Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Phronesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ancient Greek word for a type of wisdom or intelligence
For the academic journal, seePhronesis (journal). For the band, seePhronesis (band). For the album by Monuments, seePhronesis (album).

Inancient Greek philosophy,phronesis (Ancient Greek:φρόνησις,romanizedphrónēsis) refers to the type ofwisdom orintelligence concerned with practical action. It implies good judgment and excellence ofcharacter and habits. InAristotelian ethics, the concept is distinguished from other words for wisdom and intellectualvirtues (such asepisteme andsophia) because of its practical character.

Ancient Greek Philosophy

[edit]

Socrates

[edit]

In some ofSocrates' dialogues, he proposes thatphronēsis is a necessary condition for all virtue,[1] and that to be good is to be an intelligent or reasonable person with intelligent and reasonable thoughts.[2] In Plato'sMeno, Socrates writes thatphronēsis is the most important attribute to learn, although it cannot be taught and is instead gained through the understanding of one's own self.[3]

Aristotle

[edit]

In Aristotle's work,phronesis is the intellectual virtue that helps turn one's moral instincts into practical action.[4][5] He writes that moral virtues help any person to achieve the end, and thatphronesis is what it takes to discover the means to gain that end.[4] Without moral virtues,phronesis degenerates into an inability to make practical actions in regards to genuinegoods for man.[6]

In the sixth book ofAristotle'sNicomachean Ethics, he distinguished the concepts ofsophia (wisdom) andphronesis, and described the relationship between them and other intellectual virtues.[4]: VI He writes thatSophia is a combination ofnous, the ability to discern reality, andepistēmē, things that "could not be otherwise".[7]He then writes thatPhronesis involves not only the ability to decide how to reach a certain end, but the ability to reflect upon and determine "good ends" as well.[4]: VI1140a,1141b,1142b

Aristotle also writes that althoughsophia is higher and more serious thanphronesis, the pursuit of wisdom and happiness requires both, asphronesis facilitatessophia.[4]: VI.81142 According to Aristotle's theory ofrhetoric,phronesis is one of the three types of appeals to character (ethos).[8]

Aristotle claims that gaining phronesis requires gaining experience, as he writes:

...although the young may be experts ingeometry andmathematics and similar branches of knowledge [sophoi], we do not consider that a young man can have Prudence [phronimos]. The reason is that Prudence [phronesis] includes a knowledge of particular facts, and this is derived from experience, which a young man does not possess; for experience is the fruit of years.[9]

Modern Philosophy

[edit]

According to philosophers Kristjánsson, Fowers, Darnell and Pollard,phronesis means making decisions in regards to moral events or circumstances. This four-component philosophical account became known as theAristotelian Phronesis Model, orAPM.[10] There is recent[anachronism] work to return the virtue of practical judgement to overcome disagreements and conflicts in the form of Aristotle'sphronesis.[11]

In Social Sciences

[edit]

InAlasdair MacIntyre's bookAfter Virtue, he called for a phroneticsocial science. He writes that for every prediction made bysocial scientific theory there are usuallycounter-examples, meaning that theunpredictability of human beings and human life requires focus on practical experiences.

In psychologistHeiner Rindermann's bookCognitive Capitalism, he uses the termphronesis to describe a rational approach to thinking and acting, "a circumspect and thoughtful way of life in a rational manner".[12]

Critiques of theAPM's empirical limitations led to McLoughlin, Thoma, and Kristjánsson developing theneo-Aristotelian Phronesis Model (neo-APM),[13] which refines the construct using contemporary psychometric techniques. This updated model empirically identified ten distinct components and employed network analysis to highlight the interconnectedness and centrality of key elements, such as aspired moral identity and moral deliberation. The neo-APM thus provides a more nuanced and empirically valid framework for understanding practical wisdom in psychological and educational contexts.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^
  2. ^Long, Christopher P. (2004).The Ethics of Ontology: Rethinking an Aristotelian Legacy. State University of New York Press. p. 123).ISBN 0-7914-6119-X.
  3. ^Gallagher, Shaun (1992). "Self-understanding and phronēsis".Hermeneutics and Education. State University of New York Press. pp. 197–199.ISBN 0-7914-1175-3.
  4. ^abcdeAristotle.Nicomachean Ethics.
  5. ^Kristjansson, Kristján (2015)."Phronesis as an ideal in professional medical ethics: some preliminary positionings and problematics".Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.36 (5):299–320.doi:10.1007/s11017-015-9338-4.PMID 26387119.S2CID 254786871. Retrieved5 October 2022.
  6. ^MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981).After Virtue (2nd revised ed.). US: Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. p. 154.ISBN 978-0-268-00611-2.
  7. ^Parry, Richard (2021),"Episteme and Techne", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved2021-11-28
  8. ^Aristotle.Rhetoric.1378a.
  9. ^Aristotle.The Nicomachean Ethics. The Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Rackham, H.VI.8¶5 1142.
  10. ^Kristjánsso, Kristján; Fowers, Blaine; Darnell, Catherine; Pollard, David (2021)."Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Type of Contextual Integrative Thinking".Review of General Psychology.25 (3):239–257.doi:10.1177/10892680211023063.S2CID 237456851.
  11. ^Beresford, E.B. (1996)."Can phronesis save the life of medical ethics?".Theoretical Medicine.17 (3):209–24.doi:10.1007/BF00489446.PMID 8952418.S2CID 39100551. Retrieved5 October 2022.
  12. ^Rindermann, Heiner (2018).Cognitive Capitalism: Human Capital and the Wellbeing of Nations (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 188.doi:10.1017/9781107279339.ISBN 978-1-107-27933-9.
  13. ^McLoughlin, Shane; Thoma, Stephen; Kristjánsson, Kristján (2025-01-22)."Was Aristotle right about moral decision-making? Building a new empirical model of practical wisdom".PLoS One.20 (1) e0317842.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317842.ISSN 1932-6203.PMC 11753716.PMID 39841702.

Sources and further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
  • The dictionary definition ofphronesis at Wiktionary
Overview
Ideas and interests
Logic
Physics
Biology
Ethics
Politics
Rhetoric
Poetics
Works
Organon
Physics
On Animals
Metaphysics
Ethics and politics
Rhetoric and poetics
Parva Naturalia
Lost
Pseudepigrapha
Related topics
Branches
Branches
Aesthetics
Epistemology
Ethics
Free will
Metaphysics
Mind
Normativity
Ontology
Reality
By era
By era
Ancient
Chinese
Greco-Roman
Indian
Persian
Medieval
East Asian
European
Indian
Islamic
Jewish
Modern
People
Contemporary
Analytic
Continental
Miscellaneous
  • By region
By region
African
Eastern
Middle Eastern
Western
Miscellaneous
Perspectives
Declinations
Principal concepts
Antitheses
Relatedparadigm shifts
in thehistory of science
Related topics
Positivist-related debate
Method
Contributions
Proponents
Criticism
Critics
Concepts in contention
About virtues
Virtue families
Individual virtues
Chinese
Greek
Indian
Latin
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phronesis&oldid=1314832068"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp