| Part of a series on |
| War (outline) |
|---|
.jpg) |
Radiological warfare is any form of warfare involving deliberateradiation poisoning or contamination of an area with radiological sources.
Radiological weapons are normally classified asweapons of mass destruction (WMDs),[1] although radiological weapons can also be specific in whom they target, such as the radiation poisoning ofAlexander Litvinenko by theRussian FSB, using radioactivepolonium-210.[2]
Numerous countries have expressed an interest in radiological weapons programs, several have actively pursued them, and three have performed radiological weapons tests.[3]
Asalted bomb is anuclear weapon that is equipped with a large quantity of radiologically inert salting material. The radiological warfare agents are produced throughneutron capture by the salting materials of theneutron radiation emitted by the nuclear weapon. This avoids the problems of having to stockpile the highly radioactive material, as it is produced when the bomb explodes.[4] The result is a more intensefallout than from regularnuclear weapons and can render an area uninhabitable for a long period.
Thecobalt bomb is an example of a radiological warfare weapon, wherecobalt-59 is converted tocobalt-60 by neutron capture. Initially,gamma radiation of thenuclear fission products from an equivalent sized "clean"fission-fusion-fission bomb (assuming the amount of radioactive dust particles generated are equal) are much more intense than cobalt-60: 15,000 times more intense at 1 hour; 35 times more intense at 1 week; 5 times more intense at 1 month; and about equal at 6 months. Thereafter fission drops off rapidly so that cobalt-60fallout is 8 times more intense than fission at 1 year and 150 times more intense at 5 years. The very long-lived isotopes produced by fission would overtake the cobalt-60 again after about 75 years.[5]
Other salted bomb variants that do not use cobalt have also been theorized.[6][7] For example, salting withsodium-23, thattransmutes tosodium-24, which because of its 15-hour half-life results in intense radiation.[8][9]
Anair burst is preferred if the effects ofthermal radiation andblast wave is to be maximized for an area (i.e. area covered by direct line of sight and sufficient luminosity to cause burning, and formation ofmach stem respectively). Bothfission and fusion weapons will irradiate the detonation site with neutron radiation, causingneutron activation of the material there. Fission bombs will also contribute with the bomb-material residue. Air will not form isotopes useful for radiological warfare when neutron-activated. By detonating them at or near the surface instead, the ground will be vaporized, become radioactive, and when it cools down and condenses into particles cause significantfallout.[10]
A far lower-tech radiological weapon than those discussed above is a "dirty bomb" orradiological dispersal device, whose purpose is to disperse radioactive dust over an area. The release of radioactive material may involve no special "weapon" or side forces like a blast explosion and include no direct killing of people from its radiation source, but rather could make whole areas or structures unusable or unfavorable for the support of human life. The radioactive material may be dispersed slowly over a large area, and it can be difficult for the victims to initially know that such a radiological attack is being carried out, especially if detectors for radioactivity are not installed beforehand.[11]
Radiological warfare with dirty bombs could be used fornuclear terrorism, spreading or intensifying fear. In relation to these weapons, nation states can also spread rumor, disinformation and fear.[12][13][14]
In July 2023, bothUkraine andRussia blamed each other for preparing to bomb theZaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, in order to use thenuclear reactors as dirty bombs.[15][16]
9.111 Even if a radioisotope with suitable properties and which could be readily manufactured were selected as a radiological warfare agent, the problems of production, handling, and delivery of the weapon emitting intense gamma radiation would not be easily solved. In addition, stockpiling the radioactive material would present a difficulty. ... 9.112 Instead of preparing and stockpiling the contaminating agent in advance, with its attendant difficulties, the radioactive substances are produced by fission at the time of the explosion. Radiological warfare has thus become an automatic extension of the offensive use of nuclear weapons of high fission yield.
9.110 ... To be effective, a radiological warfare agent should emit gamma radiations and it should have a half-life of a few weeks or months. Radioisotopes of long half-life give off their radiations too slowly to be effective unless large quantities are used, and those of short half-life decay too rapidly to provide an extended hazard.
(page 465) 9.112 ... The explosion of such devices at low altitudes can cause radioactive contamination over large areas that are beyond the range of physical damage. Consequently, they are, in effect, weapons of radiological warfare.
(page 18:) With respect to its advantages, the Committee has learned ... that RW (radiological warfare), as a new weapon about which most people are poorly informed, is potentiaily valuable for harassment through rumor. (page 22:) Each of these modes of warfare has an unusually high anxiety-causing potential.
