.jpg)
Apundit is a person who offers opinion in an authoritative manner on a particular subject area (typically politics, the social sciences, technology or sport), usually through themass media.[1][2][3]
The term originates from theSanskrit termpandit (paṇḍitáपण्डित), meaning "knowledge owner" or "learned man".[4] It refers to someone who is erudite in various subjects and who conducts religious ceremonies and offers counsel to the king and usually referred to a person from theHinduBrahmin but may also refer to thesiddhas,Siddhars,Naths,ascetics,sadhus, oryogis (rishi).
From at least the early 19th century, a Pundit of theSupreme court inColonial India was an officer of the judiciary who advised British judges on questions ofHindu law. InAnglo-Indian use,pundit also referred to a native of India who was trained and employed by the British to survey inaccessible regions beyond the British frontier.[5]
 | The examples and perspective in this sectiondeal primarily with the United States and do not represent aworldwide view of the subject. You mayimprove this section, discuss the issue on thetalk page, or create a new section, as appropriate.(September 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Josef Joffe's book chapterThe Decline of the Public Intellectual and the Rise of the Pundit describes a change in the role of public experts and relates to developments in the audience and the media itself.[6] In the second half of the 20th century, foreigners likeHannah Arendt orJürgen Habermas and others gained a certain position in the US as public intellectuals due to the (over)specialization of US academics.[7]
A pundit now combines the roles of a public intellectual and has a certain expertise as a media practitioner. They play an increasing role in disseminating ideas and views in an accessible way to the public.[8] From Joffe's view,Karl Marx in Europe and e.g. in the US,Mark Twain were early andrelentless pundits ante festum.[6] In addition, the growing role ofthink tanks and research institutions like theBrookings Institution, theAmerican Enterprise Institute and theManhattan Institute provided a place for those dealing with 'big issues' in public language.[6]
The termtalking head (in existence since 1964[9]) has derogatory overtones. For example, the judge in theDavid Westerfield trial in San Diego in 2002 said "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking".[10]
Punditry has become a more popular vehicle in nightly newscasts on American cable news networks. A rise of partisanship among popular pundits began withBill O'Reilly ofFox News Channel. His opinion-oriented format led him to ratings success and has led others, includingBill Maher,Keith Olbermann, andNancy Grace to express their opinions on matters on their own programs.[11]
Insports commentating, a "pundit" orcolor commentator may be partnered with a play-by-play announcer who will describe the action while asking the pundit for analysis.[citation needed]
Popular in theUnited States during 2007 according to aForbes top 10 list:[12][13][unreliable source?]
.jpg)
