 | This articlemay beconfusing or unclear to readers. Please helpclarify the article. There might be a discussion about this onthe talk page.(August 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Inmetaphysics,Plato's beard is aparadoxical argument dubbed byWillard Van Orman Quine in his 1948 paper "On What There Is". The phrase came to be identified as the philosophy of understanding something based on what does not exist.[1]
Quine definedPlato's beard – and his reason for naming it so – in the following words:
This is the oldPlatonic riddle of nonbeing. Nonbeing must in some sense be, otherwise what is it that there is not? This tangleddoctrine might be nicknamed Plato's beard; historically it has proved tough, frequently dulling the edge ofOccam's razor.[2]
The argument has been favored by prominent philosophers includingBertrand Russell,A. J. Ayer andC. J. F. Williams.[3] Declaring that notp (¬p) cannot exist, one may be forced to abandontruisms such asnegation andmodus tollens. There are also variations to Quine's original, which included its application both to singular and general terms.[4] Quine initially applied the doctrine to singular terms only before expanding it so that it covers general terms as well.[4]
Karl Popper stated the inverse. "Only if Plato's beard is sufficiently tough, and tangled by many entities, can it be worth our while to use Ockham's razor."[5] Russell's theory of "singular descriptions", which clearly show "how we might meaningfully use seeming names without supposing that there be the entities allegedly named", is supposed to "detangle" Plato's beard.[6][7]
Works related toOn What There Is at Wikisource
