making a compensation order as part of the sentence for a crime. Section 130 of thePowers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 requires the courts to explain their reasoning if they do not issue a compensation order.[1] Arbitral tribunals have held that questions about the proper form and scope of reparation for a breach of an international obligation amount to “legal disputes” under Article 25 of the ICSID Convention.[2]