Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Prosopography of ancient Rome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scholarly approach to ancient Roman history focusing on social networks

Theprosopography of ancient Rome is an approach toclassical studies andancient history that focuses on family connections, political alliances, and social networks inancient Rome.[1] The methodology of Romanprosopography involves defining a group for study—often the social ranking calledordo in Latin, as ofsenators andequestrians—then collecting and analyzing data.Literary sources provide evidence mainly for the ruling elite.Epigraphy andpapyrology are sources that may also document ordinary people, who have been studied in groups such as imperial freedmen, lower-class families, and specific occupations such aswet nurses(nutrices).[2]

In German scholarship,Friedrich Münzer's many biographical articles forRealencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft took a prosopographical approach.[3]Matthias Gelzer, one of the founders of prosopographical methodology in relation to ancient Rome, focused on the social institution ofpatronage and its effects on the Roman political system.[4]

Leading 20th-century scholars who wrote in English on theprosopography of theRoman Republic includeT.R.S. Broughton, whose three-volumeThe Magistrates of the Roman Republic is a standard reference;Ronald Syme, whoseRoman Revolution (1939) became the basis for later scholars' work on the late Republic and the transition to thePrincipate;T.P. Wiseman, who has studied in particular the careers and family lines of Romans from themunicipia, towns outside Rome;E. Badian, particularly his 1965 work on the trial ofGaius Norbanus;Lily Ross Taylor; andErich Gruen.[5]

Other scholars, such asP.A. Brunt, have cautioned against an overreliance on prosopography, particularly the tendency to see court trials as "proxy wars" between political factions rather than as judicial proceedings in pursuit of just outcomes: even bitter enemies such asCicero andClodius Pulcher are recorded as testifying on behalf of the same party.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Blackwell, 2010), p. 493.
  2. ^Susan Treggiari,Roman Social History (Routledge, 2002),n.p.
  3. ^Alexander, "Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics," p. 103.
  4. ^Michael C. Alexander, "Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics in the Republic," inA Companion to Roman Rhetoric, p. 102.
  5. ^Alexander, "Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics in the Republic," pp. 102–103, 108.
  6. ^Alexander, "Oratory, Rhetoric, and Politics," pp. 102–103.

External links

[edit]
Publications
Projects
Prosopographers
Other
Types
Sources
By scale
By source
By topic
Approaches,
schools
Concepts
General
Specific
Periodization of
modern history
By country or region
Africa
Americas
Latin America
United States
Eurasia
Ancient Rome
China
France
Germany
India
Ireland
Italy
Poland
Russia
Spain
Turkey
United
Kingdom
British
Empire
Oceania
By war, conflict
Pre-18th century
conflicts
18th and 19th
century conflicts
Coalition Wars
(1792–1815)
World War I
Treaty of
Versailles
Interwar period
World War II
Eastern Front
The Holocaust
Pacific War
Western Front
Cold War
Post-Cold War
Related
By person
Political
leaders
Historical
rankings
Others
Other topics
Economics
Religion
Science /
Technology
Organizations, publications
Related
Stub icon

Thisancient Rome–related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prosopography_of_ancient_Rome&oldid=1283756652"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp