Peptide-based subunit vaccine which immunizes an organism against a pathogen
Peptide-based synthetic vaccines (epitope vaccines) aresubunit vaccines made frompeptides. The peptides mimic theepitopes of theantigen that triggers direct or potent immune responses.[1] Peptide vaccines can not only induce protection againstinfectious pathogens and non-infectious diseases but also be utilized as therapeuticcancer vaccines, where peptides fromtumor-associated antigens are used to induce an effective anti-tumorT-cell response.[2]
The traditionalvaccines are the whole live or fixed pathogens. The second generation of vaccines is mainly the protein purified from the pathogen. The third generation of vaccines is the DNA or plasmid that can express the proteins of the pathogen. Peptide vaccines are the latest step in the evolution of vaccines.[3]
Compared with the traditional vaccines such as the whole fixed pathogens or protein molecules, the peptide vaccines have several advantages and disadvantages.[4]
With more advanced solid-phasepeptide synthesis (SPPS) using automation and microwave techniques, the production of peptides becomes more efficient.
The vaccines do not have any biological contamination since they are chemically synthesized.
The vaccines are water-soluble and can be kept stable under simple conditions.
The peptides can be specially designed for specificity. A single peptide vaccine can be designed to have multiple epitopes to generate immune responses for several diseases.
The vaccines only contain a short peptide chain, so they are less like to lead toallergic or auto-immune responses.
The whole peptide vaccine is to mimic the epitope of an antigen, so epitope design is the most important stage of vaccine development and requires an accurate understanding of the amino acid sequence of the immunogenic protein interested. The designed epitope is expected to generate strong and long-period immuno-response against the pathogen. The followings are the points to consider when designing the epitope:
The non-dominant epitope could generate a stronger immune response than the dominant epitope. Ex. The antibodies from people infected by hookworm can recognize the dominant epitope of the antigen calledNecator americanus APR-1 protein, but the antibodies can't induce protection againsthookworm. However, other non-dominant epitopes on APR-1 protein show the ability to induce the production of neutralizing antibodies against hookworm. Therefore, the non-dominant epitopes are the better candidate for peptide vaccines against hookworm infection.[5]
Takehypersensitivity into consideration. Ex. SomeIgE-inducing epitopes causehypersensitivity reactions aftervaccination in humans due to the overlap withIgG epitopes in the Na-ASP-2 protein which is an antigen from hookworm.[6]
Some short peptide epitopes need elongating to maintain the native conformation. The elongated sequences can include propersecondary structure. Also, some short peptides can be stabled or cyclized together to maintain the proper conformation. Ex.B-cell epitopes could only have 5 amino acids. To induce an immune response, a sequence from yeastGCN4 protein is used to improve the conformation of the peptide vaccines by formingalpha-helix..[7]
Useadjuvants associated with the epitope to induce the immune response.[8]
Gp100 peptide vaccine is studied to treatmelanoma. To generate a greaterinvitro CTL response, the peptide, gp100:209-217(210M), is modified and binds to HLA-A2*0201. After vaccination, more circulatingT cells can recognize and kill melanoma cancer cellsin vitro.[10]
E75, GP2, and AE37 are three differentHER2/neu-derived single-peptide vaccines to treat breast cancer. HER2/neu usually has low expression in healthy tissues. E75 consisting of 9 amino acids is the immunodominant epitope of the HER2 protein. GP2 consisting of 9 amino acids is the subdominant epitope. Both E75 and GP2 stimulate theCD8+ lymphocytes but GP2 has a lower affinity than E75. AE37 stimulatesCD4+ lymphocytes.[12]
IC41 is a peptide vaccine candidate against theHepatitis C virus. It consists of five synthetic peptides along with the synthetic adjuvant called poly-l-arginine.[13]
Multimeric-001 is the most efficient peptide vaccine candidate againstinfluenza. It contains B- and T-cell epitopes fromHemagglutinin. Matrix I andnucleoprotein are combined into a single recombinantly-expressed polypeptide.[14][15]
^Melief CJ, van der Burg SH (May 2008). "Immunotherapy of established (pre)malignant disease by synthetic long peptide vaccines".Nature Reviews. Cancer.8 (5):351–360.doi:10.1038/nrc2373.PMID18418403.S2CID205468352.
^Schneble E, Clifton GT, Hale DF, Peoples GE (2016). "Peptide-Based Cancer Vaccine Strategies and Clinical Results". In Thomas S (ed.).Vaccine Design. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1403. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 797–817.doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3387-7_46.ISBN978-1-4939-3387-7.PMID27076168.
^Marincola FM, Rivoltini L, Salgaller ML, Player M, Rosenberg SA (July 1996). "Differential anti-MART-1/MelanA CTL activity in peripheral blood of HLA-A2 melanoma patients in comparison to healthy donors: evidence of in vivo priming by tumor cells".Journal of Immunotherapy with Emphasis on Tumor Immunology.19 (4):266–277.doi:10.1097/00002371-199607000-00003.PMID8877721.
^Firbas C, Jilma B, Tauber E, Buerger V, Jelovcan S, Lingnau K, et al. (May 2006). "Immunogenicity and safety of a novel therapeutic hepatitis C virus (HCV) peptide vaccine: a randomized, placebo controlled trial for dose optimization in 128 healthy subjects".Vaccine.24 (20):4343–4353.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.009.PMID16581161.
^Atsmon J, Caraco Y, Ziv-Sefer S, Shaikevich D, Abramov E, Volokhov I, et al. (October 2014). "Priming by a novel universal influenza vaccine (Multimeric-001)-a gateway for improving immune response in the elderly population".Vaccine.32 (44):5816–5823.doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.031.PMID25173483.
