The "Powell Doctrine" is a term named after GeneralColin Powell, for a military doctrine that Powell created in the run-up to the 1990–1991Gulf War. The doctrine poses questions emphasizing national security interests, overwhelming strike capabilities with an emphasis on ground forces, and widespread public support,[1] all of which have to be answered affirmatively before military action is taken. Powell's doctrine is based in large part on theWeinberger Doctrine, devised byCaspar Weinberger during his tenure asSecretary of Defense (at which time Powell was Weinberger's senior military assistant).
Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
Is there a plausibleexit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
Is the action supported by the American people?
Do we have genuine broad international support?
As Powell said in an April 1, 2009, interview onThe Rachel Maddow Show, it denotes a nation's exhausting of all "political, economic, and diplomatic means", which, only if all were futile, would result in the condition that the nation should resort to military force. Powell has also asserted that when a nation is engaging in war, every resource and tool should be used to achieve decisive force against the enemy, minimizing casualties, and ending the conflict quickly by forcing the weaker force to capitulate.[4]
The Powell Doctrine has been reported as an emerging legacy from the wars inKorea andVietnam and the "Never Again vs. Limited War" policy debates (either win or don't start versus value of limited war)[5] and Caspar Weinberger's Six Tests described in his 1984 speech "The Uses of Military Power".[6] It has been used to compare the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, and theIraq War.[7]
Campbell, Kenneth J. "Once Burned, Twice Cautious: Explaining the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine."Armed Forces & Society 24#3 (1998): 357–74.
LaFeber, Walter. "The rise and fall of Colin Powell and the Powell Doctrine."Political Science Quarterly 124.1 (2009): 71–93.online
MacMillan, John. "After Interventionism: A Typology of United States Strategies."Diplomacy & Statecraft 30.3 (2019): 576–601.online
Meiertöns, Heiko.The Doctrines of US Security Policy: An Evaluation under International Law, Cambridge University Press (2010),ISBN978-0-521-76648-7.
Middup, Luke.The Powell Doctrine and US Foreign Policy (Ashgate, 2015)online.
O'Sullivan, Christopher D.Colin Powell: American Power and Intervention From Vietnam to Iraq, New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, (2009)
Record, Jeffrey. "Back to the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine?"Strategic Studies Quarterly, no. Fall (2007): 79–95.
Walt, Stephen. "Applying the 8 Questions of the Powell Doctrine to Syria."Foreign Policy (September 13, 2013).online
Yeatman, Scott T. "Modifying the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine for the Modern Geo-Strategic Environment." (NDU/JFSC Joint Advanced Warfighting School, 2017)online.
