
ThePrinceton Field Reversed Configuration (PFRC) is a series of experiments inplasma physics, an experimental program to evaluate a configuration for afusion power reactor, at thePrinceton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). The experiment probes the dynamics of long-pulse, collisionless,[1] low s-parameter[2]field-reversed configurations (FRCs) formed with odd-parity rotating magnetic fields.[3][4] FRCs are the evolution of the Greek engineer'sNicholas C. Christofilos original idea of E-layers which he developed for theAstron fusion reactor.[5] The PFRC program aims to experimentally verify the physics predictions that such configurations are globally stable and have transport levels comparable with classical magnetic diffusion.[2] It also aims to apply this technology to theDirect Fusion Drive concept for spacecraft propulsion.[6]
The PFRC was initially funded by theUnited States Department of Energy. Early in its operation it was contemporary with such RMF-FRCs as theTranslation Confinement Sustainment experiment (TCS) and thePrairie View Rotamak (PV Rotamak).
At PPPL, the experiment PFRC-1 ran from 2008 through 2011.[7] PFRC-2 is running as of 2023[update]. PFRC-3 is scheduled next. PFRC-4 is scheduled for the late-2020s.[7]
As of 2023[update] fusion had not been achieved.
The PFRC-1 and PFRC-2 experiments have heated electrons to energies in excess of 100 eV and plasma durations to 300 ms, more than 104 times longer than the predicted tilt instability growth time.[8]

This section is empty. You can help byadding to it.(July 2023) |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Pulse length | 300 ms |
| Magnetic field strength | to 350 G (vacuum ) |
| RMF Frequency | 2-14 MHz |
| RMF Power | to 200 kW |
| RMF Coupling | 60% |
| Plasma temperature | 100 eV e- at 4.3 MHz |
| Plasma radius | 8 cm |
| Electron density | 1013 /cc |
| Gas | H2, He, Ne, Ar |
| Excluded flux | 0.6 mVs |
| Energy confinement time | 5x10−5 s |
The electric current that forms thefield-reversed configuration (FRC) in the PFRC is driven by a rotating magnetic field (RMF). This method has been well-studied and produced favorable results in the Rotamak series of experiments.[9] However, rotating magnetic fields as applied in these and other experiments (so-calledeven parity RMFs) induce opening of the magnetic field lines. When a transverse magnetic field is applied to the axisymmetric equilibrium FRC magnetic field, rather than magnetic field lines closing on themselves and forming a closed region, they spiral around in the azimuthal direction and ultimately cross the separatrix surface which contains the closed FRC region.[3]

The PFRC uses RMF antennae that produce a magnetic field which flips direction about a symmetry plane oriented with its normal along the axis, half-way along the length of the axis of the machine. This configuration is called anodd parity rotating magnetic field (RMFo). Such magnetic fields, when added in small magnitude to axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic fields, do not cause opening of the magnetic field lines and overall topology is preserved.[3] The critical threshold magnitude of 'odd parity' rotating magnetic field which opens up the axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic field lines and fundamentally changes field topology is rather high.[10] Thus, the RMF is not expected to contribute to transport of particles and energy out of the core of the PFRC.
In an FRC, the name s-parameter is given to the ratio of the distance between the magnetic null and the separatrix, and the thermal ion Larmor radius. That is how many ion orbits can fit between the core of the FRC and where it meets the bulk plasma.[2] A high-s FRC would have very small ion gyroradii compared to the size of the machine. Thus, at high s-parameter, the model ofmagnetohydrodynamics (MHD) applies.[11] MHD predicts that the FRC is unstable to the "n=1 tilt mode," in which the reversed field tilts 180 degrees to align with the applied magnetic field, destroying the FRC.
A low-s FRC is predicted to be stable to the tilt mode.[11] An s-parameter less than or equal to 2 is sufficient for this effect. However, only two ion radii between the hot core and the cool bulk means that on average only two scattering periods (velocity changes of on average 90 degrees) are sufficient to remove a hot, fusion-relevant ion from the core of the plasma. Thus the choice is between high s-parameter ions that areclassically well confined butconvectively poorly confined, and low s-parameter ions that areclassically poorly confined butconvectively well confined.
The PFRC has an s-parameter between 1 and 2.[2] Stabilizing the tilt-mode is predicted to aid confinement more than the small number of tolerable collisions will hurt confinement.
Scientists from Princeton Satellite Systems are working on a new concept calledDirect Fusion Drive (DFD) that is based on the PFRC but has one open end through which exhaust flows to generate thrust.[7] It would produce electric power and propulsion from a single compact fusion reactor. The first concept study and modeling (Phase I NASA NIAC) was published in 2017,[12] and was proposed to power the propulsion system of aPluto orbiter and lander.[12][13] Adding propellant to the cool plasma flow results in a variable thrust when channeled through a magnetic nozzle. Modeling suggests that the DFD might produce 5Newtons of thrust per eachmegawatt of generated fusion power.[14] About 35% of the fusion power goes to thrust, 30% to electric power, 25% lost to heat, and 10% is recirculated for theradio frequency (RF) heating.[12] The concept was awarded a Phase II to further advance the design and shielding.[15]