Inphysics,coherence expresses the potential for twowaves tointerfere. Twomonochromatic beams from a single source always interfere.[1]: 286 Even for wave sources that are not strictly monochromatic, they may still bepartly coherent.
When interfering, two waves add together to create a wave of greater amplitude than either one (constructive interference) or subtract from each other to create a wave of minima which may be zero[1]: 286 (destructive interference), depending on their relativephase. Constructive or destructive interference are limit cases, and two waves always interfere, even if the result of the addition is complicated or not remarkable.
Two waves with constant relative phase will be coherent.[2] The amount of coherence can readily be measured by theinterference visibility, which looks at the size of the interference fringes relative to the input waves (as the phase offset is varied); a precise mathematical definition of thedegree of coherence is given by means of correlation functions. More broadly, coherence describes the statistical similarity of a field, such as an electromagnetic field or quantum wave packet, at different points in space or time.[3]
Two slits illuminated by one source show an interference pattern. The source is far to the left in the diagram, behind collimators that create a parallel beam. This combination ensures that a wave from the source strikes both slits at the same part of the wave cycle: the wave will havecoherence.
Coherence controls the visibility or contrast of interference patterns. For example, visibility of thedouble slit experiment pattern requires that both slits be illuminated by a coherent wave as illustrated in the figure. Large sources withoutcollimation or sources that mix many different frequencies will have lower visibility.[4]: 264
Coherence contains several distinct concepts.Spatial coherence describes the correlation (or predictable relationship) between waves at different points in space, either lateral or longitudinal.[5]Temporal coherence describes the correlation between waves observed at different moments in time. Both are observed in theMichelson–Morley experiment andYoung's interference experiment. Once the fringes are obtained in theMichelson interferometer, when one of the mirrors is moved away gradually from the beam-splitter, the time for the beam to travel increases and the fringes become dull and finally disappear, showing temporal coherence. Similarly, in adouble-slit experiment, if the space between the two slits is increased, the coherence dies gradually and finally the fringes disappear, showing spatial coherence. In both cases, the fringe amplitude slowly disappears, as the path difference increases past the coherence length.
Thecoherence function between two signals and is defined as[6]
where is thecross-spectral density of the signal and and are the powerspectral density functions of and, respectively. The cross-spectral density and the power spectral density are defined as theFourier transforms of thecross-correlation and theautocorrelation signals, respectively. For instance, if the signals are functions of time, the cross-correlation is a measure of the similarity of the two signals as a function of the time lag relative to each other and the autocorrelation is a measure of the similarity of each signal with itself in different instants of time. In this case the coherence is a function of frequency. Analogously, if and are functions of space, the cross-correlation measures the similarity of two signals in different points in space and the autocorrelations the similarity of the signal relative to itself for a certain separation distance. In that case, coherence is a function ofwavenumber (spatial frequency).
The coherence varies in the interval. If it means that the signals are perfectly correlated or linearly related and if they are totally uncorrelated. If a linear system is being measured, being the input and the output, the coherence function will be unitary all over the spectrum. However, if non-linearities are present in the system the coherence will vary in the limit given above.
The coherence of two waves expresses how well correlated the waves are as quantified by thecross-correlation function.[7][1][8][9][10] Cross-correlation quantifies the ability to predict the phase of the second wave by knowing the phase of the first. As an example, consider two waves perfectly correlated for all times (by using a monochromatic light source). At any time, the phase difference between the two waves will be constant. If, when they are combined, they exhibit perfect constructive interference, perfect destructive interference, or something in-between but with constant phase difference, then it follows that they are perfectly coherent. As will be discussed below, the second wave need not be a separate entity. It could be the first wave at a different time or position. In this case, the measure of correlation is theautocorrelation function (sometimes calledself-coherence). Degree of correlation involves correlation functions.[11]: 545-550
In system with macroscopic waves, one can measure the wave directly. Consequently, its correlation with another wave can simply be calculated. However, in optics one cannot measure theelectric field directly as it oscillates much faster than any detector's time resolution.[12] Instead, one measures theintensity of the light. Most of the concepts involving coherence which will be introduced below were developed in the field of optics and then used in other fields. Therefore, many of the standard measurements of coherence are indirect measurements, even in fields where the wave can be measured directly.
Figure 1: The amplitude of a single frequency wave as a function of timet (red) and a copy of the same wave delayed by (blue). The coherence time of the wave is infinite since it is perfectly correlated with itself for all delays.[13]: 118 Figure 2: The amplitude of a wave whose phase drifts significantly in time as a function of timet (red) and a copy of the same wave delayed by(green).[14] At any particular timet the wave can interfere perfectly with its delayed copy. But, since half the time the red and green waves are in phase and half the time out of phase, when averaged overt any interference disappears at this delay.
Temporal coherence is the measure of the average correlation between the value of a wave and itself delayed by, at any pair of times. Temporal coherence tells us how monochromatic a source is. In other words, it characterizes how well a wave can interfere with itself at a different time. The delay over which the phase or amplitude wanders by a significant amount (and hence the correlation decreases by significant amount) is defined as thecoherence time. At a delay of the degree of coherence is perfect, whereas it drops significantly as the delay passes. Thecoherence length is defined as the distance the wave travels in time.[11]: 560, 571–573
The coherence time is not the time duration of the signal; the coherence length differs from the coherence area (see below).
The relationship between coherence time and bandwidth
The larger the bandwidth – range of frequencies Δf a wave contains – the faster the wave decorrelates (and hence the smaller is):[11]: 358–359, 560
Formally, this follows from theconvolution theorem in mathematics, which relates theFourier transform of the power spectrum (the intensity of each frequency) to its autocorrelation.[11]: 572
Narrow bandwidthlasers have long coherence lengths (up to hundreds of meters). For example, a stabilized and monomodehelium–neon laser can easily produce light with coherence lengths of 300 m.[15] Not all lasers have a high monochromaticity, however (e.g. for a mode-lockedTi-sapphire laser, Δλ ≈ 2 nm – 70 nm).
LEDs are characterized by Δλ ≈ 50 nm, and tungsten filament lights exhibit Δλ ≈ 600 nm, so these sources have shorter coherence times than the most monochromatic lasers.
A wave containing only a single frequency (monochromatic) is perfectly correlated with itself at all time delays, in accordance with the above relation. (See Figure 1)
Conversely, a wave whose phase drifts quickly will have a short coherence time. (See Figure 2)
Similarly, pulses (wave packets) of waves, which naturally have a broad range of frequencies, also have a short coherence time since the amplitude of the wave changes quickly. (See Figure 3)
Finally, white light, which has a very broad range of frequencies, is a wave which varies quickly in both amplitude and phase. Since it consequently has a very short coherence time (just 10 periods or so), it is often called incoherent.
Holography requires light with a long coherence time. In contrast,optical coherence tomography, in its classical version, uses light with a short coherence time.
Figure 3: The amplitude of a wavepacket whose amplitude changes significantly in time (red) and a copy of the same wave delayed by(green) plotted as a function of timet. At any particular time the red and green waves are uncorrelated; one oscillates while the other is constant and so there will be no interference at this delay. Another way of looking at this is the wavepackets are not overlapped in time and so at any particular time there is only one nonzero field so no interference can occur.Figure 4: The time-averaged intensity (blue) detected at the output of an interferometer plotted as a function of delay τ for the example waves in Figures 2 and 3. As the delay is changed by half a period, the interference switches between constructive and destructive. The black lines indicate the interference envelope, which gives thedegree of coherence. Although the waves in Figures 2 and 3 have different time durations, they have the same coherence time.
In optics, temporal coherence is measured in an interferometer such as theMichelson interferometer orMach–Zehnder interferometer. In these devices, a wave is combined with a copy of itself that is delayed by time. A detector measures the time-averagedintensity of the light exiting the interferometer. The resulting visibility of the interference pattern (e.g. see Figure 4) gives the temporal coherence at delay. Since for most natural light sources, the coherence time is much shorter than the time resolution of any detector, the detector itself does the time averaging. Consider the example shown in Figure 3. At a fixed delay, here, an infinitely fast detector would measure an intensity that fluctuates significantly over a timet equal to. In this case, to find the temporal coherence at, one would manually time-average the intensity.
In some systems, such as water waves or optics, wave-like states can extend over one or two dimensions. Spatial coherence describes the ability for two spatial pointsx1 andx2 in the extent of a wave to interfere when averaged over time. More precisely, the spatial coherence is the cross-correlation between two points in a wave for all times. If a wave has only 1 value of amplitude over an infinite length, it is perfectly spatially coherent. The range of separation between the two points over which there is significant interference defines the diameter of the coherence area,[16] (Coherence length, often a feature of a source, is usually an industrial term related to the coherence time of the source, not the coherence area in the medium). is the relevant type of coherence for the Young's double-slit interferometer. It is also used in optical imaging systems and particularly in various types of astronomy telescopes.
A distance away from an incoherent source with surface area,
Sometimes people also use "spatial coherence" to refer to the visibility when a wave-like state is combined with a spatially shifted copy of itself.
Figure 6: A wave with a varying profile (wavefront) and infinite coherence length.
Figure 7: A wave with a varying profile (wavefront) and finite coherence length.
Figure 8: A wave with finite coherence area is incident on a pinhole (small aperture). The wave willdiffract out of the pinhole. Far from the pinhole the emerging spherical wavefronts are approximately flat. The coherence area is now infinite while the coherence length is unchanged.
Figure 9: A wave with infinite coherence area is combined with a spatially shifted copy of itself. Some sections in the wave interfere constructively and some will interfere destructively. Averaging over these sections, a detector with length D will measure reducedinterference visibility. For example, a misalignedMach–Zehnder interferometer will do this.
Consider a tungsten light-bulb filament. Different points in the filament emit light independently and have no fixed phase-relationship. In detail, at any point in time the profile of the emitted light is going to be distorted. The profile will change randomly over the coherence time. Since for a white-light source such as a light-bulb is small, the filament is considered a spatially incoherent source. In contrast, a radioantenna array, has large spatial coherence because antennas at opposite ends of the array emit with a fixed phase-relationship. Light waves produced by a laser often have high temporal and spatial coherence (though the degree of coherence depends strongly on the exact properties of the laser). Spatial coherence of laser beams also manifests itself as speckle patterns and diffraction fringes seen at the edges of shadow.
Holography requires temporally and spatially coherent light. Its inventor,Dennis Gabor, produced successful holograms more than ten years before lasers were invented. To produce coherent light he passed the monochromatic light from an emission line of amercury-vapor lamp through a pinhole spatial filter.
Figure 10: Waves of different frequencies interfere to form a localized pulse if they are coherent.Figure 11: Spectrally incoherent light interferes to form continuous light with a randomly varying phase and amplitude.
Waves of different frequencies (in light these are different colours) can interfere to form a pulse if they have a fixed relative phase-relationship (seeFourier transform). Conversely, if waves of different frequencies are not coherent, then, when combined, they create a wave that is continuous in time (e.g. white light orwhite noise). The temporal duration of the pulse is limited by the spectral bandwidth of the light according to:
If the phase depends linearly on the frequency (i.e.) then the pulse will have the minimum time duration for its bandwidth (atransform-limited pulse), otherwise it is chirped (seedispersion).
Light also has apolarization, which is the direction in which the electric or magnetic field oscillates. Unpolarized light is composed of incoherent light waves with random polarization angles. The electric field of the unpolarized light wanders in every direction and changes in phase over the coherence time of the two light waves. An absorbingpolarizer rotated to any angle will always transmit half the incident intensity when averaged over time.
If the electric field wanders by a smaller amount the light will be partially polarized so that at some angle, the polarizer will transmit more than half the intensity. If a wave is combined with an orthogonally polarized copy of itself delayed by less than the coherence time, partially polarized light is created.
The polarization of a light beam is represented by a vector in thePoincaré sphere. For polarized light the end of the vector lies on the surface of the sphere, whereas the vector has zero length for unpolarized light. The vector for partially polarized light lies within the sphere.
The signature property of quantummatter waves, wave interference, relies on coherence. While initially patterned after optical coherence, the theory and experimental understanding of quantum coherence greatly expanded the topic.[19]
The simplest extension of optical coherence applies optical concepts tomatter waves. For example, when performing thedouble-slit experiment with atoms instead of light waves, a sufficiently collimated atomic beam creates a coherent atomic wave-function illuminating both slits.[20] Each slit acts as a separate but in-phase beam contributing to the intensity pattern on a screen. These two contributions give rise to an intensity pattern of bright bands due to constructive interference, interlaced with dark bands due to destructive interference, on a downstream screen. Many variations of this experiment have been demonstrated.[21]: 1057
As with light, transverse coherence (across the direction of propagation) of matter waves is controlled by collimation. Because light, at all frequencies, travels at the same velocity, longitudinal and temporal coherence are linked; in matter waves these are independent. In matter waves, velocity (energy) selection controls longitudinal coherence and pulsing or chopping controls temporal coherence.[20]: 154
The discovery of theHanbury Brown and Twiss effect – correlation of light upon coincidence – triggeredGlauber's creation[22] of uniquely quantum coherence analysis. Classical optical coherence becomes a classical limit for first-order quantum coherence; higher degree of coherence leads to many phenomena inquantum optics.
Macroscopic scale quantum coherence leads to novel phenomena, the so-calledmacroscopic quantum phenomena. For instance, thelaser,superconductivity andsuperfluidity are examples of highly coherent quantum systems whose effects are evident at the macroscopic scale. The macroscopic quantum coherence, presentingoff-diagonal long-range order (ODLRO)[23][24] for superfluidity, and laser light, is related to first-order (1-body) coherence/ODLRO, while superconductivity is related to second-order coherence/ODLRO. (For fermions, such as electrons, only even orders of coherence/ODLRO are possible.) For bosons, aBose–Einstein condensate is an example of a system exhibiting macroscopic quantum coherence through a multiple occupied single-particle state.
The classical electromagnetic field exhibits macroscopic quantum coherence. The most obvious example is the carrier signal for radio and TV. They satisfyGlauber's quantum description of coherence.
M. B. Plenio and co-workers constructed an operational formulation of quantum coherence as a resource theory. They introduced coherence monotones analogous to the entanglement monotones.[25] Quantum coherence has been shown to be equivalent toquantum entanglement[26] in the sense that coherence can be faithfully described as entanglement, and conversely that each entanglement measure corresponds to a coherence measure.
Coherent superpositions ofoptical wave fields include holography. Holographic photographs have been used as art and as difficult to forge security labels.
Further applications concern the coherent superposition ofnon-optical wave fields. In quantum mechanics for example one considers a probability field, which is related to the wave function (interpretation: density of the probability amplitude). Here the applications concern, among others, the future technologies ofquantum computing and the already available technology ofquantum cryptography. Additionally the problems of the following subchapter are treated.
Coherence is used to check the quality of the transfer functions (FRFs) being measured. Low coherence can be caused by poor signal to noise ratio, and/or inadequate frequency resolution.
Wave superposition – Fundamental physics principle stating that physical solutions of linear systems are linearPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
^Wolf, Emil (2007).Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-82211-4.OCLC149011826.
^Born, Max; Wolf, Emil (1993).Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light (6. ed., reprinted (with corrections) ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.ISBN978-0-08-026481-3.
^Hecht (1998).Optics (3rd ed.). Addison Wesley Longman. pp. 554–574.ISBN978-0-201-83887-9.
^Shin. K, Hammond. J. Fundamentals of signal processing for sound and vibration engineers. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
^Christopher Gerry; Peter Knight (2005).Introductory Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-52735-4.
^This figure needs to be changed because, in this figure, the green wave is actuallynot a copy of the red wave; both are monochromatic waves with slightly different frequencies. A proper figure would be a combination of a chirp wave and its delayed copy to match the figure and the current figure description.