Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ramanujan prime

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Prime fulfilling an inequality related to the prime-counting function
Not to be confused withHardy–Ramanujan number.

Inmathematics, aRamanujan prime is aprime number that satisfies a result proven bySrinivasa Ramanujan relating to theprime-counting function.

Origins and definition

[edit]

In 1919, Ramanujan published a new proof ofBertrand's postulate which, as he notes, was first proved byChebyshev.[1] At the end of the two-page published paper, Ramanujan derived a generalized result, and that is:

π(x)π(x2)1,2,3,4,5, for all x2,11,17,29,41, respectively{\displaystyle \pi (x)-\pi \left({\frac {x}{2}}\right)\geq 1,2,3,4,5,\ldots {\text{ for all }}x\geq 2,11,17,29,41,\ldots {\text{ respectively}}}    OEISA104272

whereπ(x){\displaystyle \pi (x)} is theprime-counting function, equal to the number of primes less than or equal to x.

The converse of this result is the definition of Ramanujan primes:

Thenth Ramanujan prime is the least integerRn for whichπ(x)π(x/2)n,{\displaystyle \pi (x)-\pi (x/2)\geq n,} for allxRn.[2] In other words: Ramanujan primes are the least integersRn for which there are at leastn primes betweenx andx/2 for allxRn.

The first five Ramanujan primes are thus 2, 11, 17, 29, and 41.

Note that the integerRn is necessarily a prime number:π(x)π(x/2){\displaystyle \pi (x)-\pi (x/2)} and, hence,π(x){\displaystyle \pi (x)} must increase by obtaining another prime atx =Rn. Sinceπ(x)π(x/2){\displaystyle \pi (x)-\pi (x/2)} can increase by at most 1,

π(Rn)π(Rn2)=n.{\displaystyle \pi (R_{n})-\pi \left({\frac {R_{n}}{2}}\right)=n.}

Bounds and an asymptotic formula

[edit]

For alln1{\displaystyle n\geq 1}, the bounds

2nln2n<Rn<4nln4n{\displaystyle 2n\ln 2n<R_{n}<4n\ln 4n}

hold. Ifn>1{\displaystyle n>1}, then also

p2n<Rn<p3n{\displaystyle p_{2n}<R_{n}<p_{3n}}

wherepn is thenth prime number.

Asn tends to infinity,Rn isasymptotic to the 2nth prime, i.e.,

Rn ~p2n (n → ∞).

All these results were proved by Sondow (2009),[3] except for the upper boundRn <p3n which was conjectured by him and proved by Laishram (2010).[4] The bound was improved by Sondow, Nicholson, and Noe (2011)[5] to

Rn4147 p3n{\displaystyle R_{n}\leq {\frac {41}{47}}\ p_{3n}}

which is the optimal form ofRnc·p3n since it is an equality forn = 5.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Ramanujan, S. (1919),"A proof of Bertrand's postulate",Journal of the Indian Mathematical Society,11:181–182
  2. ^Jonathan Sondow,"Ramanujan Prime",MathWorld
  3. ^Sondow, J. (2009), "Ramanujan primes and Bertrand's postulate",Amer. Math. Monthly,116 (7):630–635,arXiv:0907.5232,doi:10.4169/193009709x458609
  4. ^Laishram, S. (2010),"On a conjecture on Ramanujan primes"(PDF),International Journal of Number Theory,6 (8):1869–1873,CiteSeerX 10.1.1.639.4934,doi:10.1142/s1793042110003848.
  5. ^Sondow, J.; Nicholson, J.; Noe, T.D. (2011),"Ramanujan primes: bounds, runs, twins, and gaps"(PDF),Journal of Integer Sequences,14: 11.6.2,arXiv:1105.2249,Bibcode:2011arXiv1105.2249S
Prime number classes
By formula
By integer sequence
By property
Base-dependent
Patterns
k-tuples
By size
Complex numbers
Composite numbers
Related topics
First 60 primes
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ramanujan_prime&oldid=1271823037"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp