Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Proto-Samoyedic language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ancestor of the Samoyedic languages
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
icon
This articleneeds attention from an expert in Linguistics. See thetalk page for details.WikiProject Linguistics may be able to help recruit an expert.(May 2025)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Proto-Samoyed
Proto-Samoyedic
Reconstruction ofSamoyedic languages
Reconstructed
ancestor

Proto-Samoyedic, orProto-Samoyed, is thereconstructed ancestral language of theSamoyedic languages:Nenets (Tundra andForest),Enets,Nganasan,Selkup, as well as extinctKamas andMator. Samoyedic is one of the principal branches of theUralic language family, and its ancestor isProto-Uralic. It has been suggested that Proto-Samoyedic greatly influenced the development ofTocharian, anIndo-European language.[1]

Phonology

[edit]

A fairly complex system of vowel phonemes is reconstructed for Proto-Samoyedic:

FrontBack
UnroundedRoundedUnroundedRounded
Closei [i]ü [y] [ɯ]u [u]
Mide [e]ö [ø] [ɤ]o [o]
Openä [æ]a [ɑ]å [ɒ]
Reducedə [ə̟]ǝ̑ [ə̠]

The system is retained relatively faithfully inSelkup (though expanded withvowel length). Two of the vowel contrasts are however only retained inNganasan: the distinction of front and back reduced vowels, and that of *i versus *e. For the remainder of the family, following the mergers *e > *i and *ǝ̑ > *ə, a further shared change is raising of *ä > *e.[2] Earlier works often thus give a slightly different transcription of several vowels:[3]

Older reconstructionCurrent reconstruction
*i*i, *e
*e
*a

Even though the number of vowel phonemes was high, there were no long vowels or phonemic diphthongs. A peculiar feature of the reconstructed vowel system is the occurrence of vowel sequences, which consisted of any full vowel followed by a reduced vowel: for example, *tuǝ̑ 'feather', *kåǝ̑så 'man'. These sequences were not diphthongs; the vowels belonged to separate syllables. Evidence of the vowel sequences has been preserved in only part of the Samoyedic languages, primarily in Nganasan andEnets. Wagner-Nagy (2004)[4] lists the following examples:

  • Close + reduced: *iə, *iǝ̑, *üə, *üǝ̑, *uə, *uǝ̑
  • Mid + reduced: *öǝ̑, *e̮ǝ̑, *oǝ̑, *oə
  • Open + reduced: *äǝ̑ (> *eǝ̑), *åǝ̑
  • Close + open: *uå
  • Reduced + open: *ǝ̑å

Proto-Samoyedic hadvowel harmony like many other Uralic languages. Harmony determined whether a front vocalic or a back vocalicallomorph of asuffix was used. However, the restrictions imposed by vowel harmony were not absolute because also disharmonic word-stems can be reconstructed. Such stems break vowel harmony by combining front and back vowels: e.g. Proto-Samoyedic *kålä 'fish', *wäsa 'iron'.

In contrast to the vowel system, the consonant system is rather simple with only 13 phonemes:

labialdentalpalatalvelar
stopptk
affricatec [ts]
sibilants
nasalmnń [ɲ]ŋ
laterall
trillr
semivowelwj

The exact sound value of the affricate is not entirely clear; it may originally have beenretroflex[ʈ͡ʂ] rather than dental or alveolar[t͡s]. It has remained distinct only in Selkup, merging elsewhere with *t.

As inProto-Uralic, the ancestor of Proto-Samoyedic, the first syllable of words was always stressed, and hence there was no contrastivestress. Contrastivetones did not occur either.

Phonotactics

[edit]

As in Proto-Uralic, words could begin with a maximum of one consonant: initialconsonant clusters were not allowed. Anotherphonotactic constraint inherited from Proto-Uralic was that the consonants *r and *ŋ were not allowed word-initially. Proto-Samoyedic had, however, innovated final consonant clusters in a few words. In all of them, the first consonant in the cluster was the semivowel *j, as in *wajŋ 'breath'. Thus, thesyllable structure of Proto-Samoyedic was altogether (C)V(j)(C).

Inside words, clusters of two consonants were common. Clusters of three consonants were again possible only if the first consonant of the cluster was *j, as in *wajkkǝ̑ 'neck'.

Later development

[edit]

Palatalization of consonants, most prominently *k, has occurred in all recorded Samoyedic languages. This is however a post-Proto-Samoyedic development, as the details differ in each branch due to vowel developments.[5]

  • The Nenets-Enets group palatalizes both *k and *s to /sʲ/.
  • Nganasan, Selkup and Kamassian palatalize *k to a distinct /ʃ/. Nganasan also palatalizes *s to /sʲ/.
  • Mator appears to have no palatalization of *k; however, *s is, somewhat unusually, velarized to /k/.
  • Nenets-Enets and Nganasan have prominent palatalization of other consonants as well, leading to contraction of the vowel system.

Other widespread developments includeprothesis of *ŋ, initial lenition of *p, andfortition of the semivowels *w, *j.

  • In Nganasan, Nenets and Enets, PS vowel-initial words gain an initial /ŋ/ viarhinoglottophilia (which may be subsequently palatalized to /nʲ/). This is occasionally found in other Samoyedic languages as well, usually with the exception of Mator.
  • PS initial *p is lenited to /f/ in Enets, /h/ in Mator and Nganasan. (/f/ still appears in the oldest Nganasan records.)
  • PS initial *w remains only in Nenets. In Selkup, it becomes /kʷ/; all other varieties shift it to /b/.
  • PS initial *j remains in both Nenets and Enets. It becomes /tʲ/ in Selkup, and /dʲ/ in other varieties.
  • In Mator and Kamassian, /b/, /dʲ/ are furthermore nasalized to /m/, /nʲ/ preceding a word-internal nasal. This has been anareal change, shared also withSiberian Turkic languages such asKhakas.[6]

Morphology

[edit]

Proto-Samoyedic was a fairly typicalagglutinative language with only littlemorphophonological alteration, apart from vowel harmony. In the following,-A marks anarchiphoneme realized as in words with back-vocalic harmony, in words with front-vocalic harmony.

Threenumbers were distinguished: singular,dual andplural. Possession was indicated withpossessive suffixes.

Nouns distinguished seven cases:

Verbs were conjugated formood,tense,number andperson. There were also separate subjective and objectiveconjugations.

Derivational suffixes were numerous, and could form both verbs and nominals.[7]

Development

[edit]

Most Proto-Samoyedic phonemes continue the corresponding Proto-Uralic phonemes unchanged. The most prominent changes are:[5][8]

  • PU *s, š > PS *t.
  • PU *ś > PS *s.
  • PU *δ > PS *r.
  • PU *δ́ > PS *j.
  • PU *l in most positions > PS *j. *l remains initially before PU *,[9] as well as in PS intervocalic positions.
  • PU *u > PS *ǝ̑ preceding a PU stem vowel *a.
  • PU * > PS * in PS closed syllables.
  • PU *ü > PS *i. PS *ü is of secondary origin.
  • PU stem-final *i is reduced to PS *ə/ǝ̑ (per harmony), and if not preceded by an original consonant cluster, subsequently lost.
  • PU *a, o generally become PS *å, though in many cases PS *a also appears; the conditioning for this is not entirely clear.
  • PU stem-final *å becomes PS *ä after a lateral consonant (PU *l or *δ́; this points to an intermediate stage *ĺ in the development of the latter.)
  • PU *o remains in monosyllabic roots (both primary, and those resulting from loss of final *ø).
  • PU *k, *x, *w, *j are lost between vowels in roots of the shape *CVCi, yielding monosyllabic PS roots.
  • PU *k and preconsonantal *w are generally lost in medial consonant clusters.

Examples:

  • PU *äjmä "needle" > PS *äjmä
  • PU *kala "fish" > PS *kålä
  • PU *muna "egg" > PS *mǝ̑nå
  • PU *weti "water" > PS *wet
  • PU *nüδi "handle" > PS *nir
  • PU *i̮pti "hair" > PS *e̮ptǝ̑
  • PU *täwδi "full" > PS *tärə
  • PU *mośki- "to wash" > PS *måsǝ̑-
  • PU *suksi "ski" > PS *tutǝ̑
  • PU *ńi̮xli "arrow" > PS *ńe̮ǝ̑j
  • PU *käxli "tongue" > PS *käəj

Numerals

[edit]

Proto-Samoyedic numerals with wider Uralic cognates are:[10]

  • *ketä '2'
  • *säjʔwǝ '7'
  • *wüt '10' (cognate with Finno-Ugric numerals for '5')

Innovative Proto-Samoyedic numerals with no apparent wider Uralic cognates:[10]

  • *nakur '3'
  • *tättǝ '4'
  • *sǝmpǝlaŋkǝ '5'
  • *mǝktut '6'

References

[edit]
  1. ^Peyrot, Michael (2019)."The deviant typological profile of the Tocharian branch of Indo-European may be due to Uralic substrate influence".Indo-European Linguistics.7 (1):72–121.doi:10.1163/22125892-00701007.hdl:1887/139205.S2CID 213924514.
  2. ^Helimski, Eugen:The 13th Proto-Samoyedic vowel.[permanent dead link] In: Mikola-konferencia 2004. Szeged: SzTE Department of Finnougristics, 2005. 27-39.
  3. ^Aikio, Ante (2006). "New and Old Samoyed Etymologies (Part 2)".Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen (59): 10.
  4. ^Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (2004). "Wort- und Silbenstruktur im Protosamojedischen".Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen (26–27):87–108.
  5. ^abSammallahti, Pekka (1988), "Historical phonology of the Uralic languages, with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric, and Permic", in Denis Sinor (ed.),The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, Leiden: Brill, pp. 478–554
  6. ^Helimski, Eugene (2003)."Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family: A survey"(PDF).Nyelvtudományi Közlemények: 158.ISSN 0029-6791. Retrieved2014-10-31.
  7. ^Janurik, Tamás (2010)."A közszamojéd szóanyag rekonstruálható képzői"(PDF).Folia Uralica Debreceniensia.17. Retrieved2015-03-23.
  8. ^Aikio, Ante (2002), "New and Old Samoyed etymologies",Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen,57,ISSN 0355-1253
  9. ^Michalove, Peter A. (1999), "The treatment of initial *l- in Proto-Samoyed",Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne,89,ISSN 0355-0214
  10. ^abLuobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Ante Aikio): Proto-Uralic. — To appear in:Marianne Bakró-Nagy,Johanna Laakso & Elena Skribnik (eds.),The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford University Press.

Janhunen, Juha 1998. Samoyedic. In: Daniel Abondolo (ed.),The Uralic Languages, pp. 457–479. London / New York: Routledge.

Sources

[edit]
Finnic
Sámi
Eastern Sámi
Western Sámi
Unclassified
Mordvinic
Mari
Permic
Ugric
Eastern Ugric
Western Ugric
Samoyedic
Others
Reconstructed
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proto-Samoyedic_language&oldid=1322924323"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp