ThePauline epistles, also known asEpistles of Paul orLetters of Paul, are the thirteen books of theNew Testament attributed toPaul the Apostle, although the authorship of some is in dispute. Among theseepistles are some of the earliest extant Christian documents. They provide an insight into the beliefs and controversies ofearly Christianity. As part of thecanon of the New Testament, they are foundational texts for bothChristian theology andethics.
A number of scholars have argued that from biographic details from Paul, he likely suffered from some physical impediment such as vision loss or damaged hands and Paul does explicitly state, or even names, in multiple epistles that he used secretaries, which was a common practice in the Greco-Roman world; likely explaining the epistles that are seemingly non-Pauline.[3][4][5][6]
The Pauline epistles are usually placed between theActs of the Apostles and thecatholic epistles (also called the general epistles) in modern editions. Most Greek manuscripts place the general epistles first,[7] and a fewminuscules (175,325,336, and1424) place the Pauline epistles at the end of the New Testament.
In all of these epistles, except theEpistle to the Hebrews, the author and writer does claim to be Paul. The contested letters may have been written using Paul's name, as it was common to attribute at that point in history.[8]
The letters thought to bepseudepigraphic by many scholars (traditional dating given):[1] The content of these letters strongly suggests they were written a decade or more later than the traditional dates.
Finally,Epistle to the Hebrews, although anonymous and not really in the form of a letter, has long been included among Paul's collected letters. Although some churches ascribe Hebrews to Paul,[10] neither most of Christianity nor modern scholarship does so.[1][11]
This ordering is remarkably consistent in the manuscript tradition, with very few deviations. The evident principle of organization is descending length of the Greek text, but keeping the threepastoral epistles addressed to individuals in a separate final section. The only anomaly is that Galatians precedes the slightly longer Ephesians.[12]
In modern editions, the anonymousEpistle to the Hebrews is placed at the end of Paul's letters and before thegeneral epistles. This practice was popularized through the 4th centuryVulgate byJerome, who was aware of ancient doubts about itsauthorship, and is also followed in most medievalByzantine manuscripts with hardly any exceptions.[12]
The placement of Hebrews among the Pauline epistles is less consistent in the manuscripts:
between Romans and 1 Corinthians (i.e., in order by length without splitting the Epistles to the Corinthians):Papyrus 46 and minuscules103,455, 1961, 1964, 1977, 1994.
between 2 Corinthians and Galatians: minuscules 1930, 1978, and 2248
between Galatians and Ephesians: implied by the numbering inB. In B, Galatians ends and Ephesians begins on the same side of the same folio (page 1493); similarly 2 Thessalonians ends and Hebrews begins on the same side of the same folio (page 1512).[14]
between 2 Thessalonians and 1 Timothy (i.e., before the Pastorals):א,A,B,C,H,I,P,0150,0151, and about 60 minuscules (e.g.218,632)
after Philemon:D,048,E,K,L and the majority of minuscules.
Paul's own writings are sometimes thought to indicate several of his letters that have not been preserved:
A first, or "zeroth", epistle to Corinth, also calledA Prior Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians,[15] orPaul's previous Corinthian letter,[16] possibly referenced at 1 Corinthians 5:9.[17]
A third epistle to Corinth, written in between 1 and 2 Corinthians, also called theSevere Letter, referenced at 2 Corinthians 2:4[18] and 2 Corinthians 7:8-9[19]
An earlier epistle to the Ephesians referenced at Ephesians 3:3-4[20]
Several other epistles were attributed to Paul during the course of history but are now consideredpseudepigraphic:
Third Epistle to the Corinthians, a correspondence of two letters allegedly sent by the Corinthians to Paul, and then a reply letter allegedly sent by Paul to the Church of Corinth. It was considered genuine for some time by theSyriac Orthodox Church and theArmenian Apostolic Church, but is now widely dated in the second half of the 2nd century CE.[22][23]
The Marcionite Epistle to the Laodiceans. The Muratorian fragment (2nd century CE) denounces a claimed Epistle to the Laodiceans as another spurious work forged by Marcion of Sinope. Its text has been lost and nothing is known about its content.[24]
The Latin Epistle to the Laodiceans. It is found in some old LatinBible manuscripts, but is widely considered a forgery, and is largely a copy of verses from theEpistle to the Philippians. Theories vary, but it was possibly made as a counterforgery to offset the popularity of the Marcionite epistle.[24]
David Trobisch finds it likely that Paul first collected his letters for publication himself.[26] It was normal practice in Paul's time for letter writers to keep one copy for themselves and send a second copy to the recipient(s); surviving collections of ancient letters sometimes originated from the senders' copies, at other times from the recipients' copies.[27] A collection of Paul's letters circulated separately from other early Christian writings and later became part of the New Testament. When thecanon was established, thegospels and Paul's letters were the core of what would become the New Testament.[26][page needed]
^The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, publ. Geoffrey Chapman, 1989, chapter 60, at p. 920, col. 2 "That Paul is neither directly nor indirectly the author is now the view of scholars almost without exception. For details, see Kümmel, I[ntroduction to the] N[ew] T[estament, Nashville, 1975] 392–94, 401–03"
^Joseph Barber Lightfoot in hisCommentary on the Epistle to the Galatians writes: "At this point [Gal 6:11] the apostle takes the pen from hisamanuensis, and the concluding paragraph is written with his own hand. From the time when letters began to be forged in his name (2 Thess 2:2;3:17) it seems to have been his practice to close with a few words in his own handwriting, as a precaution against such forgeries... In the present case he writes a whole paragraph, summing up the main lessons of the epistle in terse, eager, disjointed sentences. He writes it, too, in large, bold characters (Gr.pelikois grammasin), that his handwriting may reflect the energy and determination of his soul."
^Arhipov, Sergei, ed. (1996).The Apostol. New Canaan, PA: St. Tikhon's Seminary Press. p. 408.ISBN1-878997-49-1.
^Ellingworth, Paul (1993).The New International Greek Testament Commentary: The Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eardmans Publishing Co. p. 3.
^abcEhrman, Bart (2012).Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford University Press. p. 452–458.ISBN9780199928033.
Carson, D.A. "Pseudonymity and Pseudepigraphy."Dictionary of New Testament Background. Eds. Craig A. Evans and Stanley E. Porter. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2000. 857–864.
Cousar, Charles B.The Letters of Paul. Interpreting Biblical Texts. Nashville: Abingdon, 1996.
Deissmann, G. Adolf.Bible Studies. Trans. Alexander Grieve. 1901. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1988.
Doty, William G.Letters in Primitive Christianity. Guides to Biblical Scholarship. New Testament. Ed. Dan O. Via, Jr. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988.
Gamble, Harry Y. "Amanuensis."Anchor Bible Dictionary. Vol. 1. Ed. David Noel Freedman. New York: Doubleday, 1992.
Hart, David Bentley. "The New Testament." New Haven and London: Yale University Press: 2017. 570–574.
Kim, Yung Suk.A Theological Introduction to Paul's Letters. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, 2011.
Longenecker, Richard N. "Ancient Amanuenses and the Pauline Epistles."New Dimensions in New Testament Study. Eds. Richard N. Longenecker andMerrill C. Tenney. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1974. 281–297. idem, "On the Form, Function, and Authority of the New Testament Letters."Scripture and Truth. Eds. D.A. Carson andJohn D. Woodbridge. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1983. 101–114.
Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome.Paul the Letter-Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1995.
Richards, E. Randolph.The Secretary in the Letters of Paul. Tübingen: Mohr, 1991. idem, "The Codex and the Early Collection of Paul's Letters."Bulletin for Bulletin Research 8 (1998): 151–66. idem,Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition, and Collection. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2004.
Stowers, Stanley K.Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Library of Early Christianity. Vol. 8. Ed. Wayne A. Meeks. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1989.
Wall, Robert W. "Introduction to Epistolary Literature."New Interpreter's Bible. Vol. 10. Ed. Leander E. Keck. Nashville: Abingdon, 2002. 369–391.