Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Quantum foam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fluctuation of spacetime on very small scales
For related articles, seeQuantum vacuum (disambiguation).
A graphic representation of Wheeler's calculations of what quantum reality may look like at the Planck length

Quantum foam (orspacetime foam, orspacetime bubble) is a theoreticalquantum fluctuation ofspacetime on very small scales due toquantum mechanics. The theory predicts that at this small scale, particles of matter and antimatter are constantly created and destroyed. These subatomic objects are calledvirtual particles.[1] The idea was devised byJohn Wheeler in 1955.[2][3]

Background

[edit]

With an incomplete theory ofquantum gravity, it is impossible to be certain whatspacetime looks like at small scales. However, there is no definitive reason that spacetime needs to be fundamentally smooth. It is possible that instead, in aquantum theory of gravity, spacetime would consist of many small, ever-changing regions in which space and time are not definite, but fluctuate in a foam-like manner.[4]

John Wheeler suggested that theuncertainty principle might imply that over sufficiently small distances and sufficiently brief intervals of time, the "very geometry of spacetime fluctuates".[5] These fluctuations could be large enough to cause significant departures from the smooth spacetime seen at macroscopic scales, giving spacetime a "foamy" character.

Experimental results

[edit]

The experimental proof of theCasimir effect, which is possibly caused byvirtual particles, is strong evidence for the existence of virtual particles. Theg-2 experiment, which predicts the strength ofmagnets formed bymuons andelectrons, also supports their existence.[1]

In 2005, during observations ofgamma-rayphotons arriving from theblazarMarkarian 501,MAGIC (Major Atmospheric Gamma-ray Imaging Cherenkov) telescopes detected that some of thephotons at differentenergy levels arrived at different times, suggesting that some of the photons had moved more slowly and thus were in violation ofspecial relativity's notion that thespeed of light is constant, a discrepancy which could be explained by the irregularity of quantum foam.[6] Subsequent experiments were, however, unable to confirm the supposed variation on the speed of light due to graininess of space.[7][8]

Other experiments involving the polarization of light from distantgamma ray bursts have also produced contradictory results.[9] More Earth-based experiments are ongoing[10][as of?] or proposed.[11]

Constraints on the size of quantum fluctuations

[edit]

The fluctuations characteristic of a spacetime foam would be expected to occur on a length scale on the order of thePlanck length (≈ 10−35 m),[12] but some models ofquantum gravity predict much larger fluctuations.

Photons should be slowed by quantum foam, with the rate depending on the wavelength of the photons. This would violateLorentz invariance. But observations of radiation from nearbyquasars by Floyd Stecker ofNASA'sGoddard Space Flight Center failed to find evidence of violation of Lorentz invariance.[13]

A foamy spacetime also sets limits on the accuracy with which distances can be measured because photons should diffuse randomly through a spacetime foam, similar to light diffusing by passing through fog. This should cause the image quality of very distant objects observed through telescopes to degrade. X-ray and gamma-ray observations of quasars using NASA'sChandra X-ray Observatory, theFermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and ground-based gamma-ray observations from theVery Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array (VERITAS) showed no detectable degradation at the farthest observed distances, implying that spacetime is smooth at least down to distances 1000 times smaller than the nucleus of a hydrogen atom,[14][15][16][17][18] setting a bound on the size of quantum fluctuations of spacetime.

Relation to other theories

[edit]

Thevacuum fluctuations providevacuum with a non-zero energy known asvacuum energy.[19]

Spin foam theory is a modern attempt to make Wheeler's ideaquantitative.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^abQuantum Foam,Don Lincoln, Fermilab, 2014-10-24.
  2. ^Wheeler, J. A. (January 1955). "Geons".Physical Review.97 (2):511–536.Bibcode:1955PhRv...97..511W.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.97.511.
  3. ^Minsky, Carly (24 October 2019)."The Universe Is Made of Tiny Bubbles Containing Mini-Universes, Scientists Say – 'Spacetime foam' might just be the wildest thing in the known universe, and we're just starting to understand it".Vice. Retrieved24 October 2019.
  4. ^See Derek Leinweber's QCD animations of spacetime foam, as exhibited in Wilczek lecture.
  5. ^Wheeler, John Archibald; Ford, Kenneth Wilson (2010) [1998].Geons, black holes, and quantum foam : a life in physics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 328.ISBN 9780393079487.OCLC 916428720.
  6. ^"Gamma Ray Delay May Be Sign of 'New Physics'". 3 March 2021.
  7. ^Vasileiou, Vlasios; Granot, Jonathan; Piran, Tsvi; Amelino-Camelia, Giovanni (2015)."A Planck-scale limit on spacetime fuzziness and stochastic Lorentz invariance violation".Nature Physics.11 (4):344–346.Bibcode:2015NatPh..11..344V.doi:10.1038/nphys3270.
  8. ^Cowen, Ron (2012)."Cosmic race ends in a tie".Nature.doi:10.1038/nature.2012.9768.S2CID 120173051.
  9. ^Integral challenges physics beyond Einstein / Space Science / Our Activities / ESA.
  10. ^Moyer, Michael (17 January 2012)."Is Space Digital?".Scientific American. Retrieved3 February 2013.
  11. ^Cowen, Ron (22 November 2012)."Single photon could detect quantum-scale black holes".Nature News. Retrieved3 February 2013.
  12. ^Hawking, Stephen W. (November 1978). "Spacetime foam".Nuclear Physics B.144 (2–3):349–362.Bibcode:1978NuPhB.144..349H.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90375-9.
  13. ^"Einstein makes extra dimensions toe the line". NASA. Archived fromthe original on 18 July 2019. Retrieved9 February 2012.
  14. ^"NASA Telescopes Set Limits on Spacetime Quantum "Foam"". 28 May 2015.
  15. ^"Chandra Press Room :: NASA Telescopes Set Limits on Space-time Quantum "Foam":: 28 May 15".chandra.si.edu. Retrieved2015-05-29.
  16. ^"Chandra X-ray Observatory – NASA's flagship X-ray telescope".chandra.si.edu. Retrieved2015-05-29.
  17. ^Perlman, Eric S.; Rappaport, Saul A.; Christensen, Wayne A.; Jack Ng, Y.; DeVore, John; Pooley, David (2014). "New Constraints on Quantum Gravity from X-ray and Gamma-Ray Observations".The Astrophysical Journal.805 (1): 10.arXiv:1411.7262.Bibcode:2015ApJ...805...10P.doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/10.S2CID 56421821.
  18. ^"Chandra :: Photo Album :: Space-time Foam :: May 28, 2015".chandra.si.edu. Retrieved2015-05-29.
  19. ^Baez, John (2006-10-08)."What's the Energy Density of the Vacuum?". Retrieved2007-12-18.

References

[edit]
Central concepts
Toy models
Quantum field theory
in curved spacetime
Black holes
Approaches
String theory
Canonical quantum gravity
Euclidean quantum gravity
Others
Applications
Background
Fundamentals
Formulations
Equations
Interpretations
Experiments
Science
Technology
Extensions
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quantum_foam&oldid=1317856236"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp