Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Portal:Liberalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Portal maintenance status:(June 2018)Pleasetake care when editing, especially if usingautomated editing software. Learn how toupdate the maintenance information here.
Wikipedia portal for content related to Liberalism

The Liberalism portal

Liberalism is apolitical andmoral philosophy based on therights of the individual,liberty,consent of the governed,political equality,right to private property, andequality before the law. Different liberals espouse various and sometimes conflicting views depending on their understanding of these principles but generally supportliberal democracy,private property,market economies, individual rights (includingcivil rights andhuman rights),secularism,rule of law,economic andpolitical freedom,freedom of speech,freedom of the press,freedom of assembly, andfreedom of religion. Liberalism is frequently cited as the dominantideology ofmodern history.

Liberalism became a distinctmovement in theAge of Enlightenment, gaining popularity amongWestern philosophers andeconomists. Liberalism sought to replace thenorms ofhereditary privilege,state religion,absolute monarchy, thedivine right of kings andtraditional conservatism withrepresentative democracy, rule of law, and equality under the law. Liberals also endedmercantilist policies,royal monopolies, and othertrade barriers, instead promotingfree trade and marketization. The philosopherJohn Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct tradition based on thesocial contract, arguing that each man has anatural right tolife, liberty and property, and governments must not violate theserights. While theBritish liberal tradition emphasized expanding democracy,French liberalism emphasized rejectingauthoritarianism and is linked tonation-building. (Full article...)

Selected article -show another


TheLiberal Alliance (LA;Danish:[lipəˈʁɑˀlæliˈɑŋsə]) is aclassical liberal andright-libertarianpolitical party in Denmark. The party is a component of thecentre-right bloc inDanish politics. The party's platform is based uponeconomic liberalism, promotion oftax cuts, reduction ofwelfare programmes, socially libertarian policies, and a pragmatic, but oppositional stance towardsEuropean integration.

From November 2016 to June 2019, the Liberal Alliance (I) was part of theLars Løkke Rasmussen III Cabinet a three-party coalition government, alongsideLiberal Party (Danish:Venstre) and theConservative People's Party (Danish:Det Konservative Folkeparti). At the2022 Danish general election, the party won 14 seats. It has 15 seats afterPernille Vermund chose to join the party. (Full article...)

List of selected articles

Selected biography -show another

Thomas Hill Green (7 April 1836 – 26 March 1882), known asT. H. Green, was an Englishphilosopher, politicalradical andtemperance reformer, and a member of theBritish idealism movement. Like all the British idealists, Green was influenced by themetaphysicalhistoricism ofG. W. F. Hegel. He was one of the thinkers behind the philosophy ofsocial liberalism. (Full article...)

Selected quote

John Stuart Mill
The despotism of custom is everywhere the standing hindrance to human advancement, being in unceasingantagonism to that disposition to aim at something better than customary, which is called, according to circumstances, the spirit ofliberty, or that of progress or improvement. The spirit of improvement is not always a spirit of liberty, for it may aim at forcing improvements on an unwilling people; and the spirit of liberty, in so far as it resists such attempts, may ally itself locally and temporarily with the opponents of improvement; but the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals. The progressive principle, however, in either shape, whether as the love of liberty or of improvement, is antagonistic to the sway of Custom, involving at least emancipation from thatyoke; and the contest between the two constitutes the chief interest of the history of mankind. The greater part of the world has, properly speaking, no history, because the despotism of Custom is complete. This is the case over the wholeEast. Custom is there, in all things, the final appeal; justice and right mean conformity to custom; the argument of custom no one, unless some tyrant intoxicated with power, thinks of resisting. And we see the result. Those nations must once have had originality; they did not start out of the ground populous, lettered, and versed in many of the arts of life; they made themselves all this, and were then the greatest and most powerful nations in the world. What are they now? The subjects or dependants of tribes whose forefathers wandered in the forests when theirs had magnificent palaces and gorgeous temples, but over whom custom exercised only a divided rule with liberty and progress. A people, it appears, may be progressive for a certain length of time, and then stop: when does it stop? When it ceases to possess individuality. If a similar change should befall the nations ofEurope, it will not be in exactly the same shape: the despotism of custom with which these nations are threatened is not precisely stationariness. It proscribes singularity, but it does not preclude change, provided all change together. We have discarded the fixed costumes of ourforefathers; every one must still dress like other people, but thefashion may change once or twice a year. We thus take care that when there is change, it shall be for change's sake, and not from any idea of beauty or convenience; for the same idea of beauty or convenience would not strike all the world at the same moment, and be simultaneously thrown aside by all at another moment. But we are progressive as well as changeable: we continually make new inventions in mechanical things, and keep them until they are again superseded by better; we are eager for improvement inpolitics, ineducation, even inmorals, though in this last our idea of improvement chiefly consists in persuading or forcing other people to be as good as ourselves. It is not progress that we object to; on the contrary, we flatter ourselves that we are the most progressive people who ever lived. It isindividuality that we war against: we should think we had done wonders if we had made ourselves all alike; forgetting that the unlikeness of one person to another is generally the first thing which draws the attention of either to the imperfection of his own type, and the superiority of another, or the possibility, by combining the advantages of both, of producing something better than either. We have a warning example inChina—a nation of much talent, and, in some respects, even wisdom, owing to the rare good fortune of having been provided at an early period with a particularly good set of customs, the work, in some measure, of men to whom even the most enlightened European must accord, under certain limitations, the title of sages and philosophers. They are remarkable, too, in the excellence of their apparatus for impressing, as far as possible, the best wisdom they possess upon every mind in the community, and securing that those who have appropriated most of it shall occupy the posts of honour and power. Surely the people who did this have discovered the secret of human progressiveness, and must have kept themselves steadily at the head of the movement of the world. On the contrary, they have become stationary—have remained so for thousands of years; and if they are ever to be farther improved, it must be by foreigners. They have succeeded beyond all hope in what English philanthropists are so industriously working at—in making a people all alike, all governing their thoughts and conduct by the same maxims and rules; and these are thefruits. The modern régime of public opinion is, in an unorganised form, what the Chinese educational and political systems are in an organised; and unless individuality shall be able successfully to assert itself against this yoke, Europe, notwithstanding its noble antecedents and its professedChristianity, will tend to become another China.

General images

The following are images from various liberalism-related articles on Wikipedia.

Subcategories

Related portals

WikiProjects

Topics

Ideas
Schools
Political
Classical
Social
Cultural
By region
Africa
Asia
Europe
Latin America and
the Caribbean
North America
Oceania
Key figures

See also:
History
of liberalism
Organisations
See also

Recognized content

Associated Wikimedia

The followingWikimedia Foundation sister projects provide more on this subject:

Discover Wikipedia usingportals
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Liberalism&oldid=1258182411"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp