Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Peregrine Mission One

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lunar lander built by Astrobotic Technology

Peregrine Mission One
Peregrine ahead of launch
Mission typeLunar landing
OperatorAstrobotic Technology
COSPAR ID2024-006AEdit this at Wikidata
SATCATno.58751
Mission duration10 days (final)
One lunar day (14 Earth days) on the Moon surface (planned)
Spacecraft properties
SpacecraftPeregrine
Launch mass1,283 kg (2,829 lb)[1]
Start of mission
Launch dateJanuary 8, 2024, 07:18:38 (2024-01-08UTC07:18:38Z) UTC
RocketVulcan Centaur VC2S
Launch siteCape Canaveral,SLC-41
End of mission
Decay dateJanuary 18, 2024, 21:04 (2024-01-18UTC21:05Z) UTC
Moon lander
Landing dateFebruary 23, 2024 (precluded)
Landing siteSinus Viscositatis (Bay of Stickiness, precluded)

Mission insignia

Peregrine Lunar Lander flight 01, commonly referred to asPeregrine Mission One, was a failed Americanlunar lander mission. The lander, dubbedPeregrine, was built byAstrobotic Technology[2] and carried payloads for the NASACommercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. Peregrine Mission One launched on January 8, 2024, at 2:18 am EST, on the maiden flight of theVulcan Centaur (Vulcan) rocket. The goal was to land the first U.S.-built lunar lander on the Moon since the crewedApollo Lunar Module onApollo 17 in 1972.

The lander carried multiple payloads, with a payload capacity of 90 kg.[3] Shortly after the lander separated from the Vulcan rocket in lunar injection orbit, a propellant leak developed that prevented the lander from completing its mission. After six days in orbit, the spacecraft was redirected intoEarth's atmosphere, where it burned up in Earth's atmosphere over the South Pacific Ocean on January 18, 2024.[4]

History

[edit]
Peregrine being rolled out toSpace Launch Complex 41 atop a Vulcan Centaur on January 5, 2024

In July 2017, Astrobotic announced an agreement withUnited Launch Alliance (ULA) to launch theirPeregrine lander aboard a Vulcanlaunch vehicle.[5] This first lunar lander mission, called Mission One, was initially to be launched in July 2021.[5][6]

On November 29, 2018, Astrobotic was made eligible to bid on NASAsCommercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) to deliver science and technology payloads to the Moon.[7]

In May 2019, Mission One received its first lander contract from NASA for 14 payloads.[8][9][10] It also had 14 commercial payloads, including small rovers fromHakuto,Team AngelicvM,[11] and a larger rover fromCarnegie Mellon University, namedAndy, which has a mass of 33 kg (73 lb) and is 103 cm (41 in) tall.[12] Another small rover, Spacebit, weighing 1.5 kg (3.3 lb), was designed to travel at least 10 m (33 ft) on four legs.[13][14][15][16] Other payloads include a library, in microprint on nickel, withWikipedia contents andLong Now Foundation'sRosetta Project.[17][18] Space burial companiesElysium Space andCelestis paid Astrobotic to carry human remains.[19] The decision to include human remains was criticized by theNavajo Nation, whose president,Buu Nygren, argued that the Moon is sacred to the Navajo and other American Indian nations.[20][21]

In June 2021, ULA CEOTory Bruno announced that payload and engine-testing problems would delay the maiden flight of Vulcan, with Mission One aboard, to 2022.[22] On February 23, 2023, ULA announced an expected launch date for the mission of May 4, 2023.[23] After an anomaly during testing of the Vulcan Centaur on March 29, the launch was delayed until June or July,[24] and then until late 2023.[25]

In early December 2023, Bruno said problems found during awet dress rehearsal of the rocket would likely delay the launch until the next launch window, on January 8.[26]

Peregrine carries a maximum payload mass of 90 kg (200 lb) during Mission One,[27] and it was planned to land onGruithuisen Gamma.[1]

The payload mass for the planned second mission (Mission Two) is capped at 175 kg (386 lb), and the Mission Three and later missions would carry the full payload capacity of 265 kg (584 lb).[1]

Lander

[edit]
AstroboticPeregrine lander

In 2016, Astrobotic announced plans to build thePeregrine lander,[28] based on their previous concept lander,Griffin, which was larger but with the same payload capacity.[28][29] Astrobotic hiredAirbus Defence and Space to help refine the lander's design.

ThePeregrinebus is largely ofaluminum alloy, and it is reconfigurable for specific missions. Its propulsion system has five thrusters built by Frontier Aerospace,[30] each producing 150 lb (667N) thrust. This propulsion system was designed to handle thetrans-lunar injection, trajectory corrections,lunar orbit insertion, and powered descent. The propulsion system can deliver an orbiter to the Moon and perform a powered soft landing.[1] The lander can carry up to 450 kg (990 lb) of bi-propellant mass in four tanks; its composition isMON-25/MMH, ahypergolic bi-propellant.[31] Forattitude control (orientation), the spacecraft uses 12 thrusters (45 N each) also powered by MON-25/MMH.[1]

The spacecraft's avionics incorporate guidance and navigation to the Moon, and a DopplerLiDAR to assist the automated landing on four legs.[28] From Mission 2, its landing ellipse will be 100 m x 100 m, down from 24 km × 6 km previously.[1]

Peregrine is about 2.5 m wide and 1.9 m tall, and would have been able to deliver up to 265 kg (584 lb) of payload to the surface of the Moon.[28][32][1][33]

Its electrical systems are powered by alithium-ion battery that is recharged by asolar panel made of GaInP/GaAs/Ge. Radiators and thermal insulators are used to dispose of excess heat, but the lander does not carry heaters, so the first fewPeregrine landers are not expected to survive the lunar night,[1] which lasts 14 Earth days. Future missions could be adapted to do so.[1]

For communications toEarth, the lander uses frequencies within theX-band range for uplink as well as downlink.[1] After landing, a 2.4GHzWi-Fi modem is to enable wireless communication between the lander and deployed rovers on the lunar surface.[1]

Payloads

[edit]

Lunar rovers

[edit]
CountryNameAgency or companySummary
MexicoColmena × 5Agencia Espacial MexicanaAgencia Espacial Mexicana (AEM), the Mexican Space Agency, attempted to fly the first Latin American scientific instruments to the surface of the Moon. The payload consisted of five small robots, weighing less than 60 grams and measuring 12 centimeters in diameter, which were to be catapulted onto the lunar surface.[34]
United StatesIrisCarnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegie Mellon University's Iris was a 2 kg rover designed by university students. Its shoebox-sized chassis and bottle-cap wheels were made fromcarbon fiber, a first for planetary robotics. Iris was designed to test small, lightweight rover mobility on the Moon, collect images for geological sciences, and gather UWB RF ranging data for testing new relative localization techniques.[35]

Instruments

CountryNameAgency or companySummary
United StatesLaser Retroreflector Array (LRA)NASAAretroreflector is a device that bounces any light that shines on it directly backwards (180° from the incoming light) from it. The LRA was a collection of eight of these, each a 1.25-cm diameter glass corner cubeprism, all embedded in analuminum hemisphere (painted gold) and mounted to the lander deck. It was designed to efficiently retroreflect laser signals from other orbiting and landing spacecraft over a wide range of incoming directions, thereby enabling precise measurement of the distance between the orbiting or landing spacecraft to the lander. The LRA was to function as a location marker on the Moon for decades. (Note: this LRA design was too small for laser ranging from the Earth).[36]
United StatesLinear Energy Transfer Spectrometer (LETS)NASASpace radiation can harm astronauts on exploration missions outside the Earth's protective atmosphere, and more so on the Moon than in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The first source of risk is the total radiation dose from Galactic Cosmic Rays, which is about twice as high on the lunar surface as in LEO. The second source of risk is from space weather events resulting from solar activity. The Linear Energy Transfer Spectrometer (LETS) was a radiation monitor that was derived from heritage hardware flown onOrion EFT-1 and was slated to fly on theOrion EM-1 mission that would have enabled acquisition of knowledge of the lunar radiation environment and demonstrate the capabilities of the system on the lunar surface. This sensor was to measure the rate of incident radiation providing information that would be critical to understanding and mitigating the hazardous environment that people would experience as they explore the surface of the Moon.[36]
GermanyM-42 Radiation DetectorDLRThis radiation detector was a complement to another scientific experiment riding aboard NASA'sArtemis I mission. These sensors were to precisely measure the level of radiation a human body will encounter on a trip to the Moon and back. The data from both Artemis I and Peregrine Missions will improve our understanding of lunar spaceflight environmental conditions with respect to astronaut health, as space radiation will be one of the key risks in the future of Human Space Exploration.[37]
United StatesNavigation Doppler Lidar (NDL)NASANDL was aLIDAR-based (Light Detection and Ranging) descent and landing sensor. This instrument (LIDAR) operates on the same principles of radar but uses pulses of light from a laser instead of radio waves. NDL was to measure vehiclevelocity (speed and direction) andaltitude (distance to ground) with high precision during descent to touchdown.[38]
United StatesNear-Infrared Volatile Spectrometer System (NIRVSS)NASAThe payload included a spectrometer context imager and a longwave calibration sensor. It was to measure surface and subsurface hydration (H2O and OH) andCO2 andmethane (CH4) while simultaneously mapping surface morphology and surface temperature. The plan was for the measurements to take place during rover traverse when integrated onto a rover, throughout areas of targeted volatile investigation (called science stations), and during drilling activities. This instrument was created at NASAAmes Research Center. In total, it had three specific instruments: the near-infrared spectrometer, Ames imaging module, and longwave calibration sensor.[36]
United StatesNeutron Spectrometer System (NSS)NASAThe NSS instrument was to determine the abundance ofhydrogen-bearing materials and the bulk regolith composition at the landing site and measure any time variations in hydrogenous volatile abundance during the diurnal cycle. NSS could measure the total volume of hydrogen up to three feet below the surface, providing high-resolution ground truth data for measurements made from instruments in orbit around the Moon. NSS was to measure the number and energy of neutrons present in the lunar surface environment, which can be used to infer the amount of hydrogen present in the environment. This detection is possible because when neutrons strike a hydrogen atom, they lose a lot of energy.[36]
United StatesPeregrine Ion-Trap Mass Spectrometer (PITMS)NASAPITMS was to characterize thelunar exosphere after descent and landing, and throughout thelunar day, to understand the release and movement of volatile species. Previous missions have demonstrated the presence of volatiles at the lunar surface, but significant questions remain about where those volatiles came from and how they are transported across the lunar surface. Investigating how the lunar exosphere changes over the course of a lunar day can provide insight into the transport process for volatiles on the Moon. The instrument had the ability to measure the low level of gases expected in the lunar exosphere and released by regolith interaction with surface disturbances, like rovers.

The PITMS sensor had direct heritage from the Ptolemy mass spectrometer that made the first in situ measurements of volatiles and organics oncomet 67P with theRosetta lander,Philae. PITMS was to operate in a passive sampling mode, where molecules fall into the zenith-facing aperture and are trapped by a radiofrequency field, then sequentially released for analysis. PITMS had a unit mass resolution up to an upper mass-to-charge (m/z) limit of 150 Da.

The PITMS investigation was to provide time-resolved variability of OH,H2O,noble gases,nitrogen, andsodium compounds released from the soil and present in the exosphere over the course of a lunar day. PITMS observations were to complement other instruments on board the Peregrine lander for a comprehensive approach to understanding the surface and exosphere composition, linking surface properties and composition toLADEE measurements from orbit, and providing a mid-latitude point of comparison for polar measurements planned byVIPER, PROSPECT, and other missions. The PITMS data was to provide a critical mid-latitude link to future polar mass specs to characterize the latitudinal migration of volatiles from equator to poles.

PITMS was a joint NASA-ESA project implemented by NASA'sGoddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) and ESA's contractors Open University (OU) and STFC RAL Space, with coordination and support provided by ESA'sSpace Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC). The integrated PITMS payload and science investigation were to be operated by GSFC with an international team of scientists.[36]

United StatesTerrain Relative Navigation (TRN)AstroboticAstrobotic was to demonstrate its standalone Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN) sensor as a payload on its first mission to the Moon. TRN was to enable spacecraft to perform landings on planetary surfaces with an unparalleled accuracy of less than 100meters. The TRN sensor was being developed under a $10million NASA Tipping Point contract with NASAJohnson Space Center,Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and Moog.[37]

Time capsules

[edit]
Further information:Time capsule
CountryNameAgency or companyType
United StatesBitcoin Magazine Genesis PlateBIT Inc.Plaque
GermanyDHL MoonBoxDHLCommercial payload capsules
CanadaLunar Codex[39]IncandenceArtwork, books, stories, music
United KingdomFootsteps on the MoonLunar Mission OneImage bank
United StatesLuna 02CelestisMemorial capsule
SeychellesLunar BitcoinBitMEXCryptocurrency
JapanLunar Dream Capsule[40]AstroscaleTime capsule
United StatesMemorial Space Flight ServicesElysium SpaceMemorial capsule
HungaryMemory of Mankind on the MoonPuli Space TechnologiesTime capsule
United StatesMoonArkCarnegie Mellon UniversityLunar Museum
United StatesThe Arch LibrariesArch Mission FoundationTime capsule
CanadaUnited StatesWriters on the MoonWriters on the MoonStories by 133 authors

Mission

[edit]

Launch and trajectory

[edit]
Launch of thePeregrine lunar lander on Vulcan's first flight

On January 8, 2024, ULA used the inaugural flight of theVulcan Centaur rocket to launch thePeregrine mission. Lift-off fromCape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 41 took place at 2:18 am EST.[41] The rocket was launched in the VC2S configuration, with two solid rocket boosters and a standard-length fairing. The solid rocket boosters separated from the vehicle at T+1 minute 50 seconds. The first stage continued firing itsBE-4 engines until T+4:59 and separated a few seconds later. The Centaur upper stage started its firstburn at T+5:15, which took more than 10 minutes to complete and put the vehicle into alow Earth orbit. Following a coast phase, the Centaur fired for the second time at T+43:35 to start thetrans-lunar injection burn, which lasted about three minutes. ThePeregrine lander separated from the rocket at T+50:26.[42]

Peregrine was to take a 46-day trajectory to the Moon, performing burns to enter lunar orbit and slowly approach the lunar surface. Landing was planned for February 23, 2024.[42]

Animation of Peregrine – Original plan
Around the Earth
Around the Moon
   Peregrine ·    Moon ·    Earth

Propellant leak

[edit]

Roughly seven hours after the launch, Astrobotic reported that a problem, likely with the propulsion system, had "prevented [the lander] from achieving a stable sun-pointing orientation".[43] The company conducted an unplanned maneuver of the spacecraft to turn the solar panels toward the Sun,[44] and, after an expected communications blackout, confirmed that the spacecraft was once again generating sufficient power. However, the problem was identified as a gradual propellant leak that required constant consumption of fuel to counteract. At 21:16 EST, Astrobotic said in a statement that thrusters were operating "well beyond their expected service life cycles" and that the "spacecraft could continue in a stable sun-pointing state for approximately 40 more hours" before it would run out of fuel, then lose attitude control and power.[45]

Later, the company confirmed thatPeregrine could no longer land on the Moon, although it could continue to operate as a spacecraft.[46] Photographs taken by the spacecraft showed damage to external insulation,[47][48] perhaps caused by a valve that failed to fully close, causing the oxidizer tank to rupture.[49][50]

Four days into the mission, the propellant leak appeared to slow, and Astrobotic reported that "there is growing optimism thatPeregrine could survive much longer" than was previously anticipated.[45]

Reentry

[edit]

The spacecraft eventually reached a position that would have allowed it to reach the Moon with trajectory corrections.[51] Six days into the mission, Astrobotic decided to direct the spacecraft toburn up in Earth's atmosphere to avoidspace debris.[52]

A controlled re-entry took place at 15:59 on January 18 EST (20:59 UTC),[53] with possible impact somewhere nearPoint Nemo, aspacecraft cemetery in theSouth Pacific. The last contact with the spacecraft was achieved by DSS-36, an antenna of theNASA Deep Space Network (DSN) at theCanberra Deep Space Communication Complex in Australia.[54]

Future

[edit]

Peregrine was the first of NASA's CLPS missions, with the second,Intuitive Machines'Odysseus, which launched and landed on the moon in February 2024.[55] Astrobotic will have a second landing attempt, consisting of the largerGriffin lander, with launch scheduled for July 2026.[56] As of August 2025, theGriffin lander is expected to land with Astrolabs FLIP rover.[56]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijk"Astrobotic: Payload User Guide".Astrobotic Technology. 2018.Archived from the original on June 3, 2019. RetrievedDecember 10, 2018.
  2. ^Kenneth Chang (January 7, 2024)."Vulcan Rocket's Inaugural Launch Carries Moon Lander to Space – Here's what you need to know about United Launch Alliance and the robotic lunar spacecraft it is sending to orbit".The New York Times.Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  3. ^"Peregrine Mission 1 (Astrobotic)".nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov.Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. RetrievedOctober 31, 2023.
  4. ^Jackie Wattles (January 19, 2024)."Astrobotic's Peregrine lunar lander burns up over Pacific Ocean".CNN.Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 19, 2024.
  5. ^abMike Wall (October 3, 2019)."SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket Will Launch Private Moon Lander in 2021".Space.com.Archived from the original on October 4, 2019. RetrievedOctober 2, 2019.
  6. ^"Astrobotic Awarded US$79.5 Million Contract to Deliver 14 NASA Payloads to the Moon".www.astrobotic.com (Press release).Astrobotic Technology. May 31, 2019. Archived fromthe original on September 4, 2020. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  7. ^"NASA Announces New Partnerships for Commercial Lunar Payload Delivery Services".nasa.gov (Press release).NASA. November 29, 2018.Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. RetrievedNovember 29, 2018.Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  8. ^"NASA funds commercial Moon landers for science, exploration".Astronomy Now. June 2, 2018.Archived from the original on June 8, 2019. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  9. ^Mike Wall (June 1, 2018)."These Are the Private Lunar Landers Taking NASA Science to the Moon".Space.com.Archived from the original on August 9, 2019. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  10. ^Loren Grush (June 5, 2019)."This tiny rover will test how well small mobile robots can survive on the Moon".The Verge.Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  11. ^Michael Cole (March 19, 2018)."Astrobotic Ready to Become Delivery Service to the Moon".Spaceflight Insider.Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  12. ^"Andy's Mission".Planetary Robotics Lab.Carnegie Mellon University. Archived fromthe original on February 3, 2015. RetrievedDecember 20, 2018.
  13. ^Ryan Browne (October 10, 2019)."Britain's first Moon rover is a four-legged robot that will explore lunar tunnels".CNBC. Archived fromthe original on October 12, 2019. RetrievedOctober 10, 2019.
  14. ^"SpaceBit Moon rover set to land on lunar surface in 2021".Sky News. October 10, 2019.Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2024.
  15. ^Stuart McDill (October 10, 2019)."Tiny walking rover bound for the moon".Reuters.Archived from the original on October 10, 2019. RetrievedOctober 10, 2019.
  16. ^Mike Wall (October 12, 2019)."UK's 1st Moon Rover to Launch in 2021".Space.com.Archived from the original on October 13, 2019. RetrievedOctober 14, 2019.
  17. ^Mike Wall (May 16, 2018)."'Lunar Library' Aims to Preserve Humanity's History On the Moon (Wikipedia, Too)".Space.com.Archived from the original on May 11, 2019. RetrievedMay 16, 2018.
  18. ^Loren Grush (May 15, 2018)."This nonprofit plans to send millions of Wikipedia pages to the Moon — printed on tiny metal sheets".The Verge.Archived from the original on May 30, 2019. RetrievedMay 16, 2018.
  19. ^Jackie Wattles (January 8, 2024)."First US Moon landing mission in decades launches with NASA science, humans remains on board".CNN.Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  20. ^Jackie Wattles (January 7, 2024)."First US Moon mission in decades to launch with NASA science, human remains on board".CNN.Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  21. ^Stephen Clark (January 7, 2024)."Navajo objection to flying human ashes to the Moon won't delay launch".Ars Technica.Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  22. ^Eric Berger (June 25, 2021)."Rocket Report: China to copy SpaceX's Super Heavy? Vulcan slips to 2022".Ars Technica.Archived from the original on June 29, 2021. RetrievedJune 30, 2021.
  23. ^Loren Grush (February 23, 2023)."United Launch Alliance Delays Vulcan Debut Flight to Early May".Bloomberg.Archived from the original on February 27, 2023. RetrievedMarch 22, 2023.
  24. ^Nate Doughty (April 19, 2023)."ULA rocket taking Astrobotic's lunar lander to space pushes back departure date following explosion during testing".www.bizjournals.com.Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. RetrievedApril 25, 2023.
  25. ^Eric Berger (June 14, 2023)."Vulcan aces engine test, but upper stage anomaly will delay launch for a while "Working corrective action and retest."".Ars Technica.Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. RetrievedJune 14, 2023.
  26. ^Tory Bruno [@torybruno] (December 10, 2023)."#VulcanRocket WDR update: Vehicle performed well. Ground system had a couple of (routine) issues, (being corrected). Ran the timeline long so we didn't quite finish. I'd like a FULL WDR before our first flight, so XMAS eve is likely out. Next Peregrine window is 8 Jan" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  27. ^"Peregrine Lander".www.astrobotic.com.Astrobotic Technology.Archived from the original on February 23, 2017. RetrievedJune 5, 2019.
  28. ^abcdJeff Foust (June 3, 2016)."Astrobotic unveils Peregrine lunar lander".SpaceNews.com.Archived from the original on October 17, 2022. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  29. ^"Griffin Lander".www.astrobotic.com.Astrobotic Technology.Archived from the original on December 11, 2018. RetrievedDecember 10, 2018.
  30. ^"Frontier Aerospace Selected for NASA Award to Develop Deep Space Thruster Using MON-25/MMH Propellant".www.astrobotic.com.Astrobotic Technology. Archived fromthe original on October 1, 2019. RetrievedOctober 1, 2019.
  31. ^"Aerojet Rocketdyne Successfully Demonstrates Low-Cost, High Thrust Space Engine".Aerojet Rocketdyne (Press release). May 23, 2018.Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  32. ^Jeff Foust (June 13, 2016)."Landers, laws, and lunar logistics".The Space Review.Archived from the original on August 14, 2019. RetrievedAugust 20, 2019.
  33. ^Debra Werner (October 24, 2019)."Spacebit forms partnership, prepares to send tiny rover to the Moon".SpaceNews.com.Archived from the original on October 17, 2022. RetrievedJanuary 28, 2020.
  34. ^"Moon Manifest".www.astrobotic.com.Astrobotic Technology.Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2024.
  35. ^"IRIS Home".Archived from the original on January 6, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2024.
  36. ^abcde"Task Order TO2-AB Scientific Payloads – NASA Science".nasa.gov.NASA.Archived from the original on December 7, 2023. RetrievedDecember 5, 2023.
  37. ^ab"Astrobotic — Launch Info Packet 5.8-1"(PDF).www.astrobotic.com.Astrobotic Technology.Archived(PDF) from the original on November 30, 2023. RetrievedDecember 5, 2023.
  38. ^"Astrobotic-Press Kit 508"(PDF).nasa.gov.NASA.Archived(PDF) from the original on November 29, 2023. RetrievedDecember 5, 2023.
  39. ^J. D. Biersdorfer (July 7, 2023)."A Time Capsule of Human Creativity, Stored in the Sky".The New York Times.Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. RetrievedJuly 7, 2023.
  40. ^"Otsuka's POCARI SWEAT Aims the Very First Moon Landing".Business Wire. May 15, 2014.Archived from the original on October 17, 2022. RetrievedFebruary 6, 2021.
  41. ^Jeff Foust (January 8, 2024)."Vulcan Centaur launches Peregrine lunar lander on inaugural mission".SpaceNews.com.Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  42. ^abAaron McCrea (January 8, 2024)."Vulcan successfully launches Peregrine lunar lander on inaugural flight".NASASpaceflight.com.Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  43. ^Eric Berger (January 8, 2024)."Hours after its launch, a US lunar lander experiences an anomaly".Ars Technica.Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  44. ^Brett Tingley (January 8, 2024)."Private Peregrine Moon lander suffers anomaly after historic Vulcan rocket launch, Astrobotic says".Space.com.Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 8, 2024.
  45. ^abAstrobotic [@astrobotic] (January 12, 2024)."Update #13 for Peregrine Mission One: Peregrine has now been operational in space for more than 4 days" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  46. ^Astrobotic [@astrobotic] (January 9, 2024)."Update #7 for Peregrine Mission One: The Peregrine spacecraft has now been operational for about 32 hours" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  47. ^Mike Wall (January 8, 2024)."1st photo from crippled private Peregrine moon lander holds clue to anomaly".Space.com.Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2024.
  48. ^Oliver Holmes (January 9, 2024)."Peregrine 1 has 'no chance' of landing on moon due to fuel leak".The Guardian.Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2024.
  49. ^Mike Wall (January 9, 2024)."Stuck valve may have doomed private Peregrine moon lander mission, Astrobotic says".Space.com.Archived from the original on January 10, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 10, 2024.
  50. ^Astrobotic [@astrobotic] (January 9, 2024)."Update #8 for Peregrine Mission One: Astrobotic's current hypothesis about the Peregrine spacecraft's propulsion anomaly is that a valve between the helium pressurant and the oxidizer failed to reseal after actuation during initialization" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  51. ^Astrobotic [@astrobotic] (January 12, 2024)."Update #15 for Peregrine Mission One: Peregrine remains operational at 238,000 miles from Earth, which means that we have reached lunar distance!" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  52. ^Astrobotic Technology (January 14, 2024)."Update #17 for Peregrine Mission One".www.astrobotic.com.Archived from the original on January 15, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 15, 2024.
  53. ^Richard Stephenson [@nascom1] (January 18, 2024)."As predicted by the APM1 team, Peregrine had loss of signal at 20:59 over Canberra's DSS36. It was a shame it had to end this way, but the mission did it in style. This is the doppler profile from its final approach. It was a graceful dive" (Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  54. ^Jonathan Amos (January 18, 2024)."Peregrine lander: American Moon mission destroyed over Pacific Ocean".BBC News.Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. RetrievedJanuary 18, 2024.
  55. ^Jeff Foust (December 19, 2023)."Intuitive Machines delays first lunar lander launch to February".SpaceNews.com.Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. RetrievedDecember 20, 2023.
  56. ^ab"FLIP Rover – Astrolab".www.astrolab.space. RetrievedFebruary 28, 2025.FLIP will be Astrolab's first rover to deploy on the lunar surface, scheduled to land at the Lunar South Pole in December 2025 as part of Griffin Mission 1.
Missions
Uncrewed
Crewed
Emblem of the Artemis program
Agencies
Facilities
Rockets
Crewed spacecraft
Robotic spacecraft
Organizers
Finalist teams
Withdrawn teams
Spacecraft
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Launches are separated by dots ( • ), payloads by commas ( , ), multiple names for the same satellite by slashes ( / ).
Crewed flights are underlined. Launch failures are marked with the † sign. Payloads deployed from other spacecraft are (enclosed in parentheses).
2024 in space
Space probe launchesSpace probes launched in 2024
Impact events
SelectedNEOs
Discoveries
ExoplanetsExoplanets discovered in 2024
CometsComets in 2024
Lunar landing missions
Active
Robotic
Past
Crewed
Robotic
Failed
Planned
Artemis
CLEP
CLPS
KLEP
Luna-Glob
Others
Proposed
CLPS
Others
Active
Past
Lunokhod
Apollo
CLEP
Chandrayaan
Rashid
CLPS
JAXA
Ispace Inc.
Planned
Proposed
Cancelled
Related
Missions are ordered by launch date. Sign indicates failure en route or before intended mission data returned.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peregrine_Mission_One&oldid=1323447227"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp