Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Portal:History

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia portal about history
Portal maintenance status:(June 2018)
  • This portal'ssubpageshave been checked by an editor, and are needed.
Pleasetake care when editing, especially if usingautomated editing software. Learn how toupdate the maintenance information here.
Wikipedia portal for content related to History

Portal topics - (Random portal)

Activities
Culture
Geography
Health
History
Mathematics
Nature
People
Philosophy
Religion
Society
Technology

The History Portal


History is the systematic study of thepast, focusing primarily on thehuman past. As anacademic discipline, it analyses and interpretsevidence to constructnarratives about what happened and explain why it happened. Some theorists categorize history as asocial science, while others see it as part of thehumanities or consider it a hybrid discipline. Similar debates surround the purpose of history—for example, whether its main aim is theoretical, to uncover thetruth, or practical, to learn lessons from the past. In a more general sense, the termhistory refers not to an academic field but to thepast itself, times in the past, or to individual texts about the past.

Historical research relies onprimary andsecondary sources to reconstruct past events and validate interpretations.Source criticism is used to evaluate these sources, assessing their authenticity, content, and reliability. Historians strive to integrate the perspectives of several sources to develop a coherent narrative. Different schools of thought, such aspositivism, theAnnales school,Marxism, andpostmodernism, have distinctmethodological approaches.

History is a broad discipline encompassing many branches. Some focus on specifictime periods, such asancient history, while others concentrate on particulargeographic regions, such as thehistory of Africa. Thematic categorizations includepolitical history,military history,social history, andeconomic history. Branches associated with specific research methods and sources includequantitative history,comparative history, andoral history.

History emerged as a field of inquiry inantiquity to replace myth-infused narratives, with influential early traditions originating inGreece,China, and later in theIslamic world. Historical writing evolved throughout the ages and became increasingly professional, particularly during the 19th century, when a rigorous methodology and various academic institutions were established. History is related to many fields, includinghistoriography,philosophy,education, andpolitics. (Full article...)

Featured articles –show another

Featured articles are displayed here, which represent some of the best content on English Wikipedia.

  • Image 1 Norwich War Memorial (also known as Norwich City War Memorial or Norwich Cenotaph) is a First World War memorial in Norwich in Eastern England. It was designed by Sir Edwin Lutyens, the last of his eight cenotaphs to be erected in England. Before Lutyens' involvement, several abandoned proposals had been made for commemorating Norwich's war dead, and by 1926 the newly elected lord mayor was determined to see the construction of a memorial before he left office. He established an appeal to raise funds for local hospitals in memory of the dead as well as a physical monument. He commissioned Lutyens, who designed an empty tomb (cenotaph) atop a low screen wall from which protrudes a Stone of Remembrance. Bronze flambeaux at either end can burn gas to emit a flame. Lutyens also designed a roll of honour, on which the names of the city's dead are listed, which was installed in Norwich Castle in 1931. A local disabled veteran unveiled the memorial on 9 October 1927. It was moved from its original location to become the centrepiece of a memorial garden between the market and the City Hall in 1938. The structure on which the garden is built was found to be unstable in 2004 and the memorial was closed off pending repairs which began in 2008. The work was completed in 2011, during which time the memorial was restored, having fallen into disrepair while it was closed off, and rotated to face the city hall rather than the marketplace. It was rededicated on Armistice Day 2011 and is today a grade II* listed building. In 2015, it became part of a "national collection" of Lutyens' war memorials. (Full article...)
    Image 1

    Norwich War Memorial (also known asNorwich City War Memorial orNorwich Cenotaph) is aFirst World War memorial inNorwich in Eastern England. It was designed bySir Edwin Lutyens, the last of his eightcenotaphs to be erected in England. Before Lutyens' involvement, several abandoned proposals had been made for commemorating Norwich's war dead, and by 1926 the newly elected lord mayor was determined to see the construction of a memorial before he left office. He established an appeal to raise funds for local hospitals in memory of the dead as well as a physical monument. He commissioned Lutyens, who designed an empty tomb (cenotaph) atop a low screen wall from which protrudes aStone of Remembrance. Bronzeflambeaux at either end can burn gas to emit a flame. Lutyens also designed a roll of honour, on which the names of the city's dead are listed, which was installed inNorwich Castle in 1931.

    A local disabled veteran unveiled the memorial on 9 October 1927. It was moved from its original location to become the centrepiece of a memorial garden betweenthe market and theCity Hall in 1938. The structure on which the garden is built was found to be unstable in 2004 and the memorial was closed off pending repairs which began in 2008. The work was completed in 2011, during which time the memorial was restored, having fallen into disrepair while it was closed off, and rotated to face the city hall rather than the marketplace. It was rededicated onArmistice Day 2011 and is today a grade II*listed building. In 2015, it became part of a "national collection" of Lutyens' war memorials. (Full article...)
  • Image 2 An AMX-30E on display at the Museum of Armored Vehicles of El Goloso, in Spain The AMX-30E (E stands for España, Spanish for Spain) is a Spanish main battle tank based on France's AMX-30. Although originally the Spanish government sought to procure the German Leopard 1, the AMX-30 was ultimately awarded the contract due to its lower price and the ability to manufacture it in Spain. 280 units were manufactured by Santa Bárbara Sistemas for the Spanish Army, between 1974 and 1983. First acquired in 1970, the tank was to supplement Spain's fleet of M47 and M48 Patton United States tanks and to reduce Spain's reliance on American equipment in its army. The first 19 AMX-30 tanks were acquired from France in 1970, while another 280 were assembled in Spain. It was Spain's first mass-produced tank and developed the country's industry to the point where the government felt it could produce a tank on its own, leading to the development of the Lince tank project in 1985. It also offered Santa Bárbara Sistemas the experience which led to the production of the Leopard 2E in late 2003. Although final assembly was carried out by Santa Bárbara Sistemas, the production of the AMX-30E also included other companies in the country. Total production within Spain amounted to as much as 65% of the tank. (Full article...)
    Image 2

    An AMX-30E on display at the Museum of Armored Vehicles of El Goloso, in Spain

    TheAMX-30E (E stands forEspaña, Spanish for Spain) is a Spanishmain battle tank based on France'sAMX-30. Although originally the Spanish government sought to procure the GermanLeopard 1, the AMX-30 was ultimately awarded the contract due to its lower price and the ability to manufacture it in Spain. 280 units were manufactured bySanta Bárbara Sistemas for theSpanish Army, between 1974 and 1983.

    First acquired in 1970, the tank was to supplement Spain's fleet ofM47 andM48 Patton United States tanks and to reduce Spain's reliance on American equipment in its army. The first 19 AMX-30 tanks were acquired from France in 1970, while another 280 were assembled in Spain. It was Spain's firstmass-producedtank and developed the country's industry to the point where the government felt it could produce a tank on its own, leading to the development of theLince tank project in 1985. It also offered Santa Bárbara Sistemas the experience which led to the production of theLeopard 2E in late 2003. Although final assembly was carried out by Santa Bárbara Sistemas, the production of the AMX-30E also included other companies in the country. Total production within Spain amounted to as much as 65% of the tank. (Full article...)
  • Image 3 The United Kingdom began a military intervention in Sierra Leone on 7 May 2000 under the codename Operation Palliser. Although small numbers of British personnel had been deployed previously, Palliser was the first large-scale intervention by British forces in the Sierra Leone Civil War. In early May 2000, the Revolutionary United Front (RUF)—one of the main parties to the civil war—advanced on the country's capital, Freetown, prompting the British government to dispatch an "Operational Reconnaissance and Liaison Team" (ORLT) to prepare to evacuate foreign citizens. On 6 May, the RUF blocked the road connecting Freetown to the country's main airport, Lungi. The next day, British soldiers began to secure the airport and other areas essential to an evacuation. The majority of those who wished to leave were evacuated within the first two days of the operation, but many chose to stay following the arrival of British forces. After the effective completion of the evacuation, the mandate of the British forces began to expand. They assisted with the evacuation of besieged peacekeepers—including several British ceasefire observers—and began to assist the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) and the Sierra Leone Army (SLA). Despite the mission expansion, it was not until 17 May that British soldiers came into direct contact with the RUF. The rebels attacked a British position near Lungi airport, but were forced to retreat after a series of firefights. On the same day, the RUF's leader, Foday Sankoh, was captured by Sierra Leonean forces, leaving the RUF in disarray. After deciding that the RUF would not disarm voluntarily, the British began training the SLA for a confrontation. During the training mission, a patrol returning from a visit to Jordanian peacekeepers was taken captive by a militia group known as the West Side Boys. Negotiations achieved the release of five of the eleven soldiers, and three weeks into the crisis, British special forces launched a mission codenamed Operation Barras, freeing the remaining six. The success of Operation Barras restored confidence in the British mission; one academic suggested that its failure would have forced the British government to withdraw all its forces from Sierra Leone. (Full article...)
    Image 3
    TheUnited Kingdom began a military intervention inSierra Leone on 7 May 2000 under the codenameOperation Palliser. Although small numbers of British personnel had been deployed previously, Palliser was the first large-scale intervention by British forces in theSierra Leone Civil War. In early May 2000, theRevolutionary United Front (RUF)—one of the main parties to the civil war—advanced on the country's capital,Freetown, prompting the British government to dispatch an "Operational Reconnaissance and Liaison Team" (ORLT) to prepare to evacuate foreign citizens. On 6 May, the RUF blocked the road connecting Freetown to the country's main airport,Lungi. The next day, British soldiers began to secure the airport and other areas essential to an evacuation. The majority of those who wished to leave were evacuated within the first two days of the operation, but many chose to stay following the arrival of British forces.

    After the effective completion of the evacuation, the mandate of the British forces began to expand. They assisted with the evacuation of besieged peacekeepers—including several British ceasefire observers—and began to assist theUnited Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL) and theSierra Leone Army (SLA). Despite the mission expansion, it was not until 17 May that British soldiers came into direct contact with the RUF. The rebels attacked a British position near Lungi airport, but were forced to retreat after a series of firefights. On the same day, the RUF's leader,Foday Sankoh, was captured by Sierra Leonean forces, leaving the RUF in disarray. After deciding that the RUF would not disarm voluntarily, the British began training the SLA for a confrontation. During the training mission, a patrol returning from a visit to Jordanian peacekeepers was taken captive by a militia group known as theWest Side Boys. Negotiations achieved the release of five of the eleven soldiers, and three weeks into the crisis, British special forces launched a mission codenamedOperation Barras, freeing the remaining six. The success of Operation Barras restored confidence in the British mission; one academic suggested that its failure would have forced the British government to withdraw all its forces from Sierra Leone. (Full article...)
  • Image 4 13th Century map of Albania and Sazan Island The Battle of Saseno took place on 14 August 1264 near Saseno Island off the coast of Albania, between a fleet of the Republic of Genoa and a trade convoy of the Republic of Venice, during the War of Saint Sabas. Since the outbreak of the war in 1256, the Genoese had experienced only defeats in direct confrontations with the Venetian navy, and had therefore resorted to raiding the Venetian commerce convoys to the Levant that were critical to the Venetian economy. In mid-1264, the Genoese commander, Simone Grillo, managed to trick his Venetian counterpart, Andrea Barozzi, as to his intentions: Grillo spread rumours that he intended to head due east to the Levant, but secretly took up station at the island of Malta, south of the usual sea lanes. When Barozzi took the bait and moved east to pursue Grillo with his much larger fleet, the latter was free to attack a Venetian convoy heading out from Venice to the Levant. Confident of the absence of any threat, the convoy commander, Michele Duaro, was caught by surprise when he encountered the Genoese fleet off Saseno. The much more manoeuvreable Genoese galleys captured or sank most of the convoy's slow-moving merchant ships, except for the giant cargo vessel (nave) Roccafortis. Duaro rallied his crews there for safety, abandoning the other ships in the process. The trade goods captured by the Genoese were estimated at 100,000 Genoese liras. Venice was able to destroy the Genoese fleet two years later, however, and in 1270 the two states concluded a truce that ended the war. (Full article...)
    Image 4

    13th Century map ofAlbania andSazan Island

    TheBattle of Saseno took place on 14 August 1264 nearSaseno Island off the coast ofAlbania, between a fleet of theRepublic of Genoa and atrade convoy of theRepublic of Venice, during theWar of Saint Sabas. Since the outbreak of the war in 1256, the Genoese had experienced only defeats in direct confrontations with theVenetian navy, and had therefore resorted toraiding the Venetian commerce convoys to theLevant that were critical to the Venetian economy.

    In mid-1264, the Genoese commander, Simone Grillo, managed to trick his Venetian counterpart,Andrea Barozzi, as to his intentions: Grillo spread rumours that he intended to head due east to the Levant, but secretly took up station at the island ofMalta, south of the usual sea lanes. When Barozzi took the bait and moved east to pursue Grillo with his much larger fleet, the latter was free to attack a Venetian convoy heading out from Venice to the Levant. Confident of the absence of any threat, the convoy commander, Michele Duaro, was caught by surprise when he encountered the Genoese fleet off Saseno. The much more manoeuvreable Genoesegalleys captured or sank most of the convoy's slow-moving merchant ships, except for the giant cargo vessel (nave)Roccafortis. Duaro rallied his crews there for safety, abandoning the other ships in the process. The trade goods captured by the Genoese were estimated at 100,000Genoese liras. Venice was able to destroy the Genoese fleet two years later, however, and in 1270 the two states concluded a truce that ended the war. (Full article...)
  • Image 5 The 1937 Brazilian coup d'état (Portuguese: Golpe de Estado no Brasil em 1937), also known as the Estado Novo coup, was a military coup in Brazil led by President Getúlio Vargas with the support of the Armed Forces on 10 November 1937. Vargas had risen to power in 1930 with the backing of the military, following a revolution that ended a decades-old oligarchy. Vargas ruled as provisional president until the National Constituent Assembly election in 1934. Under a new constitution, Vargas became the constitutional president of Brazil, but following a 1935 communist insurrection, speculation grew over a potential self-coup. Candidates for the 1938 presidential election appeared as early as late 1936. Vargas could not seek re-election, but he and his allies were unwilling to abandon power. Despite loosening political repression after the communist revolt, strong sentiment for a dictatorial government remained, and increasing federal intervention in state governments would pave the way for a coup to take place. (Full article...)
    Image 5
    The1937 Brazilian coup d'état (Portuguese:Golpe de Estado no Brasil em 1937), also known as theEstado Novo coup, was amilitary coup in Brazil led by PresidentGetúlio Vargas with the support of theArmed Forces on 10 November 1937.

    Vargas had risen to power in 1930 with the backing of the military, followinga revolution that ended adecades-old oligarchy. Vargas ruled as provisional president until theNational Constituent Assembly election in 1934. Under anew constitution, Vargas became the constitutional president of Brazil, but following a1935 communist insurrection, speculation grew over a potentialself-coup. Candidates for the 1938 presidential election appeared as early as late 1936. Vargas could not seek re-election, but he and his allies were unwilling to abandon power. Despite loosening political repression after the communist revolt, strong sentiment for a dictatorial government remained, and increasing federal intervention instate governments would pave the way for a coup to take place. (Full article...)
  • Image 6 Royal Gloucestershire Hussars cap badge from the period of the Imperial Yeomanry The Royal Gloucestershire Hussars was a volunteer yeomanry regiment which, in the 20th century, became part of the British Army Reserve. It traced its origins to the First or Cheltenham Troop of Gloucestershire Gentleman and Yeomanry raised in 1795, although a break in the lineage means that its formation is dated to the Marshfield and Dodington Troop raised in 1830. Six further troops – officered by nobility and gentry, and recruited largely from among landholders and tenant farmers – were subsequently raised in Gloucestershire, and in 1834 they came together to form the Gloucestershire Yeomanry Cavalry. In 1847, the regiment adopted a hussar uniform and the name Royal Gloucestershire Hussars. Originally intended to counter insurrection and a French invasion that never materialised, the yeomanry's first deployments were ceremonial and as mounted police during times of civil unrest. Three Gloucestershire troops were deployed to Bristol on two separate occasions in the 1830s in support of the civil authorities. From the mid-19th century, the yeomanry's policing role diminished with the establishment of a civilian police force, and renewed fears of invasion turned its focus to national defence. The Royal Gloucestershire Hussars' first battle honour was won in South Africa during the Second Boer War, when a contingent of Gloucestershire yeomanry served as mounted infantry in the Imperial Yeomanry. Before the First World War, all volunteer forces, including the yeomanry, were brought into the Territorial Force. On the outbreak of the war the regiment raised a second-line unit, which remained in the UK and became a cyclist unit in 1916, and a third-line unit, which served as a reserve. The first-line unit saw action as infantry at Gallipoli and as cavalry in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign; in the latter it fought both mounted and dismounted from the Suez Canal to Aleppo in modern-day Syria. Following the war, the regiment was downsized and converted to the 21st (Royal Gloucestershire Hussars) Armoured Car Company. (Full article...)
    Image 6

    Royal Gloucestershire Hussars cap badge from the period of the Imperial Yeomanry

    TheRoyal Gloucestershire Hussars was avolunteeryeomanryregiment which, in the 20th century, became part of the BritishArmy Reserve. It traced its origins to the First orCheltenham Troop of Gloucestershire Gentleman and Yeomanry raised in 1795, although a break in the lineage means that its formation is dated to theMarshfield andDodington Troop raised in 1830. Six furthertroops – officered bynobility andgentry, and recruited largely from amonglandholders andtenant farmers – were subsequently raised inGloucestershire, and in 1834 they came together to form the Gloucestershire Yeomanry Cavalry. In 1847, the regiment adopted ahussar uniform and the name Royal Gloucestershire Hussars. Originally intended to counter insurrection and aFrench invasion that never materialised, the yeomanry's first deployments were ceremonial and as mounted police during times of civil unrest. Three Gloucestershire troops were deployed to Bristol on two separate occasions in the 1830s in support of the civil authorities.

    From the mid-19th century, the yeomanry's policing role diminished with the establishment of acivilian police force, and renewed fears of invasion turned its focus to national defence. The Royal Gloucestershire Hussars' firstbattle honour was won in South Africa during theSecond Boer War, when a contingent of Gloucestershire yeomanry served as mounted infantry in theImperial Yeomanry. Before theFirst World War, all volunteer forces, including the yeomanry, were brought into theTerritorial Force. On the outbreak of the war the regiment raised a second-line unit, which remained in the UK and became a cyclist unit in 1916, and a third-line unit, which served as a reserve. The first-line unit saw action as infantry atGallipoli and as cavalry in theSinai and Palestine Campaign; in the latter it fought both mounted and dismounted from the Suez Canal to Aleppo in modern-day Syria. Following the war, the regiment was downsized and converted to the 21st (Royal Gloucestershire Hussars) Armoured Car Company. (Full article...)
  • Image 7 The Guilden Morden boar The Guilden Morden boar is a sixth- or seventh-century Anglo-Saxon copper alloy figure of a boar that may have once served as the crest of a helmet. It was found around 1864 or 1865 in a grave in Guilden Morden, a village in the eastern English county of Cambridgeshire. There the boar attended a skeleton with other objects, including a small earthenware bead with an incised pattern, although the boar is all that now remains. Herbert George Fordham, whose father originally discovered the boar, donated it to the British Museum in 1904; as of 2018 it was on view in room 41. The boar is simply designed, distinguished primarily by a prominent mane; eyes, eyebrows, nostrils and tusks are only faintly present. A pin and socket design formed by the front and hind legs suggests that the boar was mounted on another object, such as a helmet. Such is the case on one of the contemporary Torslunda plates found in Sweden, where boar-crested helmets are depicted similarly. (Full article...)
    Image 7

    The Guilden Morden boar

    TheGuilden Morden boar is a sixth- or seventh-centuryAnglo-Saxon copper alloy figure of aboar that may have once served as the crest of a helmet. It was found around 1864 or 1865 in a grave inGuilden Morden, a village in the eastern English county ofCambridgeshire. There the boar attended a skeleton with other objects, including a small earthenware bead with an incised pattern, although the boar is all that now remains.Herbert George Fordham, whose father originally discovered the boar, donated it to theBritish Museum in 1904; as of 2018 it was on view inroom 41.
    The boar is simply designed, distinguished primarily by a prominent mane; eyes, eyebrows, nostrils and tusks are only faintly present. A pin and socket design formed by the front and hind legs suggests that the boar was mounted on another object, such as a helmet. Such is the case on one of the contemporaryTorslunda plates found in Sweden, where boar-crested helmets are depicted similarly. (Full article...)
  • Image 8 Aerial view of Indefatigable at sea, 7 November 1944 HMS Indefatigable was one of two Implacable-class aircraft carriers built for the Royal Navy (RN) during World War II. Completed in 1944, her aircraft made several attacks that year against the German battleship Tirpitz, inflicting only light damage; they also raided targets in Norway. The ship was transferred to the British Pacific Fleet (BPF) at the end of the year and attacked Japanese-controlled oil refineries in Sumatra in January 1945 before joining the American forces in March as they prepared to invade the island of Okinawa in Operation Iceberg. Indefatigable and the BPF joined the Americans in attacking the Japanese Home Islands in July and August. Following the end of hostilities she visited ports in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. After returning to the UK in early 1946, Indefatigable was modified for transport duties, and ferried troops and civilians for the rest of the year before she was reduced to reserve. She was recommissioned in 1950 as a training ship for service with the Home Fleet Training Squadron, participating in exercises and making several port visits overseas. The Board of Admiralty decided that she was redundant in early 1954 and decommissioned her later that year. Indefatigable was sold for scrap the following year. (Full article...)
    Image 8

    Aerial view ofIndefatigable at sea, 7 November 1944

    HMSIndefatigable was one of twoImplacable-classaircraft carriers built for theRoyal Navy (RN) duringWorld War II. Completed in 1944, her aircraft made several attacks that year against theGerman battleship Tirpitz, inflicting only light damage; they also raided targets in Norway. The ship was transferred to theBritish Pacific Fleet (BPF) at the end of the year and attacked Japanese-controlledoil refineries inSumatra in January 1945 before joining the American forces in March as they prepared to invade the island ofOkinawa inOperation Iceberg.Indefatigable and the BPF joined the Americans in attacking theJapanese Home Islands in July and August. Following the end of hostilities she visited ports in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.

    After returning to the UK in early 1946,Indefatigable was modified for transport duties, and ferried troops and civilians for the rest of the year before she was reduced toreserve. She was recommissioned in 1950 as a training ship for service with theHome Fleet Training Squadron, participating in exercises and making several port visits overseas. TheBoard of Admiralty decided that she was redundant in early 1954 anddecommissioned her later that year.Indefatigable was sold forscrap the following year. (Full article...)
  • Image 9 The Battle of the Saw was the culminating battle of a campaign fought between a Carthaginian army led by Hamilcar Barca and a rebel force led by Spendius in 238 BC in what is now northern Tunisia. Carthage was fighting a coalition of mutinous soldiers and rebellious African cities in the Mercenary War which had started in 241 BC. The rebels had been besieging Carthage while the Carthaginian field army under Hamilcar raided their supply lines. Under this pressure the rebels pulled back to their base at Tunis and despatched their own army to prevent Hamilcar's activities and, ideally, destroy his army. Unable to confront the Carthaginian war elephants and cavalry on open ground, the rebels stayed on higher and rougher terrain and harassed the Carthaginian army. After several months of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or against a mountain range. Pinned against the mountains, their supply lines blockaded and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that their comrades in Tunis would sortie to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but he took all of them prisoner. The Carthaginians then attacked the leaderless, starving rebels with their whole force, led by their elephants, and massacred them to a man. (Full article...)
    Image 9

    TheBattle of the Saw was the culminating battle of a campaign fought between aCarthaginian army led byHamilcar Barca and a rebel force led bySpendius in 238 BC in what is now northernTunisia. Carthage was fighting a coalition ofmutinous soldiers and rebellious African cities in theMercenary War which had started in 241 BC. The rebels had beenbesiegingCarthage while the Carthaginian field army under Hamilcar raided their supply lines. Under this pressure the rebels pulled back to their base atTunis and despatched their own army to prevent Hamilcar's activities and, ideally, destroy his army.

    Unable to confront the Carthaginianwar elephants andcavalry on open ground, the rebels stayed on higher and rougher terrain and harassed theCarthaginian army. After several months of campaigning, the details of which are not clear in the sources, Hamilcar trapped the rebels in a pass or against a mountain range. Pinned against the mountains, their supply linesblockaded and with their food exhausted, the rebels ate their horses, their prisoners and then their slaves, hoping that their comrades in Tunis wouldsortie to rescue them. Eventually, the surrounded troops forced their leaders to parley with Hamilcar, but he took all of them prisoner. The Carthaginians then attacked the leaderless, starving rebels with their whole force, led by their elephants, and massacred them to a man. (Full article...)
  • Image 10 Lakoba in 1931 Nestor Apollonovich Lakoba (1 May 1893 – 28 December 1936) was an Abkhaz communist leader. Lakoba helped establish Bolshevik power in Abkhazia in the aftermath of the Russian Revolution, and served as the head of Abkhazia after its conquest by the Red Army in 1921. While in power, Lakoba saw that Abkhazia was initially given autonomy within the USSR as the Socialist Soviet Republic of Abkhazia. Though nominally a part of the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic with a special status of "union republic," the Abkhaz SSR was effectively a separate republic, made possible by Lakoba's close relationship with Joseph Stalin. Lakoba successfully opposed the extension of collectivization of Abkhazia, though in return Lakoba was forced to accept a downgrade of Abkhazia's status to that of an autonomous republic within the Georgian SSR. Popular in Abkhazia due to his ability to resonate with the people, Lakoba maintained a close relationship with Stalin, who would frequently holiday in Abkhazia during the 1920s and 1930s. This relationship saw Lakoba become the rival of one of Stalin's other confidants, Lavrentiy Beria, who was in charge of the Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic, which included Georgia. During a visit to Beria in Tbilisi in December 1936, Lakoba was poisoned, allowing Beria to consolidate his control over Abkhazia and all of Georgia and to discredit Lakoba and his family as enemies of the state. Rehabilitated after the death of Stalin in 1953, Lakoba is now revered as a national hero in Abkhazia. (Full article...)
    Image 10

    Lakoba in 1931

    Nestor Apollonovich Lakoba (1 May 1893 – 28 December 1936) was an Abkhazcommunist leader. Lakoba helped establish Bolshevik power inAbkhazia in the aftermath of theRussian Revolution, and served as the head of Abkhazia after its conquest by theRed Army in 1921. While in power, Lakoba saw that Abkhazia was initially given autonomy within the USSR as theSocialist Soviet Republic of Abkhazia. Though nominally a part of theGeorgian Soviet Socialist Republic with a special status of "union republic," the Abkhaz SSR was effectively a separate republic, made possible by Lakoba's close relationship withJoseph Stalin. Lakoba successfully opposed the extension ofcollectivization of Abkhazia, though in return Lakoba was forced to accept a downgrade of Abkhazia's status to that of anautonomous republic within theGeorgian SSR.

    Popular in Abkhazia due to his ability to resonate with the people, Lakoba maintained a close relationship with Stalin, who would frequently holiday in Abkhazia during the 1920s and 1930s. This relationship saw Lakoba become the rival of one of Stalin's other confidants,Lavrentiy Beria, who was in charge of theTranscaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic, which included Georgia. During a visit to Beria inTbilisi in December 1936, Lakoba was poisoned, allowing Beria to consolidate his control over Abkhazia and all of Georgia and to discredit Lakoba and his family asenemies of the state.Rehabilitated after the death of Stalin in 1953, Lakoba is now revered as a national hero in Abkhazia. (Full article...)
  • Image 11 The Fatimid conquest of Egypt took place in 969 when the troops of the Fatimid Caliphate under the general Jawhar captured Egypt, then ruled by the autonomous Ikhshidid dynasty in the name of the Abbasid Caliphate. The Fatimids launched repeated invasions of Egypt soon after coming to power in Ifriqiya (modern Tunisia and eastern Algeria) in 909, but failed against the still-strong Abbasid Caliphate. By the 960s, however, while the Fatimids had consolidated their rule and grown stronger, the Abbasid Caliphate had collapsed, and the Ikhshidid regime was facing prolonged crisis: foreign raids and a severe famine were compounded by the death in 968 of the strongman Abu al-Misk Kafur. The resulting power vacuum led to open infighting among the various factions in Fustat, the capital of Egypt. The atmosphere of crisis was deepened by the simultaneous advances of the Byzantine Empire against the Muslim states of the Eastern Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Fatimid agents operated openly in Egypt, and the local elites increasingly came to accept and even welcome the prospect of a Fatimid takeover in hopes of ending the instability and insecurity. (Full article...)
    Image 11
    TheFatimid conquest of Egypt took place in 969 when the troops of theFatimid Caliphate under the generalJawhar capturedEgypt, then ruled by the autonomousIkhshidid dynasty in the name of theAbbasid Caliphate.

    The Fatimids launched repeated invasions of Egypt soon after coming to power inIfriqiya (modernTunisia and easternAlgeria) in 909, but failed against the still-strong Abbasid Caliphate. By the 960s, however, while the Fatimids had consolidated their rule and grown stronger, the Abbasid Caliphate had collapsed, and the Ikhshidid regime was facing prolonged crisis: foreign raids and a severe famine were compounded by the death in 968 of the strongmanAbu al-Misk Kafur. The resulting power vacuum led to open infighting among the various factions inFustat, the capital of Egypt. The atmosphere of crisis was deepened by the simultaneous advances of theByzantine Empire against the Muslim states of theEastern Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Fatimid agents operated openly in Egypt, and the local elites increasingly came to accept and even welcome the prospect of a Fatimid takeover in hopes of ending the instability and insecurity. (Full article...)
  • Image 12 French battleship Intrépide fighting several British ships, by Pierre-Julien Gilbert The second battle of Cape Finisterre was a naval encounter fought during the War of the Austrian Succession on 25 October 1747 (N.S.). A British fleet of fourteen ships of the line commanded by Rear-Admiral Edward Hawke intercepted a French convoy of 250 merchant ships, sailing from the Basque Roads in western France to the West Indies and protected by eight ships of the line commanded by Vice Admiral Henri-François des Herbiers. When the two forces sighted each other, Herbiers ordered the merchant ships to scatter, formed his warships into a line of battle and attempted to draw the British warships towards him. In this he was successful, the British advanced on the French warships, enveloped the rear of the French line and brought superior numbers to bear on the French vessels one at a time. Six French warships were captured, along with 4,000 of their seamen. Of the 250 merchant ships, only seven were captured. The British victory isolated the French colonies from supply and reinforcement. The war ended the following year and under the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle France recovered those colonial possessions which had been captured in return for withdrawing from her territorial gains in the Austrian Netherlands (approximately modern Belgium and Luxembourg). (Full article...)
    Image 12

    French battleshipIntrépide fighting several British ships, byPierre-Julien Gilbert

    Thesecond battle of Cape Finisterre was anaval encounter fought during theWar of the Austrian Succession on 25 October 1747 (N.S.). ABritish fleet of fourteenships of the line commanded byRear-AdmiralEdward Hawke intercepted aFrench convoy of 250merchant ships, sailing from theBasque Roads in western France to the West Indies and protected by eight ships of the line commanded byVice AdmiralHenri-François des Herbiers.

    When the two forces sighted each other, Herbiers ordered the merchant ships to scatter, formed his warships into aline of battle and attempted to draw the British warships towards him. In this he was successful, the British advanced on the French warships,enveloped the rear of the French line and brought superior numbers to bear on the French vessels one at a time. Six French warships were captured, along with 4,000 of theirseamen. Of the 250 merchant ships, only seven were captured. The British victory isolated the French colonies from supply and reinforcement. The war ended the following year and under theTreaty of Aix-la-Chapelle France recovered those colonial possessions which had been captured in return for withdrawing from her territorial gains in theAustrian Netherlands (approximately modernBelgium andLuxembourg). (Full article...)
  • Image 13 Tirpitz at her mooring off the island of Håkøya in November 1944 Operation Obviate was an unsuccessful British air raid of World War II which targeted the German battleship Tirpitz. It was conducted by Royal Air Force heavy bombers on 29 October 1944, and sought to destroy the damaged battleship after she moved to a new anchorage near Tromsø in northern Norway. The attack followed up the successful Operation Paravane on 15 September 1944, when Tirpitz was crippled by British heavy bombers. As Allied intelligence was unaware that the battleship could no longer operate at sea and warships needed elsewhere were being retained in British waters to counter her, it was decided to make another attack. After a period of planning and preparations, 38 British bombers and a film aircraft departed from bases in northern Scotland during the early hours of 29 October. The attack took place that morning, but was frustrated by clouds over the Tromsø area which made it difficult for the Allied airmen to accurately target Tirpitz. The battleship was not directly hit, but was damaged by a bomb that exploded near her hull. A British bomber made a crash landing in Sweden after being hit by German anti-aircraft fire, and several others were damaged. (Full article...)
    Image 13

    Tirpitz at her mooring off the island of Håkøya in November 1944

    Operation Obviate was an unsuccessful British air raid ofWorld War II which targeted theGerman battleshipTirpitz. It was conducted byRoyal Air Forceheavy bombers on 29 October 1944, and sought to destroy the damaged battleship after she moved to a new anchorage nearTromsø in northern Norway.

    The attack followed up the successfulOperation Paravane on 15 September 1944, whenTirpitz was crippled by British heavy bombers. As Allied intelligence was unaware that the battleship could no longer operate at sea and warships needed elsewhere were being retained in British waters to counter her, it was decided to make another attack. After a period of planning and preparations, 38 British bombers and a film aircraft departed from bases in northern Scotland during the early hours of 29 October. The attack took place that morning, but was frustrated by clouds over the Tromsø area which made it difficult for the Allied airmen to accurately targetTirpitz. The battleship was not directly hit, but was damaged by a bomb that exploded near her hull. A British bomber made a crash landing in Sweden after being hit by German anti-aircraft fire, and several others were damaged. (Full article...)
  • Image 14 Map showing the overlapping French and British claims in New York and Pennsylvania The Battle of Ticonderoga was a minor confrontation at Fort Carillon (later renamed Fort Ticonderoga) on July 26 and 27, 1759, during the French and Indian War. A British military force of more than 11,000 men under the command of General Sir Jeffery Amherst moved artillery to high ground overlooking the fort, which was defended by a garrison of 400 Frenchmen under the command of Brigadier General François-Charles de Bourlamaque. Rather than defend the fort, de Bourlamaque, operating under instructions from General Louis-Joseph de Montcalm and New France's governor, the Marquis de Vaudreuil, withdrew his forces, and attempted to blow up the fort. The fort's powder magazine was destroyed, but its walls were not severely damaged. The British then occupied the fort, which was afterwards known by the name Fort Ticonderoga. They embarked on a series of improvements to the area and began construction of a fleet to conduct military operations on Lake Champlain. (Full article...)
    Image 14

    Map showing the overlapping French and British claims inNew York andPennsylvania

    TheBattle of Ticonderoga was a minor confrontation atFort Carillon (later renamedFort Ticonderoga) on July 26 and 27, 1759, during theFrench and Indian War. A British military force of more than 11,000 men under the command of General SirJeffery Amherst moved artillery to high ground overlooking the fort, which was defended by a garrison of 400 Frenchmen under the command of Brigadier GeneralFrançois-Charles de Bourlamaque.

    Rather than defend the fort, de Bourlamaque, operating under instructions from GeneralLouis-Joseph de Montcalm andNew France'sgovernor, theMarquis de Vaudreuil, withdrew his forces, and attempted to blow up the fort. The fort'spowder magazine was destroyed, but its walls were not severely damaged. The British then occupied the fort, which was afterwards known by the name Fort Ticonderoga. They embarked on a series of improvements to the area and began construction of a fleet to conduct military operations onLake Champlain. (Full article...)
  • Image 15 R. V. C. Bodley, c. 1914 Ronald Victor Courtenay Bodley, MC (3 March 1892 – 26 May 1970) was a British Army officer, author and journalist. Born to English parents in Paris, he lived in France until he was nine, before attending Eton College and then the Royal Military College, Sandhurst. He was commissioned in the King's Royal Rifle Corps and served with them during the First World War. After the war he spent seven years in the Sahara desert, and then travelled through Asia. Bodley wrote several books about his travels. He was considered among the most distinguished British writers on the Sahara, as well as one of the main western sources of information on the South Seas Mandate. Bodley moved to the United States in 1935, where he worked as a screenwriter. He rejoined the British Army at the outbreak of the Second World War and was sent to Paris to work for the Ministry of Information. He later immigrated to the United States, where he continued to work as a writer and also as an advisor to the United States Office of War Information. (Full article...)
    Image 15

    R. V. C. Bodley,c. 1914

    Ronald Victor Courtenay Bodley,MC (3 March 1892 – 26 May 1970) was aBritish Army officer, author and journalist. Born to English parents inParis, he lived in France until he was nine, before attendingEton College and then theRoyal Military College, Sandhurst. He was commissioned in theKing's Royal Rifle Corps and served with them during the First World War. After the war he spent seven years in theSahara desert, and then travelled through Asia. Bodley wrote several books about his travels. He was considered among the most distinguished British writers on the Sahara, as well as one of the main western sources of information on theSouth Seas Mandate.

    Bodley moved to the United States in 1935, where he worked as ascreenwriter. He rejoined the British Army at the outbreak of the Second World War and was sent to Paris to work for theMinistry of Information. He later immigrated to the United States, where he continued to work as a writer and also as an advisor to theUnited States Office of War Information. (Full article...)

Featured picture

Did you know(auto generated)

Featured biography –show another

This is aFeatured article, which represents some of the best content on English Wikipedia.

Walter's name as written on acharter of 1365:
(dative)domino Waltero dei Gracia Episcopo Dunblanensi

"Lord Walter, by God's grace, Bishop of Dunblane"

Walter de Coventre (died 1371 or 1372) was a 14th-century Scottishecclesiastic. There is no direct evidence of his birthdate, his family, or his family's origin, although he may have come from the region aroundAbernethy (in modern-dayPerth and Kinross), where a family with the name de Coventre is known to have lived. Walter appeared in the records for the first time in the 1330s, as a student at theUniversity of Paris. From there he went on to theUniversity of Orléans, initially as a student before becoming a lecturer there. He studiedthe arts,civil law andcanon law, and was awarded manyuniversity degrees, including twodoctorates. His studies were paid for, at least partially, by hisbenefices in Scotland. Despite holding perhaps more than five benefices at one stage, he did not return to Scotland until the late 1350s.

Following his return to Scotland, Walter soon becameDean ofAberdeen Cathedral. From there he became engaged in high-level ecclesiastical affairs with the Scottish church and political affairs withthe Earl of Mar. Sometime before June 1361, thecathedral chapter ofDunblane elected himBishop of Dunblane. He went toFrance to secure confirmation from the Pope atAvignon, who authorised hisconsecration. Walter was bishop for 10 years after returning home to Scotland. Records of his episcopate are thin, but there are enough to allow a modest reconstruction of his activities: he presided over legal disputes, issued a dispensation for an important irregular marriage, attended parliaments, and acted as an envoy of the Scottish crown in England. He died in either 1371 or 1372. (Full article...)

List of featured biographies

On this day

November 24:Feast day of theVietnamese Martyrs (Catholicism)

Eugene O'Neill Theatre
Eugene O'Neill Theatre

Selected quote

There cannot be two suns in the sky, nor two emperors on the earth.

— Confucius, Chinese Sage and Philosopher

Related portals

More Did you know...

Topics

Primary
Interdisciplinary
List
Other categorizations
Disciplines
Interdisciplinary fields
Themes
Journals
Academia
Related
Key concepts
Measurement
andstandards
Chronometry
Measurement
systems
Calendars
Clocks
Philosophy of time
Human experience
anduse of time
Time inscience
Geology
Physics
Other fields
Related
Key topics
Calendar eras
Regnal year
Era names
Calendars
Pre-Julian / Julian
Gregorian
Astronomical
Others
Astronomic time
Geologic time
Concepts
Standards
Methods
Chronological
dating
Absolute dating
Relative dating
Genetic methods
Linguistic methods
Related topics

Categories

WikiProjects

Things you can do


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Associated Wikimedia

The followingWikimedia Foundation sister projects provide more on this subject:

Discover Wikipedia usingportals
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:History&oldid=1257514002"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp