Highest state of yoga and synonymous term for Patanjali's system of yoga
This article is about the highest form of yoga according to various traditions. For Patanjali's yoga, seeYoga Sutras of Patanjali. For the concept from which the Yoga Sutras were derived, seeYoga (philosophy).
Rāja (Sanskrit: राज) means "king, sovereign, chief, best or most excellent of its kind".[5] The historical use of the termRāja yoga is found in other contexts, quite different from its modern usage. In ancient and medieval Sanskrit texts, it meant the highest state of yoga practice (one reachingsamādhi).[2]
TheHatha Yoga Pradipika (15th century) for example, authored by Swatmarama, presents Hatha Yoga as a preparatory and complementary practice that leads to the state of Raja Yoga:
Success in Raja Yoga cannot be attained without Hatha Yoga, nor can success in Hatha Yoga be attained without Raja Yoga. Therefore, both should be practiced until perfection is achieved. (2.76)
Raja Yoga is defined in the text as:
The union of the mind and the soul is called Raja Yoga. (4.77)
The author also warns against exclusive reliance on physical practices:
Those who are ignorant of Raja Yoga and practice only Hatha Yoga waste their energy fruitlessly. (4.79)
According to Swarmarama, these verses underscore the traditional view that physical practices such as āsanas and prāṇāyāma (core to Hatha Yoga) serve to purify and stabilize the body–mind complex, preparing the practitioner for deeper meditative absorption characteristic of Raja Yoga.[6]
Rāja yoga is discussed in theYogatattva Upanishad.[7] It is then mentioned in a 16th-century commentary on a specific step in theYoga Sūtras of Patañjali.[1] The medieval era Tantric workDattātreyayogaśāstra explains in 334 shlokas the principles of four yogas:Mantra yoga, Hatha yoga,Laya yoga and Raja yoga.[8]Alain Daniélou states thatRāja yoga was, in the historic literature of Hinduism, one of five known methods of yoga, with the other four beingHatha yoga,Mantra yoga,Laya yoga andShiva yoga.[9] Daniélou translates it as "Royal way to reintegration of Self with Universal Self (Brahman)." The term became a modernretronym in the 19th century whenSwami Vivekananda equated raja yoga with the Yoga Sūtras of Patañjali.[1][2][3] This meaning is different from that in theHatha Yoga Pradīpikā, a text of theNatha sampradaya.[10]
TheBrahma Kumaris, a new religious movement, teaches a form of meditation it calls "Raja yoga" that has nothing to do with either the precepts of Hatha Yoga or Patañjali'sYoga Sūtras.[1]
Modern interpretations and literature that discussRaja yoga often credit Patañjali'sYogasūtras as their textual source, but many neither adopt the teachings nor the philosophical foundations of the Yoga school of Hinduism.[1] This mixing of concepts has led to confusion in understanding historical and modern Indian literature on Yoga.[2][10]
TheShaiva Yoga text,Amanaska, dated from the 12th century CE or earlier, is a dialogue betweenVamadeva and the deityShiva. In the second chapter, the text mentions Raja yoga. It states that it is so named because it enables the yogin to reach the illustrious king within oneself, the supreme self.[11] Raja yoga is declared as the goal where one experiences nothing but the bliss of the undisturbed, the natural state of calm, serenity, peace, communion within and contentment.[1]
The Raja yoga goal and state are synonymous with various terms, such asAmanaska,Unmani andSahaj.[12] TheHatha Yoga Pradipika (literally,A Little Light on Hatha Yoga) asserts this as follows,[13]
राजयोगः समाधिश्च उन्मनी च मनोन्मनी | अमरत्वं लयस्तत्त्वं शून्याशून्यं परं पदम || ३ || अमनस्कं तथाद्वैतं निरालम्बं निरञ्जनम | जीवन्मुक्तिश्च सहजा तुर्या चेत्येक-वाचकाः || ४ || सलिले सैन्धवं यद्वत्साम्यं भजति योगतः | तथात्म-मनसोरैक्यं समाधिरभिधीयते || ५ || यदा संक्ष्हीयते पराणो मानसं च परलीयते | तदा समरसत्वं च समाधिरभिधीयते || ६ || तत-समं च दवयोरैक्यं जीवात्म-परमात्मनोः | परनष्ह्ट-सर्व-सङ्कल्पः समाधिः सोऽभिधीयते || ७ ||
Raja yoga, samadhi, unmani, manonmani, amaratva, laya, tatva,sunya, asunya, parama pada, amanaska,advaita, niralamba, niranjana,jivanmukti, sahaja and turiya denote the same state of being. Just as with salt dissolved in water becomes one with it, so the union ofAtman andManas (mind) is denominated samadhi, When the breath becomes exhausted, and mind becomesPraliyate (still, reabsorbed), they fuse into union called samadhi. This equality, this oneness of the two, the living self and the absolute self, when allSankalpa (desire, cravings) end is called samadhi.
Some medieval Indian texts on Yoga list Rajayoga as one of many types of yoga.[14] For example, the 17th-century Sarvanga yoga pradipikå, a Braj-bhashya commentary by Sundardas, teaches three tetrads of Yogas. The first group isBhakti yoga, Mantra yoga,Laya yoga, and Carcha yoga; the second isHatha yoga, Raja yoga, Laksha yoga, andAshtanga yoga; the third isSamkhya yoga,Jñana yoga, Brahma yoga, and Advaita yoga. Of the twelve, Sundardas states that Rajayoga is the best yoga.[14]
One meaning of Raja yoga is as a modern retronym introduced by Swami Vivekananda, when he equated raja yoga with theYoga Sutras of Patanjali.[2][1][3] After its circulation in the first half of the 1st millennium CE, many Indian scholars reviewed it, then published theirBhāṣya (notes and commentary) on it. Together, they form a canon called thePātañjalayogaśāstra ("The Treatise on Yoga of Patañjali").[15][16]
According to Axel Michaels, theYoga Sutras are built upon fragments of texts and traditions from ancient India.[17] According to Feuerstein, theYoga Sutras are a condensation of two different traditions, namely"eight limb yoga" (ashtanga yoga) and action yoga (kriya yoga).[18] Thekriya yoga part is contained in chapter 1, chapter 2 verse 1-27, chapter 3 except verse 54, and chapter 4.[18] The "eight limb yoga" is described in chapter 2 verse 28-55, and chapter 3 verse 3 and 54.[18]
There are numerous parallels in the ancientSamkhya, Yoga andAbhidharma schools of thought, particularly from the 2nd century BCE to the 1st century AD, notes Larson.[19] Patanjali's Yoga Sutras may be a synthesis of these three traditions. From the Samkhya school of Hinduism, Yoga Sutras adopt the "reflective discernment" (adhyavasaya) ofprakrti andpurusa (dualism), its metaphysical rationalism, and its threeepistemic methods to gaining reliable knowledge.[19] From Abhidharma Buddhism's idea ofnirodhasamadhi, suggests Larson, Yoga Sutras adopt the pursuit of an altered state of awareness. However, unlike Buddhism, which believes that there is neither self nor soul, Yoga is physicalist and realist, like Samkhya, in believing that each individual has a self and soul.[19] The third concept that Yoga Sutras synthesizes into its philosophy is the ancientascetic traditions of isolation, meditation and introspection, as well as the yoga ideas from the 1st millennium BCE Indian texts such asKatha Upanishad,Shvetashvatara Upanishad andMaitri Upanishad.[19]
In early 11th century, the Persian scholarAl Biruni visited India, lived among Hindus for 16 years, and with their help translated several significant Sanskrit works into Arabic and Persian. One was Patanjali's Yogasutras.[20][21][22] Along with generally accurate translations, Al Biruni's text has significant differences from Yogasutra manuscripts discovered in India during the 19th century. Al Biruni's record has helped modern scholars establish that Patanjali'sYogasutras manuscript existed in India in many versions, each with multiple commentaries by Hindu scholars. Some of these versions and commentaries are either lost or undiscovered.[20] Al Biruni's translation preserved many of the core themes of Yoga philosophy of Hinduism; however, certain sutras and analytical commentaries were restated, making them more consistent with Islamic monotheistic theology.[20][23] Al Biruni's version of Yoga Sutras reached Persia and Arabian peninsula by about 1050 AD.
In Indianhistorical timeline, marking with thearrival of Islam in India in twelfth century, further development and literature on Yoga philosophy of Hinduism went into decline.[24] By the sixteenth century, Patanjali's Yoga philosophy was nearly extinct.[25] Yoga was preserved bysadhus (ascetics,sannyasis) of India. Some of the Hindu yoga elements were adopted bySufi sect of Muslims in India.[26][27] The Sufi Muslims at times adopted and protected the Yoga tradition of Hindus during the Islamic rule of India, and at other times helped the persecution and violence against those Hindus.[28] The Mughal EmperorAkbar, known for his syncretic tolerance, was attracted to and patronized Yoga philosophy of Hinduism.[29]
The yoga scholarStephen Cope identifies the following similarities between Rāja yoga andBuddhism. He notes that the two philosophies are not the same, but are strikingly similar, having shared a long period of interchange up to about 500 CE.[30]
^abcdefgJason Birch (2013), Råjayoga: The Reincarnations of the King of All Yogas,International Journal of Hindu Studies, Volume 17, Issue 3, pages 401–444
^Jason Birch (2013), The Amanaska: King of All Yogas, Ph.D. Dissertation, Oxford University
^Gerald James Larson and Karl H. Potter (2011), The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Yoga: India's philosophy of meditation, Volume XII, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120833494, pages 364, 366
^abSanskrit and English:Hath Yoga Pradipika, Pancham Singh (Translator),OCLC897482, pages 154-155; Modern Translation (English): GW Briggs (2009), Gorakhnāth and the Kānphaṭa Yogīs, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN978-8120805644, page 343
^abJason Birch (2013), Råjayoga: The Reincarnations of the King of All Yogas,International Journal of Hindu Studies, Volume 17, Issue 3, pages 415-416
^abcS Pines and T Gelblum (Translators from Arabic to English, 1966), Al-Bīrūni (Translator from Sanskrit to Arabic, ~ 1035 AD), and Patañjali,Al-Bīrūnī's Arabic Version of Patañjali'sYogasūtra,Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1966), pages 302-325
^Philipp Maas (2013), A Concise Historiography of Classical Yoga Philosophy, in Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy (Editor: Eli Franco), Sammlung de Nobili, Institut für Südasien-, Tibet- und Buddhismuskunde der Universität Wien,ISBN978-3900271435, pages 53-90,OCLC858797956