 | This article or sectionmay have beencopied and pasted from another location,possibly in violation ofWikipedia's copyright policy. Please reviewhttps://www.seaforces.org/wpnsys/SURFACE/RIM-66-Standard-Missile-MR.htm (Copyvios) andremedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly, or flagging the content for deletion. Please be sure that the supposed source of the copyright violation is not itself aWikipedia mirror.(January 2026) |
| RIM-66 Standard MR | |
|---|---|
_during_tests_off_Puerto_Rico_March_1983.jpg) A RIM-66 Standard MR on a Mk-26 launcher | |
| Type | Medium-rangesurface-to-air missile with anti-ship capability |
| Place of origin | United States |
| Service history | |
| In service | 1967 (RIM-66A SM-1MR Block I) 1979 (RIM-66C SM-2MR)[1] |
| Used by | See list ofOperators |
| Production history | |
| Produced | 1967 onwards |
| No. built | Over 5,000[2] |
| Specifications | |
| Mass | SM-2 – 1,558 lb (707 kg) |
| Length | 15 ft 6 in (4.72 m) |
| Diameter | 13.5 in (34.3 cm) |
| Wingspan | 3 ft 6 in (1.07 m) |
| Warhead | Blast fragmentation warhead |
Detonation mechanism | Radar and contactfuze |
| Engine | Dual thrust,solid-fuel rocket |
Operational range | 40 to 92 nmi (74 to 170 km) |
| Flight ceiling | > 25,000 m (82,000 ft) |
| Maximum speed | Mach 3.5 (4,290 km/h; 2,660 mph; 1.19 km/s) |
Guidance system | SM-2MR Block IIIACommand andInertial midcourse guidance withmonopulsesemi-active radar homing in the terminal phase of the interception. SM-2MR Block IIIB missiles have dualinfrared homing/semi-active terminal homing. SM-1MR Block VI missiles have monopulsesemi-active radar homing without command and inertial mid-course guidance.[3] |
Launch platform | Surface ship |
TheRIM-66 Standard MR (SM-1MR/SM-2MR) is a medium-rangesurface-to-air missile (SAM), with a secondary role as ananti-ship missile, developed for theUnited States Navy (USN). A member of theStandard Missile family of weapons, the SM-1 was developed as a replacement for theRIM-2 Terrier andRIM-24 Tartar that were deployed in the 1950s on a variety of USN ships. TheRIM-67 Standard (SM-1ER/SM-2ER) is an extended range version of this missile with asolid rocket booster stage.
The Standard missile program was started in 1963 to produce a family of missiles to replace existing guided missiles used by the Terrier, Talos, and Tartar guided missile systems. The intention was to produce a new generation of guided missiles that could be retrofitted to existing guided missile systems.[4]
The RIM-66A is the medium ranged version of the Standard missile and was initially developed as a replacement for the earlier RIM-24C as part of theMk74 "Tartar" Guided Missile Fire Control System. It used the same fuselage as the earlier Tartar missile, for easier use with existing launchers and magazines for that system. The RIM-66A/B while looking like the earlier RIM-24C on the exterior is a different missile internally with redesigned electronics and a more reliable homing system and fuze that make it more capable than its predecessor. The RIM-66A/B Standard MR, (SM-1MR Block I to V) was used during theVietnam War. The only remaining version of the Standard missile 1 in service is the RIM-66E (SM-1MR Block VI). While no longer in service with the USN, the RIM-66E is still in service with many navies globally and was expected to remain in service until 2020.[5]
The RIM-66C/D Standard MR (SM-2MR Block I) was developed in the 1970s and was a key part of theAegis combat system andNew Threat Upgrade (NTU). The SM-2MR introduced inertial and command mid-course guidance. The missile's autopilot is programmed to fly the most efficient path to the target and can receive course corrections from the ground. Target illumination for semi-active homing is needed only for a few seconds in the terminal phase of the interception. This capability enables the Aegis combat system and New Threat Upgrade equipped vessels to time-share illumination radars, greatly increasing the number of targets that can be engaged in quick succession.[5]
The SM-1 and SM-2 were continuously upgraded through Blocks.
_launches_a_Standard_Missile-2_while_conducting_torpedo_evasion_maneuvers_during_Multi-Sail_2009.jpg)
In the middle 1980s, the SM-2MR was deployed viaMark 41 Vertical Launching System (VLS) aboardUSS Bunker Hill, the first U.S. Navy ship to deploy a vertical launcher. VLS has, since 2003, been the only launcher used for the Standard missile in the U.S. Navy aboardTiconderoga-classcruisers andArleigh Burke-classdestroyers. They are now most commonly launched from the Mk 41 VLS, which is a modular design concept with different versions that vary in size and weight. There are three lengths for this VLS: 209 in (530 cm) for the self-defense version, 266 in (680 cm) for the tactical version, and 303 in (770 cm) for the strike version. The empty weight for an 8-cell module is 26,800 lb (12,200 kg) for the self-defense version, 29,800 lb (13,500 kg) for the tactical version, and 32,000 lb (15,000 kg) for the strike version.[6]
The Standard can also be used against ships, either at line-of-sight range using its semi-active homing mode, or over the horizon using inertial guidance and terminal infrared homing.[7]
The SM-2 has conducted more than 2,700 successful live firings. In June 2017, Raytheon announced it was restarting the SM-2 production line to fulfill purchases made by the Netherlands, Japan, Australia, and South Korea. Production had been stopped in 2013 from a lack of international orders. New deliveries of SM-2 Block IIIA and IIIB missiles were scheduled to begin in 2020.[2] The United States Navy is committed to keeping the Standard Missile 2 medium-range viable until 2035.[8]
Standard missiles were constructed byGeneral Dynamics Pomona Division until 1992, when it became part of the Hughes Missile Systems Company. Hughes formed a joint venture with Raytheon called Standard Missile Company (SMCo). Hughes Missile Systems was eventually sold to Raytheon making it the sole contractor.[9]
Due to the end of the US Navy's support of the SM-1 missile system, theNational Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST) has taken over support for the system in Taiwanese service including production of replacement rocket motors. The new rocket motors allow for increased range and the upgrade also included anactive radar homing seeker.[10] The same approach was taken for the SM-1's Mark 13 missile launcher with NCIST taking over support.[11]
The Standard Missile One became operational in 1968. The missile was utilized by ships equipped with theTartar Guided Missile Fire Control System. The missile saw its first combat use in the early 1970s in the Vietnam war.[5]
The Standard Missile Two became operational in the late 1970s and was deployed operationally with the Aegis Combat System in 1983. Both Standard One and Two were used against both surface and air targets duringOperation Praying Mantis. On July 3, 1988,USS Vincennes mistakenly shot downIran Air Flight 655, anAirbusA300B2, using two SM-2MRs from her forward launcher.[12] In 1988 the IranianKaman-class missile boatJoshan was disabled by RIM-66s.[13]
On 9 October 2016, theArleigh Burke-class destroyerUSS Mason fired two SM-2s, as well as oneEvolved Sea Sparrow Missile, at two incomingHouthi anti-ship missiles off the coast of Yemen, one of which struck the water on its own. It is unknown if the SM-2s were responsible for intercepting the second cruise missile.[14] On 12 October,Mason again came under attack by an anti-ship missile, and an SM-2 she fired was confirmed to have intercepted it at a range of 8 miles.[15][16] This marked the first time in history a warship successfully defended itself with SAMs launched fromvertical launch cells against an anti-ship missile. The ship experienced yet a third attack on 15 October, this time with 5 AShMs. She fired SM-2s, destroying four of the missiles.[16]
On 1 April 2020, aTurkish NavyG-class frigate fired at least a SM-1MR Block VIA RIM-66E-05 supposedly against anUAV operated in support of theLibyan National Army. The missile missed and landed nearal-Ajaylat, just southwest ofSabratha.[17]
On 19 October 2023, theUSSCarney fired SM-2s to shoot down threeland-attack cruise missiles and eightdrones launched from Houthi-controlled territory in Yemen. The interceptions occurred over theRed Sea; although the ship wasn't threatened, the missiles were headed north towards Israel following the start of theGaza war.[18] From October 2023 to January 2024, several U.S. Navy destroyers downed dozens of missiles and attack drones launched by theHouthis against ships transiting the Red Sea, primarily using SM-2s. Although the SM-2 effectively intercepted the threats, at a cost of roughly $2.4 million per missile, it is inefficient at shooting down drones, causing concerns about expending them against such cheap targets and depleting a ship's limited VLS capacity.[19]
In February 2024, in afriendly fire incident in theRed Sea, two SM-2s were launched by German frigateHessen at a USMQ-9 Reaper drone. Both SM-2s crashed into the sea because of "a technical defect".[20][21][22]
The Standard missile is designated by blocks depending upon their technological package.
The First Standard missiles entered service in the USN in 1967. Blocks I, II, and III were preliminary versions. Block IV was the production version. This missile was a replacement for the earlierRIM-24C Tartar missile.[5]
The RIM-66B introduced changes that resulted in higher reliability. A new faster reacting autopilot, a more powerful dual thrust rocket motor, and a new warhead were added. Many RIM-66A missiles were re-manufactured into RIM-66B.[5]
The RIM-66E was the last version of the standard missile one medium-range. This version entered service in 1983[4] with theUnited States Navy and export customers. The RIM-66E was used by all remainingTartar vessels that were not modified to use theNew Threat Upgrade andOliver Hazard Perry-class frigates which controlled it with the Mk92 fire control system. Production of this missile ended in 1987. The missile was retired from USN service in 2003; however there are a large number of this model in service abroad and it is expected to remain viable until 2020.[23]
The RIM-66C was the first version of the Standard missile two. The missile became operational in 1978 with theAegis combat system fitted to theTiconderoga-class cruiser. The RIM-66D was the SM-2 medium-range block I version for the New Threat Upgrade. The SM-2 incorporates a new autopilot giving it inertial guidance in all phases of flight except for the terminal intercept where semi-active radar homing is still used. This version is no longer in service; remaining missiles have either been remanufactured into later models or have been put in storage.[5]
The Block II missile was introduced in 1983 with a new rocket motor for longer range and a new warhead. The RIM-66G is for the Aegis combat system and the Mk26 missile launcher. The RIM-66H is for Aegis and the Mk41 vertical launcher. The RIM-66J is the version for the New Threat Upgrade. Block II missiles are no longer manufactured, and have been withdrawn from service. The remainder have either been put in storage, scrapped for spare parts, or remanufactured into later models.[5]
The RIM-66M is the version of the Standard missile two medium-range (SM-2MR) currently in service with the USN aboardTiconderoga-class cruisers andArleigh Burke-class destroyers. The missile is specifically designed for the Aegis Combat System and theMk41 Vertical launch system. The Block III missiles differ from earlier blocks by the addition of the MK 45 MOD 9 target detecting device, for improved performance against low altitude targets. The Block IIIB missile additionally has a dual semi-active/infrared seeker for terminal homing. The dual seeker is intended for use in high-ECM environments, against targets over the horizon or with a small radar cross section.[23] The seeker was originally developed for the canceledAIM-7R Sparrow air-to-air missile. All USN Block III and IIIA missiles are to be upgraded to Block IIIB. Block IIIA missiles are operated by theJapanese Maritime Self-Defense Force on itsKongō-class andAtago-class Aegis destroyers. Aegis equipped vessels in theSpanish andSouth Korean navies use it as well. TheDutch andGerman Navies have added it to the Anti-Air Warfare system, which uses theThales GroupActive Phased Array RadarS-1850M and Smart-L radar. South KoreanKDX-II destroyers use the block IIIA with a New Threat Upgrade compatible guided missile fire control system. Block III variants for Aegis and arm launchers are designated RIM-66L. Block III missiles for New Threat Upgrade systems are designated RIM-66K. Block IIIB missiles were not produced for the New Threat Upgrade. Blocks IIIA and IIIB are the current production versions. The Thales Nederland STIR 1.8 and 2.4 fire control systems are also supported.[3]
The SM-2 Block IIIC is a modified version of the Block III/IIIA/IIIB missile that features a dual mode semi-active and active missile seeker based on theSM-6 Block I.[24] Additionally, the missile has a new dorsal fin design and a thrust vectoring jet tab assembly to control trajectory as the missile egresses the launcher.[24][25] In 2018, the U.S. Navy awardedRaytheon Missile Systems a $149.4 million contract for engineering, manufacturing, and development of the Block IIIC.[26] In July 2021, the U.S. Navy awarded Raytheon Missile Systems a $45 million contract for the low-rate initial production of the Block IIIC.[27] In July 2022, the U.S. Navy fired Block IIIC missiles against four targets during testing onUSS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG-121).[25] The U.S. Navy expects to field the Block IIIC in2QFY24.[24] U.S. NavyArleigh Burke-class destroyers andConstellation-class frigates will be armed with the Block IIIC.[24]
In October 2024, theAustralian Government announced that it will acquire the Block IIIC for theRoyal Australian Navy'sHobart-class destroyers.[28] TheState Department had approved the sale of the Block IIIC to Australia in August 2021.[29] In November 2020, the State Department approved the sale of the Block IIIC toCanada for their plannedCanadian Surface Combatant class.[30]
The SM-2 Medium Range Block IIICU is modified version of the Block IIIC missile that will feature a new guidance section and target detection device from the SM-6 Block IU.[24][31] In April 2024, Raytheon was awarded a $344 million contract to develop the Block IIICU and the SM-6 Block IU.[31]
_being_assembled_.jpg)
In theUS Navy, RIM-66 Standard was deployed on ships of the following classes, replacingRIM-24 Tartar in some cases:
RIM-66 has also been widely exported and is in service in other navies worldwide.
| Designation | Block | Platform | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| YRIM-66A | Prototype | Test flights starting in 1965. | |
| RIM-66A | SM-1MR Block I to IV | Digital Tartar | In service 1967, Conscan radar seeker. SM-1MR Block IV was the main production variant. All rebuilt into Block V missiles.
|
| RIM-66B | SM-1MR Block V | Digital Tartar |
|
| RIM-66C | SM-2MR Block I | Aegis combat system andMK 26 GMLS | In service 1978. First Aegis version.
|
| RIM-66D | SM-2MR Block I | New Threat Upgrade | In service 1978. FirstNew Threat Upgrade version.
|
| RIM-66E | SM-1MR Blocks VI, VIA, VIB | Digital Tartar andMk 92 Fire Control System. | In service 1983. Version still in service with export customers.
|
| RIM-66G | SM-2MR Block II | Aegis combat system and MK 26 GMLS | In service 1983. For Aegis ships.
|
| RIM-66H | SM-2MR Block II | Aegis combat system andMk 41 VLS | For Aegis ships with MK 41 VLS (Vertical Launch System) |
| RIM-66J | SM-2MR Block II | New Threat Upgrade | For Tartar ships. All Block II missiles have been withdrawn from service. Many have been rebuilt as Block III missiles. |
| RIM-66K-1 | SM-2MR Block III | New Threat Upgrade | In service 1988. For Tartar ships.
|
| RIM-66K-2 | SM-2MR Block IIIA | New Threat Upgrade | In service 1991. For Tartar ships. In Production.
|
| RIM-66L-1 | SM-2MR Block III | Aegis combat system and MK 26 GMLS | In service 1988. For Aegis ships.
|
| RIM-66L-2 | SM-2MR Block IIIA | Aegis combat system and MK 26 GMLS | In service 1991. For Aegis ships.
|
| RIM-66M-1, -4 | SM-2MR Block III | Aegis combat system and MK 41 VLS | In service 1988. For Aegis ships with MK 41 VLS.
|
| RIM-66M-2, -3 | SM-2MR Block IIIA | Aegis combat system and MK 41 VLS, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, Australia, other foreign navies | In service 1991. For Aegis ships with MK 41 VLS. In production.
|
| RIM-66M-5, -7, -8, -09, -10, -11 | SM-2MR Block IIIB | Aegis combat system and MK 41 VLS,JMSDF | In service 1998. For Aegis ships with MK 41 VLS. In production.
|
| RIM-66M-6? | SM-2MR Block IIIC | Aegis combat system and MK 41 VLS | Development announced 2017
|
| RIM-66N-1 | SM-2MR Block IIIAZ | TSCE-I/ZCS andMK 57 PVLS | Produced as conversion kits for Block IIIA between 2017 and 2018, test fired in 2020. ForZumwalt-class destroyer with MK 57 PVLS. Full production pending contract award in 2021.
|
Table sources, reference material:[1][4][23][32]
The RGM-165 LASM, also given the designation SM-4, was intended as means to give long-range precision fires in support of theUS Marine Corps. Intended as an adaptation of the RIM-66, it retained the original MK 125 warhead and MK 104 rocket motor, with the radar seeker replaced by GPS/INS guidance. While test fired in 1997 using three modified RIM-66K SM-2MR Block III missiles, with 800 missiles set for replacement and IOC expected for 2003/2004, it was cancelled in 2002 due to limited capabilities against mobile or hardened targets.[33][34]
 | This articlemay containoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(June 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
.jpg)
_is_fired_from_HMAS_Sydney_(FFG_3)_during_a_live-fire_exercise_near_the_Pacific_Missile_Range_o.jpg)
This article incorporatespublic domain material from websites or documents of theDirector, Operational Test and Evaluation.
