 | This articlerelies excessively onreferences toprimary sources. Please improve this article by addingsecondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
ThePolitical Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c. 41) is anact ofParliament of the United Kingdom that sets out howpolitical parties,elections andreferendums are to be regulated in the United Kingdom. It formed an important part of the constitutional reform programme implemented by the 1997Labour Government, building on theRegistration of Political Parties Act 1998 (c. 48) which was passed two years earlier.
The act was introduced after consultation with major political parties, and largely followed the recommendations of theCommittee on Standards in Public Life (known at the time as the "Neill Committee" after its chairman), an independent body set-up by former Prime MinisterJohn Major to consider ways of making politics more transparent. The committee set out its proposals in its report,The Funding of Political Parties in the United Kingdom.[1]
The act created an independentElectoral Commission to regulate political parties and their funding arrangements.[2] It also required parties to submit statements of their accounts on a regular basis, and prohibited the receipt of funds from foreign or anonymous donors. Restrictions on campaign expenditure were also put in place, dictating the maximum amount that parties were able to spend.[2]
| This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The law gave the newly formed Electoral Commission a role in controlling the registration of political parties.[2]
The requirement for parties to register with an official body, if they wished to be named on ballot papers, was the result of a fairly wide acceptance that the finances of political groups should be regulated to reduce the perception of underhand dealings.
In addition, political groups or individuals failing to register with the commission would only be able to describe themselves as "Independent" on ballot papers, or else have a blank space instead of a description after their names—with the single exception of theSpeaker of the House of Commons who is entitled to be described as: "The Speaker seeking re-election".
This built on the provisions of theRegistration of Political Parties Act 1998, passed amid concern about voters being fooled by misleading ballot descriptions.
There is an annual fee for the registration of a political party.
| This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Under the terms of the law, registered political parties are only allowed to accept donations in excess of £500 from "permissible donors", defined as either individuals on an electoral register in the United Kingdom, or political parties, companies, trade unions, or similar organisations that are registered in the country.
The provision of non-financial support to a registered party – such as subsidies or free materials – is counted as a donation. Each party is required to submit details of all donations received, whether by party headquarters or their subsidiary parts. Each report must provide sufficient information to show that a donor counts as a "permissible source".
Political parties on the separate register forNorthern Ireland are exempt from the controls on accepting and reporting donations.
The act places strict limits on the amount each party may spend in the campaign period for the election or referendum.[3][4]
As of 2024[update], the limit for elections to the UK Parliament in Westminster stands at £54,010 per constituency contested; this would reach a maximum of £34.13 million for parties contesting all 632 seats in Great Britain.[5] This spending limit applies within 365 days of a general election. These spending limits were last increased in November 2023 by the Representation of the People (Variation of Election Expenses, Expenditure Limits and Donation etc. Thresholds) Order 2023 (SI 2023/1235).[6]
The amount permitted to be spent by third-parties during parliamentary elections to support or oppose candidates was increased from the previous limit of £5 (which had been held to be an impermissible restriction on freedom of expression by theEuropean Convention on Human Rights in the case ofBowman v United Kingdom) to £500.[7]
| This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The act provides a basic framework to the running of all future referendums that are to be held under the jurisdiction of the Electoral Commission in pursuance of any provision made by a subsequentact of Parliament in the following areas:
The act also makes the provision that in any future UK-wide referendum the chairperson of the Electoral Commission is appointed "Chief Counting Officer" for the United Kingdom or gives the power for the chairperson to appoint a Chief Counting Officer.
In December 2006Prime MinisterTony Blair and politicians of other parties were questioned by police as part of their investigation into theCash for Honours affair. Part of their time was said to be spent looking at whether the act had been breached by parties taking loans from supporters in return for nominations to theHouse of Lords. Unlike donations, loans did not have to be made public as long as they were made on "commercial terms".[citation needed]
The government later changed the law to require the declaration of all forms of loan, and asked a formerClerk of the Crown in Chancery, SirHayden Phillips, to undertake a fundamental review of party funding arrangements. He reported in 2008.[8]
In November 2007 the provisions of the act were again the subject of scrutiny in the cases of Labour party donorDavid Abrahams and Scottish Labour leaderWendy Alexander.[citation needed]
In 2016, several UK police forces started investigations into allegations of election fraud during the 2015 general election, specifically on allegations that the Conservatives breached the spending limits. The majority of allegations focus on the misrepresentation of the "battle-bus" finances.[citation needed]
.svg)