Sponges aremulticellular organisms consisting of jelly-likemesohyl sandwiched between two thin layers ofcells, and usually have tube-like bodies full of pores and channels that allow water to circulate through them. They have unspecialized cells that cantransform into other types and that often migrate between the main cell layers and the mesohyl in the process. They do not have complexnervous,[7]digestive orcirculatory systems. Instead, most rely on maintaining a constant water flow through their bodies to obtain food and oxygen and to remove wastes, usually viaflagella movements of the so-called "collar cells".
Sponges are similar to other animals in that they aremulticellular,heterotrophic, lackcell walls and producesperm cells. Unlike other animals, they lack truetissues[10] andorgans.[11] Some of them are radially symmetrical, but most are asymmetrical. The shapes of their bodies are adapted for maximal efficiency of water flow through the central cavity, where the water deposits nutrients and then leaves through a hole called theosculum. Thesingle-celledchoanoflagellates resemble thechoanocyte cells of sponges which are used to drive their water flow systems and capture most of their food. This along with phylogenetic studies of ribosomal molecules have been used as morphological evidence to suggest sponges are the sister group to the rest of animals.[12] A great majority are marine (salt-water) species, ranging in habitat from tidal zones to depths exceeding 8,800 m (5.5 mi), though there are freshwater species. All adult sponges aresessile, meaning that they attach to an underwater surface and remain fixed in place (i.e., do not travel). While in theirlarval stage of life, they aremotile.
Many sponges have internal skeletons of spicules (skeletal-like fragments ofcalcium carbonate orsilicon dioxide), and/orspongin (a modified type of collagen protein).[10] An internal gelatinousmatrix called mesohyl functions as anendoskeleton, and it is the only skeleton in soft sponges that encrust such hard surfaces as rocks. More commonly, the mesohyl is stiffened bymineralspicules, by spongin fibers, or both. 90% of all known sponge species that have the widest range of habitats including all freshwater ones aredemosponges that use spongin; many species havesilica spicules, whereas some species have calcium carbonateexoskeletons.Calcareous sponges have calcium carbonate spicules and, in some species, calcium carbonate exoskeletons, are restricted to relatively shallow marine waters where production of calcium carbonate is easiest.[13]: 179 The fragileglass sponges, with "scaffolding" of silica spicules, are restricted to polar regions and the ocean depths where predators are rare. Fossils of all of these types have been found in rocks dated from580 million years ago. In additionArchaeocyathids, whose fossils are common in rocks from530 to 490 million years ago, are now regarded as a type of sponge.
Although most of the approximately 5,000–10,000 known species of sponges feed onbacteria and other microscopic food in the water, some hostphotosynthesizing microorganisms asendosymbionts, and these alliances often produce more food and oxygen than they consume. A few species of sponges that live in food-poor environments have evolved ascarnivores that prey mainly on smallcrustaceans.[14]
Most sponges reproducesexually, but they can also reproduce asexually. Sexually reproducing species releasesperm cells into the water to fertilizeova released or retained by its mate or "mother"; the fertilized eggs develop intolarvae which swim off in search of places to settle.[13]: 183–185 Sponges are known for regenerating from fragments that are broken off, although this only works if the fragments include the right types of cells. Some species reproduce by budding. When environmental conditions become less hospitable to the sponges, for example as temperatures drop, many freshwater species and a few marine ones producegemmules, "survival pods" of unspecialized cells that remain dormant until conditions improve; they then either form completely new sponges or recolonize the skeletons of their parents.[13]: 120–127
Cells of the protist choanoflagellate clade closely resemble sponge choanocyte cells. Beating of choanocyteflagella draws water through the sponge so that nutrients can be extracted and waste removed.[15]
The few species of demosponge that have entirely soft fibrous skeletons with no hard elements have been used by humans over thousands of years for several purposes, including as padding and as cleaning tools. By the 1950s, though, these had beenoverfished so heavily that the industry almost collapsed, and most sponge-like materials are now synthetic. Sponges and their microscopic endosymbionts are now being researched as possible sources of medicines for treating a wide range of diseases.Dolphins have been observed using sponges as tools whileforaging.[16]
Sponges constitute thephylum Porifera, and have been defined assessilemetazoans (multicelled immobile animals) that have water intake and outlet openings connected by chambers lined withchoanocytes, cells with whip-like flagella.[13]: 29 However, a few carnivorous sponges have lost these water flow systems and the choanocytes.[13]: 39 [17] All known living sponges can remold their bodies, as most types of their cells can move within their bodies and a few can change from one type to another.[17][18]
Even if a few sponges are able to produce mucus – which acts as a microbial barrier in all other animals – no sponge with the ability to secrete a functional mucus layer has been recorded. Without such a mucus layer their living tissue is covered by a layer of microbial symbionts, which can contribute up to 40–50% of the sponge wet mass. This inability to prevent microbes from penetrating their porous tissue could be a major reason why they have never evolved a more complex anatomy.[19]
Likecnidarians (jellyfish, etc.) andctenophores (comb jellies), and unlike all other known metazoans, sponges' bodies consist of a non-living jelly-like mass (mesohyl) sandwiched between two main layers of cells.[20][21] Cnidarians and ctenophores have simple nervous systems, and their cell layers are bound by internal connections and by being mounted on a basement membrane (thin fibrous mat, also known as "basal lamina").[21] Sponges do not have a nervous system similar to that of vertebrates but may have one that is quite different.[7] Their middle jelly-like layers have large and varied populations of cells, and some types of cells in their outer layers may move into the middle layer and change their functions.[18]
A sponge's body is hollow and is held in shape by themesohyl, a jelly-like substance made mainly ofcollagen and reinforced by a dense network of fibers also made of collagen. 18 distinct cell types have been identified.[24] The inner surface is covered withchoanocytes, cells with cylindrical or conical collars surrounding oneflagellum per choanocyte. The wave-like motion of the whip-like flagella drives water through the sponge's body. All sponges haveostia, channels leading to the interior through the mesohyl, and in most sponges these are controlled by tube-likeporocytes that form closable inlet valves.Pinacocytes, plate-like cells, form a single-layered external skin over all other parts of the mesohyl that are not covered by choanocytes, and the pinacocytes also digest food particles that are too large to enter the ostia,[18][20] while those at the base of the animal are responsible for anchoring it.[20]
Other types of cells live and move within the mesohyl:[18][20]
Lophocytes areamoeba-like cells that move slowly through the mesohyl and secrete collagen fibres.
Collencytes are another type of collagen-producing cell.
Sclerocytes secrete the mineralizedspicules ("little spines") that form theskeletons of many sponges and in some species provide some defense against predators.
In addition to or instead of sclerocytes,demosponges havespongocytes that secrete a form of collagen thatpolymerizes intospongin, a thick fibrous material that stiffens the mesohyl.
Myocytes ("muscle cells") conduct signals and cause parts of the animal to contract.
"Grey cells" act as sponges' equivalent of animmune system.
Archaeocytes (oramoebocytes) areamoeba-like cells that aretotipotent, in other words, each is capable of transformation into any other type of cell. They also have important roles in feeding and in clearing debris that block the ostia.
Many larval sponges possess neuron-lesseyes that are based oncryptochromes. They mediate phototaxic behavior.[25]
Glass sponges present a distinctive variation on this basic plan. Their spicules, which are made ofsilica, form ascaffolding-like framework between whose rods the living tissue is suspended like acobweb that contains most of the cell types.[18] This tissue is asyncytium that in some ways behaves like many cells that share a single externalmembrane, and in others like a single cell with multiplenuclei.
Most sponges work rather likechimneys: they take in water at the bottom and eject it from theosculum at the top. Since ambient currents are faster at the top, the suction effect that they produce byBernoulli's principle does some of the work for free. Sponges can control the water flow by various combinations of wholly or partially closing the osculum and ostia (the intake pores) and varying the beat of the flagella, and may shut it down if there is a lot of sand or silt in the water.[18]
Although the layers ofpinacocytes andchoanocytes resemble theepithelia of more complex animals, they are not bound tightly by cell-to-cell connections or a basal lamina (thin fibrous sheet underneath). The flexibility of these layers and re-modeling of the mesohyl by lophocytes allow the animals to adjust their shapes throughout their lives to take maximum advantage of local water currents.[18]: 83
The simplest body structure in sponges is a tube or vase shape known as "asconoid", but this severely limits the size of the animal. The body structure is characterized by a stalk-like spongocoel surrounded by a single layer of choanocytes. If it is simply scaled up, the ratio of its volume to surface area increases, because surface increases as the square of length or width while volume increases proportionally to the cube. The amount of tissue that needs food andoxygen is determined by the volume, but the pumping capacity that supplies food and oxygen depends on the area covered by choanocytes. Asconoid sponges seldom exceed 1 mm (0.039 in) in diameter.[18]
Diagram of a syconoid sponge
Some sponges overcome this limitation by adopting the "syconoid" structure, in which the body wall ispleated. The inner pockets of the pleats are lined with choanocytes, which connect to the outer pockets of the pleats by ostia. This increase in the number of choanocytes and hence in pumping capacity enables syconoid sponges to grow up to a few centimeters in diameter.
The "leuconoid" pattern boosts pumping capacity further by filling the interior almost completely with mesohyl that contains a network of chambers lined with choanocytes and connected to each other and to the water intakes and outlet by tubes. Leuconid sponges grow to over 1 m (3.3 ft) in diameter, and the fact that growth in any direction increases the number of choanocyte chambers enables them to take a wider range of forms, for example, "encrusting" sponges whose shapes follow those of the surfaces to which they attach. All freshwater and most shallow-water marine sponges have leuconid bodies. The networks of water passages inglass sponges are similar to the leuconid structure.[18]
In all three types of structure, the cross-section area of the choanocyte-lined regions is much greater than that of the intake and outlet channels. This makes the flow slower near the choanocytes and thus makes it easier for them to trap food particles.[18] For example, inLeuconia, a small leuconoid sponge about 10 centimetres (3.9 in) tall and 1 centimetre (0.39 in) in diameter, water enters each of more than 80,000 intake canals at 6 cm perminute. However, becauseLeuconia has more than 2 million flagellated chambers whose combined diameter is much greater than that of the canals, water flow through chambers slows to 3.6 cm perhour, making it easy for choanocytes to capture food. All the water is expelled through a singleosculum at about 8.5 cm persecond, fast enough to carry waste products some distance away.[27]
In zoology, askeleton is any fairly rigid structure of an animal, irrespective of whether it has joints and irrespective of whether it isbiomineralized. The mesohyl functions as anendoskeleton in most sponges, and is the only skeleton in soft sponges that encrust hard surfaces such as rocks. More commonly the mesohyl is stiffened by mineralspicules, by spongin fibers or both. Spicules, which are present in most but not all species,[28] may be made ofsilica or calcium carbonate, and vary in shape from simple rods to three-dimensional "stars" with up to six rays. Spicules are produced bysclerocyte cells,[18] and may be separate, connected by joints, or fused.[17]
Some sponges also secreteexoskeletons that lie completely outside their organic components. For example,sclerosponges ("hard sponges") have massive calcium carbonate exoskeletons over which the organic matter forms a thin layer withchoanocyte chambers in pits in the mineral. These exoskeletons are secreted by thepinacocytes that form the animals' skins.[18]
Although adult sponges are fundamentallysessile animals, some marine and freshwater species can move across the sea bed at speeds of 1–4 mm (0.039–0.157 in) per day, as a result ofamoeba-like movements ofpinacocytes and other cells. A few species can contract their whole bodies, and many can close theiroscula andostia. Juveniles drift or swim freely, while adults are stationary.[18]
Sponges do not have distinctcirculatory,respiratory,digestive, andexcretory systems – instead, the water flow system supports all these functions. Theyfilter food particles out of the water flowing through them. Particles larger than 50 micrometers cannot enter theostia andpinacocytes consume them byphagocytosis (engulfing and intracellular digestion). Particles from 0.5 μm to 50 μm are trapped in the ostia, which taper from the outer to inner ends. These particles are consumed by pinacocytes or byarchaeocytes which partially extrude themselves through the walls of the ostia. Bacteria-sized particles, below 0.5 micrometers, pass through the ostia and are caught and consumed bychoanocytes.[18] Since the smallest particles are by far the most common, choanocytes typically capture 80% of a sponge's food supply.[29] Archaeocytes transport food packaged invesicles from cells that directly digest food to those that do not. At least one species of sponge has internal fibers that function as tracks for use by nutrient-carrying archaeocytes,[18] and these tracks also move inert objects.[20]
It used to be claimed thatglass sponges could live on nutrients dissolved in sea water and were very averse to silt.[30] However, a study in 2007 found no evidence of this and concluded that they extract bacteria and other micro-organisms from water very efficiently (about 79%) and process suspended sediment grains to extract such prey.[31] Collar bodies digest food and distribute it wrapped in vesicles that are transported bydynein "motor" molecules along bundles ofmicrotubules that run throughout thesyncytium.[18]
Sponges' cells absorb oxygen bydiffusion from water into cells as water flows through body, into whichcarbon dioxide and other soluble waste products such asammonia also diffuse. Archeocytes remove mineral particles that threaten to block the ostia, transport them through the mesohyl and generally dump them into the outgoing water current, although some species incorporate them into their skeletons.[18]
Carnivorous sponges
The carnivorous ping-pong tree sponge,Chondrocladia lampadiglobus[32]
In waters where the supply of food particles is very poor, some species prey oncrustaceans and other small animals. So far only 137 species have been discovered.[33] Most belong to thefamilyCladorhizidae, but a few members of theGuitarridae andEsperiopsidae are also carnivores.[34] In most cases, little is known about how they actually capture prey, although some species are thought to use either sticky threads or hookedspicules.[34][35] Most carnivorous sponges live in deep waters, up to 8,840 m (5.49 mi),[36] and the development of deep-ocean exploration techniques is expected to lead to the discovery of several more.[18][34] However, one species has been found inMediterranean caves at depths of 17–23 m (56–75 ft), alongside the more usualfilter-feeding sponges. The cave-dwelling predators capture crustaceans under 1 mm (0.039 in) long by entangling them with fine threads, digest them by enveloping them with further threads over the course of a few days, and then return to their normal shape; there is no evidence that they usevenom.[36]
Most known carnivorous sponges have completely lost the water flow system andchoanocytes. However, thegenusChondrocladia uses a highly modified water flow system to inflate balloon-like structures that are used for capturing prey.[34][37]
Endosymbionts
Freshwater sponges often hostgreen algae asendosymbionts withinarchaeocytes and other cells and benefit from nutrients produced by the algae. Many marine species host otherphotosynthesizing organisms, most commonlycyanobacteria but in some casesdinoflagellates. Symbiotic cyanobacteria may form a third of the total mass of living tissue in some sponges, and some sponges gain 48% to 80% of their energy supply from these micro-organisms.[18] In 2008, aUniversity of Stuttgart team reported that spicules made ofsilica conduct light into themesohyl, where the photosynthesizing endosymbionts live.[38] Sponges that host photosynthesizing organisms are most common in waters with relatively poor supplies of food particles and often have leafy shapes that maximize the amount of sunlight they collect.[20]
Sponges do not have the compleximmune systems of most other animals. However, they rejectgrafts from other species but accept them from other members of their own species. In a few marine species, gray cells play the leading role in rejection of foreign material. When invaded, they produce a chemical that stops movement of other cells in the affected area, thus preventing the intruder from using the sponge's internal transport systems. If the intrusion persists, the grey cells concentrate in the area and release toxins that kill all cells in the area. The "immune" system can stay in this activated state for up to three weeks.[20]
Sponges have threeasexual methods of reproduction: after fragmentation, bybudding, and by producinggemmules. Fragments of sponges may be detached by currents or waves. They use the mobility of theirpinacocytes andchoanocytes and reshaping of themesohyl to re-attach themselves to a suitable surface and then rebuild themselves as small but functional sponges over the course of several days. The same capabilities enable sponges that have been squeezed through a fine cloth to regenerate.[18]: 239 A sponge fragment can only regenerate if it contains bothcollencytes to producemesohyl andarcheocytes to produce all the other cell types.[29] A very few species reproduce by budding.[18]: 90–94
Gemmules are "survival pods" which a few marine sponges and many freshwater species produce by the thousands when dying and which some, mainly freshwater species, regularly produce in autumn.Spongocytes make gemmules by wrapping shells of spongin, often reinforced with spicules, round clusters ofarcheocytes that are full of nutrients.[18]: 87–88 Freshwater gemmules may also include photosynthesizing symbionts.[39] The gemmules then become dormant, and in this state can survive cold, drying out, lack of oxygen and extreme variations insalinity.[18] Freshwater gemmules often do not revive until the temperature drops, stays cold for a few months and then reaches a near-"normal" level.[39] When a gemmule germinates, the archeocytes round the outside of the cluster transform intopinacocytes, a membrane over a pore in the shell bursts, the cluster of cells slowly emerges, and most of the remaining archeocytes transform into other cell types needed to make a functioning sponge. Gemmules from the same species but different individuals can join forces to form one sponge.[18]: 89–90 Some gemmules are retained within the parent sponge, and in spring it can be difficult to tell whether an old sponge has revived or been "recolonized" by its own gemmules.[39]
Sexual
Most sponges arehermaphrodites (function as both sexes simultaneously), although sponges have nogonads (reproductive organs). Sperm are produced bychoanocytes or entire choanocyte chambers that sink into themesohyl and form spermaticcysts while eggs are formed by transformation ofarcheocytes, or of choanocytes in some species. Each egg generally acquires ayolk by consuming "nurse cells". During spawning, sperm burst out of their cysts and are expelled via theosculum. If they contact another sponge of the same species, the water flow carries them to choanocytes that engulf them but, instead of digesting them, metamorphose to anameboid form and carry the sperm through the mesohyl to eggs, which in most cases engulf the carrier and its cargo.[18]: 77
A few species release fertilized eggs into the water, but most retain the eggs until they hatch. By retaining the eggs, the parents can transfer symbiotic microorganisms directly to their offspring throughvertical transmission, while the species who release their eggs into the water has to acquire symbionts horizontally (a combination of both is probably most common, where larvae with vertically transmitted symbionts also acquire others horizontally).[40][41] There are four types of larvae, but all are lecithotrophic (non-feeding) balls of cells with an outer layer of cells whoseflagella orcilia enable the larvae to move. After swimming for a few days the larvae sink and crawl until they find a place to settle. Most of the cells transform into archeocytes and then into the types appropriate for their locations in a miniature adult sponge.[18]: 77 [42]
Glass sponge embryos start by dividing into separate cells, but once 32 cells have formed they rapidly transform into larvae that externally areovoid with a band ofcilia round the middle that they use for movement, but internally have the typical glass sponge structure of spicules with a cobweb-like mainsyncitium draped around and between them andchoanosyncytia with multiple collar bodies in the center. The larvae then leave their parents' bodies.[43]
Meiosis
The cytological progression of poriferaoogenesis andspermatogenesis (gametogenesis) is very similar to that of other metazoa.[44] Most of the genes from the classic set ofmeiotic genes, including genes for DNA recombination and double-strand break repair, that are conserved ineukaryotes are expressed in the sponges (e.g.Geodia hentscheli andGeodia phlegraei).[44] Since porifera are considered to be the earliest divergent animals, these findings indicate that the basic toolkit of meiosis including capabilities for recombination and DNA repair were present early in eukaryote evolution.[44]
Life cycle
Sponges intemperate regions live for at most a few years, but sometropical species and perhaps some deep-ocean ones may live for 200 years or more. Some calcifieddemosponges grow by only 0.2 mm (0.0079 in) per year and, if that rate is constant, specimens 1 m (3.3 ft) wide must be about 5,000 years old. Some sponges start sexual reproduction when only a few weeks old, while others wait until they are several years old.[18]
Coordination of activities
Adult sponges lackneurons or any other kind ofnervous tissue. However, most species have the ability to perform movements that are coordinated all over their bodies, mainly contractions of thepinacocytes, squeezing the water channels and thus expelling excess sediment and other substances that may cause blockages. Some species can contract theosculum independently of the rest of the body. Sponges may also contract in order to reduce the area that is vulnerable to attack by predators. In cases where two sponges are fused, for example if there is a large but still unseparated bud, these contraction waves slowly become coordinated in both of the "Siamese twins". The coordinating mechanism is unknown, but may involve chemicals similar toneurotransmitters.[45] However,glass sponges rapidly transmit electrical impulses through all parts of thesyncytium, and use this to halt the motion of theirflagella if the incoming water contains toxins or excessive sediment.[18]Myocytes are thought to be responsible for closing the osculum and for transmitting signals between different parts of the body.[20]
Sponges containgenes very similar to those that contain the "recipe" for the post-synaptic density, an important signal-receiving structure in the neurons of all other animals. However, in sponges these genes are only activated in "flask cells" that appear only in larvae and may provide some sensory capability while the larvae are swimming. This raises questions about whether flask cells represent the predecessors of true neurons or are evidence that sponges' ancestors had true neurons but lost them as they adapted to a sessile lifestyle.[46]
Sponges are worldwide in their distribution, living in a wide range of ocean habitats, from the polar regions to the tropics.[29] Most live in quiet, clear waters, because sediment stirred up by waves or currents would block their pores, making it difficult for them to feed and breathe.[30] The greatest numbers of sponges are usually found on firm surfaces such as rocks, but some sponges can attach themselves to soft sediment by means of a root-like base.[47]
Sponges are more abundant but less diverse in temperate waters than in tropical waters, possibly because organisms that prey on sponges are more abundant in tropical waters.[48]Glass sponges are the most common in polar waters and in the depths of temperate and tropical seas, as their very porous construction enables them to extract food from these resource-poor waters with the minimum of effort.Demosponges andcalcareous sponges are abundant and diverse in shallower non-polar waters.[49]
The differentclasses of sponge live in different ranges of habitat:
Marine, brackish; and about 150 freshwater species[18]
Inter-tidal to abyssal;[20] a carnivorous demosponge has been found at 8,840 m (5.49 mi)[36]
Any
As primary producers
Sponges withphotosynthesizingendosymbionts produce up to three times moreoxygen than they consume, as well as more organic matter than they consume. Such contributions to their habitats' resources are significant along Australia'sGreat Barrier Reef but relatively minor in the Caribbean.[29]
Defenses
Holes made by clionaid sponge (producing the traceEntobia) after the death of a modern bivalve shell of speciesMercenaria mercenaria, fromNorth CarolinaClose-up of the sponge boringEntobia in a modern oyster valve. Note the chambers connected by short tunnels.
Many sponges shedspicules, forming a dense carpet several meters deep that keeps awayechinoderms which would otherwise prey on the sponges.[29] They also produce toxins that prevent other sessile organisms such asbryozoans orsea squirts from growing on or near them, making sponges very effective competitors for living space. One of many examples includesageliferin.
A few species, theCaribbean fire spongeTedania ignis, cause a severe rash in humans who handle them.[18] Turtles and some fish feed mainly on sponges. It is often said that sponges producechemical defenses against such predators.[18] However, experiments have been unable to establish a relationship between the toxicity of chemicals produced by sponges and how they taste to fish, which would diminish the usefulness of chemical defenses as deterrents. Predation by fish may even help to spread sponges by detaching fragments.[20] However, some studies have shown fish showing a preference for non chemically defended sponges,[50] and another study found that high levels of coral predation did predict the presence of chemically defended species.[51]
Glass sponges produce no toxic chemicals, and live in very deep water where predators are rare.[30]
Spongeflies, also known as spongillaflies (Neuroptera,Sisyridae), are specialist predators of freshwater sponges. The female lays her eggs on vegetation overhanging water. The larvae hatch and drop into the water where they seek out sponges to feed on. They use their elongated mouthparts to pierce the sponge and suck the fluids within. The larvae of some species cling to the surface of the sponge while others take refuge in the sponge's internal cavities. The fully grown larvae leave the water and spin a cocoon in which to pupate.[52]
Bioerosion
The Caribbean chicken-liver spongeChondrilla nucula secretes toxins that kill coralpolyps, allowing the sponges to grow over the coral skeletons.[18] Others, especially in the familyClionaidae, use corrosive substances secreted by their archeocytes to tunnel into rocks, corals and the shells of deadmollusks.[18] Sponges may remove up to 1 m (3.3 ft) per year from reefs, creating visible notches just below low-tide level.[29]
Diseases
Caribbean sponges of the genusAplysina suffer fromAplysina red band syndrome. This causesAplysina to develop one or more rust-colored bands, sometimes with adjacent bands ofnecrotic tissue. These lesions may completely encircle branches of the sponge. The disease appears to becontagious and impacts approximately ten percent ofA. cauliformis on Bahamian reefs.[53] The rust-colored bands are caused by acyanobacterium, but it is unknown whether this organism actually causes the disease.[53][54]
Collaboration with other organisms
In addition to hosting photosynthesizing endosymbionts,[18] sponges are noted for their wide range of collaborations with other organisms. The relatively large encrusting spongeLissodendoryx colombiensis is most common on rocky surfaces, but has extended its range intoseagrass meadows by letting itself be surrounded or overgrown by seagrass sponges, which are distasteful to the localstarfish and therefore protectLissodendoryx against them; in return, the seagrass sponges get higher positions away from the sea-floor sediment.[55]
Shrimps of the genusSynalpheus form colonies in sponges, and each shrimp species inhabits a different sponge species, makingSynalpheus one of the most diversecrustacean genera. Specifically,Synalpheus regalis utilizes the sponge not only as a food source, but also as a defense against other shrimp and predators.[56] As many as 16,000 individuals inhabit a singleloggerhead sponge, feeding off the larger particles that collect on the sponge as it filters the ocean to feed itself.[57] Other crustaceans such as hermit crabs commonly have a specific species of sponge,Pseudospongosorites, grow on them as both the sponge and crab occupy gastropod shells until the crab and sponge outgrow the shell, eventually resulting in the crab using the sponge's body as protection instead of the shell until the crab finds a suitable replacement shell.[58]
Bathymetrical range of some sponge species.[59] DemospongeSamus anonymus (up to 50 m),hexactinellidScleroplegma lanterna (~100–600 m), hexactinellidAulocalyx irregularis (~550–915 m), lithistid demospongeNeoaulaxinia persicum (~500–1700 m)Generalised food web for sponge reefs[60]
The hypothesis has been made that coral reef sponges facilitate the transfer of coral-derived organic matter to their associated detritivores via the production of sponge detritus, as shown in the diagram. Several sponge species are able to convert coral-derived DOM into sponge detritus,[62][63] and transfer organic matter produced by corals further up the reef food web. Corals release organic matter as both dissolved and particulate mucus,[64][65][66][67] as well as cellular material such as expelledSymbiodinium.[68][69][61]
Organic matter could be transferred from corals to sponges by all these pathways, but DOM likely makes up the largest fraction, as the majority (56 to 80%) of coral mucus dissolves in the water column,[65] and coral loss of fixed carbon due to expulsion ofSymbiodinium is typically negligible (0.01%)[68] compared with mucus release (up to ~40%).[70][71] Coral-derived organic matter could also be indirectly transferred to sponges via bacteria, which can also consume coral mucus.[72][73][74][61]
Sponge loop hypothesis. Steps of the sponge loop pathway: (1) corals and algae release exudates asdissolved organic matter (DOM), (2) sponges take up DOM, (3) sponges release detritalparticulate organic matter (POM), (4) sponge detritus (POM) is taken up by sponge-associated and free-livingdetritivores.[61][63][75]The sponge holobiont. The spongeholobiont is an example of the concept of nested ecosystems. Key functions carried out by themicrobiome (colored arrows) influence holobiont functioning and, through cascading effects, subsequently influence community structure and ecosystem functioning. Environmental factors act at multiple scales to alter microbiome, holobiont, community, and ecosystem scale processes. Thus, factors that alter microbiome functioning can lead to changes at the holobiont, community, or even ecosystem level and vice versa, illustrating the necessity of considering multiple scales when evaluating functioning in nested ecosystems.[76] (DOM: dissolved organic matter, POM: particulate organic matter, DIN: dissolved inorganic nitrogen)
Sponge holobiont
Besides a one to onesymbiotic relationship, it is possible for a host to become symbiotic with amicrobial consortium, resulting in a diversesponge microbiome. Sponges are able to host a wide range ofmicrobial communities that can also be very specific. The microbial communities that form a symbiotic relationship with the sponge can amount to as much as 35% of thebiomass of its host.[77] The term for this specific symbiotic relationship, where a microbial consortia pairs with a host is called aholobiotic relationship. The sponge as well as the microbial community associated with it will produce a large range of secondarymetabolites that help protect it against predators through mechanisms such aschemical defense.[78]
Some of these relationships include endosymbionts within bacteriocyte cells, and cyanobacteria or microalgae found below the pinacoderm cell layer where they are able to receive the highest amount of light, used for phototrophy. They can host over 50 different microbial phyla and candidate phyla, including Alphaprotoebacteria,Actinomycetota,Chloroflexota,Nitrospirota, "Cyanobacteria", the taxa Gamma-, the candidate phylumPoribacteria, andThaumarchaea.[78]
The phylum Porifera is further divided intoclasses mainly according to the composition of theirskeletons:[17][29]
Hexactinellida (glass sponges) have silicate spicules, the largest of which have six rays and may be individual or fused.[17] The main components of their bodies aresyncytia in which large numbers of cell share a single externalmembrane.[29]
Calcarea have skeletons made ofcalcite, a form ofcalcium carbonate, which may form separate spicules or large masses. All the cells have a single nucleus and membrane.[29]
MostDemospongiae have silicate spicules orspongin fibers or both within their soft tissues. However, a few also have massive external skeletons made ofaragonite, another form of calcium carbonate.[17][29] All the cells have a single nucleus and membrane.[29]
In the 1970s, sponges with massive calcium carbonate skeletons were assigned to a separate class,Sclerospongiae, otherwise known as "coralline sponges".[81]However, in the 1980s, it was found that these were all members of either the Calcarea or the Demospongiae.[82]
So far scientific publications have identified about 9,000 poriferan species,[29] of which: about 400 are glass sponges; about 500 are calcareous species; and the rest are demosponges.[18] However, some types of habitat, vertical rock and cave walls and galleries in rock and coral boulders, have been investigated very little, even in shallow seas.[29]
Classes
Sponges were traditionally distributed in three classes: calcareous sponges (Calcarea), glass sponges (Hexactinellida) and demosponges (Demospongiae). However, studies have now shown that theHomoscleromorpha, a group thought to belong to theDemospongiae, has agenetic relationship well separated from other sponge classes.[13]: 153–154 Therefore, they have recently been recognized as the fourth class of sponges.[83][84]
Sponges are divided intoclasses mainly according to the composition of theirskeletons:[20] These are arranged in evolutionary order as shown below in ascending order of their evolution from top to bottom:
The phylogeny of sponges has been debated heavily since the advent ofphylogenetics. Originally thought to be the most basal animal phylum, there is now considerable evidence thatCtenophora may hold that title instead.[86][87] Additionally, themonophyly of the phylum is now under question. Several studies have concluded thatall other animals emerged from within the sponges, and usually recover that thecalcareous sponges andHomoscleromorpha are closer to other animals than todemosponges.[88][89] The internal relationships of Porifera have proven to be less uncertain. A close relationship of Homoscleromorpha and Calcarea has been recovered in nearly all studies, whether or not they support sponge or eumetazoan monophyly.[88][6][84][83] The position ofglass sponges is also fairly certain, with a majority of studies recovering them as the sister of the demosponges.[83][6][88] Thus, the uncertainty at the base of the animal family tree is probably best represented by the below cladogram.
Althoughmolecular clocks andbiomarkers suggest sponges existed well before theCambrian explosion of life,silica spicules like those of demosponges are absent from the fossil record until the Cambrian.[90] An unsubstantiated 2002 report exists of spicules in rocks dated around750 million years ago.[91] Well-preservedfossil sponges from about580 million years ago in theEdiacaran period have been found in theDoushantuo Formation.[92] These fossils, which include: spicules;pinacocytes;porocytes;archeocytes;sclerocytes; and the internal cavity, have been classified as demosponges. The Ediacaran record of sponges also contains two other genera: the stem-hexactinellidHelicolocellus from theDengying Formation[93] and the possible stem-archaeocyathanArimasia from theNama Group.[94] These genera are both from the "Nama assemblage" of Ediacaran biota, although whether this is due to a genuine lack beforehand or preservational bias is uncertain. Fossils ofglass sponges have been found from around540 million years ago in rocks in Australia, China, and Mongolia.[95] Early Cambrian sponges from Mexico belonging to the genusKiwetinokia show evidence of fusion of several smaller spicules to form a single large spicule.[96]Calcium carbonate spicules ofcalcareous sponges have been found in Early Cambrian rocks from about530 to 523 million years ago in Australia. Other probable demosponges have been found in the EarlyCambrianChengjiang fauna, from525 to 520 million years ago.[97] Fossils found in the Canadian Northwest Territories dating to890 million years ago may be sponges; if this finding is confirmed, it suggests the first animals appeared before the Neoproterozoic oxygenation event.[98]
Oxygen content of the atmosphere over the last billion years. If confirmed, the discovery of fossilized sponges dating to 890 million years ago would predate the Neoproterozoic Oxygenation Event.
Freshwater sponges appear to be much younger, as the earliest known fossils date from the Mid-Eocene period about48 to 40 million years ago.[95] Although about 90% of modern sponges aredemosponges, fossilized remains of this type are less common than those of other types because their skeletons are composed of relatively soft spongin that does not fossilize well.[99]The earliest sponge symbionts are known from theearly Silurian.[100]
A chemical tracer is24-isopropyl cholestane, which is a stable derivative of 24-isopropylcholesterol, which is said to be produced bydemosponges but not byeumetazoans ("true animals", i.e.cnidarians andbilaterians). Sincechoanoflagellates are thought to be animals' closest single-celled relatives, a team of scientists examined thebiochemistry andgenes of onechoanoflagellate species. They concluded that this species could not produce 24-isopropyl cholesterol but that investigation of a wider range of choanoflagellates would be necessary in order to prove that the fossil 24-isopropyl cholestane could only have been produced by demosponges.[101]Although a previous publication reported traces of the chemical 24-isopropyl cholestane in ancient rocks dating to1,800 million years ago,[102] recent research using a much more accurately dated rock series has revealed that these biomarkers only appear before the end of theMarinoan glaciation approximately635 million years ago,[103] and that "Biomarker analysis has yet to reveal any convincing evidence for ancient sponges pre-dating the first globally extensive Neoproterozoic glacial episode (the Sturtian, ~713 million years ago in Oman)". While it has been argued that this 'sponge biomarker' could have originated from marine algae, recent research suggests that the algae's ability to produce this biomarker evolved only in theCarboniferous; as such, the biomarker remains strongly supportive of the presence of demosponges in the Cryogenian.[104][105][106]
Archaeocyathids, which some classify as a type of coralline sponge, are very common fossils in rocks from the EarlyCambrian about530 to 520 million years ago, but apparently died out by the end of the Cambrian490 million years ago.[97]It has been suggested that they were produced by: sponges;cnidarians;algae;foraminiferans; a completely separatephylum of animals, Archaeocyatha; or even a completely separatekingdom of life, labeled Archaeata or Inferibionta. Since the 1990s, archaeocyathids have been regarded as a distinctive group of sponges.[80]
It is difficult to fitchancelloriids into classifications of sponges or more complex animals. An analysis in 1996 concluded that they were closely related to sponges on the grounds that the detailed structure of chancellorid sclerites ("armor plates") is similar to that of fibers of spongin, acollagenprotein, in modern keratose (horny)demosponges such asDarwinella.[108] However, another analysis in 2002 concluded that chancelloriids are not sponges and may be intermediate between sponges and more complex animals, among other reasons because their skins were thicker and more tightly connected than those of sponges.[109] In 2008, a detailed analysis of chancelloriids' sclerites concluded that they were very similar to those ofhalkieriids, mobilebilaterian animals that looked likeslugs inchain mail and whose fossils are found in rocks from the very Early Cambrian to the Mid Cambrian. If this is correct, it would create a dilemma, as it is extremely unlikely that totally unrelated organisms could have developed such similar sclerites independently, but the huge difference in the structures of their bodies makes it hard to see how they could be closely related.[107]
In the 1990s, sponges were widely regarded as amonophyletic group, all of them having descended from acommon ancestor that was itself a sponge, and as the "sister-group" to all othermetazoans (multi-celled animals), which themselves form a monophyletic group. On the other hand, some 1990s analyses also revived the idea that animals' nearest evolutionary relatives arechoanoflagellates, single-celled organisms very similar to sponges'choanocytes – which would imply that most Metazoa evolved from very sponge-like ancestors and therefore that sponges may not be monophyletic, as the same sponge-like ancestors may have given rise both to modern sponges and to non-sponge members of Metazoa.[110]
Analyses since 2001 have concluded thatEumetazoa (more complex than sponges) are more closely related to particular groups of sponges than to other sponge groups. Such conclusions imply that sponges are not monophyletic, because thelast common ancestor of all sponges would also be a direct ancestor of the Eumetazoa, which are not sponges. A study in 2001 based on comparisons ofribosomeDNA concluded that the most fundamental division within sponges was betweenglass sponges and the rest, and that Eumetazoa are more closely related tocalcareous sponges (those with calcium carbonate spicules) than to other types of sponge.[110] In 2007, one analysis based on comparisons ofRNA and another based mainly on comparison of spicules concluded that demosponges and glass sponges are more closely related to each other than either is to the calcareous sponges, which in turn are more closely related to Eumetazoa.[95][112]
Other anatomical and biochemical evidence links the Eumetazoa withHomoscleromorpha, a sub-group of demosponges. A comparison in 2007 ofnuclearDNA, excluding glass sponges andcomb jellies, concluded that:
Thesperm of Homoscleromorpha share features with the sperm of Eumetazoa, that sperm of other sponges lack. In both Homoscleromorpha and Eumetazoa layers of cells are bound together by attachment to a carpet-like basal membrane composed mainly of "typ IV"collagen, a form of collagen not found in other sponges – although thespongin fibers that reinforce the mesohyl of all demosponges is similar to "type IV" collagen.[22]
The analyses described above concluded that sponges are closest to the ancestors of all Metazoa, of all multi-celled animals including both sponges and more complex groups. However, another comparison in 2008 of 150 genes in each of 21 genera, ranging from fungi to humans but including only two species of sponge, suggested thatcomb jellies (ctenophora) are the most basal lineage of the Metazoa included in the sample.[113][114][115][116] If this is correct, either modern comb jellies developed their complex structures independently of other Metazoa, or sponges' ancestors were more complex and all known sponges are drastically simplified forms. The study recommended further analyses using a wider range of sponges and other simple Metazoa such asPlacozoa.[113]
However, reanalysis of the data showed that the computer algorithms used for analysis were misled by the presence of specific ctenophore genes that were markedly different from those of other species, leaving sponges as either the sister group to all other animals, or an ancestral paraphyletic grade.[117][118] 'Family trees' constructed using a combination of all available data – morphological, developmental and molecular – concluded that the sponges are in fact a monophyletic group, and with thecnidarians form the sister group to the bilaterians.[119][120]
A very large and internally consistent alignment of 1,719 proteins at the metazoan scale, published in 2017, showed that (i) sponges – represented by Homoscleromorpha, Calcarea, Hexactinellida, and Demospongiae – are monophyletic, (ii) sponges are sister-group to all other multicellular animals, (iii) ctenophores emerge as the second-earliest branching animal lineage, and (iv) placozoans emerge as the third animal lineage, followed bycnidarians sister-group to bilaterians.[121]
In March 2021, scientists from Dublin found additional evidence that sponges are the sister group to all other animals,[122] while in May 2023, Schultz et al. found patterns of irreversible change in genome synteny that provide strong evidence thatctenophores are the sister group to all other animals instead.[123]
A report in 1997 described use of spongesas a tool bybottlenose dolphins inShark Bay in Western Australia. A dolphin will attach a marine sponge to itsrostrum, which is presumably then used to protect it when searching for food in the sandysea bottom.[124] The behavior, known assponging, has only been observed in this bay and is almost exclusively shown by females. A study in 2005 concluded that mothers teach the behavior to their daughters and that all the sponge users are closely related, suggesting that it is a fairly recent innovation.[16]
Thecalcium carbonate orsilicaspicules of most spongegenera make them too rough for most uses, but two genera,Hippospongia andSpongia, have soft, entirely fibrous skeletons.[13]: 88 Early Europeans used soft sponges for many purposes, including padding for helmets, portable drinking utensils and municipal water filters. Until the invention of synthetic sponges, they were used as cleaning tools, applicators for paints andceramic glazes and discreetcontraceptives. However, by the mid-20th century, overfishing brought both the animals and the industry close toextinction.[125]
Theluffa "sponge", also spelledloofah, which is commonly sold for use in the kitchen or the shower, is not derived from an animal but mainly from the fibrous "skeleton" of thesponge gourd (Luffa aegyptiaca,Cucurbitaceae).[128]
Lacking any protective shell or means of escape, sponges have evolved to synthesize a variety of unusual compounds. One such class is the oxidized fatty acid derivatives calledoxylipins. Members of this family have been found to have anti-cancer, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties. One example isolated from the OkinawanPlakortis sponges,plakoridine A, has shown potential as a cytotoxin to murine lymphoma cells.[131][132]
^Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940)."σπόγγος".A Greek-English Lexicon.Archived from the original on 5 September 2021. Retrieved5 September 2021 – via Perseus.
^Leys, S. P. (16 February 2006). "Embryogenesis in the glass sponge Oopsacas minuta: Formation of syncytia by fusion of blastomeres".Integrative and Comparative Biology.46 (2):104–117.doi:10.1093/icb/icj016.ISSN1540-7063.PMID21672727.
^Weaver, James C.; Aizenberg, Joanna; Fantner, Georg E.; Kisailus, David; Woesz, Alexander; Allen, Peter; Fields, Kirk; Porter, Michael J.; Zok, Frank W.; Hansma, Paul K.; Fratzl, Peter; Morse, Daniel E. (2007). "Hierarchical assembly of the siliceous skeletal lattice of the hexactinellid sponge Euplectella aspergillum".Journal of Structural Biology.158 (1):93–106.doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2006.10.027.PMID17175169.
^abGochfeld, D.J.; et al. (2012). Steller, D.; Lobel, L. (eds.)."Population Dynamics of a Sponge Disease on Caribbean Reefs".Diving for Science 2012. Proceedings of the American Academy of Underwater Sciences 31st Symposium. Archived from the original on 2015-09-04.
^Rix L, de Goeij JM, Mueller CE, Struck U and others (2016) "Coral mucus fuels the sponge loop in warm- and coldwater coral reef ecosystems".Sci Rep,6: 18715.
^abRix, Laura; de Goeij, Jasper M.; van Oevelen, Dick; Struck, Ulrich; Al-Horani, Fuad A.; Wild, Christian; Naumann, Malik S. (March 2017). "Differential recycling of coral and algal dissolved organic matter via the sponge loop".Functional Ecology.31 (3): 778−789.Bibcode:2017FuEco..31..778R.doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12758.
^Crossland, C.J. (July 1987). "In situ release of mucus and DOC-lipid from the corals Acropora variabilis and Stylophora pistillata in different light regimes".Coral Reefs.6 (1): 35−42.Bibcode:1987CorRe...6...35C.doi:10.1007/BF00302210.
^abWild, Christian; Huettel, Markus; Klueter, Anke; Kremb, Stephan G.; Rasheed, Mohammed Y. M.; Jørgensen, Bo B. (2004). "Coral mucus functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the reef ecosystem".Nature.428 (6978):66–70.Bibcode:2004Natur.428...66W.doi:10.1038/nature02344.ISSN0028-0836.PMID14999280.
^Tanaka, Yasuaki; Miyajima, Toshihiro; Umezawa, Yu; Hayashibara, Takeshi; Ogawa, Hiroshi; Koike, Isao (2009). "Net release of dissolved organic matter by the scleractinian coral Acropora pulchra".Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology.377 (2):101–106.Bibcode:2009JEMBE.377..101T.doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2009.06.023.
^Naumann, M. S.; Haas, A.; Struck, U.; Mayr, C.; el-Zibdah, M.; Wild, C. (September 2010). "Organic matter release by dominant hermatypic corals of the Northern Red Sea".Coral Reefs.29 (3): 649−659.Bibcode:2010CorRe..29..649N.doi:10.1007/s00338-010-0612-7.
^abHoegh-Guldberg, O.; McCloskey, L. R.; Muscatine, L. (April 1987). "Expulsion of zooxanthellae by symbiotic cnidarians from the Red Sea".Coral Reefs.5 (4): 201−204.Bibcode:1987CorRe...5..201H.doi:10.1007/BF00300964.
^Tremblay, Pascale; Grover, Renaud; Maguer, Jean François; Legendre, Louis; Ferrier-Pagès, Christine (15 April 2012). "Autotrophic carbon budget in coral tissue: a new 13C-based model of photosynthate translocation".Journal of Experimental Biology.215 (8):1384–1393.Bibcode:2012JExpB.215.1384T.doi:10.1242/jeb.065201.ISSN1477-9145.PMID22442377.
^Ferrier-Pagès, C; Leclercq, N; Jaubert, J; Pelegrí, Sp (2000). "Enhancement of pico- and nanoplankton growth by coral exudates".Aquatic Microbial Ecology.21:203–209.doi:10.3354/ame021203.ISSN0948-3055.
^Wild, C.; et al. (July 2010). "Organic matter release by Red Sea coral reef organisms—potential effects on microbial activity and in situ O2 availability".Marine Ecology Progress Series.411: 61−71.Bibcode:2010MEPS..411...61W.doi:10.3354/meps08653.
^de Goeij, Jasper M.; van Oevelen, Dick; Vermeij, Mark J. A.; Osinga, Ronald; Middelburg, Jack J.; de Goeij, Anton F. P. M.; Admiraal, Wim (4 October 2013). "Surviving in a Marine Desert: The Sponge Loop Retains Resources Within Coral Reefs".Science.342 (6154):108–110.Bibcode:2013Sci...342..108D.doi:10.1126/science.1241981.ISSN0036-8075.PMID24092742.
^Hartman, W.D.; Goreau, T.F. (1970). "Jamaican coralline sponges: Their morphology, ecology and fossil relatives".Symposium of the Zoological Society of London.25:205–243.(cited by MGG.rsmas.miami.edu).Archived 2018-08-18 at theWayback Machine
^Vacelet, J. (1985). "Coralline sponges and the evolution of the Porifera". In Conway Morris, S.; George, J.D.; Gibson, R.; Platt, H.M. (eds.).The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates.Oxford University Press. pp. 1–13.ISBN978-0-19-857181-0.
^Reitner, J; Wörheide, G. (2002). "Non-lithistid fossil Demospongiae – origins of their palaeobiodiversity and highlights in history of preservation". In Hooper, J.N.; Van Soest, R.W. (eds.).Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges(PDF). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Plenum.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2008-12-16. RetrievedNovember 4, 2008.
^Wang, Xiaopeng; Liu, Alexander G.; Chen, Zhe; Wu, Chengxi; Liu, Yarong; Wan, Bin; Pang, Ke; Zhou, Chuanming; Yuan, Xunlai; Xiao, Shuhai (27 June 2024). "A late-Ediacaran crown-group sponge animal".Nature.630 (8018):905–911.Bibcode:2024Natur.630..905W.doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07520-y.PMID38839967.
^Runnegar, Bruce; Gehling, James G.; Jensen, Sören; Saltzman, Matthew R. (October 2024). "Ediacaran paleobiology and biostratigraphy of the Nama Group, Namibia, with emphasis on the erniettomorphs, tubular and trace fossils, and a new sponge, Arimasia germsi n. gen. n. sp".Journal of Paleontology.98 (S94):1–59.Bibcode:2024JPal...98S...1R.doi:10.1017/jpa.2023.81.
^Gold, D.A. (September 2018). "The slow rise of complex life as revealed through biomarker genetics".Emerging Topics in Life Sciences.2 (2):191–199.doi:10.1042/ETLS20170150.PMID32412622.S2CID90887224.
^abDunn, Casey W.; Hejnol, Andreas; Matus, David Q.; Pang, Kevin; Browne, William E.; Smith, Stephen A.; et al. (April 2008). "Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life".Nature.452 (7188):745–9.Bibcode:2008Natur.452..745D.doi:10.1038/nature06614.PMID18322464.S2CID4397099.
^Smolker, Rachel; Richards, Andrew; Connor, Richard; Mann, Janet; Berggren, Per (1997). "Sponge-carrying by Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins: Possible tool-use by a delphinid".Ethology.103 (6):454–465.doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00160.x.hdl:2027.42/71936.
^Imhoff, J.F.; Stöhr, R. (2003). "Sponge-Associated Bacteria". In Müller, W.E. (ed.).Sponges (Porifera): Porifera.Springer. pp. 43–44.ISBN978-3-540-00968-9.
^Takeuchi, Shinji; Ishibashi, Masami; Kobayashi, Junichi (1994). "Plakoridine A, a new tyramine-containing pyrrolidine alkaloid from theOkinawan marine sponge Plakortis sp".Journal of Organic Chemistry.59 (13):3712–3713.doi:10.1021/jo00092a039.
^Etchells, Laura L.; Sardarian, Ali; Whitehead, Roger C. (18 April 2005). "A synthetic approach to the plakoridines modeled on a biogenetic theory".Tetrahedron Letters.46 (16):2803–2807.doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.02.124.
.jpg)
.jpg)
