Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Rubidium–strontium dating

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromRb-Sr dating)
Radiometric dating technique for rocks and minerals

Therubidium–strontium dating method (Rb–Sr) is a radiometric dating technique, used byscientists to determine theage of rocks and minerals from their content of specific isotopes ofrubidium (87Rb) andstrontium (87Sr,86Sr). One of the two naturally occurring isotopes of rubidium,87Rb, decays to87Sr with ahalf-life of 49.23 billion years. Theradiogenic daughter,87Sr, produced in this decay process is the only one of the four naturally occurring strontium isotopes that was not produced exclusively by stellar nucleosynthesis predating the formation of the Solar System. Over time, decay of87Rb increases the amount of radiogenic87Sr while the amount of other Sr isotopes remains unchanged.

The ratio87Sr/86Sr in a mineral sample can be accurately measured using a mass spectrometer. If the amount of Sr and Rb isotopes in the sample when it formed can be determined, the age can be calculated from the increase in87Sr/86Sr. Different minerals that crystallized from the same silicic melt will all have the same initial87Sr/86Sr as the parent melt. However, because Rb substitutes for K in minerals and these minerals have differentK/Ca ratios, the minerals will have had different starting Rb/Sr ratios, and the final87Sr/86Sr ratio will not have increased as much in the minerals poorer in Rb. Typically, Rb/Sr increases in the order plagioclase, hornblende, K-feldspar, biotite, muscovite. Therefore, given sufficient time for significant production (ingrowth) of radiogenic87Sr, measured87Sr/86Sr values will be different in the minerals, increasing in the same order. Comparison of different minerals in a rock sample thus allows scientists to infer the original87Sr/86Sr ratio and determine the age of the rock.

In addition, Rb is a highlyincompatible element that, during partial melting of the mantle, prefers to join the magmatic melt rather than remain in mantle minerals. As a result, Rb is enriched in crustal rocks relative to the mantle, and87Sr/86Sr is higher for crust rock than mantle rock. This allows scientists to distinguishmagma produced by melting of crust rock from magma produced by melting of mantle rock, even if subsequentmagma differentiation produces similar overall chemistry.[1] Scientists can also estimate from87Sr/86Sr when crust rock was first formed from magma extracted from the mantle, even if the rock is subsequently metamorphosed or even melted and recrystallized. This provides clues to the age of the Earth's continents.[2][3]

Development of this process was aided by GermanchemistsOtto Hahn andFritz Strassmann, who later went on to discovernuclear fission in December 1938.

Example

[edit]

For example, consider the case of anigneous rock such as agranite that contains several major Sr-bearing minerals including plagioclasefeldspar,K-feldspar,hornblende,biotite, andmuscovite. Each of these minerals has a different initial rubidium/strontium ratio dependent on their potassium content, the concentration of Rb and K in the melt and the temperature at which the minerals formed. Rubidium substitutes for potassium within the lattice of minerals at a rate proportional to its concentration within the melt.

The ideal scenario according toBowen's reaction series would see a granite melt begin crystallizing acumulate assemblage of plagioclase and hornblende (i.e.;tonalite ordiorite), which is low in K (and hence Rb) but high in Sr (as this substitutes for Ca), which proportionally enriches the melt in K and Rb. This then causes orthoclase and biotite, both K rich minerals into which Rb can substitute, to precipitate. The resulting Rb–Sr ratios and Rb and Sr abundances of both the whole rocks and their component minerals will be markedly different. This, thus, allows a different rate of radiogenic Sr to evolve in the separate rocks and their component minerals as time progresses.

Calculating the age

[edit]

The age of a sample is determined by analysing several minerals within multiple subsamples from different parts of the original sample. The87Sr/86Sr ratio for each subsample is plotted against its87Rb/86Sr ratio on a graph called anisochron. If these form a straight line then the subsamples are consistent, and the age probably reliable. The slope of the line dictates the age of the sample.

Given theuniversal law of radioactive decay and the following rubidiumbeta decay:Rb3787β 3887Sr +e +ν¯e{\displaystyle {\ce {^{87}_{37}Rb->[{\beta ^{-}}]~_{38}^{87}Sr~+e^{-}\ +{\bar {\nu }}_{e}}}}, we obtain the expression which describes the growth of strontium-87 from the decay of rubidium-87:3887Sr(t)= 3887Sr(0)+ 3787Rb(eλt1) ,{\displaystyle _{38}^{87}{\text{Sr}}(t)=~_{38}^{87}{\text{Sr}}(0)+~_{37}^{87}{\text{Rb}}(e^{\lambda t}-1)\ ,}λ{\displaystyle {\ce {\lambda}}} being thedecay constant of rubidium. Furthermore, we consider the number ofSr3886{\displaystyle {\ce {^{86}_{38}Sr}}} as a constant, since it is stable and not radiogenic. Hence,87Sr86Sr=(87Sr86Sr)0+87Rb86Sr(eλt1){\displaystyle {\frac {^{87}{\text{Sr}}}{^{86}{\text{Sr}}}}=\left({\frac {^{87}{\text{Sr}}}{^{86}{\text{Sr}}}}\right)_{0}+{\frac {^{87}{\text{Rb}}}{^{86}{\text{Sr}}}}(e^{\lambda t}-1)}is the isochron equation. After measurements of Rubidum and Strontium concentration in the mineral we can easily determine the age, the t value, of the sample.[4]

Sources of error

[edit]

Rb–Sr dating relies on correctly measuring the Rb–Sr ratio of a mineral or whole rock sample, plus deriving an accurate87Sr/86Sr ratio for the mineral or whole rock sample.

Several preconditions must be satisfied before a Rb–Sr date can be considered as representing the time of emplacement or formation of a rock.

  • The system must have remained closed to Rb and Sr diffusion from the time at which the rock formed or fell below theclosure temperature (generally considered to be 650 °C);
  • The minerals which are taken from a rock to construct anisochron must have formed in chemical equilibrium with one another or in the case of sediments, be deposited at the same time;
  • The rock must not have undergone anymetasomatism which could have disturbed the Rb–Sr system either thermally or chemically

One of the major drawbacks (and, conversely, the most important use) of utilizing Rb and Sr to derive a radiometric date is their relative mobility, especially inhydrothermal fluids. Rb and Sr are relatively mobile alkaline elements and as such are relatively easily moved around by the hot, oftencarbonated hydrothermal fluids present during metamorphism or magmatism.

Conversely, these fluids may metasomatically alter a rock, introducing new Rb and Sr into the rock (generally during potassic alteration or calcic (albitisation) alteration. Rb–Sr can then be used on the altered mineralogy to date the time of this alteration, but not the date at which the rock formed.

Thus, assigningage significance to a result requires studying the metasomatic and thermal history of the rock, any metamorphic events, and any evidence of fluid movement. A Rb–Sr date which is at variance with other geochronometers may not be useless, it may be providing data on an event which is not representing the age of formation of the rock.

Uses

[edit]

Geochronology

[edit]

The Rb–Sr dating method has been used extensively in dating terrestrial and lunar rocks, and meteorites. If the initial amount of Sr is known or can be extrapolated, the age can be determined by measurement of the Rb and Sr concentrations and the87Sr/86Sr ratio. The dates indicate the true age of the minerals only if the rocks have not been subsequently altered.

The important concept in isotopic tracing is that Sr derived from any mineral through weathering reactions will have the same87Sr/86Sr as the mineral. Although this is a potential source of error for terrestrial rocks, it is irrelevant for lunar rocks and meteorites, as there are no chemical weathering reactions in those environments.

Isotope geochemistry

[edit]

Initial87Sr/86Sr ratios are a useful tool inarchaeology,forensics andpaleontology because the87Sr/86Sr of a skeleton, sea shell or indeed a clay artefact is directly comparable to the source rocks upon which it was formed or upon which the organism lived. Thus, by measuring the current-day87Sr/86Sr ratio (and often the143Nd–144Nd ratios as well) the geological fingerprint of an object or skeleton can be measured, allowing migration patterns to be determined.

Strontium isotope stratigraphy

[edit]

Strontium isotope stratigraphy relies on recognised variations in the87Sr/86Sr ratio of seawater over time.[5] The application of Sr isotope stratigraphy is generally limited to carbonate samples for which the Sr seawater curve is well defined. This is well known for the Cenozoic time-scale but, due to poorer preservation of carbonate sequences in the Mesozoic and earlier, it is not completely understood for older sequences. In older sequences diagenetic alteration combined with greater uncertainties in estimating absolute ages due to lack of overlap between other geochronometers (for exampleU–Th) leads to greater uncertainties in the exact shape of the Sr isotope seawater curve.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Hawkesworth, C. J.; Vollmer, R. (1979). "Crustal contamination versus enriched mantle: 143Nd/144Nd and 87Sr/86Sr evidence from the Italian volcanics".Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.69 (2):151–165.Bibcode:1979CoMP...69..151H.doi:10.1007/BF00371858.S2CID 128876101.
  2. ^Moller, A.; Mezger, K.; Schenk, V. (1 April 1998)."Crustal Age Domains and the Evolution of the Continental Crust in the Mozambique Belt of Tanzania: Combined Sm–Nd, Rb–Sr, and Pb–Pb Isotopic Evidence".Journal of Petrology.39 (4):749–783.doi:10.1093/petroj/39.4.749.
  3. ^McCulloch, M. T.; Wasserburg, G. J. (2 June 1978)."Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr Chronology of Continental Crust Formation: Times of addition to continents of chemically fractionated mantle-derived materials are determined".Science.200 (4345):1003–1011.doi:10.1126/science.200.4345.1003.PMID 17740673.S2CID 40675318.
  4. ^Bowen, Robert (1994). "Rubidium-Strontium Dating".Isotopes in the Earth Sciences. pp. 162–200.doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2611-0_4.ISBN 978-94-010-7678-4.
  5. ^Elderfield, H. (October 1986). "Strontium isotope stratigraphy".Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.57 (1):71–90.doi:10.1016/0031-0182(86)90007-6.
  6. ^Veizer, Ján; Buhl, Dieter; Diener, Andreas; Ebneth, Stefan; Podlaha, Olaf G; Bruckschen, Peter; Jasper, Torsten; Korte, Christoph; Schaaf, Michael; Ala, Davin; Azmy, Karem (August 1997). "Strontium isotope stratigraphy: potential resolution and event correlation".Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.132 (1–4):65–77.doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00054-0.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toRb-Sr dating.
The WikibookHistorical Geology has a page on the topic of:Rb-Sr dating
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rubidium–strontium_dating&oldid=1245879590"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp