Railway Mania was astock market bubble in the railway industry of theUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in the 1840s.[1] It followed a common pattern: as the price of railway shares increased, speculators invested more money, which further increased the price of railway shares, until the share price collapsed. The mania reached its zenith in 1846, when 263Acts of Parliament for setting up new railway companies were passed, with the proposed routes totalling 9,500 miles (15,300 km). About a third of the railways authorised were never built—the companies either collapsed because of poor financial planning, were bought out by larger competitors before they could build their line, or turned out to be fraudulent enterprises to channel investors' money into other businesses.[2]
The world's first recognizably modern inter-city railway, theLiverpool and Manchester Railway (the L&M),opened in 1830 and proved to be successful for transporting both passengers and freight. In the late 1830s and early 1840s, the British economy slowed.Interest rates rose, making it more attractive to invest money in government bonds—the main source of investment at the time—and political and social unrest deterred banks and businesses from investing the huge sums of money required to build railways; the L&M cost £637,000 (£55,210,000 adjusted for 2015).[3]
By the mid-1840s, the economy was improving and the manufacturing industries were once again growing. TheBank of England cut interest rates, making government bonds less attractive investments, and existing railway companies' shares began to boom as they moved ever-increasing amounts of cargo and people, making people willing to invest in new railways.
In 1825 the government had repealed theBubble Act, which had put close limits on the formation of new business ventures and restrictedjoint stock companies. Shares were promoted and could be purchased for a 10% deposit. Many lost heavily.[4]
The British government promoted alaissez-faire system of low regulation for the railways. Companies had to submit abill to Parliament to gain the right to acquire land for the line, which required the route of the proposed railway to be approved, but there were no limits on the number of companies and no real checks on the financial viability of a line. Anyone could form a company, gain investment and submit a bill to Parliament. ManyMembers of Parliament (MPs) were heavy investors in such schemes.
Magnates likeGeorge Hudson developed routes in the North and Midlands by amalgamating small railway companies and rationalising routes. He was also an MP, but ultimately failed because of his fraudulent practices of, for example, payingdividends fromcapital.
As with otherbubbles, the Railway Mania became a self-promoting cycle based purely on over-optimistic speculation. As the dozens of companies formed began to operate and the simple unviability of many of them became clear, investors began to realise that railways were not all as lucrative and as easy to build as they had been led to believe. Coupled to this, in late 1845 the Bank of England increased interest rates. As banks began to re-invest in bonds, the money began to flow out of railways, undercutting the boom.
The share prices of railways slowed in their rise, then leveled out. As they began to fall, investment stopped virtually overnight[when?], leaving numerous companies without funding and numerous investors with no prospect of any return on their investment. The larger railway companies such as theGreat Western Railway and the nascentMidland began to buy up strategic failed lines to expand their network. These lines could be purchased at a fraction of their real value as given a choice between a below-value offer for their shares or the total loss of their investment, shareholders naturally chose the former. Many middle-class families on modest incomes had sunk their entire savings into new companies during the mania, and they lost everything when the speculation collapsed.
The boom-and-bust cycle of early-industrial Britain was still in effect, and the boom that had created the conditions for Railway Mania began to cool and then a decline set in. The number of new railway companies fell away to almost nothing in the late 1840s and early 1850s, with the only new lines constructed being by the large companies. Economic upturns in the 1850s and 1860s saw smaller booms in railway construction, but these never reached anywhere near the scale of the mania—partly because of more thoughtful (if still very limited) government control, partly because of more cautious investors and partly because the UK railway network was approaching maturity, with none of the 'blank canvas' available to numerous companies as in the 1840s.
Unlike somestock market bubbles, there was a net tangible result from all the investment: a vast expansion of theBritish railway system, though perhaps at an inflated cost. Amongst the high number of impractical, overambitious and downright fraudulent schemes promoted during the mania were a good number of practical trunk routes (most notably the initial part of theGreat Northern Railway and the trans-PennineWoodhead route) and important freight lines (such as large parts of what would become theNorth Eastern Railway). These projects all required vast amounts of capital, all of which had to be raised from private enterprise. The speculative frenzy of the mania made people much more willing to invest the large sums required for railway construction than they had been previously or would be in later years. Even many of the routes that failed when the mania collapsed became viable (if not lucrative) when each was in the hands of the larger company that had purchased it. A total of 6,220 miles (10,010 km) of railway line were built as a result of projects authorised between 1844 and 1846—by comparison, the total route mileage of the modern UK railway network is around 11,000 miles (18,000 km).
Railway andCanal Mania can be compared with a similar mania in the 1990s in the stock oftelecom companies. The telecom mania resulted in the installation and deployment of a vast amount of fibre-optic telecommunications infrastructure, spurred on from the realisation that the same railway rights-of-way could make affordable conduits for fibre optics. Yet another boom occurred in the period 1995–2000, during the development of theInternet, when many companies were established to promote new services on the growing network. Thedot-com bubble collapsed in 2000, and the much more extensive telecoms bubble in 2002 with the bankruptcies ofEnron,WorldCom,Global Crossing and QWest, although some platform companies such asGoogle andAmazon grew and prospered, diversifying into backbone fibre networks andcloud computing services.In 2025, comparisons were made to investment inartificial intelligence, with parallels being drawn between railways and AIdata centers, though the level of economic concentration was greater in railways due to the less-developed market of the time.[5]
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)