In 1850, Kummer proved thatFermat's Last Theorem is true for a prime exponent if is regular. This focused attention on the irregular primes.[1] In 1852,Genocchi was able to prove that thefirst case of Fermat's Last Theorem is true for an exponent, if is not an irregular pair. Kummer improved this further in 1857 by showing that for the "first case" of Fermat's Last Theorem (seeSophie Germain's theorem) it is sufficient to establish that either or fails to be an irregular pair. (As applied in these results, is an irregular pair when is irregular due to a certain condition, described below, being realized at.)
Kummer found the irregular primes less than 165. In 1963, Lehmer reported results up to 10000 and Selfridge and Pollack announced in 1964 to have completed the table of irregular primes up to 25000. Although the two latter tables did not appear in print, Johnson found that is in fact an irregular pair for and that this is the first and only time this occurs for.[2] It was found in 1993 that the next time this happens is for; seeWolstenholme prime.[3]
An odd prime number is defined to be regular if it does not divide theclass number of thethcyclotomic field, where is a primitiveth root of unity.
The prime number 2 is often considered regular as well.
Theclass number of the cyclotomicfield is the number ofideals of thering of integers up to equivalence. Two ideals and are considered equivalent if there is a nonzero in so that. The first few of these class numbers are listed inOEIS: A000927.
Kummer's proof that this is equivalent to the class number definition is strengthened by theHerbrand–Ribet theorem, which states certain consequences of dividing the numerator of one of these Bernoulli numbers.
An odd prime that is not regular is anirregular prime (or Bernoulli irregular or B-irregular to distinguish from other types of irregularity discussed below). The first few irregular primes are:
K. L. Jensen (a student ofNiels Nielsen[5]) proved in 1915 that there are infinitely many irregular primes of the form.[6]In 1954Carlitz gave a simple proof of the weaker result that there are in general infinitely many irregular primes.[7]
Metsänkylä proved in 1971 that for any integer, there are infinitely many irregular primes not of the form,[8] and later generalized this.[9]
If is an irregular prime and divides the numerator of the Bernoulli number for, then is called anirregular pair. In other words, an irregular pair is a bookkeeping device to record, for an irregular prime, the particular indices of the Bernoulli numbers at which regularity fails. The first few irregular pairs (when ordered by) are:
For a given prime, the number of such pairs is called theindex of irregularity of.[10] Hence, a prime is regular if and only if its index of irregularity is zero. Similarly, a prime is irregular if and only if its index of irregularity is positive.
It was discovered that is in fact an irregular pair for, as well as for.. There are no more occurrences for.
An odd prime hasirregular indexif and only if there are values of for which divides and theses are less than. The first irregular prime with irregular index greater than 1 is157, which divides and, so it has an irregular index 2. Clearly, the irregular index of a regular prime is 0.
The irregular index of theth prime starting with, or the prime 3 is
Similarly, we can define anEuler irregular prime (or E-irregular) as a prime that divides at least oneEuler number with. The first few Euler irregular primes are
Vandiver proved in 1940 thatFermat's Last Theorem (that has no solution for integers,, with) is true for prime exponents that are Euler-regular. Gut proved that has no solution if has an E-irregularity index less than 5.[11]
Granville, A.; Monagan, M. B. (1988), "The First Case of Fermat's Last Theorem is True for All Prime Exponents up to 714,591,416,091,389",Transactions of the American Mathematical Society,306 (1):329–359,doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0927694-5,MR0927694
Gardiner, A. (1988), "Four Problems on Prime Power Divisibility",American Mathematical Monthly,95 (10):926–931,doi:10.2307/2322386,JSTOR2322386