Prehistoric France is the period in the human occupation (including earlyhominins) of the geographical area covered by present-dayFrance which extended throughprehistory and ended in theIron Age with theRoman conquest, when the territory enters the domain of written history.
ThePleistocene is characterized by long glacial periods accompanied by marine regressions, interspersed at more or less regular intervals by milder but shorter interglacial stages. Human populations during this period consisted of nomadic hunter-gatherers. Several human species succeeded each other in the current territory of France until the arrival of modern humans in theUpper Palaeolithic .
The earliest known fossil man isTautavel Man, dating from 570,000 years ago.Neanderthal Man is attested in France from about 335,000 years before present.Homo sapiens, modern humans, are attested since around 54,000 years ago in theMandrin Cave.[1][2]
In theNeolithic, which begins in the south of France in the middle of the 6th millennium BC, the first farmers appeared. The first megaliths were erected in the early 5th millennium BC.
TheLower Paleolithic period began with the first human occupation of the region. Stone tools discovered atLézignan-la-Cèbe indicate that early humans were present in France from least 1.2 million years ago.[3]
5 prehistoric sites in France are dated from between 1 and 1.2 million years ago:[4]
the Bois-de-Riquet, in Lézignan-la-Cèbe, in the Hérault (1.2 Ma), discovered in 2008
the Vallonnet cave, in Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, in the Alpes-Maritimes (1.15 Ma), discovered in 1958
Terre-des-Sablons, in Lunery-Rosières, in Cher (1.15 Ma),
Pont-de-Lavaud, at Éguzon-Chantôme, in Indre (1.05 Ma),
Pont-de-la-Hulauderie, in Saint-Hilaire-la-Gravelle, in Loir-et-Cher (1 My).
None of these sites have thus far revealed any evidence oflithic industry which prevents identification of the human species responsible for them.[4]
France includesOlduwan (Abbevillian) andAcheulean sites from early or non-modern (transitional)Hominini species, most notablyHomo erectus andHomo heidelbergensis. ToothArago 149 - 560,000 years.Tautavel Man (Homo erectus tautavelensis), is a proposed subspecies of the hominidHomo erectus, the 450,000-year-old fossil remains of whom were discovered in theArago cave in Tautavel.
TheGrotte du Vallonnet nearMenton contained simple stone tools dating to 1 million to 1.05 million years BC.[5] Cave sites were exploited for habitation, but thehunter-gatherers of thePalaeolithic era also possibly built shelters such as those identified in connection with Acheulean tools atGrotte du Lazaret andTerra Amata nearNice in France. Excavations at Terra Amata found traces of the earliest known domestication of fire inEurope, from 400,000 BC.[5]
TheNeanderthals are thought to have arrived earlier than 300,000 BC,[a] but seem to have died out by about by 30,000 BC, presumably unable to compete with modern humans during a period of cold weather. Numerous Neanderthal, or "Mousterian", artifacts (named after thetype site ofLe Moustier, a rock shelter in theDordogne region of France) have been found from this period, some using the "Levallois technique", a distinctive type offlint knapping developed by hominids during theLower Palaeolithic but most commonly associated with the Neanderthal industries of the Middle Palaeolithic. Importantly, recent findings suggest that Neanderthals and modern humans may have interbred.[7]
The first identified Neanderthal burials were discovered at La Chapelle-aux-Saints in 1908 (dating from 70 ka) then at La Ferrassie in 1909.[10] The identification of burial practices in Neanderthals at these sites led to new insights concerning the capacity of Neanderthals to develop spiritual or metaphysical beliefs,[11] extending understanding of the human species beyond what had been hitherto assumed.[12]
The earliest indication ofUpper Palaeolithicearly modern human (formerly referred to as Cro-Magnon) migration into France, and indeed in the whole of Europe, is a series of modern human teeth with Neronian industry stone tools found at Grotte Mandrin Cave,Malataverne in France, dated in 2022 to between 56,800 and 51,700 years ago. The Neronian is one of the many industries associated with modern humans classed as transitional between the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic.[13] When they arrived in Europe, they brought with them sculpture, engraving, painting, body ornamentation, music and the painstaking decoration of utilitarian objects. Some of the oldestworks of art in the world, such as thecave paintings atLascaux in southern France, are datable to shortly after this migration.[14]
European Palaeolithic cultures are divided into several chronological subgroups (the names are all based on Frenchtype sites, principally in theDordogne region):[15]
Périgordian (c. 35,000 - 20,000 BP) – use of this term is being debated (the term implies that the following subperiods represent a continuous tradition).
Châtelperronian (c. 39,000 - 29,000BP) – culture derived from the earlier, Neanderthal, Mousterian industry as it made use of Levallois cores and represents the period when Neanderthals and modern humans occupied Europe together.
Magdalenian (c. 17,000 - 10,000 BP) – thought to be responsible for the cave paintings atPech Merle (in theLot inLanguedoc, dating back to 16,000 BC),Lascaux (located near the village ofMontignac, in theDordogne, dating back to somewhere between 13,000 and 15,000 BC, and perhaps as far back as 25,000 BC), theTrois-Frères cave and theRouffignac Cave also known as The Cave of the hundred mammoths. It possesses the most extensive cave system of thePérigord in France with more than 8 kilometers of underground passageways.
Thaïs bone,Azilian culture, c. 10,000 BC.[b]Painted pebbles,Azilian culture
From the Paleolithic to theMesolithic, the Magdalenian culture evolved. The Early Mesolithic, orAzilian, began about 14,000 years ago, in theFranco-Cantabrian region of northernSpain andSouthern France. This was ahead of other parts of Western Europe, where the Mesolithic began by 11,500 years ago at the beginning of theHolocene. It ended with theintroduction of farming.[17]
The Azilian culture of theLate Glacial Maximum co-existed with similar early Mesolithic European cultures such as theTjongerian of North-Western Europe, theAhrensburgian of Northern Europe and theSwiderian of North-Eastern Europe, all succeeding theFedermesser complex. The Azilian culture was followed by theSauveterrian in Southern France and Switzerland, theTardenoisian in Northern France, theMaglemosian in Northern Europe.[18]
Archeologists are unsure whether Western Europe saw a Mesolithic immigration. Populations speaking non-Indo-European languages are obvious candidates for Mesolithic remnants. TheVascons (Basques) of thePyrenees present the strongest case, since their language is related to none other in the world, and the Basque population has a distinct genetic profile.[19] The disappearance ofDoggerland affected the surrounding territories and the hunter gatherers living there are believed to have migrated to northern France and as far as eastern Ireland to escape from the floods.[20]
TheNeolithic period lasted in northern Europe for approximately 3,000 years (c. 5000 BC–2000 BC). It is characterised by the so-calledNeolithic Revolution, a transitional period that included the adoption ofagriculture, the development oftools andpottery (Cardium pottery,LBK), and the growth of larger, more complex settlements. There was an expansion of peoples from southwest Asia into Europe; this diffusion across Europe, from the Aegean to Britain, took about 2,500 years (6500 BC–4000 BC).[21] According to the leadingKurgan hypothesis, Indo-European languages were introduced to Europe later, during the succeedingBronze Age, and Neolithic peoples in Europe are called "Pre-Indo-Europeans" or "Old Europe". Nevertheless, some archaeologists believe that the Neolithic expansion, and the eclipse of Mesolithic culture, coincided with the introduction ofIndo-European speakers.[22] In what is known as theAnatolian hypothesis, it is postulated that Indo-European languages arrived in the early Neolithic.Old European hydronymy is taken byHans Krahe to be the oldest reflection of the early presence of Indo-European languages in Europe.
During theChalcolithic or Copper Age, a transitional age from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age, France shows evidence of the Seine-Oise-Marne culture and the Beaker culture.
Beginning about 2600 BC, theArtenacian culture, a part of the largerEuropean Megalithic Culture, developed in Dordogne, possibly as a reaction to the advance ofDanubian peoples (such as SOM) over Western France. Armed with typical arrows, they took over all Atlantic France and Belgium by 2400 BC, establishing a stable border with theIndo-Europeans (Corded Ware) near theRhine that would remain stable for more than a millennium.[citation needed]
In theKurgan Hypothesis, Indo-European languages spread to Europe in the Bronze Age. The culture of the Kurgans is also known asYamnaya Culture and recent results from acheaogenetics have linked this culture with genetic ancestry components of theWestern Steppe Herders, and it has been possible to reconstruct migrations of these people across Europe co-extensive with the arrival of the Yamnaya andCorded Ware cultures.[citation needed]
In France, the first studies on the Bronze Age date from the 19th century. The"Manuel d'archéologie préhistorique, celtique et gallo-romaine," (Manual of Prehistoric, Celtic and Gallo-Roman Archaeology), by Joseph Déchelette, published in 1910, was for a long time the reference for the study of this period.[30] In the 1950s, Jean-Jacques Hatt proposed a subdivision of the French Bronze Age, and in 1958 he published a tripartate division.[31] This model divided the Bronze Age into three parts, Early Bronze, Middle Bronze and Late Bronze Age and serves as a reference for the majority of subsequent studies on the Bronze Age in France.[32]
Some archeologists date the arrival of several non-Indo-European peoples to this period, including theIberians in southern France andSpain, theLigures on theMediterranean coast, and theVascons (Basques) in southwest France and Spain.[citation needed]
The Hallstatt culture was succeeded by theLa Tène culture, which developed out of the Hallstatt culture without any definite cultural break, under the impetus of considerable Mediterranean influence fromGreek, and laterEtruscan civilizations. The La Tène culture developed and flourished during the late Iron Age (from 450 BC to the Roman conquest in the 1st century BC) in eastern France, Switzerland, Austria, southwest Germany, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Farther to the north extended the contemporaryPre-Roman Iron Age culture of Northern Germany and Scandinavia.[36][37]
By the 2nd century BC, Celtic France was calledGaul by the Romans, and its people were calledGauls. The people to the north (in what is present-day Belgium) were calledBelgae (scholars believe this may represent a mixture of Celtic and Germanic elements) and the peoples of the south-west of France were called theAquitani by the Romans, and may have beenCeltiberians orVascons.[citation needed]
^The oldest known Neanderthal fossil in France was found in 1998 in the cave of Pradayrol, in Caniac-du-Causse, in Lot-et-Garonne. A Neanderthal incisor has been dated there to 335,000 years.[6]
^The engraving on the Thaïs bone is a non-decorative notational system of considerable complexity. The cumulative nature of the markings together with their numerical arrangement and various other characteristics strongly suggest that the notational sequence on the main face represents a non-arithmetical record of day-by-day lunar and solar observations undertaken over a time period of as much as 3½ years. The markings appear to record the changing appearance of the moon, and in particular its crescent phases and times of invisibility, and the shape of the overall pattern suggests that the sequence was kept in step with the seasons by observations of the solstices. The latter implies that people in the Azilian period were not only aware of the changing appearance of the moon but also of the changing position of the sun, and capable of synchronizing the two. The markings on the Thaïs bone represent the most complex and elaborate time-factored sequence currently known within the corpus of Palaeolithic mobile art. The artefact demonstrates the existence, within Upper Palaeolithic (Azilian) cultures c. 12,000 years ago, of a system of time reckoning based upon observations of the phase cycle of the moon, with the inclusion of a seasonal time factor provided by observations of the solar solstices.[16]
^Provence stelae with chevron ornamentation are relatively well dated. They have always been dated to the Middle Neolithic, and more exactly to the Late Chasséen.[26]
^The technostylistic origin of the swords of Tréboul and Le Cheylounet types has been widely debated elsewhere. For the former, J. Briard (1965) favoured an evolution from theArmorican Tumulus daggers; for the latter, J.P. Daugas and D. Vuaillat (2009) highlight aUnétician tradition, but the strong technostylistic kinship between the two sword types suggests a complex interplay of influences. Their chronological position is clearly established: Middle Bronze Age 1, from about 1550 to 1450 BC according to the latest available chronological details. (Translated from French).[33]
Champagne, Fernand; Champagne, Christian; Jauzon, Pierre; et al. (1990). "Le site préhistorique des Fieux à Miers (Lot) [Etat actuel de la recherche]: Etat actuel de la recherche".Gallia préhistoire.32 (1):1–28.doi:10.3406/galip.1990.2275.
Dufau, Jean; Favarel, Jacques; Séronie-Vivien, M. (2004). "Un site pléistocène moyen à hominidé en Quercy: La grotte de Pradayrol à Caniac-du-Causse (Lot)" (in French).S2CID190002964.{{cite web}}:Missing or empty|url= (help)
Ebel, Charles (1976). "Chapter 2, Massilia and Rome before 390 B.C.".Transalpine Gaul: the emergence of a Roman province. Brill Archive. pp. 5–16.ISBN90-04-04384-5.,
Lumley, Henry de,. (2009).La grande histoire des premiers hommes européens. Paris: O. Jacob.ISBN978-2-7381-2386-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Sankararaman, Sriram; Patterson, Nick; Li, Heng; Pääbo, Svante; Reich, David (2012). "The date of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans".arXiv:1208.2238 [q-bio.PE].
Hatt, Jean-Jacques (1954). "Pour une nouvelle chronologie de la Protohistoire française".Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France.51 (7):379–384.doi:10.3406/bspf.1954.3113.