Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Principle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rule, guide or inevitable consequence
For other uses, seePrinciple (disambiguation).
Not to be confused withPrincipal.
Theconcept of blind justice is a moral principle.[1]

Aprinciple may relate to a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of beliefs or behavior or a chain of reasoning.[2] They provide a guide for behavior or evaluation.[2] A principle can make values explicit, so they are expressed in the form of rules and standards. Principles unpack the values underlying them more concretely so that the values can be more easily operationalized in policy statements and actions.[3]

Inlaw, higher order, overarching principles establishrules to be followed, modified by sentencing guidelines relating to context and proportionality. In science and nature, a principle may define the essential characteristics of the system, or reflect the system's designed purpose. The effective operation would be impossible if any one of the principles was to be ignored.[4] A system may be explicitly based on and implemented from a document of principles as was done in IBM's360/370Principles of Operation. It is important to differentiate an operational principle, including reference to 'first principles' from higher order 'guiding' or 'exemplary' principles, such as equality, justice and sustainability. Higher-order, 'superordinate' principles (Super-Ps) provide a basis for resolving differences and building agreement/alignment.[5]

Examples of principles are,entropy in a number of fields, least action in physics, those in descriptive comprehensive and fundamental law:doctrines or assumptions forming normative rules of conduct,separation of church and state in statecraft, thecentral dogma of molecular biology,fairness in ethics, etc.

In common English, it is a substantive and collective term referring to rule governance, the absence of which, being "unprincipled", is considered a character defect. It may also be used to declare that a reality has diverged from some ideal or norm as when something is said to be true only "in principle" but not in fact.

As law

[edit]

As moral law

[edit]
Socrates preferred to face execution rather than betray his moral principles.[6]
Main article:Ethics

A principle represents values that orient and rule the conduct of persons in a particular society. To "act on principle" is to act in accordance with one's moral ideals.[7] Principles are absorbed in childhood through a process ofsocialization. There is a presumption of liberty of individuals that is restrained. Exemplary principles includeFirst, do no harm, theGolden Rule and theDoctrine of the Mean.

As a juridic law

[edit]
Main article:Principle of legality in criminal law

It represents a set of values that inspire the written norms that organize the life of a society submitting to the powers of an authority, generally the State. The law establishes a legal obligation, in a coercive way; it therefore acts as principleconditioning of the action that limits the liberty of the individuals. See, for examples, theterritorial principle,homestead principle, andprecautionary principle.

As scientific law

[edit]

Archimedes principle, relating buoyancy to the weight of displaced water, is an early example of alaw in science. Another early one developed byMalthus is thepopulation principle, now called theMalthusian principle.[8] Freud also wrote on principles, especially thereality principle necessary to keep the id andpleasure principle in check. Biologists use theprinciple of priority andprinciple of Binominal nomenclature for precision in namingspecies. There are many principles observed in physics, notably incosmology which observes themediocrity principle, theanthropic principle, theprinciple of relativity and thecosmological principle. Other well-known principles include theuncertainty principle inquantum mechanics and thepigeonhole principle andsuperposition principle in mathematics.

As axiom or logical fundament

[edit]

Principle of sufficient reason

[edit]
Main article:Principle of sufficient reason

The principle states that every event has a rational explanation.[9] The principle has a variety of expressions, all of which are perhaps best summarized by the following:

For every entityx, ifx exists, then there is a sufficient explanation for whyx exists.
For every evente, ife occurs, then there is a sufficient explanation for whye occurs.
For every propositionp, ifp is true, then there is a sufficient explanation for whyp is true.

However, one realizes that in every sentence there is a direct relation between the predicate and the subject. To say that "the Earth is round", corresponds to a direct relation between the subject and the predicate.

Principle of non-contradiction

[edit]
Portrait bust of Aristotle; anImperial Roman copy of a lostbronze sculpture made byLysippos
Main article:Law of noncontradiction

According toAristotle, "It is impossible for the same thing to belong and not to belong at the same time to the same thing and in the same respect."[10] For example, it is not possible that in exactly the same moment and place, it rains and does not rain.[11]

Principle of excluded middle

[edit]
Main article:Law of excluded middle

The principle of the excluding third or "principium tertium exclusum" is a principle of the traditional logic formulated canonically byLeibniz as: eitherA isB orA isn'tB. It is read the following way: eitherP is true, or its denial ¬P is.[12]It is also known as "tertium non datur" ('A third (thing) is not'). Classically it is considered to be one of the most important fundamental principles or laws of thought (along with the principles of identity, non-contradiction and sufficient reason).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Jacoby, Jeff."Lady Justice's blindfold."Boston.com. 10 May 2009. 25 October 2017.
  2. ^abStevenson, Angus; Lindberg, Christine A., eds. (2010-01-01)."New Oxford American Dictionary".doi:10.1093/acref/9780195392883.001.0001.ISBN 978-0-19-539288-3.
  3. ^UNESCO (2021)."Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence".
  4. ^Alpa, Guido (1994)General Principles of Law,Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 1: Is. 1, Article 2. fromGolden Gate University School of Law
  5. ^Sharpley, D. (2024)."Leadership Principles and Purpose".
  6. ^"The Ethics of Socrates."Archived 2018-05-01 at theWayback MachinePhilosophy. 25 October 2017.
  7. ^"Full Transcript: Jeff Flake’s Speech on the Senate Floor."New York Times. 24 October 2017. 25 October 2017.
  8. ^Elwell, Frank W."T. Robert Mathus's Principle ...."Rogers State University. 2013. 25 October 2017.
  9. ^"Principle of Sufficient Reason."Archived 2018-06-11 at theWayback MachineStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 7 September 2016. 25 October 2017.
  10. ^"Aristotle on Non-contradiction."Archived 2018-06-11 at theWayback MachineStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 12 June 2015. 25 October 2017.
  11. ^"Great Philosophers."Oregon State University. 2002. 25 October 2017.
  12. ^Whitehead, Alfred North (2005).Principia mathematica, by Alfred North Whitehead ... and Bertrand Russell.

External links

[edit]
Normative
Applied
Meta
Schools
Concepts
Ethicists
Works
Related
Theories
Concepts
Metaphysicians
Notable works
Related topics
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Principle&oldid=1265519840"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp