Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Positronium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bound state of an electron and positron
Not to be confused withProtonium.
This article is about the exotic atom. For the hydrogen isotope, seeIsotopes of hydrogen § Hydrogen-1 (protium).
Anelectron andpositron orbiting around their commoncentre of mass. An s state has zero angular momentum, so orbiting around each other would mean going straight at each other until the pair of particles is either scattered or annihilated, whichever occurs first. This is abound quantum state known aspositronium.
Antimatter
A Feynman diagram showing the annihilation of an electron and a positron (antielectron), creating a photon that later decays into an new electron–positron pair.

Positronium (Ps) is a system consisting of anelectron and itsanti-particle, apositron, bound together into anexotic atom, specifically anonium. Unlike hydrogen, the system has noprotons. The system is unstable: the two particles annihilate each other to predominantly produce two or threegamma-rays, depending on the relative spin states. Theenergy levels of the two particles are similar to that of thehydrogen atom (which is a bound state of aproton and an electron). However, because of the reduced mass, thefrequencies of thespectral lines are less than half of those for the corresponding hydrogen lines.

States

[edit]

The mass of positronium is 1.022 MeV, which is twice the electron mass minus the binding energy of a few eV. The lowest energy orbital state of positronium is 1S, and like with hydrogen, it has ahyperfine structure arising from the relative orientations of the spins of the electron and the positron.

Thesinglet state,1
S
0
, withantiparallelspins (S = 0,Ms = 0) is known aspara-positronium (p-Ps). It has a mean lifetime of0.12 ns and decays preferentially into two gamma rays with energy of511 keV each (in thecenter-of-mass frame).Para-positronium can decay into any even number of photons (2, 4, 6, ...), but the probability quickly decreases with the number: thebranching ratio for decay into 4 photons is1.439(2)×10−6.[1]

Para-positronium lifetime in vacuum is approximately[1]t0=2mec2α5=0.1244 ns.{\displaystyle t_{0}={\frac {2\hbar }{m_{\mathrm {e} }c^{2}\alpha ^{5}}}=0.1244~\mathrm {ns} .}

Thetriplet states,3S1, withparallel spins (S = 1,Ms = −1, 0, 1) are known asortho-positronium (o-Ps), and have an energy that is approximately 0.001 eV higher than the singlet.[1] These states have a mean lifetime of142.05±0.02 ns,[2] and the leading decay is three gammas. Other modes of decay are negligible; for instance, the five-photons mode has branching ratio of ≈10−6.[3]

Ortho-positronium lifetime in vacuum can be calculated approximately as:[1]t1=129h2mec2α6(π29)=138.6 ns.{\displaystyle t_{1}={\frac {{\frac {1}{2}}9h}{2m_{\mathrm {e} }c^{2}\alpha ^{6}(\pi ^{2}-9)}}=138.6~\mathrm {ns} .}

However, more accurate calculations with corrections toO2) yield a value of7.040 μs−1 for the decay rate, corresponding to a lifetime of142 ns.[4][5]

Positronium in the 2S state ismetastable having a lifetime of1100 ns againstannihilation.[6] The positronium created in such an excited state will quickly cascade down to the ground state, where annihilation will occur more quickly.

Measurements

[edit]

Measurements of these lifetimes and energy levels have been used inprecision tests of quantum electrodynamics, confirmingquantum electrodynamics (QED) predictions to high precision.[1][7][8]

Annihilation can proceed via a number of channels, each producinggamma rays with total energy of1022 keV (sum of the electron and positron mass-energy), usually 2 or 3, with up to 5 gamma ray photons recorded from a single annihilation.

The annihilation into aneutrino–antineutrino pair is also possible, but the probability is predicted to be negligible. The branching ratio foro-Ps decay for this channel is6.2×10−18 (electron neutrino–antineutrino pair) and9.5×10−21 (for other flavour)[3] in predictions based on the Standard Model, but it can be increased by non-standard neutrino properties, like relatively highmagnetic moment. The experimental upper limits on branching ratio for this decay (as well as for a decay into any "invisible" particles) are <4.3×10−7 forp-Ps and <4.2×10−7 foro-Ps.[2]

Energy levels

[edit]
Main article:Bohr model § Electron energy levels

While precise calculation of positronium energy levels uses theBethe–Salpeter equation or theBreit equation, the similarity between positronium and hydrogen allows a rough estimate. In this approximation, the energy levels are different because of a different effective mass,μ, in the energy equation (seeelectron energy levels for a derivation):En=μqe48h2ε021n2,{\displaystyle E_{n}=-{\frac {\mu q_{\mathrm {e} }^{4}}{8h^{2}\varepsilon _{0}^{2}}}{\frac {1}{n^{2}}},}where:

Thus, for positronium, its reduced mass only differs from the electron by a factor of 2. This causes the energy levels to also roughly be half of what they are for the hydrogen atom.

So finally, the energy levels of positronium are given byEn=12meqe48h2ε021n2=6.8 eVn2.{\displaystyle E_{n}=-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {m_{\mathrm {e} }q_{\mathrm {e} }^{4}}{8h^{2}\varepsilon _{0}^{2}}}{\frac {1}{n^{2}}}={\frac {-6.8~\mathrm {eV} }{n^{2}}}.}

The lowest energy level of positronium (n = 1) is−6.8 eV. The next level is−1.7 eV. The negative sign is a convention that implies abound state. Positronium can also be considered by a particular form of thetwo-body Dirac equation; two particles with aCoulomb interaction can be exactly separated in the (relativistic)center-of-momentum frame and the resulting ground-state energy has been obtained very accurately usingfinite element methods ofJanine Shertzer.[9] Their results lead to the discovery of anomalous states.[10][11]The Dirac equation whose Hamiltonian comprises two Dirac particles and a static Coulomb potential is not relativistically invariant. But if one adds the1/c2n (orα2n, whereα is thefine-structure constant) terms, wheren = 1,2..., then the result is relativistically invariant. Only the leading term is included. Theα2 contribution is the Breit term; workers rarely go toα4 because atα3 one has the Lamb shift, which requires quantum electrodynamics.[9]

Formation and decay in materials

[edit]

After a radioactive atom in a material undergoes aβ+ decay (positron emission), the resulting high-energy positron slows down by colliding with atoms, and eventually annihilates with one of the many electrons in the material. It may however first form positronium before the annihilation event. The understanding of this process is of some importance inpositron emission tomography. Approximately:[12][13]

  • ~60% of positrons will directly annihilate with an electron without forming positronium. The annihilation usually results in two gamma rays. In most cases this direct annihilation occurs only after the positron has lost its excess kinetic energy and has thermalized with the material.
  • ~10% of positrons formpara-positronium, which then promptly (in ~0.12 ns) decays, usually into two gamma rays.
  • ~30% of positrons formortho-positronium but then annihilate within a few nanoseconds by 'picking off' another nearby electron with opposing spin. This usually produces two gamma rays. During this time, the very lightweight positronium atom exhibits a strong zero-point motion, that exerts a pressure and is able to push out a tiny nanometer-sized bubble in the medium.
  • Only ~0.5% of positrons formortho-positronium that self-decays (usually intothree gamma rays). This natural decay rate ofortho-positronium is relatively slow (~140 ns decay lifetime), compared to the aforementioned pick-off process, which is why the three-gamma decay rarely occurs.

History

[edit]
The Positronium Beam atUniversity College London, a lab used to study the properties of positronium.[14]

The Croatian physicistStjepan Mohorovičić predicted the existence of positronium in a 1934 article published inAstronomische Nachrichten, in which he called it the "electrum".[15] Other sources incorrectly creditCarl Anderson as having predicted its existence in 1932 while atCaltech.[16] It was experimentally discovered byMartin Deutsch atMIT in 1951 and became known as positronium.[16] Many subsequent experiments have precisely measured its properties and verified predictions of quantum electrodynamics.

A discrepancy known as the ortho-positronium lifetime puzzle persisted for some time, but was resolved with further calculations and measurements.[17] Measurements were in error because of the lifetime measurement of unthermalised positronium, which was produced at only a small rate. This had yielded lifetimes that were too long. Also calculations using relativistic quantum electrodynamics are difficult, so they had been done to only the first order. Corrections that involved higher orders were then calculated in a non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics.[4]

In 2024, theAEgIS collaboration atCERN was the first to cool positronium by laser light, leaving it available for experimental use. The substance was brought to −100 °C (−148 °F) usinglaser cooling.[18][19]

Exotic compounds

[edit]

Molecular bonding was predicted for positronium.[20] Molecules ofpositronium hydride (PsH) can be made.[21] Positronium can also form a cyanide and can form bonds with halogens or lithium.[22]

The first observation ofdi-positronium (Ps2)molecules—molecules consisting of two positronium atoms—was reported on 12 September 2007 by David Cassidy and Allen Mills fromUniversity of California, Riverside.[23][24][25]

Unlikemuonium, positronium does not have a nucleus analogue, because the electron and the positron have equal masses.[26] Consequently, while muonium tends to behave like a light isotope of hydrogen,[27] positronium shows large differences in size, polarisability, and binding energy from hydrogen.[26]

Natural occurrence

[edit]

Theevents in the early universe leading tobaryon asymmetry predatethe formation of atoms (including exotic varieties such as positronium) by around a third of a million years, so no positronium atoms occurred then.

Likewise, the naturally occurring positrons in the present day result from high-energy interactions such as incosmic ray–atmosphere interactions, and so are too hot (thermally energetic) to form electrical bonds beforeannihilation.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeKarshenboim, Savely G. (2003). "Precision Study of Positronium: Testing Bound State QED Theory".International Journal of Modern Physics A.19 (23):3879–3896.arXiv:hep-ph/0310099.Bibcode:2004IJMPA..19.3879K.doi:10.1142/S0217751X04020142.S2CID 14848837.
  2. ^abBadertscher, A.; Crivelli, P.; Fetscher, W.; Gendotti, U.; Gninenko, S. N.; Postoev, V.; Rubbia, A.; Samoylenko, V.; Sillou, D. (2007). "An Improved Limit on Invisible Decays of Positronium".Physical Review D.75 (3) 032004.arXiv:hep-ex/0609059.Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75c2004B.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.032004.S2CID 9001914.
  3. ^abCzarnecki, Andrzej; Karshenboim, Savely G. (2000). "Decays of Positronium". In Levchenko, B. B.; Savrin, V. I. (eds.).Proceedings of the International Workshop on High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory (QFTHEP). Vol. 14. pp. 538–544.arXiv:hep-ph/9911410.Bibcode:1999hep.ph...11410C.
  4. ^abKataoka, Y.; Asai, S.; Kobayashi, t. (2009)."First Test of O(α2) Correction of the Orthopositronium Decay Rate"(PDF).Physics Letters B.671 (2):219–223.arXiv:0809.1594.Bibcode:2009PhLB..671..219K.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.12.008.
  5. ^Adkins, G. S.; Fell, R. N.; Sapirstein, J. (29 May 2000). "Order α2 Corrections to the Decay Rate of Orthopositronium".Physical Review Letters.84 (22):5086–5089.arXiv:hep-ph/0003028.Bibcode:2000PhRvL..84.5086A.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5086.PMID 10990873.S2CID 1165868.
  6. ^Cooke, D. A.; Crivelli, P.; Alnis, J.; Antognini, A.; Brown, B.; Friedreich, S.; Gabard, A.; Haensch, T. W.; Kirch, K.; Rubbia, A.; Vrankovic, V. (2015). "Observation of positronium annihilation in the 2S state: towards a new measurement of the 1S-2S transition frequency".Hyperfine Interact.233 (1–3):67–73.arXiv:1503.05755.Bibcode:2015HyInt.233...67C.doi:10.1007/s10751-015-1158-4.S2CID 89605682.
  7. ^Rubbia, A. (2004). "Positronium as a probe for new physics beyond the standard model".International Journal of Modern Physics A.19 (23):3961–3985.arXiv:hep-ph/0402151.Bibcode:2004IJMPA..19.3961R.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.346.5173.doi:10.1142/S0217751X0402021X.S2CID 119442567.
  8. ^Vetter, P.A.; Freedman, S.J. (2002)."Branching-ratio measurements of multiphoton decays of positronium".Physical Review A.66 (5) 052505.Bibcode:2002PhRvA..66e2505V.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052505.OSTI 821022.
  9. ^abScott, T.C.;Shertzer, J.; Moore, R.A. (1992). "Accurate finite element solutions of the two-body Dirac equation".Physical Review A.45 (7):4393–4398.Bibcode:1992PhRvA..45.4393S.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.45.4393.PMID 9907514.
  10. ^Patterson, Chris W. (2019). "Anomalous states of Positronium".Physical Review A.100 (6) 062128.arXiv:2004.06108.Bibcode:2019PhRvA.100f2128P.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.062128.S2CID 214017953.
  11. ^Patterson, Chris W. (2023). "Properties of the anomalous states of Positronium".Physical Review A.107 (4) 042816.arXiv:2207.05725.Bibcode:2023PhRvA.107d2816P.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.042816.
  12. ^Harpen, Michael D. (2003). "Positronium: Review of symmetry, conserved quantities and decay for the radiological physicist".Medical Physics.31 (1):57–61.doi:10.1118/1.1630494.ISSN 0094-2405.PMID 14761021.
  13. ^Moskal P, Kisielewska D, Curceanu C, Czerwiński E, Dulski K, Gajos A, et al. (2019)."Feasibility study of the positronium imaging with the J-PET tomograph".Phys Med Biol.64 (5): 055017.arXiv:1805.11696.Bibcode:2019PMB....64e5017M.doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aafe20.PMID 30641509.
  14. ^N., Zafar; G., Laricchia; M., Charlton; T.C., Griffith (1991)."Diagnostics of a positronium beam".Journal of Physics B.24 (21): 4661.Bibcode:1991JPhB...24.4661Z.doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/21/016.ISSN 0953-4075.S2CID 250896764.
  15. ^Mohorovičić, S. (1934). "Möglichkeit neuer Elemente und ihre Bedeutung für die Astrophysik".Astronomische Nachrichten.253 (4):93–108.Bibcode:1934AN....253...93M.doi:10.1002/asna.19342530402.
  16. ^ab"Martin Deutsch, MIT physicist who discovered positronium, dies at 85" (Press release). MIT. 2002.
  17. ^Dumé, Belle (May 23, 2003)."Positronium puzzle is solved".Physics World.
  18. ^Glöggler, L. T. (2024)."Positronium Laser Cooling via the 13S−23P Transition with a Broadband Laser Pulse".Physical Review Letters.132 (8) 083402.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.083402.hdl:11311/1261341.PMID 38457696.
  19. ^Ghosh, Pallab (2024-02-22)."Antimatter: Scientists freeze positronium atoms with lasers".BBC. Retrieved2024-02-23.
  20. ^Usukura, J.; Varga, K.; Suzuki, Y. (1998). "Signature of the existence of the positronium molecule".Physical Review A.58 (3):1918–1931.arXiv:physics/9804023.Bibcode:1998PhRvA..58.1918U.doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.58.1918.S2CID 11941483.
  21. ^""Out of This World" Chemical Compound Observed"(PDF). p. 9. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2009-10-12.
  22. ^Saito, Shiro L. (2000). "Is Positronium Hydride Atom or Molecule?".Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B.171 (1–2):60–66.Bibcode:2000NIMPB.171...60S.doi:10.1016/s0168-583x(00)00005-7.
  23. ^Cassidy, D.B.; Mills, A.P. (Jr.) (2007). "The production of molecular positronium".Nature.449 (7159):195–197.Bibcode:2007Natur.449..195C.doi:10.1038/nature06094.PMID 17851519.S2CID 11269624.
  24. ^Surko, C. (2007)."A whiff of antimatter soup".Nature.449 (7159):153–155.doi:10.1038/449153a.PMID 17851505.S2CID 8153916.
  25. ^"Molecules of positronium observed in the lab for the first time".Physorg.com. Retrieved2007-09-07.
  26. ^abBarnabas, Mary V.; Venkateswaran, Krishnan; Walker, David C. (January 1989)."Comparison of muonium and positronium with hydrogen atoms in their reactions towards solutes containing amide and peptide linkages in water and micelle solutions".Canadian Journal of Chemistry.67 (1):120–126.Bibcode:1989CaJCh..67..120B.doi:10.1139/v89-020.
  27. ^Rhodes, Christopher J. (2012)."Muonium–the second radioisotope of hydrogen: a remarkable and unique radiotracer in the chemical, materials, biological and environmental sciences".Science Progress.95 (2):101–174.doi:10.3184/003685012X13336424471773.PMC 10365539.PMID 22893978.

External links

[edit]
Elementary
Fermions
Quarks
Leptons
Bosons
Gauge
Scalar
Ghost fields
Hypothetical
Superpartners
Gauginos
Others
Others
Composite
Hadrons
Baryons
Mesons
Exotic hadrons
Others
Hypothetical
Baryons
Mesons
Others
Quasiparticles
Lists
Related
Formalism
Particles
Concepts
Processes
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Positronium&oldid=1314978659"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp