Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Prince Álmos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Duke of Hungary, Croatia and Nyitra (c.1070–1127)
Álmos
Duke of Hungary,Croatia andNyitra
Reconciliation of Kálmán and Álmos (Illuminated Chronicle).
Bornc. 1070
Kingdom of Hungary
Died1 September 1127 (aged 56–57)
Constantinople,Byzantine Empire
SpousePredslava of Kiev
IssueAdelaide, Duchess of Bohemia
Béla II, King of Hungary
Hedwig, Margravine of Austria
HouseHouse of Árpád
FatherGéza I of Hungary
MotherSophia

Álmos (also "Almus",Slovak,Croatian:Almoš;c. 1070  or 1075[1] – 1 September 1127[2]) was aHungarian prince, the son of KingGéza I of Hungary and brother of KingColoman. He held several governmental posts in theKingdom of Hungary.

Life

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Álmos was the younger of the two sons surviving infancy of the future KingGéza I.[3][4] His mother seems to have been his father's first wife,Sophia, because Géza'sByzantine second wife—whose baptismal name is unknown—returned to her homeland after her husband's death.[3] Both Álmos and his older brother,Coloman, were born around 1070, according to the historians Gyula Kristó and Márta Font.[3][5]

Géza I who ascended the throne in 1074 died on 25 April 1077.[6] He was succeeded by his brother,Ladislaus I, because Coloman and Álmos were stillminors.[7] The new king decided that Coloman should be prepared for a career in the Church.[5] The king's decision was unusual, as Coloman was older than Álmos.[5]

Between 1084 and 1091 Álmos was the duke ofSlavonia; between 1091 and 1095 he was named duke ofCroatia.[8] According to theIlluminated Chronicle both Coloman and Álmos accompanied their uncle on a military campaign againstBohemia in the spring of 1095.[9][10] Before reaching the border of his kingdom, Ladislaus I "was overcome by a grave infirmity"[11] and decided to appoint Álmos as his heir.[10][12] However, Coloman did not agree with his uncle's decision, deciding to flee toPoland.[13][14]

Conflicts with Coloman

[edit]

Coloman returned after King Ladislaus had died to claim his rights.[14] According to theIlluminated Chronicle, it was his uncle who had invited him back from Poland.[15] The same source adds that Álmos "in the true simplicity of his heart honoured his brother, Coloman, and yielded to him the crown of the kingdom",[11] which suggests that Coloman ascended the throne without bloodshed.[13] On the other hand, he was only crowned king in early 1096, implying that the two brothers had been fighting for the crown before they reached an agreement.[14][16] Coloman was crowned inSzékesfehérvár by Archbishop Seraphin of Esztergom.[13] According to theIlluminated Chronicle, at the same time he "granted the dukedom with full rights"[17] to Álmos.[18] This report shows that Álmos only acknowledged his brother's rule in exchange for receiving the one-timeducatus or duchy of their father andgrandfather, which encompassed one-third of the kingdom.[18][19]

After Coloman's victories over the marauding crusaders in 1096,Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor, whom Ladislaus I had supported againstPope Urban II in his last years, wrote a letter to Duke Álmos.[20] He stated that Coloman had "neglected" his "interests because of his own necessities"[21] and asked Álmos to intervene on his behalf at Coloman.[20] However, the king—a former bishop—did not continue his predecessor's foreign policy and joined the pope's camp.[22][23] Historian Gyula Kristó writes that the fact that his brother, Álmos had for years had a close relationship with Emperor Henry may also have influenced Coloman's decision.[23]

Coloman invadedCroatia and participated himself in the campaign in 1097.[16] Taking advantage of Coloman's absence, Álmos began to conspire against the king and mustered his armies.[24] Coloman returned from Croatia and marched towards his brother's duchy with his troops in 1098.[24] The two armies encountered atTiszavárkony, only the riverTisza separated them.[25] However, the commanders of the two troops started negotiations and decided not to fight against each other, compelling Coloman and Álmos to make a peace.[25][26]

[Coloman]and his army marched to [Tiszavárkony]against [Álmos], and [Álmos]drew near to [Tiszavárkony]from the opposite direction, and between them was the river [Tisza]. But loyal Hungarians sought to bring about a truce, in order that they could talk with each other, and they said: "Why do we fight? If they defeat us in battle, we shall die; and if they escape, they will flee: in times pastour fathers fought against each other and brothers against brothers, and they died. Nor do we see any ground for fighting. Let those two fight if fighting pleases them; and whichever of them shall win, let us take as lord." Having taken this decision, the chief men dispersed. When Grak told [Coloman]of their decision and Ilia informed [Álmos], they kept the peace, though it was not by their own will.

— The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle[27]

Final confrontation

[edit]
Álmos and Béla are blinded
Álmos and his son,Béla are blinded on Coloman's order (from theIlluminated Chronicle)

The conflict was renewed a few years later between the two brothers, when Coloman had his four-year-old son,Stephen, crowned in 1105, which resulted in the open rebellion of Álmos.[28][29] The duke left Hungary and sought the assistance of Emperor Henry IV against the king.[30] However, he realized that the emperor, who was facing arebellion of his own son, could not help him.[30] Álmos returned to Hungary in 1106, but soon fled to his brother-in-law,Boleslaw III of Poland.[28][25] With Polish assistance, he took the fortress ofAbaújvár in Hungary.[31] As a result, Coloman had a meeting with Boleslaw III and the two monarchs "vowed perpetual friendship and brotherhood".[31][32][33] Without the Polish monarch's support Álmos was forced to yield to Coloman.[31]

Coloman had Álmos seized
Coloman had the blind Álmos imprisoned before his death (from theIlluminated Chronicle)

King Coloman decided to take advantage of the absence of Álmos—who had made a pilgrimage to theHoly Land—and seized his duchy in 1107 or 1108.[31] Although Álmos was allowed to keep his own private property, the annexation of his duchy ensured the integrity of Coloman's kingdom.[32] Having returned from the Holy Land, Álmos decided to set up a monastery atDömös.[32] On the occasion of its consecration, where Coloman was also present, Álmos was—falsely, according to theIlluminated Chronicle—accused of an assassination attempt on the monarch.[32] Coloman decided to have his brother arrested, but "the most reverend bishops and other well-disposed dignitaries" intervened on Álmos's behalf and "thus reconciliation was solemnly sworn"[34] between the king and his brother.[32]

Álmos left forPassau.[31] Upon his request,Henry V of Germany invaded Hungary and laid siege toPressburg (Bratislava,Slovakia) in September 1108.[35][31] At the same time, DukeSvatopluk of Bohemia, who also supported Álmos, made an incursion into the regions north of the Danube.[35] However, Coloman's ally, Boleslaw III invaded Bohemia, forcing the Czech duke to withdraw.[31][36] Although the emperor's attempt to take Pressburg was also a total failure, he could persuade Coloman to forgive his rebellious brother, who thus return to Hungary.[37]

Coloman discovered that Álmos was again conspiring to seize the throne.[38][39] Having lost his patience, Coloman had Álmos and Álmos's young son,Béla, blinded in order to secure a peaceful succession for his own son.[38] On the same occasion, many of his brother's partisans were likewise mutilated.[40] After this Álmos went on to live in seclusion at the monastery of Dömös. Coloman died in 1116. His son, Stephen was crowned king inSzékesfehérvár in the month of his father's death.[41] His peaceful succession proves that the safety measures Coloman had implemented to prevent Álmos from aspiring the throne were effective.[42][43]

Exile

[edit]

According to theIlluminated Chronicle, the blind Álmos, "fearing death at the hands of King Stephen",[44] fled to theByzantine Empire.[45][46] Many of his partisans followed him and EmperorJohn II Komnenos settled them in a town inMacedonia.[47] There, Álmos received a new name from the Emperor,Constantine.[48] The ByzantineJohn Kinnamos confirms that the emperor "regarded" Álmos "favorably and received him with kindness".[49] He adds that king Stephen II "sent his envoys to the emperor and demanded that" Álmos "be expelled from"[50] the Byzantine Empire, but his request was rejected.[47][51] The sources do not specify the date of Álmos's flee, but it seems to have occurred in about 1125.[47] Historian Ferenc Makk writes that Álmos was forced to flee from Hungary, because he had taken advantage of Stephen's failures in Volhynia and Dalmatia and conspired against Stephen. His departure resulteda war between the two realms, lasting from 1127 to 1129.[46] Álmos died in exile on 1 September 1127.[52]

His son Béla the Blind would succeed as king of Hungary in 1131. The duke's remains were returned to Hungary in 1137.

Family

[edit]
Ancestors of Prince Álmos[53][54]
16.Michael
8.Vazul
4.Béla I of Hungary
9.A lady of the Tátony clan
2.Géza I of Hungary
20.Boleslav I of Poland
10.Mieszko II Lambert of Poland
21.Emnilda
5.Richeza or Adelaide of Poland
22.Ezzo of Lotharingia
11.Richeza of Lotharingia
23.Matilda of Germany
1.Prince Álmos
3. Sophia

On August 21, 1104, Álmos marriedPredslava of Kiev,[55] and had the following children:

References

[edit]
  1. ^Margaret Odrowaz-Sypniewska,The Courtly Lives of Polish Kings, Nobles, Saints, Knights and Their Genealogy
  2. ^Detlev Schwennicke,Europäische Stammtafeln (Marburg, 1980-1991), ST Volume 2, Chart 154
  3. ^abcKristó & Makk 1996, p. 125.
  4. ^Font 2001, p. 12.
  5. ^abcFont 2001, p. 13.
  6. ^Bartl 2002, p. 27.
  7. ^Kontler 1999, p. 61.
  8. ^István Kapitánffy (2003).Hungarobyzantina: Bizánc és a görögség középkori magyarországi forrásokban. Typotex Kft. pp. 161–.ISBN 978-963-9326-67-5.
  9. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 129.
  10. ^abFont 2001, p. 15.
  11. ^abThe Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 140.101), p. 130.
  12. ^Engel 2001, p. 34.
  13. ^abcFont 2001, p. 16.
  14. ^abcMakk 1989, p. 11.
  15. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 131.
  16. ^abStephenson 2000, p. 197.
  17. ^The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 142.102), p. 131.
  18. ^abKristó & Makk 1996, p. 133.
  19. ^Font 2001, p. 20.
  20. ^abFont 2001, p. 21.
  21. ^The letters of Henry IV: Henry thanks Duke Almus for his support and promises him a reward, p. 171.
  22. ^Font 2001, pp. 21–22.
  23. ^abKristó & Makk 1996, p. 136.
  24. ^abKristó & Makk 1996, p. 137.
  25. ^abcFont 2001, p. 22.
  26. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 138.
  27. ^The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 144.102-103), p. 131.
  28. ^abKristó & Makk 1996, p. 143.
  29. ^Font 2001, p. 79.
  30. ^abMakk 1989, p. 14.
  31. ^abcdefgMakk 1989, p. 15.
  32. ^abcdeFont 2001, p. 23.
  33. ^The Deeds of the Princes of the Poles (ch. 2.29.), p. 173.
  34. ^The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 148.105), p. 132.
  35. ^abBartl 2002, p. 28.
  36. ^Manteuffel 1982, p. 108.
  37. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 146.
  38. ^abEngel 2001, p. 35.
  39. ^Font 2001, p. 82.
  40. ^Makk 1989, pp. 16–17.
  41. ^Makk 1989, p. 18.
  42. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, p. 151.
  43. ^Font 2001, p. 83.
  44. ^The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 157.112), p. 135.
  45. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. 156–157.
  46. ^abMakk 1989, p. 23.
  47. ^abcMakk 1989, p. 22.
  48. ^The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 157.), p. 292.
  49. ^Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus by John Kinnamos (1.4), p. 17.
  50. ^Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus by John Kinnamos (1.4), pp. 17–18.
  51. ^Fine 1991, p. 234.
  52. ^Makk 1989, p. 24.
  53. ^Kristó & Makk 1996, pp. Appendices 1–2.
  54. ^Wiszewski 2010, pp. 29–30, 60, 376.
  55. ^Prinzing, Salamon & Stephenson 2001, p. 162.
  56. ^abcSteinhübel 2021, p. 480.

Sources

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]
  • Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus by John Kinnamos (Translated by Charles M. Brand) (1976). Columbia University Press.ISBN 0-231-04080-6.
  • The Deeds of the Princes of the Poles (Translated and annotated by Paul W. Knoll and Frank Schaer with a preface by Thomas N. Bisson) (2003). CEU Press.ISBN 963-9241-40-7.
  • The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle: Chronica de Gestis Hungarorum (Edited by Dezső Dercsényi) (1970). Corvina, Taplinger Publishing.ISBN 0-8008-4015-1.
  • "The letters of Henry IV: Henry thanks Duke Almus for his support and promises him a reward" (2000). InImperial Lives & Letters of the Eleventh Century (Translated by Theodor E. Mommsen and Karl F. Morrison, with a historical introduction and new suggested readings by Karl F. Morrison, edited by Robert L. Benson). Columbia University Press. pp. 52–100.ISBN 978-0-231-12121-7.

Secondary sources

[edit]
  • Bartl, Július (January 2002).Slovak History: Chronology & Lexicon. Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.ISBN 978-0-86516-444-4.
  • Engel, Pál (2001).The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. I.B. Tauris Publishers.ISBN 1-86064-061-3.
  • Fine, John V. A. Jr. (1991) [1983].The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.ISBN 0-472-08149-7.
  • Font, Márta (2001).Koloman the Learned, King of Hungary (Supervised by Gyula Kristó, Translated by Monika Miklán). Márta Font (supported by the Publication Commission of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Pécs).ISBN 963-482-521-4.
  • Kontler, László (1999).Millennium in Central Europe: A History of Hungary. Atlantisz Publishing House.ISBN 963-9165-37-9.
  • Kristó, Gyula; Makk, Ferenc (1996).Az Árpád-ház uralkodói[=Rulers of the House of Árpád] (in Hungarian). I.P.C. Könyvek.ISBN 963-7930-97-3.
  • Makk, Ferenc (1989).The Árpáds and the Comneni: Political Relations between Hungary and Byzantium in the 12th century (Translated by György Novák). Akadémiai Kiadó.ISBN 963-05-5268-X.
  • Manteuffel, Tadeusz (1982).The Formation of the Polish State: The Period of Ducal Rule, 963–1194(Translated and with an Introduction by Andrew Gorski). Wayne State University Press.ISBN 0-8143-1682-4.
  • Prinzing, Günter; Salamon, Maciej; Stephenson, Paul (2001).Byzantium and East Central Europe. Universitas.
  • Steinhübel, Ján (2021).The Nitrian Principality: The Beginnings of Medieval Slovakia. Brill.ISBN 978-90-04-43863-7.
  • Stephenson, Paul (2000).Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 900–1204. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-02756-4.
  • Wiszewski, Przemysław (2010).Domus Bolezlai: Values and Social Identity in Dynastic Traditions of Medieval Poland (c. 966–1138). Brill.ISBN 978-90-04-18142-7.
Prince Álmos
Born:c. 1070 Died: 1 September 1127
Regnal titles
Preceded byDuke of Croatia
forLadislaus I
1091–1095		Succeeded by
Preceded byDuke of Nyitra
1095–1108		Succeeded by
Last creation
Preceded byDuke of Slavonia
1084–1091		Succeeded by
?
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Prince_Álmos&oldid=1282512594"
Categories:
Hidden categories:
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp