Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Plane partition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromPlanar partitions)
Array of nonnegative integers in combinatorics
A plane partition of 30 represented as stacks of unit cubes

Inmathematics and especially incombinatorics, aplane partition is a two-dimensional array of nonnegative integersπi,j{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}} (withpositiveinteger indicesi andj) that is nonincreasing in both indices. This means that

πi,jπi,j+1{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}\geq \pi _{i,j+1}} andπi,jπi+1,j{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}\geq \pi _{i+1,j}} for alli andj.

Moreover, only finitely many of theπi,j{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}} may be nonzero. Plane partitions are a generalization ofpartitions of an integer.

A plane partition may be represented visually by the placement of a stack ofπi,j{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}}unit cubes above the point (i,j) in the plane, giving a three-dimensional solid as shown in the picture. The image has matrix form

4432143113211{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}4&4&3&2&1\\4&3&1&1\\3&2&1\\1\end{matrix}}}

Plane partitions are also often described by the positions of the unit cubes. From this point of view, a plane partition can be defined as a finite subsetP{\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}} of positiveinteger lattice points (i,j,k) inN3{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} ^{3}}, such that if (r,s,t) lies inP{\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}} and if(i,j,k){\displaystyle (i,j,k)} satisfies1ir{\displaystyle 1\leq i\leq r},1js{\displaystyle 1\leq j\leq s}, and1kt{\displaystyle 1\leq k\leq t}, then (i,j,k) also lies inP{\displaystyle {\mathcal {P}}}.

Thesum of a plane partition is

n=i,jπi,j.{\displaystyle n=\sum _{i,j}\pi _{i,j}.}

The sum describes the number of cubes of which the plane partition consists. Much interest in plane partitions concerns theenumeration of plane partitions in various classes. The number of plane partitions with sumn is denoted by PL(n). For example, there are six plane partitions with sum 3

32111121111111{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}3\end{matrix}}\qquad {\begin{matrix}2&1\end{matrix}}\qquad {\begin{matrix}1&1&1\end{matrix}}\qquad {\begin{matrix}2\\1\end{matrix}}\qquad {\begin{matrix}1&1\\1\end{matrix}}\qquad {\begin{matrix}1\\1\\1\end{matrix}}}

so PL(3) = 6.

Plane partitions may be classified by how symmetric they are. Many symmetric classes of plane partitions are enumerated by simple product formulas.

Generating function of plane partitions

[edit]

Thegenerating function for PL(n) is[1]

n=0PL(n)xn=k=11(1xk)k=1+x+3x2+6x3+13x4+24x5+{\displaystyle \sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\operatorname {PL} (n)x^{n}=\prod _{k=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{(1-x^{k})^{k}}}=1+x+3x^{2}+6x^{3}+13x^{4}+24x^{5}+\cdots \qquad }(sequenceA000219 in theOEIS).

It is sometimes referred to as theMacMahon function, as it was discovered byPercy A. MacMahon.

This formula may be viewed as the 2-dimensional analogue ofEuler'sproduct formula for the number ofinteger partitions ofn. There is no analogous formula known for partitions in higher dimensions (i.e., forsolid partitions).[2] The asymptotics for plane partitions were first calculated byE. M. Wright.[3] One obtains, for largen{\displaystyle n}, that[a]

PL(n)ζ(3)7/3612π (n2)25/36 exp(3 ζ(3)1/3(n2)2/3+ζ(1)).{\displaystyle \operatorname {PL} (n)\sim {\frac {\zeta (3)^{7/36}}{\sqrt {12\pi }}}\ \left({\frac {n}{2}}\right)^{-25/36}\ \exp \left(3\ \zeta (3)^{1/3}\left({\frac {n}{2}}\right)^{2/3}+\zeta '(-1)\right).}

Evaluating numerically yields

lnPL(n)2.00945n2/30.69444lnn1.4631.{\displaystyle \ln \operatorname {PL} (n)\sim 2.00945n^{2/3}-0.69444\ln n-1.4631.}

Plane partitions in a box

[edit]

Around 1896, MacMahon set up the generating function of plane partitions that are subsets of ther×s×t{\displaystyle r\times s\times t} boxB(r,s,t)={(i,j,k)|1ir,1js,1kt}{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)=\{(i,j,k)|1\leq i\leq r,1\leq j\leq s,1\leq k\leq t\}} in his first paper on plane partitions.[5] The formula is given byπB(r,s,t)q|π|=i=1rj=1s1qi+j+t11qi+j1{\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\prod _{j=1}^{s}{\frac {1-q^{i+j+t-1}}{1-q^{i+j-1}}}}

A proof of this formula can be found in the bookCombinatory Analysis written by MacMahon.[6] MacMahon also mentions the generating functions of plane partitions.[7] The formula for the generating function can be written in an alternative way, which is given byπB(r,s,t)q|π|=i=1rj=1sk=1t1qi+j+k11qi+j+k2{\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\prod _{j=1}^{s}\prod _{k=1}^{t}{\frac {1-q^{i+j+k-1}}{1-q^{i+j+k-2}}}}

Multiplying each component by1q1q{\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {1-q}{1-q}}}, and settingq = 1 in the formulas above yields that the total numberN1(r,s,t){\displaystyle N_{1}(r,s,t)} of plane partitions that fit in ther×s×t{\displaystyle r\times s\times t} boxB(r,s,t){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)} is equal to the following product formula:[8]N1(r,s,t)=(i,j,k)B(r,s,t)i+j+k1i+j+k2=i=1rj=1si+j+t1i+j1.{\displaystyle N_{1}(r,s,t)=\prod _{(i,j,k)\in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}{\frac {i+j+k-1}{i+j+k-2}}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\prod _{j=1}^{s}{\frac {i+j+t-1}{i+j-1}}.}The planar case (whent = 1) yields thebinomial coefficients:

B(r,s,1)=(r+sr).{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,1)={\binom {r+s}{r}}.}

The general solution is

B(r,s,t)=k=1t(r+s+k1)!(k1)!(r+k1)!(s+k1)!=k=1t(r+s+k1r+k1)(r+s+k1s+k1)(r+s+k1r)(s+k1s){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)&=\prod _{k=1}^{t}{\frac {(r+s+k-1)!(k-1)!}{(r+k-1)!(s+k-1)!}}\\&=\prod _{k=1}^{t}{\frac {{\binom {r+s+k-1}{r+k-1}}{\binom {r+s+k-1}{s+k-1}}}{{\binom {r+s+k-1}{r}}{\binom {s+k-1}{s}}}}\end{aligned}}}

Theisometric projection of the unit cubes representing a plane partition in a box gives abijection between these plane partitions and rhombus tilings of a hexagon with the same edge lengths as the box.[9]

Special plane partitions

[edit]

Special plane partitions include symmetric, cyclic and self-complementary plane partitions, and combinations of these properties.

In the subsequent sections, the enumeration of special sub-classes of plane partitions inside a box are considered.These articles use the notationNi(r,s,t){\displaystyle N_{i}(r,s,t)} for the number of such plane partitions, wherer,s, andt are the dimensions of the box under consideration, andi is the index for the case being considered.

Action ofS2,S3 andC3 on plane partitions

[edit]

S2{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{2}} is the group ofpermutations acting on the first two coordinates of a point. This group contains the identity, which sends (i,j,k) to itself, and the transposition (i,j,k) → (j,i,k). The number of elements in an orbitη{\displaystyle \eta } is denoted by|η|{\displaystyle |\eta |}.B/S2{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}/{\mathcal {S}}_{2}} denotes the set of orbits of elements ofB{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}} under the action ofS2{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{2}}. The height of an element (i,j,k) is defined byht(i,j,k)=i+j+k2.{\displaystyle ht(i,j,k)=i+j+k-2.}The height increases by one for each step away from the back right corner. For example, the corner position (1, 1, 1) has height 1 andht(2, 1, 1) = 2. The height of an orbit is defined to be the height of any element in the orbit. This notation of the height differs from the notation ofIan G. Macdonald.[10]

There is a natural action of the permutation groupS3{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{3}} on a Ferrers diagram of a plane partition—this corresponds to simultaneously permuting the three coordinates of all nodes. This generalizes the conjugation operation forinteger partitions. The action ofS3{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{3}} can generate new plane partitions starting from a given plane partition. Below there are shown six plane partitions of 4 that are generated by theS3{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{3}} action. Only the exchange of the first two coordinates is manifest in the representation given below.

313121121111111111{\displaystyle {\begin{smallmatrix}3&1\end{smallmatrix}}\quad {\begin{smallmatrix}3\\1\end{smallmatrix}}\quad {\begin{smallmatrix}2&1&1\end{smallmatrix}}\quad {\begin{smallmatrix}2\\1\\1\end{smallmatrix}}\quad {\begin{smallmatrix}1&1&1\\1\end{smallmatrix}}\quad {\begin{smallmatrix}1&1\\1\\1\end{smallmatrix}}}

C3{\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}_{3}} is called the group of cyclic permutations and consists of

(i,j,k)(i,j,k),(i,j,k)(j,k,i),and (i,j,k)(k,i,j).{\displaystyle (i,j,k)\rightarrow (i,j,k),\quad (i,j,k)\rightarrow (j,k,i),\quad {\text{and }}\quad (i,j,k)\rightarrow (k,i,j).}

Symmetric plane partitions

[edit]

A plane partitionπ{\displaystyle \pi } is called symmetric ifπi,j =πj,i for alli,j. In other words, a plane partition is symmetric if(i,j,k)B(r,s,t){\displaystyle (i,j,k)\in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)} if and only if(j,i,k)B(r,s,t){\displaystyle (j,i,k)\in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}. Plane partitions of this type are symmetric with respect to the planex =y. Below is an example of a symmetric plane partition and its visualisation.

A symmetric plane partition, sum 35
43321332132212111{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}4&3&3&2&1\\3&3&2&1&\\3&2&2&1&\\2&1&1&&\\1&&&&\end{matrix}}}

In 1898, MacMahon formulated his conjecture about the generating function for symmetric plane partitions which are subsets ofB(r,r,t){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,t)}.[11] This conjecture is called theMacMahon conjecture. The generating function is given byπB(r,r,t)/S2q|π|=i=1r[1qt+2i11q2i1j=i+1r1q2(i+j+t1)1q2(i+j1)]{\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,t)/{\mathcal {S}}_{2}}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\left[{\frac {1-q^{t+2i-1}}{1-q^{2i-1}}}\prod _{j=i+1}^{r}{\frac {1-q^{2(i+j+t-1)}}{1-q^{2(i+j-1)}}}\right]}

Macdonald[10] pointed out that Percy A. MacMahon's conjecture reduces to

πB(r,r,t)/S2q|π|=ηB(r,r,t)/S21q|η|(1+ht(η))1q|η|ht(η){\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,t)/{\mathcal {S}}_{2}}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{\eta \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,t)/{\mathcal {S}}_{2}}{\frac {1-q^{|\eta |(1+ht(\eta ))}}{1-q^{|\eta |ht(\eta )}}}}

In 1972 Edward A. Bender andDonald E. Knuth conjectured[12] a simple closed form for the generating function for plane partition which have at mostr rows and strict decrease along the rows.George Andrews showed[13] that the conjecture of Bender and Knuth and the MacMahon conjecture are equivalent. MacMahon's conjecture was proven almost simultaneously by George Andrews in 1977[14] and later Ian G. Macdonald presented an alternative proof.[15] When settingq = 1 yields the counting functionN2(r,r,t){\displaystyle N_{2}(r,r,t)} which is given by

N2(r,r,t)=i=1r2i+t12i11i<jri+j+t1i+j1{\displaystyle N_{2}(r,r,t)=\prod _{i=1}^{r}{\frac {2i+t-1}{2i-1}}\prod _{1\leq i<j\leq r}{\frac {i+j+t-1}{i+j-1}}}

For a proof of the caseq = 1 please refer to George Andrews' paperMacMahon's conjecture on symmetric plane partitions.[16]

Cyclically symmetric plane partitions

[edit]

π is called cyclically symmetric, if thei-th row ofπ{\displaystyle \pi } is conjugate to thei-th column for alli. Thei-th row is regarded as an ordinary partition. The conjugate of a partitionπ{\displaystyle \pi } is the partition whose diagram is the transpose of partitionπ{\displaystyle \pi }.[10] In other words, the plane partition is cyclically symmetric if whenever(i,j,k)B(r,s,t){\displaystyle (i,j,k)\in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)} then (k,i,j) and (j,k,i) also belong toB(r,s,t){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}. Below an example of a cyclically symmetric plane partition and its visualization is given.

A cyclically symmetric plane partition
65543364331643114221311111{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}6&5&5&4&3&3\\6&4&3&3&1&\\6&4&3&1&1&\\4&2&2&1&&\\3&1&1&&&\\1&1&1&&&\end{matrix}}}

Macdonald's conjecture provides a formula for calculating the number of cyclically symmetric plane partitions for a given integerr. This conjecture is called theMacdonald conjecture. The generating function for cyclically symmetric plane partitions which are subsets ofB(r,r,r){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)} is given by

πB(r,r,r)/C3q|π|=ηB(r,r,r)/C31q|η|(1+ht(η))1q|η|ht(η){\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {C}}_{3}}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{\eta \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {C}}_{3}}{\frac {1-q^{|\eta |(1+ht(\eta ))}}{1-q^{|\eta |ht(\eta )}}}}

This equation can also be written in another way

ηB(r,r,r)/C31q|η|(1+ht(η))1q|η|ht(η)=i=1r[1q3i11q3i2j=ir1q3(r+i+j1)1q3(2i+j1)]{\displaystyle \prod _{\eta \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {C}}_{3}}{\frac {1-q^{|\eta |(1+ht(\eta ))}}{1-q^{|\eta |ht(\eta )}}}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\left[{\frac {1-q^{3i-1}}{1-q^{3i-2}}}\prod _{j=i}^{r}{\frac {1-q^{3(r+i+j-1)}}{1-q^{3(2i+j-1)}}}\right]}

In 1979, Andrews proved Macdonald's conjecture for the caseq = 1 as the"weak" Macdonald conjecture.[17] Three years later William H. Mills,David Robbins and Howard Rumsey proved the general case of Macdonald's conjecture in their paperProof of the Macdonald conjecture.[18] The formula forN3(r,r,r){\displaystyle N_{3}(r,r,r)} is given by the"weak" Macdonald conjecture

N3(r,r,r)=i=1r[3i13i2j=iri+j+r12i+j1]{\displaystyle N_{3}(r,r,r)=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\left[{\frac {3i-1}{3i-2}}\prod _{j=i}^{r}{\frac {i+j+r-1}{2i+j-1}}\right]}

Totally symmetric plane partitions

[edit]

A totally symmetric plane partitionπ{\displaystyle \pi } is a plane partition which is symmetric and cyclically symmetric. This means that the diagram is symmetric at all three diagonal planes, or in other words that if(i,j,k)B(r,s,t){\displaystyle (i,j,k)\in {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)} then all six permutations of (i,j,k) are also inB(r,s,t){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)}. Below an example of a matrix for a totally symmetric plane partition is given. The picture shows the visualisation of the matrix.

A totally symmetric plane partition
54431433143213111{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}5&4&4&3&1\\4&3&3&1&\\4&3&2&1&\\3&1&1&&\\1&&&&\end{matrix}}}

Macdonald found the total number of totally symmetric plane partitions that are subsets ofB(r,r,r){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)}. The formula is given by

N4(r,r,r)=ηB(r,r,r)/S31+ht(η)ht(η){\displaystyle N_{4}(r,r,r)=\prod _{\eta \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {S}}_{3}}{\frac {1+ht(\eta )}{ht(\eta )}}}

In 1995John R. Stembridge first proved the formula forN4(r,r,r){\displaystyle N_{4}(r,r,r)}[19] and later in 2005 it was proven by George Andrews,Peter Paule, and Carsten Schneider.[20] Around 1983 Andrews and Robbins independently stated an explicit product formula for the orbit-counting generating function for totally symmetric plane partitions.[21][22] This formula already alluded to in George E. Andrews' paperTotally symmetric plane partitions which was published 1980.[23] The conjecture is calledTheq-TSPPconjecture and it is given by:

LetS3{\displaystyle {\mathcal {S}}_{3}} be the symmetric group. The orbit counting function for totally symmetric plane partitions that fit insideB(r,r,r){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)} is given by the formula

πB(r,r,r)/S3q|π|=ηB(r,r,r)/S31q1+ht(η)1qht(η)=1ijkr1qi+j+k11qi+j+k2.{\displaystyle \sum _{\pi \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {S}}_{3}}q^{|\pi |}=\prod _{\eta \in {\mathcal {B}}(r,r,r)/{\mathcal {S}}_{3}}{\frac {1-q^{1+ht(\eta )}}{1-q^{ht(\eta )}}}=\prod _{1\leq i\leq j\leq k\leq r}{\frac {1-q^{i+j+k-1}}{1-q^{i+j+k-2}}}.}

This conjecture was proved in 2011 byChristoph Koutschan,Manuel Kauers andDoron Zeilberger.[24]

Self-complementary plane partitions

[edit]

Ifπi,j+πri+1,sj+1=t{\displaystyle \pi _{i,j}+\pi _{r-i+1,s-j+1}=t} for all1ir{\displaystyle 1\leq i\leq r},1js{\displaystyle 1\leq j\leq s}, then the plane partition is called self-complementary. It is necessary that the productrst{\displaystyle r\cdot s\cdot t} is even. Below an example of a self-complementary symmetric plane partition and its visualisation is given.

A self-complementary plane partition
443214222321{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}4&4&3&2&1\\4&2&2&2&\\3&2&1&&\end{matrix}}}

Richard P. Stanley[25] conjectured formulas for the total number of self-complementary plane partitionsN5(r,s,t){\displaystyle N_{5}(r,s,t)}. According to Stanley, Robbins also formulated formulas for the total number of self-complementary plane partitions in a different but equivalent form. The total number of self-complementary plane partitions that are subsets ofB(r,s,t){\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}(r,s,t)} is given by

N5(2r,2s,2t)=N1(r,s,t)2{\displaystyle N_{5}(2r,2s,2t)=N_{1}(r,s,t)^{2}}
N5(2r+1,2s,2t)=N1(r,s,t)N1(r+1,s,t){\displaystyle N_{5}(2r+1,2s,2t)=N_{1}(r,s,t)N_{1}(r+1,s,t)}
N5(2r+1,2s+1,2t)=N1(r+1,s,t)N1(r,s+1,t){\displaystyle N_{5}(2r+1,2s+1,2t)=N_{1}(r+1,s,t)N_{1}(r,s+1,t)}

It is necessary that the product ofr,s andt is even. A proof can be found in the paperSymmetries of Plane Partitions which was written by Stanley.[26][25] The proof works with Schur functionsssr(x){\displaystyle s_{s^{r}}(x)}. Stanley's proof of the ordinary enumeration of self-complementary plane partitions yields theq-analogue by substitutingxi=qi{\displaystyle x_{i}=q^{i}} fori=1,,n{\displaystyle i=1,\ldots ,n}.[27] This is a special case of Stanley's hook-content formula.[28] The generating function for self-complementary plane partitions is given by

sγα(q,q2,,qn)=qγα(α+1)/2i=1αj=0γ11qi+nα+j1qi+j{\displaystyle s_{\gamma ^{\alpha }}(q,q^{2},\ldots ,q^{n})=q^{\gamma \alpha (\alpha +1)/2}\prod _{i=1}^{\alpha }\prod _{j=0}^{\gamma -1}{\frac {1-q^{i+n-\alpha +j}}{1-q^{i+j}}}}

Substituting this formula in

ssr(x1,x2,,xt+r)2  for B(2r,2s,2t){\displaystyle s_{s^{r}}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{t+r})^{2}\ {\text{ for }}{\mathcal {B}}(2r,2s,2t)}
ssr(x1,x2,,xt+r)s(s+1)r(x1,x2,,xt+r) for B(2r,2s+1,2t){\displaystyle s_{s^{r}}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{t+r})s_{(s+1)^{r}}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{t+r}){\text{ for }}{\mathcal {B}}(2r,2s+1,2t)}
ssr+1(x1,x2,,xt+r+1)ssr(x1,x2,,xt+r+1) for B(2r+1,2s,2t+1){\displaystyle s_{s^{r+1}}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{t+r+1})s_{s^{r}}(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{t+r+1}){\text{ for }}{\mathcal {B}}(2r+1,2s,2t+1)}

supplies the desiredq-analogue case.

Cyclically symmetric self-complementary plane partitions

[edit]

A plane partitionπ{\displaystyle \pi } is called cyclically symmetric self-complementary if it iscyclically symmetric andself-complementary. The figure presents a cyclically symmetric self-complementary plane partition and the according matrix is below.

A cyclically symmetric self-complementary plane partition
4441332132113{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}4&4&4&1\\3&3&2&1\\3&2&1&1\\3&&&\end{matrix}}}

In a private communication with Stanley, Robbins conjectured that the total number of cyclically symmetric self-complementary plane partitions is given byN6(2r,2r,2r){\displaystyle N_{6}(2r,2r,2r)}.[22][25] The total number of cyclically symmetric self-complementary plane partitions is given by

N6(2r,2r,2r)=Dr2{\displaystyle N_{6}(2r,2r,2r)=D_{r}^{2}}

Dr{\displaystyle D_{r}} is the number ofr×r{\displaystyle r\times r}alternating sign matrices. A formula forDr{\displaystyle D_{r}} is given by

Dr=j=0r1(3j+1)!(r+j)!{\displaystyle D_{r}=\prod _{j=0}^{r-1}{\frac {(3j+1)!}{(r+j)!}}}

Greg Kuperberg proved the formula forN6(r,r,r){\displaystyle N_{6}(r,r,r)} in 1994.[9]

Totally symmetric self-complementary plane partitions

[edit]

A totally symmetric self-complementary plane partition is a plane partition that is bothtotally symmetric andself-complementary. For instance, the matrix below is such a plane partition; it is visualised in the accompanying picture.

A totally symmetric self-complementary plane partition
6665536553316553315331153311311{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}6&6&6&5&5&3\\6&5&5&3&3&1\\6&5&5&3&3&1\\5&3&3&1&1&\\5&3&3&1&1&\\3&1&1&&&\end{matrix}}}

The formulaN7(r,r,r){\displaystyle N_{7}(r,r,r)} was conjectured by William H. Mills, Robbins and Howard Rumsey in their workSelf-Complementary Totally Symmetric Plane Partitions.[29] The total number of totally symmetric self-complementary plane partitions is given by

N7(2r,2r,2r)=Dr{\displaystyle N_{7}(2r,2r,2r)=D_{r}}

Andrews proves this formula in 1994 in his paperPlane Partitions V: The TSSCPP Conjecture.[30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Richard P. Stanley,Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 2. Corollary 7.20.3.
  2. ^R.P. Stanley,Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 2. pp. 365, 401–2.
  3. ^E. M. Wright, Asymptotic partition formulae I. Plane partitions, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics1 (1931) 177–189.
  4. ^L. Mutafchiev and E. Kamenov, "Asymptotic formula for the number of plane partitions of positive integers", Comptus Rendus-Academie Bulgare Des Sciences59 (2006), no. 4, 361.
  5. ^MacMahon, Percy A. (1896). "XVI. Memoir on the theory of the partition of numbers.-Part I".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.187 52.
  6. ^MacMahon, Major Percy A. (1916).Combinatory Analysis Vol 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. §495.
  7. ^MacMahon, Major Percy A. (1916).Combinatory Analysis. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. §429.
  8. ^MacMahon, Major Percy A. (1916).Combinatory Analysis. Cambridge University Press. pp. §429, §494.
  9. ^abKuperberg, Greg (1994). "Symmetries of plane partitions and the permanent-determinant method".Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.68:115–151.arXiv:math/9410224.Bibcode:1994math.....10224K.doi:10.1016/0097-3165(94)90094-9.S2CID 14538036.
  10. ^abcMacdonald, Ian G. (1998).Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Clarendon Press. pp. 20f, 85f.ISBN 9780198504504.
  11. ^MacMahon, Percy Alexander (1899). "Partitions of numbers whose graphs possess symmetry".Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.17.
  12. ^Bender & Knuth (1972). "Enumeration of plane partitions".Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.13:40–54.doi:10.1016/0097-3165(72)90007-6.
  13. ^Andrews, George E. (1977)."Plane partitions II: The equivalence of the Bender-Knuth and MacMahon conjectures".Pacific Journal of Mathematics.72 (2):283–291.doi:10.2140/pjm.1977.72.283.
  14. ^Andrews, George (1975). "Plane Partitions (I): The Mac Mahon Conjecture".Adv. Math. Suppl. Stud.1.
  15. ^Macdonald, Ian G. (1998).Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Clarendon Press. pp. 83–86.ISBN 9780198504504.
  16. ^Andrews, George E. (1977)."MacMahon's conjecture on symmetric plane partitions".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.74 (2):426–429.Bibcode:1977PNAS...74..426A.doi:10.1073/pnas.74.2.426.PMC 392301.PMID 16592386.
  17. ^Andrews, George E. (1979). "Plane Partitions(III): The Weak Macdonald Conjecture".Inventiones Mathematicae.53 (3):193–225.Bibcode:1979InMat..53..193A.doi:10.1007/bf01389763.S2CID 122528418.
  18. ^Mills; Robbins; Rumsey (1982). "Proof of the Macdonald conjecture".Inventiones Mathematicae.66:73–88.Bibcode:1982InMat..66...73M.doi:10.1007/bf01404757.S2CID 120926391.
  19. ^Stembridge, John R. (1995)."The Enumeration of Totally Symmetric Plane Partitions".Advances in Mathematics.111 (2):227–243.doi:10.1006/aima.1995.1023.
  20. ^Andrews; Paule; Schneider (2005)."Plane Partitions VI: Stembridge's TSPP theorem".Advances in Applied Mathematics.34 (4):709–739.doi:10.1016/j.aam.2004.07.008.
  21. ^Bressoud, David M. (1999).Proofs and Confirmations. Cambridge University Press. pp. conj. 13.ISBN 9781316582756.
  22. ^abStanley, Richard P. (1970). "A Baker's dozen of conjectures concerning plane partitions".Combinatoire énumérative:285–293.
  23. ^Andrews, George (1980). "Totally symmetric plane partitions".Abstracts Amer. Math. Soc.1: 415.
  24. ^Koutschan; Kauers; Zeilberger (2011)."A proof of George Andrews' and David Robbins' q-TSPP conjecture".PNAS.108 (6):2196–2199.arXiv:1002.4384.Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.2196K.doi:10.1073/pnas.1019186108.PMC 3038772.S2CID 12077490.
  25. ^abcStanley, Richard P. (1986)."Symmetries of Plane Partitions"(PDF).Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.43:103–113.doi:10.1016/0097-3165(86)90028-2.
  26. ^"Erratum".Journal of Combinatorial Theory.43: 310. 1986.
  27. ^Eisenkölbl, Theresia (2008)."A Schur function identity related to the (−1)-enumeration of self complementary plane partitions".Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.115 (2):199–212.doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2007.05.004.
  28. ^Stanley, Richard P. (1971). "Theory and Application of Plane Partitions. Part 2".Studies in Applied Mathematics.50 (3):259–279.doi:10.1002/sapm1971503259.
  29. ^Mills; Robbins; Rumsey (1986). "Self-Complementary Totally Symmetric Plane Partitions".Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.42 (2):277–292.doi:10.1016/0097-3165(86)90098-1.
  30. ^Andrews, George E. (1994). "Plane Partitions V: The TSSCPP Conjecture".Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A.66:28–39.doi:10.1016/0097-3165(94)90048-5.
  1. ^Here the typographical error (in Wright's paper) has been corrected, pointed out by Mutafchiev and Kamenov.[4]

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plane_partition&oldid=1307465167"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp