Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Quantum Monte Carlo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Probabilistic algorithms to simulate quantum many-body systems

Electronic structure methods
Valence bond theory
Coulson–Fischer theory
Generalized valence bond
Modern valence bond theory
Molecular orbital theory
Hartree–Fock method
Semi-empirical quantum chemistry methods
Møller–Plesset perturbation theory
Configuration interaction
Coupled cluster
Multi-configurational self-consistent field
Quantum chemistry composite methods
Quantum Monte Carlo
Density functional theory
Time-dependent density functional theory
Thomas–Fermi model
Orbital-free density functional theory
Adiabatic connection fluctuation dissipation theorem
Görling–Levy perturbation theory
Generalized Kohn Sham theory
Optimized effective potential method
Linearized augmented-plane-wave method
Projector augmented wave method
Electronic band structure
Nearly free electron model
Tight binding
Muffin-tin approximation
k·p perturbation theory
Empty lattice approximation
GW approximation
Korringa–Kohn–Rostoker method

Quantum Monte Carlo encompasses a large family of computational methods whose common aim is the study of complexquantum systems. One of the major goals of these approaches is to provide a reliable solution (or an accurate approximation) of the quantummany-body problem. The diverse flavors of quantum Monte Carlo approaches all share the common use of theMonte Carlo method to handle the multi-dimensional integrals that arise in the different formulations of the many-body problem.

Quantum Monte Carlo methods allow for a direct treatment and description of complex many-body effects encoded in thewave function, going beyondmean-field theory. In particular, there exist numerically exact andpolynomially-scalingalgorithms to exactly study static properties ofboson systems withoutgeometrical frustration. Forfermions, there exist very good approximations to their static properties and numerically exact exponentially scaling quantum Monte Carlo algorithms, but none that are both.

Background

[edit]

In principle, any physical system can be described by the many-bodySchrödinger equation as long as the constituent particles are not moving "too" fast; that is, they are not moving at a speed comparable to that of light, andrelativistic effects can be neglected. This is true for a wide range of electronic problems incondensed matter physics, inBose–Einstein condensates andsuperfluids such asliquid helium. The ability to solve the Schrödinger equation for a given system allows prediction of its behavior, with important applications ranging frommaterials science to complexbiological systems.

The difficulty is however that solving the Schrödinger equation requires the knowledge of the many-body wave function in the many-bodyHilbert space, which typically has an exponentially large size in the number of particles. Its solution for a reasonably large number of particles is therefore typically impossible, even for modernparallel computing technology in a reasonable amount of time. Traditionally, approximations for the many-body wave function as anantisymmetric function of one-bodyorbitals[1] have been used, in order to have a manageable treatment of the Schrödinger equation. However, this kind of formulation has several drawbacks, either limiting the effect of quantum many-body correlations, as in the case of theHartree–Fock (HF) approximation, or converging very slowly, as inconfiguration interaction applications in quantum chemistry.

Quantum Monte Carlo is a way to directly study the many-body problem and the many-body wave function beyond these approximations. The most advanced quantum Monte Carlo approaches provide an exact solution to the many-body problem for non-frustrated interactingboson systems, while providing an approximate description of interactingfermion systems. Most methods aim at computing theground state wavefunction of the system, with the exception ofpath integral Monte Carlo and finite-temperatureauxiliary-field Monte Carlo, which calculate thedensity matrix. In addition to static properties, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation can also be solved, albeit only approximately, restricting the functional form of the time-evolvedwave function, as done in thetime-dependent variational Monte Carlo.

From a probabilistic point of view, the computation of the top eigenvalues and the corresponding ground state eigenfunctions associated with the Schrödinger equation relies on the numerical solving of Feynman–Kac path integration problems.[2][3]

Quantum Monte Carlo methods

[edit]

There are several quantum Monte Carlo methods, each of which uses Monte Carlo in different ways to solve the many-body problem.

Zero-temperature (only ground state)

[edit]
  • Variational Monte Carlo: A good place to start; it is commonly used in many sorts of quantum problems.
    • Diffusion Monte Carlo: The most common high-accuracy method for electrons (that is, chemical problems), since it comes quite close to the exact ground-state energy fairly efficiently. Also used for simulating the quantum behavior of atoms, etc.
    • Reptation Monte Carlo: Recent zero-temperature method related to path integral Monte Carlo, with applications similar to diffusion Monte Carlo but with some different tradeoffs.
  • Gaussian quantum Monte Carlo
  • Path integral ground state: Mainly used for boson systems; for those it allows calculation of physical observables exactly, i.e. with arbitrary accuracy

Finite-temperature (thermodynamic)

[edit]

Real-time dynamics (closed quantum systems)

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^"Functional form of the wave function". Archived fromthe original on July 18, 2009. RetrievedApril 22, 2009.
  2. ^Caffarel, Michel; Claverie, Pierre (1988). "Development of a pure diffusion quantum Monte Carlo method using a full generalized Feynman–Kac formula. I. Formalism".The Journal of Chemical Physics.88 (2):1088–1099.Bibcode:1988JChPh..88.1088C.doi:10.1063/1.454227.ISSN 0021-9606.
  3. ^Korzeniowski, A.; Fry, J. L.; Orr, D. E.; Fazleev, N. G. (August 10, 1992). "Feynman–Kac path-integral calculation of the ground-state energies of atoms".Physical Review Letters.69 (6):893–896.Bibcode:1992PhRvL..69..893K.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.893.PMID 10047062.
  4. ^Rousseau, V. G. (May 20, 2008). "Stochastic Green function algorithm".Physical Review E.77 (5) 056705.arXiv:0711.3839.Bibcode:2008PhRvE..77e6705R.doi:10.1103/physreve.77.056705.PMID 18643193.S2CID 2188292.

References

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quantum_Monte_Carlo&oldid=1331090793"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp