| Part ofa series on the | ||||||||
| Anthropology ofkinship | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||
Basic concepts
| ||||||||
Case studies | ||||||||
Major theorists | ||||||||
| Social anthropology Cultural anthropology | ||||||||
Insocial anthropology,patrilocal residence orpatrilocality, also known asvirilocal residence orvirilocality, are terms referring to thesocial system in which a married couple resides with or near the husband's parents. The concept of location may extend to a larger area such as avillage,town orclan territory. The practice has been found in around 70 percent of the world's modern human cultures that have been describedethnographically.[1] Archaeological evidence for patrilocality has also been found amongNeanderthal remains inSpain and for ancienthominids inAfrica.[citation needed]
In a patrilocal society, when a man marries, his wife joins him in his father's home or compound, where they raise their children. These children will follow the same pattern. Sons will stay and daughters will move in with their husbands' families. Families living in a patrilocal residence generally assume joint ownership of domestic sources. The household is led by a senior member, who also directs the labor of all other members.
Matrilocal residence may be regarded as the opposite of patrilocal residence.
Early theories explaining the determinants of postmarital residence (e.g.,Lewis Henry Morgan,Edward Tylor, orGeorge Peter Murdock) connected it with the sexual division of labor. However, to date,cross-cultural tests of thishypothesis using worldwide samples have failed to find any significant relationship between these two variables. However,Korotayev's tests show that the female contribution to subsistence does correlate significantly with matrilocal (as opposed to patrilocal) residence in general; however, this correlation is masked by a general polygyny factor. Although an increase in the female contribution to subsistence tends to lead to matrilocal residence, it also tends simultaneously to lead to general non-sororalpolygyny which effectively destroysmatrilocality, and pushes a social system toward patrilocality. If this polygyny factor is controlled (e.g., through a multipleregression model), division of labor turns out to be a significant predictor of postmarital residence. Thus, Murdock's hypotheses regarding the relationships between the sexual division of labor and postmarital residence were basically correct, though, as has been shown by Korotayev, the actual relationships between those two groups of variables are more complicated than he expected.[2][3]
In someSlavonic languages, verbs formarrying show evidence of patrilocality. InPolish the verb for "to marry", when done by a woman, iswyjść za mąż while inRussian it isвыйти замуж (vyjti zamuzh). Both mean literally "to go out and behind the husband". In comparison, a man in Polish can simplyżenić się and in Russian he is able toжениться, both meaning "to wife oneself". (A synonymous expression iswziąć kobietę za żonę/взять в жёны, "to take a woman for a wife").
The verbs for marriage in theHungarian language show evidence of patrilocality. The verb for "to marry", when done by a woman, isférjhez menni, literally meaning "to leave [the family home] for the husband". However, the verbsházasodni andmegházasodni, meaning "to house oneself", andösszeházasodni "to house together", can be used by both males and females. Similarly theSpanish term for "to marry",casarse, is gender-neutral and literally means "to house oneself" (from the Spanishcasa, "house".) "A married couple" isuna pareja casada, which translates as "a housed couple".
Indeed, in many European languages including English, the verb "to marry" may ultimately come from a past participle ofProto-Indo European *mari, for young woman - as in, provided with a *mari.[4]
It is claimed that the practice was also prevalent in someNeanderthal populations. A 49,000-year-old grave was found in Spain in 2010 which contained three related-to-each-other males, with three unrelated-to-each-other females, suggesting they were the partners of the males.[5]
A 2011 study using ratios ofstrontium isotopes in teeth also suggested that roughly 2 million years ago, amongAustralopithecus andParanthropus robustus groups in southern Africa, women tended to settle farther from their region of birth than men did.[6][7]
A 2022 study of data from 13 Neanderthals from two Middle Palaeolithic sites in the Altai Mountains of southern Siberia: 11 from Chagyrskaya Cave and 2 from Okladnikov Cave was able to examine mitochondrial DNA, which mothers pass down to their children, and compare it to Y chromosomes, which is passed down by fathers. They found more genetic diversity in the mitochondrial DNA, suggesting that women may have moved from community to community more than the men, perhaps when they chose a mate.
{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)